Judicial Watch FOIA Documents Reveal the CDC Paid for Development of SARS2 Virus, One Hour to VSRF @4 PST

avatar

I have just received an email from Dr. Robert Malone that discusses the documents Judicial Watch received as response to a FOIA request. Dr. Malone pointed out his review of these documents revealed that the CDC specifically paid for the mutations of viruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that are known to be features of the SARS2 virus that causes Covid19.

JudicialWatch.jpg
IMG source - rwamalonemd.substack.com

"Specific Aim 3: Testing predictions of CoV inter-species transmission. We will test our models of host range (i.e. emergence potential) experimentally using reverse genetics, pseudovirus and receptor binding assays, and virus infection experiments in cell culture and humanized mice. With bat-CoVs that we've isolated or sequenced, and using live virus or pseudovirus infection in cells of different origin or expressing different receptor molecules, we will assess potential for each isolated virus and those with receptor binding site sequence, to spill over. We will do this by sequencing the spike (or other receptor binding/fusion) protein genes from all our bat-CoVs, creating mutants to identify how significantly each would need to evolve to use ACE2, CD26/DPP4 (MERS-CoV receptor) or other potential CoV receptors. We will then use receptor-mutant pseudovirus binding assays, in vitro studies in bat, primate, human and other species' cell lines, and with humanized mice where particularly interesting viruses are identified phylogenetically, or isolated. These tests will provide public health-relevant data, and also iteratively improve our predictive model to better target bat species and CoVs during our field studies to obtain bat-CoV strains of the greatest interest for understanding the mechanisms of cross-species transmission.

"we will assess potential for each isolated virus and those with receptor binding site sequence, to spill over. We will do this by sequencing the spike (or other receptor binding/fusion) protein genes from all our bat-CoVs, creating mutants to identify how significantly each would need to evolve to use ACE2, CD26/DPP4 (MERS-CoV receptor) or other potential CoV receptors."

Dr. Malone explains why these specific statements are of particular relevance.

"It is important to understand that, although these quotes are technical and well beyond many to understand, the bottom line is that this project was and is gain of function research. In contrast to Dr. Fauci’s sworn testimony to Congress.

"It is important to pull out these sections highlighting the gain of function research conducted that led to the deaths of millions of people. This is the only way I know of to make scientists, the courts and policy makers aware that this is not a conspiracy theory. This is real. That these deaths were caused by manslaughter."

The official death toll from Covid19 is ~7M people. That's a lot of manslaughter.

I have also received email from Steve Kirsch, who has been instrumental in enabling humanity to understand the plandemic that has killed and injured so many of us. In it he says that at 4pm PST he will be talking to Dr. Kirk Moore, a Utah physician who is being criminally prosecuted by the Utah US Attorney for refusing to administer the Covid-19 vaccine.

Steve points out that the defendant will be entitled to discovery that will include data regarding vaccination injuries and deaths that no government has yet released to the public. I hope more folks are able to follow that interview, and we are able to contribute meaningfully to the work of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, that today is enabling us to be safer from iatrogenic injury and death.

Finally, another email, this time from Karen Kingston, whose specific expertise in the legal documents and technology involved in the plandemic is essential to understanding why certain policies and legal mechanisms were employed, and why that's a bad thing, has substantial information to add.

"Most Americans know that Pfizer has admitted that their mRNA injections do not prevent infection or transmission."

We also remember being lied to and told the jabs would protect us, by government, the enemedia, and the pharmaceutical companies. She goes on to share critical talking points we can focus on to enable productive discussions of the plandemic and what needs to be done regarding the lies, crimes, and horrible toll of death and injuries that have resulted.

"Point 1: Pfizer’s mRNA Injections Do NOT Prevent Infection and Disease
Page 23 of the FDA Briefing Document states; “An additional analysis appears to indicate that incidence of COVID-19 generally increased in each group of study participants with increasing time post-Dose 2.”

