RE: Seymour Butts exposed on the chain

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

like I get a lot of votes from curators who are after those juicy curator rewards that will make them change their voting habits,

Do you produce content people want?

but I think you believe HF21 will be a boon to a majority, that is why I made that proposal to you, obviously one of us has to be wrong.

You think you know what I think. THat might be a problem.



0
0
0.000
7 comments
avatar

I think sometimes I do, most of the time no, about par with everyone here, of course excepting the select few who nearly always write great stuff. I don't know what you think but I can certainly infer part of it from what you write, you are OK with HF21 and expect good results from it, I don't.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I expect that it will help improve the foundation to improve further upon. People want to earn on their content alone, try a centralized platform like youtube. If people want to participate in a decentralized ecosystem, there will be ups and downs - people seem to only want ups - that is BS childish behaviour in my opinion.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well I guess the people who only want ups are probably tired of only having downs. Steem is badly run and has been for a long time, both founders are now all but out their brainchild didn't work like they planned and both left, now THAT is childish BS.

0
0
0.000
avatar

umm. decentralized environment. even without founders, it is still going. This isn't a company.

0
0
0.000
avatar

STINC?

0
0
0.000
avatar

STEEM

Steemit Inc isn't Steem.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I know that, but Steemit is a part of Steem, and if you notice the people who mine Steem depend on people from Steemit to hold their positions, and unfortunately these witnesses at least the top ones have been suspected of being controlled by STINC, so I have some doubts about that decentralization.

0
0
0.000