Capitalism Is War

avatar

If you've read my post about the Perpetual War, or if you are even remotely interested in the politics and economics that shape the modern-day human condition, you're aware of the fact that war is a feature, and not a bug, of the capitalism paradigm.


trade_war_small.jpg
Image by mohamed hassan - source: PxHere

A general whose name I can't recall, once said that war is the continuation, on another level and with different means, of politics. And since there is no real divide between the economy and government, one might say that in in our time that means continuation of the politics of preservation and growth of capital; economy is war by other means, war is politics by other means. The drive to war is not accidental, nor is it, as many would have you believe, the natural state of human existence or cultural evolution, but instead it is inherent in the logic of capitalism. We have largely dismissed this notion because how could our water be polluted in this way? Nah, that's ridiculous... We sought to put an end to war by trying to convince the ruling classes to behave differently, more peacefully, and to this end we've managed to sign a slew of international agreements in which our leaders all swear to do everything possible to avoid large scale armed conflicts. After all, how could war, with its large scale destruction of property and life, be in the interest of the free market economy?

Marx saw capitalism for what is was and is, and he once wrote: "The leading ideas of any age, are the ideas in the leaders of that age." He alse knew that those leaders were, and still are, the capitalists, the owner class that has control over the four main factors of the capitalist mode of production: entrepreneurship, capital goods, natural resources, and labor. "Entrepreneurship" is a more romantic way of expressing capitalism's central characteristic of capital accumulation; successful capitalists start as entrepreneurs, but with the ultimate goal of accumulating more capital, a profit, growth. Bezos and Gates are entrepreneurs no more, and many in their class never even started as one. At its heart, capitalism incentivizes competition and self-interest. We so often have heard a version of the story of the noble entrepreneurial baker, who bakes and sells bread to accumulate enough capital to increase the living standard and happiness of himself and his loved ones, but provides a great service to the larger community by providing that bread. In this ideology, selfishness, being greedy even, is seen as a good thing, a positive trait. We believe this to be true, as expressed throughout popular culture; the "greed is good" speech in Oliver Stone's "Wall Street", the hilarious "show me the money" scene in "Jerry Maguire", and even the Whitney Houston song "The Greatest Love Of All" that says that love for one's self is the greatest love of all, are but a few cultural symptoms to attest to that fact. The leading idea of our age that the individual, individual rights, individual property and individual freedom trumps anything that's common or shared, is the idea that's in heads of the leaders of our age.


Jerry Maguire Show Me The Money!

"The sheer scale of production in the industrialising nations could no longer be contained within the geographical boundaries of the state and had to reach out beyond those limits. The interests of these large firms are increasingly merged with the state — and it backs them up politically and militarily in the name of the national interest. It builds up armies and weapons, invades countries where necessary to grab resources or to safeguard trade routes and markets, establishes spheres of influence and alliances — and it will go to war against other powers to defend any of these things."
source: Socialist Review

Capitalism is war, on all scales, and the competition at its heart inevitably leads to the elimination of the losers in that game, and the losers' capital to be added to that of the winners. Competition and elimination in an everlasting quest for growth; that's basically what capitalism is. The noble baker isn't so noble anymore when another baker encroaches on his segment of the marketplace; from that moment on, it's a fight to the end. Competition on small scales leads to trade wars, and eventually real wars on larger scales. When the bakery, through the "natural" process of elimination and incorporation, has grown to become "International Foods Incorporated", the intimate marriage between politics and the economy is expressed more openly, to the point that it's now obvious to anyone that government rules at the behest of the nation's largest industries and financial institutes. Some tend to forget that the bakery, when it just became the largest bakery in town, years ago, it already had great sway over the town's local government; politics is just the face put on the power relationship, the power imbalance between the capitalist class and the rest of us. It's only to be expected that we see international diplomacy and international treaties as the alternative to armed conflict, and diplomacy is certainly to be preferred over war. And it is true, as I've said myself so many times, that people never get into war over silly ideas like religion or socioeconomic ideologies, but that war is always our leaders fighting each other over something they think should be theirs; land, resources, cheap labor or to safeguard trade-routes. But in the end it's just capitalist competition and growth that on large scales translate into imperialist wars of expansion. Not in the last place the expansion of the idea that capitalism is good, the idea that's in our warring leaders' heads...

To close, here's an optimistic message, despite the title, about how we could evolve toward a post-capitalist society, a "system that will emerge if we suppress monopolies, and let prices of information and things fall, and if we radically de-link work from wages, and if we then nurture that part of the economy where free, shared and socially produced things are replacing money and market forces."


