Court Agrees Law Enforcement Agencies Can Alert Prosecutors To Police Misconduct

in palnet •  10 months ago 

In a move to promote further access to information relating to police misconduct, the California Supreme Court recently decided that the LA County Sheriff's Dep, and other law enforcement agencies, have the authority to alert prosecutors that a deputy who might be testifying in court, has a past history of misconduct.

The public have a right to know what officers are up to and it helps to hold police departments accountable when there is more transparency regarding this information.

Various lawsuits have been launched in the past because the police have sought to keep certain records secret from the public, pertaining to various investigations of police misconduct. As well, lawsuits have also been filed by police unions to prevent individuals from turning over information to the DA for example, that might list a variety of officers who have a history of misconduct.

The testimony of an officer holds a lot of weight in court and it's important for the court to know who they are dealing with. This includes knowing the sort of history that the individual might have because that history might be one of perpetual lies, that would effectively obstruct justice rather than help to pursue it.

One previous survey from 2015 asked Americans if they agreed with the statement that most officers lie to serve their own interests, 30.9 percent said that they agreed with the statement, while 43.8 percent disagreed, and 25.2 percent were unsure. There are still millions of people who have confidence in the trustworthiness of this group. However, other investigations have found that younger individuals today are much less likely than adults to have confidence in business leaders, police officers, and religious leaders.

Surprisingly, even police officers themselves will admit and agree that bad actors aren't held accountable.

Still, many officers on the streets see themselves not as enforcers but protectors of the public. Unfortunately though, many of them as per their job description will violate natural rights and initiate violence against peaceful people over unjust laws, in those circumstances they aren't protecting anyone but those rulers in power who unjustly continue to seek to suppress their liberty. Those officers who have respect for their profession and who truly want to contribute to the safety of the public, should be eager to purge bad actors from the group as they pose a risk in a variety of ways. Seeking to be open and transparent about their wrongdoing is how you build trust; not by hiding away from and avoiding it.

Despite the recent ruling from the California Supreme Court however, it's alleged that law enforcement agencies still won't be required to keep lists of those officers who they might be having perpetual problems with. There is a great deal of record keeping over this matter that needs to be vastly improved and thankfully there are some who've challenged themselves already with trying to meet that goal.


Related Posts:

Former Officer Turned Criminologist Dedicates His Life To Catching Dirty Cops

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

A lot of agencies who are supposed to enforce laws have failed drastically in these functions and it is even worse in some parts of the country.