The leader's decision is the future of the nation

A country will achieve prosperity, justice, and glory if its leaders prioritize the interests of the people and always work for them and advance the country in all areas. A country will progress very quickly without greedy leaders. However, what is happening now in my own country, Indonesia, is the prevalence of corruption by officials and leaders. The nation's main enemy is corruption. The country will never recover from adversity and will never achieve glory if corruption continues to thrive.

Every country has its own rules or constitution, all of which aim to improve the welfare of the people, build and advance the country. However, in the hands of greedy leaders, all of these constitutions are ignored, prioritizing only personal, family, and party interests. These leaders are unaware that they were previously ordinary citizens, as we are not a monarchy. They come from the people, are elected by the people, and are paid by the people. When they reach the top, they oppress the people. To say that the country lacks proper regulations is wrong, because everything is regulated in the constitution, but the current leaders are not carrying out that mandate properly.

Raising all types of taxes This makes it difficult for people to do business and poverty occurs everywhere, ultimately leading to a monetary crisis. When the country goes bankrupt, the people are the victims, but when the country is on the path to glory, the corruptors are the ones who gain prosperity. This makes us all wonder why corruptors are protected as if there is a special legal umbrella to defend them and keep them safe. How come every corruptor who is about to be sentenced to death or a severe punishment is always defended by those who claim humanity and human rights?

Should a country's citizens be made to suffer because of the decisions of their leaders? This is a very extraordinary question, we go back to look at the mandate of the ancient warriors and it is embedded in the country's constitution that the state and the people are obliged to defend every inch of their homeland, in this context, for example, when a country is involved in a dispute and war with another country, the people will suffer and be miserable both in terms of economic life and security and also the regulations or decisions of the leaders which sometimes require young people to join the military and take part in fighting, from one perspective the decisions of the leaders can make the people suffer and be miserable, but if you look at it in terms of the mandate of the country's constitution, it is the obligation of all people to defend their homeland, so it is the right choice to defend a country's homeland.

However, on the other hand, if it is a colonial country and their greedy leaders make a very selfish decision, namely wanting to colonize another country, which makes their people miserable due to counter attacks from the country they want to colonize, which makes their country destroyed and also their people suffer as a result of a long war, actually what is to blame for this war is the leader's wrong decision so that the people have to endure heavy suffering, even though the people and government are part of a country, however The people are innocent and do not deserve the punishment.

Should the innocent people and their children bear the brunt of their leaders' mistakes due to their wrong decisions? I don't think so. They should have a decent life free from suffering and torture, as a matter of humanity and human rights. They also have the right to an adequate education. That might be fairer.