Capitalism is failing, and it's time to panic – Paul Mason


Thanks so much for visiting my blog and reading my posts dear reader, I appreciate that a lot :-) If you like my content, please consider leaving a comment, upvote or resteem. I'll be back here tomorrow and sincerely hope you'll join me. Until then, keep steeming!


wave-13 divider odrau steem

Recent articles you might be interested in:

Latest article >>>>>>>>>>>COOL USA
Perpetual WarWar On Film
When Democracy Dies...Redistributing Wealth
The FuturistsThe Twenty-second Amendment

wave-13 divider odrau steem

Thanks for stopping by and reading. If you really liked this content, if you disagree (or if you do agree), please leave a comment. Of course, upvotes, follows, resteems are all greatly appreciated, but nothing brings me and you more growth than sharing our ideas. It's what Steemit is made for!
Helpienaut_post_banner_02-01.png

I am a proud helpinaut! @Helpie is looking for new members! Helpie has been growing nicely and we are always on the lookout for new valuable members. We are very supportive and community oriented. If you would like to be scouted for @helpie , please drop a comment on THIS POST or contact @paintingangels on discord at paintingangels(serena)#3668.

wave-13 divider odrau steem

Just for Full Disclosure, I'm invested in these crypto-currencies:

Bitcoin | Litecoin | EOS | OmiseGo | FunFair | KIN | Pillar | DENT | Polymath | XDCE | 0x | Decred | Ethereum | Carmel | XYO

wave-13 divider odrau steem

@helpie is a WITNESS now! So please help @helpie help you by voting for us here!Helpie_01.png



0
0
0.000
20 comments
avatar

First the general you are referring to is Clausewitz. Not sure if they were a general but they none the less coined the phrase. And second I downvoted because I don't like the insinuation of your post. Your ability to speak and write is a direct result of capitalism. And once you've gotten your spoils you attack it with gusto in order to keep your place in it. In the guise of being the speaker against it.

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

Your ability to speak and write is a direct result of capitalism.

First, it's been a while since I read something this laughable... And second, I upvoted because this put a smile on my face 😉

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm pretty sure the Russians and the Chinese can "speak and write" as well...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @zyx066! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You published a post every day of the week

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
0
0
0.000
avatar

Hi @zyx066!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 3.896 which ranks you at #4553 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 98 contributions, your post is ranked at #48.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You're on the right track, try to gather more followers.
  • The readers like your work!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

0
0
0.000
avatar

At its heart, capitalism incentivizes competition and self-interest.

More like, anti-competitive, monopoly-seeking (rent-seeking).

Mobster-Ethics.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Could we start at "surpressing" the monopoly of all monopolies, the monopoly on violence?

Are you willing to give up the violence you use, to make your neighbours obey your will?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Without a government, how do you propose protecting yourself from your violent neighbors?

Are you nostalgic for the wild west?

0
0
0.000
avatar

The government IS my violent neighbors. If I don't let myself being extorted or oppressed by those neighbors what do you think will happen? They will send neighbors with guns to make me bow and obey them, that's what I call Wild West.

What do you think my neighbors will say if I defend myself against a thief or attacker from the street?
What do you think my neighbors will say if I defend myself against a thief or attacker from government?

0
0
0.000
avatar

So, you ARE nostalgic for the wild west.

You'd rather fend for yourself.

0
0
0.000
avatar

One could organize defense. (organizing defense is not what government is)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Please explain.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

If you organize for defense, you don't have rights that other people don't have. You don't have the right to rob people and put them in a cage if they don't want you to "defend" them. Governments are seen (by people believing in the most dangerous superstition as having the right to do what the mafia protection agency does. If a protection agency or you protecting yourself andyou family or neighborhood would do the things government does it or you would be (correctly) seen as a crook and a criminal

edit I saw just jet that in another post we already talked about this ;) I had forgotten that post. Peace.

0
0
0.000
avatar

If you organize for defense, you don't have rights that other people don't have.

If you don't have rights that other people don't have, is that the same as saying you DO you have rights that other people DO have?

If you believe that individuals and or families should not be coerced (for-the-greater-good), what mechanism do you believe should protect individuals and or families from "mafia protection agencies"?

It seems that some referee or ombudsman is required, otherwise, any group of individuals and or families can quite easily overpower any non-affiliated individual and or family with impunity.

0
0
0.000
avatar

If you don't have rights that other people don't have, is that the same as saying you DO you have rights that other people DO have?

Yes and no. I do have the right to do the things that don't harm other people.

If other people think they DO have the right to steal from me extort me, aggress against me, defraud me, rape torture or murder me. in short, force me to do something without my consent. Then I do not believe I have the right to go and do the same thing (I can not force someone else to do something without his consent)
I have the right to defend myself against an aggressor just like everyone else would have the right to defend themselves against me if I would aggress against them. Most people know this and live their lives that way except they make an exception for the mafia called the state.

