RE: Flag Wars?! Ohhhh I'm Coming 2x as Hard for ALL of you!! **PLEASE WATCH STEEMIANS**
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I hope they will listen to your comments in the video.
I also hope they notice you do get engagement and I have no problem with people thinking your content is over valued or enjoying it.
I have no problem with you getting downvoted, but getting downvoted by a trail based on voting behavior, troubles me.
Who doesn't have some autovotes?
0
0
0.000
I try to do the best i can here to spread this token. i have mega interest in doing so. i also have no prob getting down voted but about 30 of them came in all at the same time. i got bum rushed by flaggers!! lol.
Creating engagement by paying community funds to those who comment, upvote and re-steem \o/
Oh wait, of course you support that, it's your strategy too.
I have never typed “upvotes for resteem” on my blog since I been here, I just did on this one to piss you off.
LOL
You're the lobbying group on the wrong side of terror. You will become the past of society pharesim.
A single entity trying to make a point against a trail of flaggers needs a support trail to keep it fair and if you don't belong to one then I think it is OK to "rent" some.
"Community Funds".... I assume you mean the influence I have by holding Steem Power.
Yes, I use my SP to reward engagement and activity, that is correct. That is my strategy, also I have shown up nearly every day for 3.5 years and engaged. Stated my vision, worked on improvements. Powered up.
Your strategy was to send 800k+ to exchanges while criticizing the community the content and others repeatedly. I know what you think of Steem, I've heard it. The community and posts and quality are not what drove the price down. Pull a report at the outgoing Steem and find your answers. It's factual that way.
I don't pretend I have all the answers or am always right, but I do listen to reasonably stated feedback. Do you?
I'll compare my track record to yours any day, anytime.
I'd rather not make it personal, but I got on your list based on who has been voting for me for the last 3 months. Not because of how I conduct myself.
You can continue to attack those who have been here, making the best decisions they know how to make and acting like you know all the right things to do. It's your stake and your voice.
I'm done engaging in your personal attacks, name calling, and self aggrandizing.
If you wanted to engage in a conversation about vision, results and moving forward I would be open to it.
The price is down the alt-coin market is in the toilet and I don't think fighting about rewards is the solution.
So, I am going to continue to do what I do. You can continue to toss insults and feel superior all you like.
"Community funds" as in content and curation rewards, yes. The stuff that forms the value proposal of steem, which has been horribly failing. It's getting better though. Surprised about #newsteem now? What happened to "#newsteem is you don't complain?" :D
You found out that I sold steem, wow. Jelly that you held during the bull run? Did you also see that I bought ever since it's going down again, and still do? How much did you buy, while we're at it?
I'm not attacking anyone personally, only a certain type of behaviour.
I am not surprised by the impact of the EIP at all. In fact I wrote about it. NewSteem was about looking outside of our own community to market and onboard people and focus on creating demand.
Not a bit jealous, you won a Mining Lottery, I don't know how to mine. Still don't. I totally hope your mining continues to pay off. If you win, we win. We have the same goal.
I can't wait until we have more conversations about how to promote Steem than we have arguments about our own inside tech and rewards.
Yeah, let's fix the retention first and not drive all new users off when they see that the big guys move the rewards mostly between themselves. If you haven't realized that that was the problem by now, maybe you should look a bit more what former users or people watching from the sidelines say on other platforms about steem...
Happy to help with promotion after that issue is fixed, meanwhile I'm doing what my stake allows me to do. Cause that's how I understand newsteem.
I complained about my own naivity for a moment when I saw how many people are not behind the changes of the EIP, who did not switch their behaviour to rewarding more diverse content and being happy with the curation rewards they receive, and now I act by using the tools which were introduced.
An individuals impact agains groups of voters with stake in the millions is minimal, so I made a tool to bundle the efforts of many people with the same goal, there's nothing wrong with that. Complaining about being downvoted by a group when you have built a group for upvotes is just hilarious.
Check my votes.
Save your lecture for someone who needs it.
You haven't been targeted. I wouldn't even talk to you right now if you wouldn't have criticized what happened to the poor guy here.
Elsewhere you said to upvote based on content. Why would the standards for downvoting be different?
I'm sorry you felt criticized, what I felt was empathy for bronc and although his content isn't something I would regularly seek I don't think it is bad for Steem.
I would be more likely to watch his video than review someone's photography and or beautifully formatted blog, which I know is totally subjective.
He does get engagement and has supported many other projects on Steem.
Again, I get that your intentions are in the right place, I standby not liking the tone or the method, I was/am critical of that.
You absolutely should use your stake and your influence to try to impact what you think helps/harms Steem.
Complaining about Upvote Groups when you have built downvote groups is equally as hilarious. :)
Either Collusion is right or wrong, you don't get to have it both ways.
Of course content quality plays a role - and if curangel and its trail had the power to bring this post to an extremely low level, I would have added something to the queue myself or asked someone else to put something to not hit it too hard. It doesn't though, it received a 100% downvote (I think the first ever in the short history of curangel, because there haven't been many submissions that round), and it still has a reward considerably higher than the big majority of content. We're not big enough to even counter all of the votes of the circle on one post, and he gets a lot of votes from outside of it on top of that.
The whitepaper speaks of colluding groups to be countered by downvotes, so I strongly disagree, there's nothing wrong with working together when doing that. We group up for the downvotes as a reaction, because as individuals we're too weak (SP) and vulnerable (retaliation). We don't complain, we act. As soon as they break up their groups, we're happy to put all our focus on positive things again. This is not fun for anyone ;D
Alright... Carry on.
I think we have both taken the time to check ourselves and our opinions and I think that is enough. In fact I think that is what consensus is all about.
Steem's up a little. :)