RE: The New Normal Isn't Normal and Never Will Be
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Its time to unseat the so called experts who only seem to really excel at our pain for their profit. Saw this video earlier today and maybe you could do a post on it as you have a good reach here. Lots of credible science is cited in the anti Covid vaccination (and the industry as a whole) that those pushing it can't deny if you bring it up.
0
0
0.000
I've seen this video making the rounds, but haven't found time to give it a go yet. Would you recommend it?
I think I read some quote of douche-witz lately where he said people do not have the right to refuse a vaccine - or something to that effect. In the past, Dershowitz has portrayed himself as a champion of free-speech and individual rights in many cases, so it's hard to imagine how he can reconcile these seemingly differing positions.
I don't think Dershowitz is necessarily advocating for the things that are being proposed and floated as possible public policy, on a personal level. In context, it's more about what he believes the supreme would rule (in favour of mandatory vaccinations) if it was passed by the state as formal legislation and taken to court.
I guess many people will interpret what he is debating in different ways, depending on their own positions.
Is he just being a Douche-o-witz government programmer, or just a making a case based on the constitution - which he says is based on past precedence?
That's the real question we have to ask ourselves I guess;)
I have to hope he is wrong, but he is considered one of the pre-eminent Constitutional scholars in the world.
I find alarming the lack of mention of legal consequences to captive agencies and their corruptocrats as well as USG mandates to be vaccinated with the vile poisons they allow to be sold without manufacturer liability to people today - that making current Covid19 vaccines mandatory sentences tens of millions of Americans to debilitating side effects, and an unknown number of deaths.
Just as Kennedy advocated reading the science papers personally, and not just taking his word on it, you can do the same for Dershowitz by reading the case law. Notably, the smallpox case mentioned did not force the loser to be vaccinated, but merely pay a fine, and that is a huge difference from being forced to submit to having your DNA modified by Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci.
So, relevant case law would involve the draft, as he mentioned, and that is chilling indeed. However being drafted did not alter your DNA, your natural born self, merely putting your life at risk. At least you still died a human being if you died from being drafted.
That is not certain with DNA vaccines.
Yes, I certainly agree with you on all points. I would never advocate for the positions being debated by Deshorwitz...
Reading the actual source material and information yourself, is always a position I take personally over anybody's mere words.
Trying to be fair to Dershowitz, I note he states that his professional assessment of the SCOTUS is different from his personal feelings on the issue of mandatory vaccination.
I'm not certain that's true, but it's what he says.
I agree. As always it will come down to the interpretation of each individual. Whether he is being honest about that, is a different matter altogether.
The one thing I give him credit for, is that at least he was willing to have the discussion with Kennedy. That can only be seen as a positive.
I strongly recommend it.
After the debate, Dershowitz conceded that any mandatory vaccine would necessarily have to be safe and effective.
Frankly, given the corruption and agency capture detailed by Kennedy in this video, it is absolutely impossible any vaccine today, and much less the Covid19 vaccines being rammed through without adequate testing, could meet those standards.
Moderna's vaccine, which there are now millions of doses ordered by the USG, has a 20% major side effect rate. IIRC, Kennedy pointed out that 20% of test subjects had to be hospitalized. I am confident that these vaccines are far more deadly than SARS2. It doesn't have a 20% hospitalization rate. It has a 50% rate of people that didn't even know they had it.
You'll be grateful to Kennedy after watching it, and I am also grateful to @practicalthought for touting it.
Yes, it is possibly the best video I've ever seen on vaccination. I always here the derogatory term anti-vaxxer associated with the line of reasoning that anti folks are idiots who don't understand or approve of science. Kennedy shares so much science there is no room left on the table for those claiming to use science against those not for vaccinations. To be for vaccinations in their current role is to be anti science.