I don't know how to protect yourself against the statemafia/mafia, because most people are still believers. If I would defend myself against other mafia noone would think I'm a criminal.

People could hire (and fire) a referee or ombudsman directly, if the person was corrupt you could stop paying, which you can't do with the state.

A group of people could indeed overpower you in fact statism is exactly that. A group of people that are seen as having the right to overpower you, if you don't obey their opinion or pay them.

What mechanism should protect me my family and friends (individuals and or families) the mechanism of self defense first and foremost, neighbor hood watches, protection agencies. I'm not gonna decide how you and the people you love are gonna have to protect themselves and who they must pay or be locked up. I would be an aggressor.

There are people who thought about solution and people who have other solutions that they put in practice. But that does not mean you or I must must do that. We need to think for ourselves first not expecting others to solve our problems

some ideas

https://www.bitchute.com/video/SDV38d7R64FF/
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1647CADF96760B37

self ownership and the NAP (non aggression principle) need to more understood for a move in the right direction.
But you can not make it into a law and force people that would be the opposite of self ownership and the NAP. lol

Thanks for the reply ....peace.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ok, I can see the appeal of "free-market-conflict-resolution", however, each "conflict-resolution-organization" (CRO) would also need an enforcement arm. For example, if party A subscribes to CRO#1 and party B subscribes to CRO#2 and they can't agree on which CRO should handle the case, each insisting that their personally subscribed CRO arbitrate their disagreement, then CRO#1 and or CRO#2 must resolve their conflicting conclusions, either by FORCE, or by mutually agreeing to another CRO#3 in order to resolve the dispute resolution between dispute resolvers (CRO#1 and CRO#2).

Ultimately a hierarchy of CROs would emerge, and perhaps some balance of power might exist between two or three CROs for some period of time, but eventually a single CRO would either coerce or FORCE the others into de facto submission, thus becoming the Supreme CRO, The Supreme Court so-to-speak, or, The Ultimate Arbiter Of The Law (TUAOTL).

A system like this already exists. Two parties can agree to an "out-of-court-settlement" by agreeing to a mutual arbitrator. A law firm is a de facto CRO and there is a "free-market" of these CROs. The CROs with the "best" reputations charge the most money for their services. This has the effect of insuring the wealthiest citizens get the most favorable outcomes.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

A CRO that forces the others in submision is not a CRO anymore. It is what we have now, a violent state that forces everybody to pay for their so called protection. It has a monopoly, it makes arbitrary laws, with which it turns innocent people into criminals.

I think competition for the best service of protecting is better that a violent monopoly that you have to pay which has no obligation at all to protect you and you can't stop paying them.

But the believe in authority under the general population is the problem, not how things will be after the believe in slavery (and that slavery is a good thing) has stopt.

Thanks Peace

edit just curious What is the reason you decline payouts?

0
0
0.000
avatar

What mechanism would you propose to inoculate your utopia from an inevitable TUAOTL?

We are programmed from childhood, even in primitive tribal cultures, to "respect our elders" (parents, chieftains).

Individual helplessness isn't so much "brainwashing" (modern propaganda) as it is much more simply, a REAL-TRUE-FACT.

0
0
0.000
avatar

edit just curious What is the reason you decline payouts?

By voting for my "payout declined" comments and posts, you are supporting the highest-quality-community-approved-content of the top-earners!!!

When you vote for something that's "payout declined" your contribution goes directly into the "reward pool" which gets distributed to all the posts that make more than $20 steem, with the highest percentage of the pool getting distributed to the top-earners who are providing the highest-quality-community-approved-content!!!

So you're not contributing your steem to me, you're contributing your steem to whoever the whales decide "deserves" your steem (but I still get a small rep boost).

Why am I declining rewards?

Imagine a "democratic" system, where you could vote for your elected officials, but your vote only "counted" as much as you "invested" in the election system itself (election tokens)... Now that by itself sounds reasonably "fair".

bUT, now imagine that anyone with a larger "investment" in the election system could ERASE your vote?

Would you continue voting? Or would you just give directly to the candidate of your choosing?

Also, imagine steem without voting. Imagine they just Hard-Forked voting right out of the whole thing altogether.

What's left?

A lot of really awesome stuff, that's what!!

The delegation system is amazing (way better than pa.treon). The steem-token transfer system is amazing (way better than v.enmo or credit-cards or banks). The blogging system is amazing (way better than tw.itter or fa.cebuk). It's all super-awesome!!

0
0
0.000