Is the Steem tap closing?

avatar

With the upcoming hardfork that is going to reduce the earnings on many authors while increasing it on others, does it mean that the Steem tap is finally closing its valve?

The Steem blockchain has always been about distribution and for the last three years it has been doing just that but, things are changing finally. While imperfect, there are literally thousands of users who hold significant amounts of Steem but with the coming owned communities and SMTs to consider, the Steem holder base has to also increasingly become foundational in purpose to form the support of what will be built upon it.

While many people might be upset at the move as it will could effectively put more Steem into the hands of those who already have Steem and who already get support on their posts through the convergent curve, perhaps this is what is required to force the SMT communities out of the nest.

Someone brought up yesterday how many projects were started during the bullrun only to later die, and I believe the major reason was that they relied on the inflation pool for earnings, not their userbase. While it is not easy to build a business with customers who pay in an ecosystem that has an open tap, @Steemmonsters has successfully managed it thus far and @threespeak is well on the way to building a SaaS model upon their platform.

But, if contributors haven't yet noticed, the SCOT tribes layers above the Steem blockchain have also successfully added some level of value to their users and are able to offer value for creation. This is where it was always headed and it isn't like people didn't know SMTs weren't coming… for almost 3 years now. This will continue and must continue as the Steem inflation pool is much to shallow and small for a huge number of users.

Right now there are about 324 million Steem in the supply which means that if all are spread evenly across a million users, no one account would have more than 324 each and with 10 million users, that drops to 32.4 Steem each. It isn't going to scale. However, the tokens above Steem need not suffer this same fate and can use a host of various ways to empower their user experience with limited resources. Resource Credit Delegation pools will be the first move toward this.

However, there will always be the complaint that new users will not be able to get in on Steem, but this is short sighted. New users need not have Steem at all as long as the tokenized layer applications that they use can provide some RCs to transact and, there are many ways to stretch these further too.

There seems to be an idea that every user who arrives at Steem should have the same opportunity no matter when they arrive, but then there is no point in being an early adopter. It is like saying that all people who buy Bitcoin should be able to get it at the 2009 price, or everyone who purchases Apple stocks gets them at the 1980 price. There are benefits to early adoption and risk taking and those benefits diminish over time.

The beauty of Steem is that the opportunity to be an early adopter doesn't disappear, it just moves to a different layer of the blockchain experience. People should start seeing Steem as the internet and the various tokens as the businesses that they can participate in. They can buy the tokens, earn the tokens and even mine the tokens in various ways and in doing so, support the business to build its future position as an early adopter.

While the earnings tap from the Steem pool might be slowly closing off the distribution of Steem to new users, the distribution to those who support the growth of the chain should create many more opportunities in the layers above as they fractal out to create similar but different expressions of the Steem blockchain and its userbase.

What is quite amazing is that even though someone is able to target and be an early adopter on a token business layer, their post will still have the potential to earn something from the Steem tap also. A tap that they could use to invest into Steem or sell to buy into the token layer above of their choice. Some of these layers have the potential to be very valuable also and the more the traditional economic mass starts to shift toward blockchain, tokens and the businesses that facilitate and use them, the more value gets built.

How I see it is that this latest change in the code of Steem blockchain is shifting the community support focus toward answering the question of, who we you want to secure the infrastructure of Steem? It could be said that in a general sense, those who have been buying in during the continual fall are those who see potential in a future rise and those who have continually participated and powered up, will continue to do so into the foreseeable future on average.

While these might be large assumptions, there is more track record in this than there is in distribute Steem to everyone and they will power it up and distribute it further. We do know that the chain needs to have enough distributed users with enough spread for security and stability and perhaps this move will not only encourage people to actively attract more stake and grow, it will also encourage some to buy some of the 100+ million Steem off the exchanges to be owners at the infrastructure level.