ClevelandStudy.jpg
IMG source - karenkingston.substack.com
The Cleveland Study shows that the more jabs people get, the more they get Covid19, and the more they die of it and of other causes.

"Point 2: Pfizer’s mRNA Injections Increase the Risk for Severe Disease and Hospitalizations

"Point 3: Pfizer’s mRNA Injections Cause Stroke, Heart Attacks, Autoimmune Diseases, Miscarriages, Birth Defects, Blood Clotting, Myocarditis, Convulsions, Seizures, and Death

"The risk for heart attacks, stroke, autoimmune diseases, blood clotting, myocarditis, convulsions, seizures, and other COVID-19 vaccine-induced injuries and diseases including death, was known by the FDA on October 22, 2020."

That day the FDA met with Pfizer and other manufacturers "...to discuss more than two dozen harmful outcomes and diseases caused by the COVID-19 vaccines."

JabDamage.jpg
IMG source - karenkingston.substack.com

"Point 4: Pfizer’s Phase 2/3 Clinical Trials, FDA Authorization and FDA Approval are Acts of Criminal Biological Experimentation on Humans and NOT bona fide Research"

"Pfizer’s Phase 2/3 clinical trials, the FDA’s authorization and then the FDA’s approval of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA injections are in violation of the FDA’s own safety laws 21 U.S.C 312.42b1i/b2i and 21 U.S.C 355.

"Per 21 U.S.C 312.42b1i/b2i, during a Phase 1 trial of 20-80 healthy people, if a ‘vaccine’ (biological agent) places humans at unreasonable and significant risk for illness or injury, the experiment is to be terminated.

"These laws are in place to protect American civilians from being unknowingly exposed to harmful biological agents that can cause injury, illness, disability, or even death."

"Point 5: Pfizer and the FDA Knowingly Placed Adults and Children at Unnecessary Risk for Injury or Death from a Harmful Agent"

"Based on the October 22, 2020, meeting alone, when industry and the FDA discussed the more than two-dozen debilitating and life-threatening outcomes from the COVID-19 injections, the FDA should have terminated all of the COVID-19 vaccine trials and never enabled access to these harmful mRNA injections by civilian adults and children.

"Even under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) (per the FDA’s guidance) the FDA must determine that the known benefits of an EUA vaccine (biological agent) outweighs the known risks before authorizing a product for use in the United States."

"Point 6: The FDA and Pfizer Placed Children at Unnecessary Risk for Injury, Disease and Death from a Harmful Agent

"Verbatim from the FDA document;
“Reactogenicity data from a total of 100 adolescents 12 through 15 years of age were provided in the EUA submission. However, the Sponsor, did not request inclusion of this age group in the EUA because the data available… were insufficient to support a favorable benefit-risk determination at this time. Therefore, the reactogenicity data for participants 12 through 15 years of age are NOT presented in this document.”

In other words, the data showed the jabs did more harm than good to kids.

"Point 7: The COVID-19 Injections Do NOT Meet the Definition of a Vaccine

- do NOT prevent infection or disease, 

- do NOT protect against mild-to-moderate or severe disease, 

- were NOT done under bona fide research, and

- are known to CAUSE illness, injuries, disabilities, and death?

"...the COVID-19 mRNA injections meet the exact definition of a bioweapon per 18 USC 175."

Bioweapon.jpg
IMG source - karenkingston.substack.com

Dr. Malone may consider iatrogenic harm manslaughter. However, Kingston shows that these injuries and deaths were not due to negligence, but were known results of the bioweapon the CDC paid for. Kirsch shows the criminal prosecution of a medical doctor that refused to inflict these bioweapons on Americans reveals they wanted to force medical doctors to inflict that bioweapon on Americans enough to threaten them with prison if they refused.

A threat they're carrying out against Dr. Moore.

I don't think that's not premeditated, deliberate, and purposeful. I'm very confident that these facts taken together establish that not only murder, but the crime against humanity of genocide was deliberately committed by the guilty parties FOR PROFIT. It's bad enough if they were so deranged they hated our freedoms, or some such BS.

