Instagram - The Cash Grab ContinuessteemCreated with Sketch.

in social-media •  4 months ago 

Hey Jessinstagramers

Instagram with its now billion user base with almost 50% of them being daily active users is kind of a big deal to normies. The feeling of adding more Satoshi's into your wallet to Bitcoiners is the same feeling these guys and girls get when they get more likes and follows.

While Bitcoiners will be getting a digital asset they truly own and can freely spend Instagrammers have a custodial service they provide content towards to tap into the audience on the network.

As they grow their audience and engagement they can then sell this on to brands. These are known as influencers and they are these superuser middlemen. In the current system, people would build up large followings and then charge brands to tap into them. Brands would pay for sponsored posts and these influencers would be paid on the content they create/engagement/sales they generate from there service.

Image source: -

Superusers were always being used

Or rather, influencers were being influenced.

Influencer marketing became a billion-dollar industry and Instagram saw none of those ad dollars. Which they accepted in the beginning because these users encourage engagement, user retention and act as ambassadors for the platform. However now that these people have locked themselves to the platform and built up these followings, Instagram can now milk them for all its worth.

Instagram is now larger than any 1000s of influencers defecting would matter, someone else would only take their place and now that they've reached this level its time to beat this pony for pennies.

No metrics no money

Instagram removing its primary metric of success on the platform may seem counter-intuitive but from a money perspective, it makes a lot of sense. Removing likes means brands cannot measure the penetration of their sponsor.

Yes, they can measure views and comments but what likes gives is a sort of engagement metric that was used to pay these influencers. The removal of this metric means brands will be less likely to approach these influencers and instead opt for paying Instagram directly for ads.

Paid profiles

I'm not sure if this is on the cards but since Instagram has become a business for many people it would make sense for them to eventually release pro-profiles where these people pay a fee lets to say $10 per month and their metrics would be shown publically. This sort of weeds out serious influencers from the wannabes and allows those guys and girls to still get brand deals.

It also brings in an additional steady income for Instagram, which I'm sure they're thinking about.

Custodial sites mean you're a hostage

Since Instagram is the host of your data and the UX you are at the mercy of any changes they make and all you are is another cog in the wheel. I don't think this will chase any of the normies away they will suck it up and accept whatever these sites do and never defect.

But it is a lesson to some of us wanting something more and pushing towards a web 3.0. If this were a blockchain project you could simply switch to an interface that serves your data the way you want.

While I care very little about Instagram, I think this move is also a sign of the times and it shows that these sites have lost their social aspect.

Let's connect

If you liked this post sprinkle it with an upvote or resteem and if you don't already, consider following me @chekohler
follow me

Buy & sell STEEMDonate LikeCoin For FreeEarn Interest On Crypto
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I was about to say you rocking that Leo stuffs then I see no Leo stuffs tag. You renegade you. :) Nice breakdown, you can expect my doctors bill for the stroke I got from reading the word influencer so much.

Do you have a moment to talk about the GOAT of influencers?

Lol Influencer and Influenza are pretty much the same things, except one of them you can medicate

Very well said. I hadn’t thought of this yet, but it makes total sense.

Get big enough, get everyone hooked and then start milking them for everything they are worth. That's the monopoly business model, just has a new face and name each time

True, they bought it for 1 billion. They are expecting a big return on that investment.

Indeed and since they've monetised it it has been a big money-spinner for them. I won't be surprised if in the next 3 years it will be a bigger income generator than Facebook in their overall income stream

Hi, @chekohler!

You just got a 4.86% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.

Hi @chekohler!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 4.191 which ranks you at #3200 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 83 contributions, your post is ranked at #72.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • Some people are already following you, keep going!
  • Try to show your post to more followers, for example via networking on our discord!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server