RE: Topkek of the day 2019-09-24: Grumpy Greta Thunberg at the UNGA

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

she's ridiculous and a child actress or her parents are really screwing with her. lol I can't believe anyone is taking it seriously.



0
0
0.000
70 comments
avatar

I like to think she started the whole thing with genuine intentions... nothing wrong with saving the environment... but she definitely got instrumentalized as soon as she started going viral

0
0
0.000
avatar

lmfao you people are fucking wild

0
0
0.000
avatar

Said the communist.

0
0
0.000
avatar

At least i believe in climate change and that the earth is round xD

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

I believe in climate change too. Yesterday was hot, today is cold, summer is hot, winter is cold. See, climate change is real! Must be those evil humans causing it. The Earth is round of course, I never said the opposite.

0
0
0.000
avatar

God you are so fucking dense. Learn the difference between climate and weather you moron.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Boy, the climate change mob is angry today. Did you know the climate is different in the north pole vs the equator? Or is that weather too?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Can I ask a reasonable question and get a reasoned answer?

How much CO2 was in our atmosphere 55mya, and how did that affect life on Earth?

Thanks!

0
0
0.000
avatar

You are too smart for those, they think USSR was not communist country

0
0
0.000
avatar

It was a totalitarian one that wanted to use people for state profit, like China.

Communism requires people to be together and have rights, the USSR did not do that.

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh, so China and USSR were "bad" communism. I guess we need "good" communism to spread across the world. gtfo.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I suggest googling communism, anarchism, and latin america. You are severely misinformed.

0
0
0.000
avatar

My dear idiot, when you want to colectivize MY means of production, my tractor, my car, my tools, my oxen, my factory, my axe, my house, my fields, my forest....
I will say: NO, go to hell!

After that, you will need to bring some commerades with guns to steal it from me and redistribute.

After that, idiot, you will have a whole new class of soldier-police-like-forces who will decide between life and death = totalitarism

0
0
0.000
avatar

You have none of those things dude

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Welp, American civilians do. We have more personal arms than all the military forces of the world combined. The reason the 2nd Amendment exists is to enable those civilians to murder crooked, totalitarian politicians, their thugs, and prevent government from oppressing free people.

Although, it's not actually murder when it's self defense.

0
0
0.000
avatar

So then why don't we do it already?

0
0
0.000
avatar

The cost benefit ratio inveighs against it for individuals today. War sucks more than having a sucky job. That ratio changes when jack booted fascists bang on your door.

0
0
0.000
avatar

They've already been banging on our doors, just not yours.

0
0
0.000
avatar

My plan is working perfectly then!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, people being kidnapped and murdered is a funny joke!

First they came for the immigrants, but I was not an immigrant...

0
0
0.000
avatar

The full extent of my plan is to not be kidnapped and murdered. Handle your business. Evolution is the result of your competence, and mine.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Talk to someone that lives in the middle east and ask them about droughts.

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

They live in damn deserts you idiot.

0
0
0.000
avatar

So they've always been unable to farm? Throughout all of time? Wow, guess all the history books lied then.

0
0
0.000
avatar

How about you answer the questions I asked, or let the person I asked do so, instead of butting in and diverting the topic to how cutting down all the trees leaves only dirt? Because that's why there's a desert from Mauritania to Kamchatka. That's why China is planting trees in the Gobi: to reverse desertification.

Notice how they're not sucking the CO2 out of desert air to reverse desertification?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm not butting into anything, it's called a social media forum. I added my thoughts onto the discussion and nothing was taken away or detracted from lol.

Trees and human life are different things, humans are already getting owned all across the world from things like hurricanes that are much more powerful and frequent now than ever before.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I didn't ask Steem those questions. I asked a specific individual those questions.

Again you change the subject and avoid answering the questions I asked. One might suspect you were desperately clinging to the narrative delivered to you by the enemedia, rather than interested in actually understanding facts.

I'll be happy to address your segues if you but first answer the questions I asked, even though I didn't ask you.

It is a social forum, after all, and you are socializing along with the rest of us.

But, I'll refute this:

"...hurricanes that are much more powerful and frequent now than ever before."

[citation needed]

CNN shows you more of them through the magic of video that folks would not have known of before. Don't put carts before horses, and you won't get nowhere.

0
0
0.000
avatar

lmfao dude it's called a public forum. Look it up.

I just went through hurricane dorian. I have personal experience with this.

0
0
0.000
avatar

stormfrequencyandpower.png

stormharm.png

Anecdotal evidence is not statistically valid. Do consider that there is actual data relevant to your assumptions, consider it, and change your mind to accord with facts. That's what reasonable, intelligent people do.

0
0
0.000
avatar

People like you won't believe anything until it directly happens.

Not accounting for technological increasing in the last 100 years proves that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

0
0
0.000
avatar

O rly? You clearly have no idea who you're talking to, or what you're talking about. Either discuss the data or STFU. Your problem is your opinions are fed to you by propagandists, you have no idea what's going on, and you like it that way.

You're a sheep, baahing on cue. Human reason is based on evidence, not belonging to the ingroup you think will go best with your eyes.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, the things happening to me outside are "propagandists". The weather being hotter and hotter every year to the point where being outside makes me pass out is "propaganda"

fucking lol dude. Not everyone gets their info from others like you do. I actually go outside.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You have no grasp of science, reality, or good sense at all. WTF do your personal experiences have to do with Earth's climate? Are you an oracle?