But they, I believe, did it for money. That makes it much worse IMHO.

We have just laws that are written to protect us from these exact crimes, and they have failed to protect us. Only if we arrest, charge, prosecute, and convict the genocidal psychopaths that have hired the enemedia, government, and medical industry to murder and grievously injure millions of us is there any chance we and our children will be protected from these criminals doing this again.

After all, we're being promised there's going to be a next time. Here at ~26 seconds in, he pushes the deadly bioweapons he has paid a lot of money for, and promises to do it again, real soon.

We may not want that to happen. I sure don't. We may insist it doesn't happen. I do, and will. We may be so determined to keep it from happening that it will only happen over our dead bodies.

I would say instead we need to stay alive so we can ACT to prevent this crap, because our dead bodies is exactly what they want, and are doing everything in their power to plant in the dirt.



0
0
0.000
14 comments
avatar

We ain't seen nothin yet.

The die off from the VAXXX is just starting.
And those who survive the VAXXX will have shorter lifespans.

When we look back on this we will notice that:
The MSM selling of fear cut everyone's lifespan by 5 years.
The VAXXX cuts off more than 30 years from a person's lifespan.

And now we have to deal with some mutated disease that is now part of our earth.

This will lead to big pharma being wiped from the face of the earth.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I agree that the harms are only beginning to become apparent. I am concerned that there seems to be negative consequences that are caused by the jabbed shedding spike proteins. However, I am confident those consequences are far less than if we'd been jabbed and were manufacturing those toxins ourselves.

Big pharma being wiped will be a great benefit to humanity, particularly as we are going to have the ability to use AI to diagnose, and 3D printers to make our own medicines, pretty soon.

Thanks!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @valued-customer! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You distributed more than 49000 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 50000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Check out our last posts:

The Hive Gamification Proposal
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
0
0
0.000
avatar

Everything written here is already a known. But it isn't enough since they changed up the DOD rules that you have to prove fraud not harmful intent. I was over on the DOD site the other day looking for something I had read there but it was reworded differently. Anyway, they changed it up to include that under EA that there is no liability from harms just fraud. I am taking it they put it so bluntly as such because they knew harms were involved or that harms would be involved. But if you can't go after them for harms even if they lied about it you have to hit them with another angle on fraud. That would be the class switch being sold as immunity. The Cleveland Clinic, if we are looking at the same study, never diminished the vaccines in the way described above. They actually said the vaccines saved millions of lives but....they do this, the switch up your immune response. They had to have known because Weissman and Kariko did that switch up in 2005, they called the immune system problematic when it came to trying to introduce chemicals into the body, they discovered a workaround the immune system 2005 by getting the immune system to treat it as an allergy. There was never any immunity just lesser disease and that was sold out the door the minute they admitted the vaccines didn't create immunity just lesser disease, they create lesser disease by switching the immune response...so there's your fraud. They wouldn't have been able to say it if they hadn't know it.

As far as blaming the FDA for approval and getting somewhere with that you are aiming your arrow in the wrong direction. That lays solely on the shoulders of Trump who threaten Hahn's job, which is even in a tweet, so undeniable on Trump's behalf, the night before they met to approve it. If you took time to read my ops you'd know all this. He didn't even allow time for the FDA to write safety data information which was one of the reason's they were going to do that right before approval but Trump told him you're gone if it's not done by tomorrow. So all those blank data safety sheets is the direct result of Trump's threat.

It wasn't just the sequencing of the mutations that needed to be, or the virus for that matter. What mattered was they needed to have the right LNP for the virus and it's mutations to hold the whole mess together in a vaccine. That also came on Trump's watch, in 2017 the virus, 2018 the mutations.

