Mustang - Part I

in #life2 years ago (edited)

When we were born we experienced some pretty extreme trauma. As our consciousness formed in the womb, it reached a point where our personalities developed. We became who we are, and as our bodies grew we gained more and more grasp of our surroundings. We were floating in darkness, speculating on the nature of existence, impacted by various sensations and perceptions.

The dream time.

Upon birth, we were ejected from that environment, those philosophical musings, and disturbed by a vast array of novel experiences and sensations, of particular import is pain, which heretofore we had probably but limited experience of. Sound was radically different, immediate and shrill. Our skin was a riot of overwhelming and bizarre sensations, cold, and pain, and the touch of others and things besides flesh. The world was unimaginably full of light, before a dim, passing glow, a cacophany of color, intensity, and motion.

We didn't know how to interpret it, but our bodies were ready to take us on that journey, and we undertook the process and coping with the PTSD of the experience. Our bodies quit screaming, the instinctive alerting our mothers to save and protect us, which we found to be a process and undertaking we were eager to support and participate in. We calmed down, and our prior navel gazing was thereafter largely supplanted with looking out at the new world we were in and seeking to understand it.

Who were our mother's, father's, siblings, nan's and pawpaw's. How we were swaddled or not. Was the carpet plush or the floors slick and cool. What were windows and doors. And the tit. Most important to a newborn is the tit and the nappy. So we undertook the commencement of human life and consciousness, and the enormity of the tasks before us of becoming pillars of the community and raising the tent of society that protects us all from the rain of barbarism.


IMG source - BeautiesandBabies

We form a basis for understanding many of these things. The scientific method rules our lives as we test theories and consider experimental results. A baby is a full time scientist, diligently focused at all times on understanding the world. Not that we don't have fun, or aren't directed in doing so by integrated mechanisms or external forces. However, it's test, test, test, and interpret the results most of our conscious effort is spent on.

Today, most of us pass through this phase to become happy toddlers, and that's the demographic I am going to address. The dying and broken are no less people, and no less undertaking the same process, but they do not become able to undertake society in a formative way, and since that's my goal in this series of essays, they aren't relevant to my purpose. It is noteworthy that many that do become those pillars of the community get there broken, and but few aren't deprived of capacity to be supportive to some degree or another, whether intellectually or physically.

Almost none, in fact. Humanity isn't something that can be achieved perfectly. It's an amorphous goal, probably different in every mind that considers it. Degree of functionality is therefore highly subjective and indeterminate objectively. There is no consensus. Nonetheless, significant commonalities between us enable sweeping categorizations to be made, and various mental and physical incapacities of things that are necessary to peak humanity are recognizable by a broad consensus of the competent.

These are the topic of my essays here.

Sometime during infancy, generally quite early, only days in at most, something approaching half of infants are circumsized. Few published studies of the intellectual and emotional impact of circumcision have been undertaken, and those were been have been suppressed. This is a tell.

The excruciating torture committed by doctors and others slicing off foreskins is not without import to babies. Heretofore stimuli negatively impacting their emotional states has been acted on instinctively to summon caregiving that tends to mitigate such perceptions. This isn't gonna happen in circumcision, that is the crying for help will be undertaken, but there is no surcease for the pain.


IMG source - /pol/

I'm not going to discuss circumcision's effects beyond this here. We can discuss whatever you want in the comments. The real question is why many people are convinced to torture their newborns in this way. I note it requires a significant lapse of empathy and parental focus on caregiving, and a plethora of influence on the thought processes of people in general, who are the pool from which parents are drawn.

As we are socialized and mature Western civilization inflicts a great deal of unnatural influence on us, particularly through the mechanisms availed to our parents, who themselves are the products of their society. Western civilization is a strange and potent culture amongst the examples that have eventuated throughout human existence, and it strongly emphasizes socialization in order to empower overlords, which have been able to use it to overpower other cultures to unprecedented degree.

These mechanisms have put a premium on indoctrination and propaganda in the West to a degree both amazing and alarming, as well as revelatory of the malleability of human society. It is notable that many extant cultures, presumably the most resilient of all that have arisen due to their current persistence, feature similar tortuous ritual passages, from the scarification and piercings undertaken by many primitive tribes, vision quests and gauntlets, to public schools and other Western institutional practices.