JFC. Go pass out. Perhaps you need more electrolytes. It's what plants crave.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Well that escalated quickly. The term communist? Some wear the term as a badge of honour, so the label communist might be a compliment?

It would not be for me as I am a die-hard anti-communist (cold-war Vet).

ANTICOMMUNIST

Image Source: ย  Image created by sgt-dan using GIMP Open-Source Software

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's the truth though, self-proclaimed communist:

cyberdemon.png

0
0
0.000
avatar

.01 STU upvote for clearing that up for me. I am still vehemently opposed to Communism and radical Socialists of any kind. Hey, took an oath saying the same many times. I don't hate the self-identified people, just the mindset. Goes against my oath as a Marine, Soldier, and lifetime member of the American Legion.

0
0
0.000
avatar

So is universal healthcare against your oath? Lol

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

No it is not. I think it should be a right. You have me confused. This is the problem in our world today (e.g., I did not vote for Trump, therefore many surmised that I voted for Clinton. I voted for neither, but I voted. I voted for Jill Stein.)

I do not follow party/caucus lines. I think for myself and from time to time my views change and evolve.

I don't like communism, facism, radical socialism (which is communism with a mask), libertarianism (deregulated everything).

I am familiar with all of these isms but not an expert.

There are no simple answers to anything. The only label I would put on myself is maybe a Centrist. Look at both sides of a debate and look for a compromise to solve a problem.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Also voted for Jill.

When one side is calling for healthcare (left) and the other is calling to kill brown people (right), how can you be in the middle of that? That's my first question to frame the discussion.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

She is an idiot who is making fruit salad:

anarchist = individuals, communist = groups, it's not easy to be both
Anti-fascist, this is stupid because fascism = anarchy + socialism
*(you can't be you and anti-you)

anti-racist, ok, whatever

Conclusion, this is a stupid woman @cyberdemon531

0
0
0.000
avatar

Google would solve a lot of your problems. Search anarcho communism.

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

Nice she-male like definition:

Anarcho-communism,[1][2][3][4][5] also referred to as anarchist communism,[6][7] communist anarchism,[8][9] free communism[10] and libertarian communism,[11][12][13][14][15] is a political philosophy and anarchist school of thought which advocates the abolition of the state, capitalism, wage labour and private property (while retaining respect for personal property, along with collectively-owned items, goods and services)[16] in favor of common ownership of the means of production,[17][18] direct democracy, and a horizontal network of workers' councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".[19][20]

...abolition of the state... ... favor of common ownership of the means of production... = no state, but state

...abolition of the state, capitalism, wage labour and private property..
PRIVATE PROPERTY

... favor of common ownership of the means of production...

So, my tools are our tools, my land is our land, my labour is our labour and so on.

As I said, nice definition of a women with a dick

0
0
0.000
avatar

lol what are you blabbing about? Is English not your native language? What's wrong with dick girls, they're hot.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The USSR was not communist, it was state capitalist, open to a convo in another thread if you like.

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

you're an idiot, a mental midget, well unread, retarded in your thinking, boxed in by propaganda to which everyone has been subjected.

seriously, you are clueless, your statement is still making me laugh now.
ps - hope you're triggered 'luv.'

0
0
0.000
avatar

Don't shit, the economy was centralized in cities and hard-working peasants were stripped of their own land to create collective farms, you stupid, stupid woman

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, by the state.

Idiot.

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, my dear stupid women, but the state is People's

Do you know what us the full name of China?
People's Republic of China

Do you know what is the full name of Yugoslavia?
People's Republic of Yugoslavia

Unfortunately, from education and school, you learned nothing

0
0
0.000
avatar

oh my god you're so epic.

So because it's called "People's" that automatically makes it communist? Is North Korea communist, too? LOL

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, idiot, with the Communist party, membership in The Communist International, collectivized means of production and non-class society, bloddy star on their flag

BTW, they were in war with South Korea, because... Communism vs Capitalism
Commy North was supported by Commy China and Commy USSR, remember?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War

0
0
0.000
avatar

Korean War
The Korean War (in South Korean Korean: ํ•œ๊ตญ์ „์Ÿ; Hanja: ้Ÿ“ๅœ‹ๆˆฐ็ˆญ; RR: Hanguk Jeonjaeng, "Korean War"; in North Korean Korean: ์กฐ๊ตญํ•ด๋ฐฉ์ „์Ÿ; Hanja: ็ฅ–ๅœ‹่งฃๆ”พๆˆฐ็ˆญ; MR: Choguk haebang chลnjaeng, "Fatherland Liberation War"; 25 June 1950 โ€“ 27 July 1953) was a war between North Korea (with the support of China and the Soviet Union) and South Korea (with the support of the United Nations, principally from the United States). The war began on 25 June 1950 when North Korea invaded South Korea following a series of clashes along the border.As a product of the Cold War, the Soviet Union and the United States divided Korea into two sovereign states in 1948 with the border set at the 38th parallel. A socialist state was established in the north under the communist leadership of Kim Il-sung and a capitalist state in the south under the anti-communist leadership of Syngman Rhee. Both governments of the two new Korean states claimed to be the sole legitimate government of all of Korea, and neither accepted the border as permanent.

0
0
0.000
avatar

LOL hahahahahaha, now I know you're satire. Had me going for a bit.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Please see my Alex Jones comment above. ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

0
0
0.000