As far as that doctor is concern he never refused to give anyone the vaccine, he was ordering the vaccines so he could help people avoid having to get the shot. He wasn't, at least from what I figured out back then, making a profit off it like they claimed. Yeah he was trying to help people, completely understandable, I'd gone to him if my job or child was in jeopardy if I didn't take it. Words have meaning, stay truthful to the story, lies only confuse people and move them away from having compassion. This man was doing a service, he should be commended for but don't sell it like he was refusing when he was helping. There's a difference. The only problem I had with the guy was he poured the vaccines down the drain..I mean really, we don't even know if there would have been consequences to that at the time.

I know these people need to sell hype to get clicks but they aren't helping by misaligning events and faults. Stay true to the passion and convictions don't mislead people like the left does...you'll get a whole lot farther and truth not lies prevail.

0
0
0.000
avatar

"...you have to prove fraud not harmful intent."

I disagree. Criminals bent on murder can demand any interpretation of lawful they want, but justice will not be bent to their purposes. The blood of their victims cries out today, and will be answered whether genocidal psychopaths like it or not.

"As far as blaming the FDA for approval and getting somewhere with that you are aiming your arrow in the wrong direction."

No, I'm not. Any deflection from the responsibility of those corrupt traitors disregards their culpability in the genocidal crimes they directly contributed to.

"That lays solely on the shoulders of Trump..."

That's blatantly false. He was but one of myriad conspirators that are all individually responsible for their personal actions. Nothing exculpates Trump of his guilt, but nothing exculpates any of them.

"If you took time to read my ops you'd know all this."

I follow you and undertake to read what you post. I may miss some, but I doubt I miss much. I think you misunderstand what 'know' means in this context. Clearly, as I reveal in this reply, I do not agree with your views in toto. Neither do I disagree with all of them. There is much you share I learn, and I am grateful for that, but I do not ascribe to Trump all the evils that the entire nest of vipers has committed, and find the concept ludicrous.

"As far as that doctor is concern he never refused to give anyone the vaccine..."

What use is a claim without evidence? Walk your talk.

Thanks!

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I disagree. Criminals bent on murder can demand any interpretation of lawful they want, but justice will not be bent to their purposes. The blood of their victims cries out today, and will be answered whether genocidal psychopaths like it or not.

There's a perceived proportion of people who are on a path to stymie or constrain the conversation into a particular direction. They do it to make the endeavor more complicated to solve and in some instances, probably in even more instances than not, lead individuals down a path to be ridiculed. This just compounds or adds additional barriers those individuals have to go through to prove something. Trying to prove harms is one of those topics. Much more difficult to prove, can delay the process for years. Proving fraud is instantaneous at this point because it's been proven the vaccines switch up and individuals immune response, they do not create immunity, another fraud, they do not stop transmission, another fraud. Once that frauds been established legally you can argue the harms that have been done. Up to and including causing individuals immune systems not only do not stop the individual from getting the disease, spreading the disease it makes it impossible for them to ward off any disease, infection or illness sufficiently they may catch moving forward. As for those with compromised immune systems or inflictions of other illnesses it leads to taxing an already burdened immune system causing yet even more harms or deaths.

If you'd like me to give you a motive that is non conspiratorial proof is the amounts of monies it cost governments when people get ill, monies in medical cost, social program cost to take care of them and lost productions. I can even link that move not only from a government intent of such a proposed proposition but to Pfizer also if you go read what you describe as my near worthless dribble here: https://hive.blog/deepdives/@sunlit7/covid-deaths-and-the-economic-factor. But like I said there's certain individuals that'd rather guide people into a more difficult path to reach that which would reach the same conclusion in the end, the vaccines caused harms and deaths. The immune switch is proven, what avenue they took to manage that switch was done with using the proapoptotic cells which are categorically (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc., ) aligned for distribution into various parts of the body, which is why the shot caused distribution through out the body and didn't stay in the arm as promoted, another fraud.

No, I'm not. Any deflection from the responsibility of those corrupt traitors disregards their culpability in the genocidal crimes they directly contributed to.

That's blatantly false. He was but one of myriad conspirators that are all individually responsible for their personal actions. Nothing exculpates Trump of his guilt, but nothing exculpates any of them.