In many ways, this particular Hardfork might be a good indicator of who is looking long on Steem as it should somewhat narrow the distribution and for those who earn more only to sell it off again, they could be recognized and have the support they receive redirected. For me, this is quite an important factor as I am looking to have Steem be the foundation of a massive amount of opportunity and that means I need to play my part and support those at the foundation level.

The earning level is another usecase for Steem however and that is massively important, but people need to remember that one can be on Steem earning, without earning Steem itself, as we can see on the tribes. Many of those earners on the tribes are dumping their earnings in much the same way many on Steem have done, however eventually, those taps might start to turn off as they mature and then the next round will arrive.

The thing with Steem is that it was always meant to be an ecosystem that distributes tokens without having to commit to an individual token with an individual use. The culture of Steem needs to start shifting to incorporate the larger picture of the entire economy of multiple tokens and uses, not Steem as the only worthy currency.

This takes time to make the mental shift, but it is much like investing into any kind of traditional stock or an index of stocks. Steem is the index fund that creates a mass of held stake that supports the individual businesses upon it. Have you bought any of the Steem infrastructure, it is only 18 cents on the market?

While there are going to be a lot of complaints due to changes in distribution, the most interesting part of the next hardfork is seeing who believes Steem is going to be here in the future because, they will be competing hard and powering up while they can because eventually, the tap will shut off tight.

I have a bit of Steem FOMO at the mo.

Taraz
[ a Steem original ]



0
0
0.000
33 comments
avatar

To the question in your title, my Magic 8-Ball says:

Outlook good

Hi! I'm a bot, and this answer was posted automatically. Check this post out for more information.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Dang.... I have kicked myself over and over and over again for not sticking with steem years ago when it was new and I had the chance stock up and build a better rep.
but there is no real point in regret about that anymore - lesson learned and stamped on my forehead. SO I have to work twice as hard, so be it.

I see it this way: I am here at the dawn of a newer era of Steem. I am not in the position I would like to be SP wise but I am here, a little older and a little wiser. There are massive opportunities to explore and options to invite in.

besides, this is far from the last hardfork of changes. right?

0
0
0.000
avatar

The distribution percentage actually hasbn' changed at all, there is 100% in the pool. Where it may end up has though. There is still heaps of Steem up for grabs through content creation and at 65 percent going to content/curation, over the next 12 months that is something like 17 million Steem.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Good to know there will be plenty of steem to go around for those willing to earn/create for it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Perhaps the HF will provide a better course for Steem's future. Let's hope so.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It could do that as there may be a higher percentage of the stake in the hands of those who are looking to stabilize the chain for the future. There is still a large amount of Steem coming out into the distribution, it is just being distributed partially to different people, like the 10% to the Steem DAO for development. In time, this might turn into concentration of Stake across the users who are here now, not the ones that are coming unless they want to buy in - which is still and will likely be for a while, very possible.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The Steem blockchain has always been about distribution and for the last three years it has been doing just that but, things are changing finally.

....so you are happy less distribution in preferable?

This makes an investor and part to of -rentier class.

You want to be a landlord, and rentier?
(ie nothing different than the crony capitalism that is the problem for every persons issue, in today's world. The rentier class.

Perpetuation is not solution, just selfishness in most uncapitalistical way of real capitalism (it's called socialism).

...do you want me to provide the link to my post about coincidences? Yu seem enchanted with it...
.....or are you gonna finally be honest - and try and defend the indefensible.
An ambitious part of the rentier class you so wish to be?

You remind me of me..... before I grew up.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wasn't happy when i first heard about the hardfork and less rewards for users but all of the information since combined with tribes has changed my perspective a little. I see a lot of good things in the fork and it will be interesting to see how it plays out. The main thing for me now is a smooth transition so that we can restart steem and start marketing it positively to the world.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think that once the dust settles so to speak, there will be a few interesting dynamics that start to come into play and the impact of the SteemDAO is an unknown quantity and therefore hasn't been addressed much at all by the people who are worried the most about the split change. Funny thing about development and innovation, people dismiss it until it benefits them.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's the DAO i'm really looking forward to. That could really give us a new angle to improve the blockchain and get some of the issues fixed. The stuff that steem.inc was never going to get around to but is vital for people using the chain.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep, it is an unknown so it is avoided but it could bring a massive amount of development change and if i can nudge prices up to double, that 10% can develop twice as much and so on. Who knows where it will lead.