Dershowitz is arguing we don't have the right not to be mandated being vaccinated. After the case he cited was shredded by Kennedy, he changed a little to say that we wouldn't be allowed in public for any reason without being vaccinated. The current vaccination they have in mind for us is only using the healthiest of people as specimens, including their family medical histories. Of those being given a full dose, there is a 20% hospitalization rate. He also cited that for all vaccinations (since they no longer have any legal liability preventing them from being sued for discovery on what they know as well) they only watch for adverse affects for 3-5 days or so. I can't convey the deep research Kennedy gives in this video, which is why I think it should be shared. I don't do Threespeak or have a Youtube account so trying to find someone who will upload it to Threespeak now and discuss this in their own post.
Thank you for asking about it, and please do watch it. I don't download many videos, and this one was obvious very quickly I needed to preserve it as it fits exactly with what they are scrubbing. Even Google is in on it. Their latest round of tweaks for website owners penalizes anyone discussing medical/health.
https://selfhack.com/blog/google-censorship-of-health-websites-is-taken-to-the-next-level/
This next link is using the premier traffic tool used by website/blogging pros.
https://selfhack.com/blog/health-websites-that-have-been-crushed-by-googles-censorship-and-those-crushing-it/
There are many more links discussing Googles censorship, but that last one really focuses on it. I saw somewhere but don't want to look to hard right now that their latest update in May hurt those sites even more.
Well then I'll have to give it a watch asap. I have heard Kennedy talk on the corruption of the CDC years ago and it was very eye opening. Thanks for breaking it down for me though, much appreciated.
I finally watched the debate and it's excellent. Thank you.
Kennedy knows this topic like the back of his hand and makes a compelling argument, and also in a very respectful and tactful manner.
I certainly remember that the CDC owns numerous vaccine patents - which is insane - but I had almost forgotten about one the 1986 law exempting vaccine manufacturers from liable - this is unconscionable. Something few are aware of but that is a critical factor in these debates.
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986
https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546
Like Kennedy, I'm not anti-vaccine but this is incredibly corrupt and the fact that the manufacturers have complete immunity for any injuries/complications/adverse side effects is completely unethical and criminal. The process of testing and trials of any vaccine needs to be scientifically rigorous, open and transparent.
I hope someone has uploaded the video to 3speak.
I think it's fair to assume there is much fire due to the smoke with vaccines since their shield of immunity. The explosion in new vaccines foisted on the public since its inception strongly suggests they exploit the immunity loophole for maximum profits. As you mention, the fact that the agency relegated to overseeing our protection is an extension of those who it's supposed to protect us from is frightening. Coupled with the fact that their own papers state they only record for adverse affects for 3-5 days for most of these vaccines doesn't lend itself to garnering my trust. Especially since their immunity protects them from being sued for discovery purposes.
I was able to talk Lucylin into uploading it onto ThreeSpeak.
https://hive.blog/hive-181335/@lucylin/fkzyvjrw
It still hasn't garnered quite the views I was hopeful it would. I'm hoping someone with lots of engagement will open a debate on it here. I've been compiling so much recently on this that one would have to be a shill or one of the most ignorant people I've seen to oppose this information. So much promise with HCQ, and was even touted by the farce profitmonger Fauci in the past. The American Doctors Discuss Covid Video is being scrubbed even, and they even took down their website.
The video is on Bitchute (I downloaded it as well).
https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/doi/10.1093/aje/kwaa093/5847586
Some are saying Quercetin also might be a good alternative to HCQ as it also acts as an Ionophore for Zinc.
https://nutritionalpharmacology.wordpress.com/2020/03/21/combating-covid-19-with-zinc-and-quercetin/
I'm not certain of that, will need to look into it more. But it appears it serves the same function as HCQ in delivering the Zinc to fight off the virus. I notice that many even now are attacking HCQ in comment sections citing the now debunked Lancet article. The quicker folks have the truth on this the quicker those shills can be deflected, their motives called into question.
