I say non conspiratorial, because 'conspiracy theorist' is a label thrown around to besmirch genuine attempts to uncover truths.
( see the psy-op of the 'troll paradigm' - where by calling someone 'a troll' , then affords the actual troll, legitimacy in deflecting perfectly logical and sensible questioning).
It's no surprise then, that the term 'conspiracy theorist' was introduced as a term, by the CIA, after Kennedy 'took one for the team'. (Who's team, is another question entirely).
Besmirch the truth finders legitimacy first, with a preemptive psy-op attack.
This is a work in progress.
(I.e, I started it today).
I've already discovered more links and crazy connections to things that will maybe surprise you, maybe worry you, .....and maybe not bother you at all, notif you think that the world is hunky dory, that nothing needs to change, and banks are your friends.... oh yeah, and Soros really is a philanthropist.
That's up to you.
Thinking for yourself is your personal responsibility.
This initially started out as a single post, based on some information that I discovered concerning some interesting connections to social media platforms.
But then- as per usual- the rabbit hole got deeper, and it morphed into some thing much bigger, and more far reaching, than I initially thought.
So much so in fact, that I have no idea how long a single post would be, or even how long a series of posts would be.
So rather than collate everything together – something that might take many days, if not weeks, I thought why not just commit it to the block chain, as and when I discover the info...
I'm writing the posts to show objective facts, connections, truths, and the cost of ignoring them.
(and because I love researching stuff, once I get my teeth into something)
Make of the posts what you will.
Thinking is a personal responsibility, not a communal experience.
Seeing as this series is meandering all over the place, expect it to take some strange diversions, be sporadic, hit some cul de sacs, and throw up some unexpected revelations.
(I've found a few 'interesting coincidences', already).
Before I even start the first post, it's important that my perspectives are understood.
I have my biases, as does everyone, so knowing the filter with which I look through, will enable you, the reader, to judge the information, and my own conjecture, for yourself.
I'm objective in collating the facts. Names, financial information, company information, and past employment details, are facts, and not up for conjecture.
Making connections based on these _facts _are, sometimes conjecture. The thinking reader, and the weight of evidence presented, is the jury on the legitimacy of my narrative that I present.
Which is fine by me.
So, here is my basic perspectives relevant to my investigation.
All governments and the various institutions of, are corrupt.
The Judiciary is mostly corrupt.
All corporations are corrupt.
All mainstream media organizations are corrupt.
Money corrupts, and the more you have of it, the more liable to corruption you become. A rule of thumb.
Well meaning, and naive people are used by the corrupt manipulators all the time, without ever realizing that they are being used, and unwittingly corrupted themselves.
Individuals with power will manipulate others to gain advantage, be it financial, or ideological in nature, or both.
Money and power does not equate to any specific ideology.
The longer the time frame that anyone operates in, the more corrupt they'll become.
Leftism, Marxism, postmodernism, socialism, corporatism, crony capitalism, are all the same cancer but with different names.
Authoritarianism is cancer.
Censorship is cancer.
I think that pretty much outlines my broad perspectives and philosophy, relative to this series of posts, and will be referring and dissecting each point as we go along.
It may be a long journey, and sometimes an uncomfortable one, but hopefully it will be an educational and enlightening one, to.
Knowledge is power, and in today's world, owning the technological infrastructure is having the access to the information flowing across it, whether that access to the information is legal or not is not a deterrent to the corrupt. An annoyance, an obstacle, or simply ignored.
Money gives influence over companies. Positions of influence and inserting people in key areas within those companies can, and is, bought.
All the time.
Black is white, up is down, freedom is war.....Orwell knew the score.
Listen to the corrupt, listen to lies. Up is down, and night is day.
There is truth in their words if you believe not a single word they say, and insread, re frame it, based on the ideologies they hold, and the actions they they've done.
Billionaire hedge fund manager George Soros slammed Facebook (FB) and Google (GOOGL), two companies he’s invested in recently, noting that “the rise and monopolistic behavior” of tech platform companies has become a “global problem.”
George Soros, billionaire, praised facebook and google, and invested in them, noting "the rise and monopolistic behaviour" of tech platform companies has become a global solution.
Soros, 87, believes one of the critical problems these networks cause is their ability to influence how people think and behave, often without them even being aware of it. “This has far-reaching adverse consequences on the functioning of democracy, particularly on the integrity of elections,” he added.
Soros, 87, believes the strongest benefit the networks create, is the their ability to influence how people think and behave, without them even being aware of it.
"This has far reaching beneficial consequences on the destruction of democracy, particularity in terms of legitimate elections," he added..
To Paraphrase a Rothchild
'If I own the communications infrastructure, I care not who makes the companies either end - because I'll have my people inserted in them anyway.
Slack....The private, 'secure', messaging service, used by tech companies and a big business communication tool.
(more about at a later date).