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is my personal opinion about the new implementation: I think that if the steem does not go up to at least $ 1 this would no longer be profitable for content creators, we know that the accounts that have the most steem are not as good as the authors who have no steem.

This platform feeds on us, the creators of low profile content is the reality, then if the steem does not increase in value it would no longer be profitable for the creators of high quality content, for example in steemstem the best authors are the people " poor in steem "and I fear that with the new changes they can leave forever, so it can happen in many more communities.

So my question is: what will happen with steem if this happens?

Without content this would be the end, don't you think? Then the rich get richer and the poor poorer and end up running away from steem.

What is the true purpose of this HF? ... Attract new investors right? That is very good and I think it's great. But if quality content they will cure? And new users who want to get incoporporated? what will happen to them?

I am too confused with all this and I no longer know what to think, right now I feel that I lost 2 years and 6 months of my life here on steem. Of which I have been 1 year and 8 months as curator. This is very discouraging for me.

0
0
0.000
avatar

we know that the accounts that have the most steem are not as good as the authors who have no steem.

Pretty bold statement.

For three years there has been something like 80 million Steem coming out of the pool with most going to authors and a great deal of that went off to the markets. After the change the percentage changes, but there are also a great deal more ways to earn.

for example in steemstem the best authors are the people " poor in steem "and I fear that with the new changes they can leave forever,

If steemStem is your example of good internet content, you should check the engagement they get on their posts.

Without content this would be the end, don't you think?

Content comes in many forms.

Then the rich get richer and the poor poorer and end up running away from steem.

No, if this fails the rich get a great deal poorer. THe highest staked accounts on this platform have the most to lose from failure as they have the most, skin in the game.

What is the true purpose of this HF? ... Attract new investors right?

I don't think so. It is to stabilize the chain so that development can continue and create a fuller field of experiences.

But if quality content they will cure?

There is not much quality content on Steem in comparison to something like Medium.

And new users who want to get incoporporated? what will happen to them?

You seemed to have missed the entire point of communities, SMTs and RCs.

I am too confused with all this and I no longer know what to think, right now I feel that I lost 2 years and 6 months of my life here on steem. Of which I have been 1 year and 8 months as curator. This is very discouraging for me.

It seems that you have also missed some of the fundamental reasons as to why this development needs to take place. Steem is a little over three years old yet, people have milked it like it is a mature investment in an established industry. That is on them.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Sorry to drop in but this seems like a interesting convo this time. haha

you should check the engagement they get on their posts.

Does engagement really matter that much? Is it really a metric of anything? I got almost 90 comments 3 posts back which made it a top 5 commented post on Steem with $2 for the payout. lol My content is still trash. No engagement changes that. 😂
Does engagement really translate to anything? Not really.
So on your point on Steemstem.... engagement isnt really a measure of anything and it seemed that you were a bit critical on his point of "quality" content related to Steemstem. (correct me if im mistaken)

The highest staked accounts on this platform have the most to lose from failure as they have the most, skin in the game.

Do you really think that matters? Do you really think people are capable of fighting off their greed?
The highest staked accounts have ALWAYS had most to lose and that didnt change their behavior one bit. NOT one BIT.
You give people too much credit. Most people are self-absorbed morons. Dumb as a bag of bricks.

It is to stabilize the chain so that development can continue and create a fuller field of experiences.

Hahaha. This really made me giggle. Please dont get mad, thats not my intention honestly. But this was the biggest non answer i have ever seen you write.
"Stabilize the chain"?
"Create a fuller field of experiences"?
Sounds like something Chbartist would write in one of his nonsense peddling posts.. haha
Cmon man. haha. You know this is just a meaningless answer.

