The Upvote Economy: Changing The Face Of Information

avatar


Source

Tell me if this is ever happened to you:

You are researching a particular subject, going along and reading a website. The information is helpful and you are making progress. Suddenly, you click on a link and get the pitch. To access this information, it is going to cost you $49.99 to get the special report.

This is a common tactic in the world of information selling. Use the free teaser to get someone baited in before hitting them with the page where they are to pull out the ole credit card. Even the mainstream information services do this such as newspapers. They offer the subscription model which allows access to "member content".

Obviously, the goal here is for these entities to make money. The challenge with this is that it limits access to only those who can afford it. While it might only be a couple dollars a month, not a big deal in the United States, this is difficult in many third world nations.

This could all change with the upvote economy. We are looking at another step in the demonetizing of information. Making it widely available to everyone is vital.

Steem is a platform that can assist in this effort. Since there is a currency that is tied to every vote on here, anyone can reward a content creator. The amounts differ based upon stake yet this is only at the base level. We are already seeing layer 2 solutions change this landscape.

The upvote economy is a radical departure from what we presently experience. Under the present system, if I want something that you have for sale, to access the information, I must take money out of my wallet and send it to you. Hence, for you to gain, I have to experience a financial credit. Thus, my account goes down while yours goes up. Obviously, I will do this if I feel what I am getting in return, the information, outweighs the amount of money I am sending to you.

However, we are starting to see a better way.

In the upvote economy, I can fund the "payment" via an upvote. Under this scenario, I am not suffering a financial "loss" since my account is not lessened. You, as the content producer, are receiving compensation for the information which will be added to your account.

While this is not an exact swap in financial terms, at this point, as we see things evolving, this could be a model that is followed. We are still in the phase where a cryptocurrency is still price in fiat since that is what we have to remit payments in. Hence, a 1 SP payout is looked at as roughly 40 cents. This will not always be the case. As crypto-economic systems develop. the tie to fiat will be reduced. This brings an attractiveness to operating in tokens as opposed to fiat.

We also have the prospect of providing a lot more information to the world. YouTube was a wonderful platform in that it allowed content creators to post all kinds of videos. The DIY crowd found this to be a gold mine. Want to learn how to change out a faucet on your sink, look it up on YouTube, there will be a video about it. The price of information dropped dramatically.

Technological breakthroughs put deflationary pressure on existing systems. We saw this with the Internet and will see it again with blockchain. The price reduction of many things is already being documented. Over the next 5 years, this will only evolve further.

Information is something that still has a cost to it. As we see AI get simpler and more affordable, the creation of information is going to explode. This will help to drive down the cost of it.

That said, there still needs to be some incentive. Cryptocurrency can prove to be that incentive. Upvoting content shows an appreciation for what was created. This can evolve into a form of "purchase". As we discuss the idea of communities, one's entry into the "member" section could simply be a result of supporting said "tribe".

Perhaps, at the end of the day, there is nothing more valuable than one's attention. And for that, instead of charging people for the information, i.e. them paying to hand over their attention, we are going to see a model where people are paid for it.

This, I believe, is going to be the new world of information. The purveyors of it are going to have to alter their models or get left behind.

We are embarking upon a major paradigm shift that few are aware of.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and resteem.

image.png

image.png



0
0
0.000
12 comments
avatar

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

0
0
0.000
avatar
In the upvote economy, I can fund the "payment" via an upvote. Under this scenario, I am not suffering a financial "loss" since my account is not lessened. You, as the content producer, are receiving compensation for the information which will be added to your account.

There is an opportunity cost. By upvoting something, you allocate part of the ongoing inflation to it. Said inflation debases all existing units of the currency.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Inflation is in every currency though. Even bitcoin. The only difference is we know what the inflation will be (assuming the devs don't hard fork it at some point - which is a big assumption tbh).

0
0
0.000
avatar

Interesting position.

  • Popular information is not always accurate

  • Time limiting the value of receiving votes runs contrary to the concept of providing value through votes (as in, there's LESS motivation to make a tutorial that might hold value for years when the value of upvotes is only good for days)

  • A dancing monkey might garner some attention, but has little to offer in terms of value, the argument could be made that attention paid to the distraction detracts from the value of that attention.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Perhaps, at the end of the day, there is nothing more valuable than one's attention. And for that, instead of charging people for the information, i.e. them paying to hand over their attention, we are going to see a model where people are paid for it.

I completely agree. With so much information now being accessible in the age of data, attention is the most valuable resource.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you so much for participating in the Partiko Delegation Plan Round 1! We really appreciate your support! As part of the delegation benefits, we just gave you a 3.00% upvote! Together, let’s change the world!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I do see your point and for the bulk of information this might indeed happen. However, good quality information is rare in the pay per click economy and I'm afraid the same is true for the upvote economy. So I think there will be a market for exceptional information for a good price. It does however need to be significantly better than normal information.

In the end people are willing to spend money on saving time, less effort, privileges, status, luxury and insurance.

Posted using Partiko iOS

0
0
0.000
avatar

As crypto-economic systems develop. the tie to fiat will be reduced. This brings an attractiveness to operating in tokens as opposed to fiat.

Yes this is happening. It’s a bifurcation of the online (cryptocurrency-based) economy and the offline (fiat-based) economy. And the interface between the two will become less and less necessary as people are able to create/receive/procure cryptocurrency and spend it online (and even offline).

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hi @taskmaster4450!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.477 which ranks you at #182 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 168 contributions, your post is ranked at #4.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You've built up a nice network.
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Great user engagement! You rock!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

0
0
0.000