Approval is just a part or parcel of the tasks at hand. The FDA didn't invent the vaccine or the virus for that matter. It was the FDA's responsibility to look at the data and transcript a safety data sheet which was denied to them by threats made not only by Trump in a tweet but others who Trump directed to get the message across to the FDA they wanted approval and they wanted it the very next day or else. If they had had time to transcribe the data it may have made a decision more difficult for thousands of doctors to give the populace these shots willy nilly as a whole had they have known what the potential consequences would have been to many. Had people had access to the data safety sheets themselves may have also made a vast difference in their decision to get the shots. That all happened in Dec 2020, Trump knew he was running out of time, he was brought in as a hit man, it was his job to get the vaccine out. It was never intended for Trump to stay in office after the roll out, they needed a mentally compromised individual to take the fall. An individual that also could be used to lead people into believing a falsehood that they were dealing with an inept individual instead of a corrupt criminal enterprise. Each step was masterfully crafted and each step has to be masterfully taken down, raising your finger and pointing in just one direction while calling squirrel is just making the endeavor much more difficult. But like I said there are many out there deliberately misleading people obscuring the optics.

0
0
0.000
avatar

"...what you describe as my near worthless dribble..."

There's no point in discussing things with you if you just make up things to argue that I didn't say, and do not respond to things I do.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It may just be the way you word stuff that people can easily take offense at.

but I doubt I miss much.
People can take that in more than one way.
I responded plenty, you just don't like it I called what you had to say basically the same dribble they've been pouring out repeatedly just saying it in a different context. They put it out there, everyone runs for it, post it up, people click on the blaring new headline only to realize it's stuff we basically already know or, as in the case of the surgeon taken out of context.

0
0
0.000
avatar

First, because of incorrect formatting, the comment I am replying to implies you are quoting me when you say "I responded plenty, you just don't like it..." and so on. Please be more attentive to formatting to avoid my misunderstanding what you mean.

Second, you say "I called what you had to say basically the same dribble..."

No, that's not what you did say. You may have meant to say that. What you did, in fact, was to misquote me as having described your words as "...near worthless dribble...", which I did not do.

Because you're missformatting, missquoting, and mistaking the specific words I write it is impossible for me to sort what you mean from what you write in response. I am left with the marked sense that this indicates you have misunderstood me. However, because you do not precisely and specifically differentiate between what I did say, what you understood me to say, nor even what you mean to say in response, I cannot tell what you mean to say.

It's true I don't like that, but not because I don't like whatever you meant by it. I don't like it because I can't TELL what you meant by it. That also makes it utterly pointless to try to discuss it with you, because I can't even tell whatever it is you're trying to say.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I can't TELL what you meant by it

Did you ever stop to consider when writing a response the same thing applies from your comments to me.

0
0
0.000
avatar

As per the guy up on charges why don't you spend hours going through my near useless dribble comments either on here or disqus where I even went and done the math to get to the answer as if he was actually trying to profit off the vaccines like accused. No he wasn't. He was trying to help people who were being forced to take the vaccine. You can't hand out vaccines cards if you aren't matching up those supposed vaccinations if you are not ordering vaccines. There's a huge difference between "refusing" to give individuals the vaccines and trying to find an avenue for those in a quandary of being forced to take them. Simply logic prevails here without me having to spend hours explaining the whole case to you, if you don't want to give people the vaccine you don't order any vaccines....get it. He was a plastic surgeon who owned his own business....get it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

"...my near useless dribble..."

Since you categorize your comments so, I am not going to spend further time on them.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You don't like to admit when you are wrong sometimes, you don't even consider compromise sometime. But the holy grail Malone hits you up and you take every word he has to say verbatim and he can only be right one hundred percent of the time and provides for website clicks on an instance, regardless if it's been said before and repeatedly regurgitated in a different format over and over again.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Besides you know you'd miss me. Who else in bot land is going to make your post so worthy of debate.

0
0
0.000