The truth is that this is completely and undeniably an attempt to attract investors. An attempt to keep the big accounts here and attract new ones and thats completely fine.

And on his point about wasting time here.... Well fuck... No one forced him. If people feel they wasted their time here then they have only themselves to blame.
Ive been here almost 2 years and i dont find 1 second of it a waste. I mean just the knowledge i acquired about Crypto on Steem is worth the time i spent here let alone the fun ive had and stimulating conversations ive been a part of.

Viewing STEEM through CMC eyes is what got us here in the first place. If Steem went to 0 i still would not say i wasted my time here. Wouldnt think it for a second.
@carloserp-2000

0
0
0.000
avatar

engagement isnt really a measure of anything and it seemed that you were a bit critical on his point of "quality" content related to Steemstem. (correct me if im mistaken)

It is a measure of conversation and for a social network that is important, isn't it?

Do you really think that matters? Do you really think people are capable of fighting off their greed?

Some people can.

The highest staked accounts have ALWAYS had most to lose and that didnt change their behavior one bit. NOT one BIT.

Depends who you look at as some have always done better or worse than others.

Sounds like something Chbartist would write in one of his nonsense peddling posts.. haha

Perhaps, I have only ever read a part of one of his posts a long time ago. It isn't a non-answer though. The only reason any author has earned anything here is because of development and stake backing it. The only reason that there are games, tokenized frontends, video platforms and all the other stuff is - because of development and stake backing it. People here who were earning nthing as writers are earning something as vloggers because of -development and stake backing it. THat is a fuller experience - perhaps you should get out of your mental box more.

And on his point about wasting time here.... Well fuck... No one forced him. If people feel they wasted their time here then they have only themselves to blame.

Yes, it is all opt-in and all opt-out.

Ive been here almost 2 years and i dont find 1 second of it a waste. I mean just the knowledge i acquired about Crypto on Steem is worth the time i spent here let alone the fun ive had and stimulating conversations ive been a part of.

Me either and, if it goes to zero (I don't think it can go all the way so I'd buy more), all good as the place still serves the the purpose I use it for.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

It is a measure of conversation and for a social network that is important, isn't it?

Let me ask you this. Say you run into a good music post.... What do you really have to say? "Nice job"? "You sing well"? "You play well?"
Those comments are kind of cheap and i avoid them. I just upvote and leave it be.
How about art?
There are of course posts that are discussion driving and thats all good and well but many times you dont have much to say.
Does that make those kinds of posts lesser?
Absolutely not.
Thats why i gave you an example of my post couple days ago.
I went out and criticized openly in a provocative way a lot of things. That drew in "opinions".
Last time i did that Ned showed up and i got 120 comments.
Did that make my content "good", "worthy", "quality".
NO.

Id wager that every single @curie voted post has brought in 100 times more value to the blockchain then what ever i might think up because as you may have pointed out (or something close to it) in the last post i showed up in: "Emotional bias and echo chambers are a real thing."
What i wrote had absolutely no mainstream objective value.
It pandered to the echo chamber.
Steemstem does not do that most times and Curie simply avoids steem related content. Its in their rulebook as it should be.

Depends who you look at as some have always done better or worse than others.

What is the rule and what is the exception? Is @theycallmedan a rule or an exception?
I mean i call out @exyle and @slowwalker for their borderline hypocritical behavior. They act in line with the majority.
Acidyo is probably the only large account that ive seen acknowledge when he was in a situation where you could downvote him justly because he realized that:"Well yeah, this really was worth a flag.".
And it was over the silliest of thing.
Most get offended. Most get their egos hurr because they are large accounts and you have "no right" to flag them.
That is the rule. "Some" is the minority.

THat is a fuller experience.