https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny-lancet-retracts-study-that-said-hydroxychloroquine-was-unsafe-20200604-6wwydfhiungctissbo4exykube-story.html
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine-idUSKBN23B31W
More citations for the effectiveness of HCQ
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/
This is from that American Doctors I mentioned who have been censored.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-gsn_Ye2EYDDkV_79Ag1tgUqZLNCMSt-/view
I still haven't read most of it, as I am finding so much information it is overwhelming. The common theme as I read shows there is a heavy push to force us to either remdevisir, which causes major damage to the liver i believe it said and is patented so cost about 3k each. Of course, if it causes organ damage, future treatments for that as well. Setting up future clients as it were. No worries about impact on life quality or shortened life expectancy. Got to think of the profits. And Kennedy highlighted how abysmal the new vaccine they are working to push on us is going. Here is a clip of Gates being called out on it by the msm surprisingly, and he looks very uncomfortable. I was surprised to see him even agree to do this interview as well as the mainstream media conduct it.
https://twitter.com/LegendaryEnergy/status/1287509508206391296
Gonna wrap this response up as I barely touched the links I've been saving. Suffice it to say the conspiracy to hook us onto expensive, patented cures for illnesses that I suspect they are largely causing is so in our face now only true sheep are insisting all is well and those of us pointing at the many facts are conspiracy loons. The science is against the stance of those supposedly meant to look out for us, and that screams for attention. Can't put this one back in the box.
Thanks for your interest in all of this.
LOL My first inclination was to reblog it - but it's in a comment on my own blog. Can't.
I deeply appreciate this information. I have only just seen it today, but I can feel these facts percolating in my principles and beliefs. I think it will impact every post I make from now on. Fauci and Gates positioning themselves under spigots of public money that blast out $B's when government mandates Covid vaccinations is not only horrifically unprincipled, it's an existential danger to everyone in the fucking world.
Listening to Dershowitz I was struck by the horrible realization that our courts are hopelessly corrupt, and the people like Blackrock that are profiting from all this crap aren't going to let the Supreme Court rule on merits and law.
They're gonna be offered what they cannot refuse.
Thanks!
I understand the initial thought why that would be the case. But I think this case is different. I am not the originator of this knowledge, just sharing it to those of influence who I think have the best chance of getting others to see and know this. I look at it as being an advocate and honoring the work Kennedy has done compiling the much needed research into the evil mechanisms claiming to be looking after a trusting publics best interests.
You have a wide audience here, one who actively engages with you which is rare here. Especially with the material you cover/discuss. I know that there are many who seek out your thoughts on a matter, either to break you or break themselves, or to confirm things they suspected but didn't hold the knowledge you have clothed yourself in.
It's imperative that as many people see this as possible, so if you change your mind on posting this I think it would be noble. Your ability for analyses and presenting from that once you dissect would do much to entice others to watch this video, as well as expose those who come at you to discredit as having an agenda rooted in ignorance.
I have just downloaded the video from 3speak, thanks to your efforts to make that possible, and I intend to share it with folks IRL who have so focused on the Trump koolaid they do not grasp that Gates and Trump are on the same team.
This has caused them to not know the facts Kennedy presents, and it is my hope that they can ascertain those facts without having first to disengage their minds from the Trump machine.
Thanks for your kind words, and thanks again for bringing this video to my attention. I make no promises, but rest assured it has become formative in my thinking on these matters.
Edit: I can't reblog my own post. That's all I meant. I didn't mean I couldn't post the video in a new post.
Unfortunately everything has become so heavily politicised from both sides of politics, that this is now the new norm. No matter how much data and evidence there is out there that Trump is not fighting the "Deep State", or whatever else you'd like to call it, the reality gets lost in all of the insanity. Trump is not at all against Gates, or any other technocratic figurehead. He is merely playing his part to slowly condition the public into accepting the very thing they think he is opposing. His own brand of social engineering with the help of spin doctors and PR firms.
This has been true from the very beginning of his presidency, but many don't want to hear it in all of the heated debate taking place.
I am constantly amazed at the cognitive dissonance right now, from some of his supporters...just like what happened with Barry O.
This is not a left or right issue either, but a handover of the globe to the technocratic class.
Great article btw!
Exactly correct.
Thanks!