Perhaps it is highly beneficial to societies to impact their children in ways that reduce the capacity of adults to be rational and reckon well the import of their cultural practices, sometimes referred to in statements of elders to the effect of 'It was good enough for my ancestors...'

Strong societies are generally beneficial to individuals in them, but this does not void their costs, and it is undeniable that all such societies do harm to their members.

Here ends Part I


@MediKatie and I decided to break the tradition with our new son. There are pros and cons to everything, but when considered rationally, the cons outweigh the pros by so much, the decision should be obvious in almost all cases. I don't like asking the state to get involved in stuff like this, but no, I'm not in favour of any mutilation of babies, and that's what it is. Mutilation... often for religious or other nonsensical reasons. We need to stop normalizing this abuse.

I also did not inflict genital mutilation on my sons. It was an easy decision. All I had to do was ask myself the question "Should I mutilate the genitals of my sons?"

There was only one answer.


Why people do it?
They think it's more "clean" usually, so likely out of fear that they wouldn't clean and it would get infected etc.
Then there's the people who do it for Aesthetics, either way I agree, it's inhumane and mutilation. Full Disclosure I'm not cut!

Curated for #informationwar (by @thoughts-in-time)

Our purpose on steem is to encourage posts discussing information war, propaganda, disinformation, and liberty. We are a peaceful group of truth-oriented individuals. The topics we write about are those that the controlled social and mainstream media actively suppress. You can learn more about our mission, various websites, and community benefits by clicking here!

Ways you can help the @informationwar!

Nice one, almost like you remember being born.
Reminded me of the the Fallout 3 birth scene.

I am not very smart, but I am very persistent. When something leaves me curious it rolls around in the back of my mind forever. These aren't memories, but the result of long consideration of the matter.

I haven't played Fallout 3, so thanks for the link. It's an interestingly natural character development mechanism. I was nowhere near so composed when my sons were born LOL. I think I waved and said 'Howdy' to my first.

I remember his pupils were completely the width of his eyes, dark as caverns reaching deep into his head.


Growing up in the UK, I was under the impression that circumcision was relatively rare (I don't think it's common there [a quick search puts it at around 15% of males in 2000]). It was less than a year ago that I heard from a woman here in Australia, that there is actually a stigma against uncircumcised males here, as it's consider cleaner to be circumcised. The conversation came up, because I was expressing my surprise over an article I'd read which said most male babies are mutilated by circumcision shortly after birth in the US.

It's amazing that one can go for decades without even hearing about this, because it's seen as so normal that there appears to be no reason to discuss the ethics of it. Only now are we hearing more about it, because people are questioning it.

As an American I am alarmed at the prevalence of circumcision in the USA, but almost more at the mechanism that perpetuates the practice. There is almost no discussion of it. There's no pro-circumcision ads on TV, lobbies in Congress, or NGOs promoting it on a massive scale. It's suggested by a sort of gestalt that includes it amongst things Americans absorb about their culture and themselves from TV.

That's their culture. It's unquestionable, so circumcision is unquestionable for them as are indoctrinated with their beliefs instead of deciding what is true. Unquestioned beliefs are always false IME.


Do they ask you at the hospital about it? Is the assumption there that you'll want to get it done?

My sister had a boy and the subject wasn't even broached for her. I guess my assumption in England was that only Jewish did circumcision. I wonder how it reached the point where it became the cultural norm in Australia and the US. Having said that, occurrence does seem to be dropping rapidly in Australia.

Posted using Partiko Android

It came up, but we had arranged for a home birth with a midwife, a doctor consulting as needed. In the event, we had an emergency c-section, but the doctor presiding was informed as to our decision. Fortunately there was no further pressure brought to bear on us.

It is an enormously profitable business, with foreskins selling for a great deal of money to cosmetics companies, biomedical research, and other markets. We paid our doctor cash, so perhaps that was enough to permit us to deprive them of the additional income someone derives from circumcisions. I dunno if the doctors or the institutions they work in get the lion's share of that money, but someone has a financial incentive to circumcize baby boys in the USA.

 2 years ago Reveal Comment