Its not really.. Thats why i made the chb comparisson. You can attach any meaning to a vague answer when confronted. Thats why i try to always be as concise as i can. Make it easily understandable and not as broad.
You just said here that the "fuller experience" has to do with people having stake making steem possible.
I agree. That is indeed a fact but your initial statement of a fuller experience does not in any way point to that.
You leave that statement as "to be interpreted by the reader" and i find that as a copout. Which is why i called it meaningless in a discussion. You arent writing poetry here. Youre discussing things and a clearly communicated message is a must in my book.

The rest i wrote for the original commenter.
I really hope people will eventually get out of that frame of mind.
What value will you place on being able to discuss things as openly as you can here. The things you can learn here.
The people you can converse with and learn from.
Does making a few dollars that are worth a big mac and a soda really drive you more then everything else that a platform like this offers?
I find that shortminded.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Does that make those kinds of posts lesser?

Depends what you consider "value to the blockchain" as those same posts would have value wherever they are viewed, right?

Id wager that every single @curie voted post has brought in 100 times more value to the blockchain then what ever i might think up because as you may have pointed out (or something close to it) in the last post i showed up in: "Emotional bias and echo chambers are a real thing."

Not necessarily. If it didn't make people think and perhaps change their behavioir for the better, it might not have brought any value to the blockchain.

You leave that statement as "to be interpreted by the reader" and i find that as a copout.

Definitely not a cop-out. Everything is going to be interpreted by the reader and based on their own experience and bias, they will make their mind independently, as they should. I feel no need to explain myself to anyone, nor justify my position or behavior because people demand it of me.

Youre discussing things and a clearly communicated message is a must in my book.

It is clearly communicated, you just might not be the audience. For those who find value in it, there is enough, for those that don't, there may never be enough. Again, I write as I feel and do as I please - if people benefit from it, good - but I have no obligation to explain every detail to every person as that is a losing game for everyone. I don't pander to the lowest common denominator - I am not a politician. I don't need a million followers, I don't chase the attention, I just do what I do and if people support I am grateful, if not they are welcome to move along to something that holds value for them.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Id be going in circles if i attempted to respond to this comment as i think i have already made the necessary responses to your points here in my previous comment.
Anyways... See you later. ;)

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm planning to exit into fiat.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Funny how an exit plan is actually a buy in plan :)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Here from the @steemitblog and to be very honest, I am confused. I read posts and comments to get a better feel of what people think about something I can't decide on. People have a problem with producing content and get half rewarded for it... And I would like to argue with it but I feel like it's not fair.

Anyway, let's see how it goes because either way, I am staying.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Depends how one looks at it. If things keep going the way it is no one will have any value no matter how much Steem they get. 100% of valueless is still valueless, right?

There are parts of the change like the Steem DAO that are aimed to develop the technologoy and application side of it and this should work in favor of end users. However, end users are not going to be fund it themselves, as we have seen over the last 3 years.

This space has been a massive tap for thousands of authors for three years now. It is time to develop it so there can be millions more.

0
0
0.000
avatar

In general there are or at least will be other entities of value within the steem community, just a matter of time and taking part and patience.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is the hope and once there is enough collecting users through hundreds of funnels, there could be a very fast growth in total number.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Distribution is only getting better which is the positive side of all the whales powering down to sell out into the market!

Posted using Partiko iOS

0
0
0.000
avatar

I agree. Selling at this price means selling more than what they would likely sell at a much higher price. This speeds up the flattening of the peaks.

0
0
0.000
avatar

TLDR but my take is the tap has been split into like a million different faucets (scot tokens) and some of those faucets are more open than others...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Indeed, and that means there are many opportunities for people to participate. What people are yet to realize it seems is that many of the larger accounts on Steem, don't do that much on the tribes nd that will continue with SMTs. While the "whales" (there are only a handful) "control Steem" (all stakeholders), the creators can have free reign of a much more dynamic space and still buy-in/work for ownership.

0
0
0.000