Photography - RAW Exposure

in #palnet2 years ago

I hadn't done any photography for a while, but the other day the sunset looked like it was going to pan out, so I headed out with camera and tripod. For some reason I had previously set my camera for JPG only capture, but I didn't realise this at this time. The resulting image and image capturing process provides a good example of the importance of RAW capture in landscape photography. To be clear, you can do perfectly fine with JPG only capture, but it's important to expose appropriately for each image format.

DSCF004512.jpg

As you can see, I have over-exposed the highlights in the brightest part of the sunset, and consequently lost all detail in that area. And there was a lot of cloud detail in the scene.

Where I went wrong was that I was exposing for RAW capture, but instead captured in JPG format. The reason I "overexposed" the image was because RAW capture gives you some 'headroom' at the highlights end, which enables you to bring back some clipped highlights. I was exposing the scene with the knowledge that I could recover the blown highlights in post processing. Unfortunately, as I've mention, I captured this in JPG - a format that is 'baked in' at the time of image capture. Once those highlights were clipped in JPG, there is no getting them back.

The following image was one I capture on Christmas Island to document the karst landscape there. This is a great example of exposing for RAW (i.e. an apparent overexposure) and bringing back the clipped highlights in post production. If the first image was captured as JPG, I would have been unable to rescue the clipped highlights. But as it was captured in RAW I was able to finish up with a correctly exposed image after correcting in post-production.

RAW capture:
IMG_31601.jpg

Post-processed image with 'rescued' highlights:
IMG_316012.jpg

As you can see, after 'rescuing' the highlights, a whole lot of detail in the sky in the right of the image has been revealed.

Why not just expose without clipping the highlights? Well, the benefit of shooting in RAW and 'overexposing', and bringing back the highlights, is that you also overexpose the shadows, which leads to more detail being visible in the shadows. Due to the nature of image sensors, this also means less noise in the shadows.

It's well worth learning to shoot and expose in RAW, particularly if you want to get the most out of your image sensor.

By the way, this is my first post using palnet tag to see what the fuss is all about.. :)

Sort:  

Hi @revo!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 3.938 which ranks you at #3787 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has improved 2 places in the last three days (old rank 3789).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 178 contributions, your post is ranked at #162.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You're on the right track, try to gather more followers.
  • The readers like your work!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server