Seattle's CHAZ/CHOP had it's first mass shooting last night. One dead and one critically injured.

avatar

https://np.reddit.com/r/CapHillAutonomousZone/comments/hck130/any_details_available_on_the_early_morning/

How long will their Communism last for? It is past time for Police to have acted, bring in the National Guard/Feds and clear this hell hole out. It is only going to get worse.

They are also having a side effect of giving Trump campaign ads that will be very effective. Previously a deaf woman was raped and the rapist was still in the "Autonomous Zone" so the police couldn't go in and catch him. They had to wait until he left the zone to get him. There's also been many other incidents of violence, like the Street Preacher being choked out by a mob...For the crime of talking about God...

More links, and there's a ton more that has happened I have been reading about. Will probably update this post at some point with more.

https://nypost.com/2020/06/20/my-terrifying-5-day-stay-inside-seattles-autonomous-zone/

https://spdblotter.seattle.gov/2020/06/20/homicide-investigation-inside-protest-area/

https://twitter.com/SeattlePD/status/1274286565355687936

https://twitter.com/Omarisal/status/1274301877643968512

Street Preacher being choked out is about 3 or 4 minutes in



0
0
0.000
23 comments
avatar

Sorry, you don't have enough staked BEER in your account. You need 24 BEER in your virtual fridge to give some of your BEER to others. To view or trade BEER go to hive-engine.com

0
0
0.000
avatar

bring in the National Guard/Feds and clear this hell hole out.

you have to start with the politicians running lawfare in support of domestic terrorists like antifa, and the journalists running propaganda in support

we are not voting ourselves out of this mess, and it's going to take a LOT of scouring with wirebrush and bleach of the system as a whole to clean things up, especially in burrocracy and education

0
0
0.000
avatar

True. These Mayors have too much power. I made a few comments over on reddit about this too I will add here.

"It is also insanely dangerous that any Mayor can just declare no police can do their jobs. Some of these large cities that have a Mayor that has the equivalent power of an Emperor from thousands of years ago. I say that litterally, thinking about how many police officers that Mayor directly controls, and everything else with mandates and dictates or executive orders.

Mayors should not be able to do such things like this and limits need to be put on their power. Mayors are supposed to serve the people and are elected by people to do so, they are not elected so they can tell police to not help the people."

0
0
0.000
avatar

"It is also insanely dangerous that any Mayor can just declare no police can do their jobs.

It is also illegal...18 USC 242 requires sworn officials to defend the constitutional rights of Americans.

Obviously, you have the 2 supreme court cases saying that police dont have to do their jobs, but those cases are in context of police capability; not that an elected official can say "give them room to destroy"

the sad thing is that the police, who have the absolute power to end democong treason at the local level, are either ignorant of and/or afraid to act against lawless socialists holding office.

Taking Suggestions for the Next Information War Post : Winning the Information War for America's Police

0
0
0.000
avatar

Doesn't the Mayor select the police chief? Wasn't sure how that worked.

0
0
0.000
avatar

idk exactly how in Seattle, they might go through a city manager appointed by the city council

different cities, different models, but essentially ALL city police departments are controlled by the city politicians

where those cities are blue, riots will follow...also highest rates for blacks to be incarcerated and arrested, and where police brutality complaints prove out the most, ,, it's like the democong sabotage the black community or something

0
0
0.000
avatar

The communally socialist utopia isn't so utopic at all.

Misery loves plenty of company

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is going to get VERY miserable over there for them. They seem to think their society won't have crime/rape/murder/theft/etc but it will. There will be more of it due to their lack of any enforcers to laws. It is going to be like a mafia/gang controlled hell hole where only those in power do what they want.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

So, like Chicago during prohibition?

Cops cause crime. Lawless thugs are able to prey on society with impunity because the people have not undertaken their responsibility to secure their persons, property, and community. Criminals then prey on the people at will, and cops show up and take a report. At best the cops then go and catch the criminal. Of course it's a catch and release for real, violent predators, because the cops need them to justify your fear and dependence - exactly as you undertake in the OP.

You've still suffered the predation before your master's thugs come and take their report. All because you trusted police to keep you safe.

In the meantime cops have stolen >$30B from Americans without convicting them of any crime. They call it 'Civil Asset Forfeiture' but it's just piracy.

Here the cops dip and the criminals go wild.

Now they've got you begging for them to come back, please come back and oppress us like we're used to!

Before 1900 there were few cops in America and far lower crime because Americans were armed and handled their business.

COPS CAUSE CRIME

Free society will only ever be possible when free people secure themselves from hazards. When you do, you can call yourself free.

Right now you look like a goddamn supplicant in chains begging for the masters attention and the familiar touch of the loving lash.

JFC, I'm practically at a loss for words. Believe me, I've censored myself to avoid ad hominems because I want to remind you of your actual sovereign power to create a free society rather than simply be property of the overlords who grant gangs of thugs a monopoly on force.

I only want to insult you enough to make you regret this abject calling for the overlords to protect you, by reminding you IT'S YOUR JOB to keep your liberty and provide your security as a sovereign person in a free society.

Keep your freedom and your kids will inherit it. Give it up, and leave them that legacy instead, leave them the property of your masters dependent on the whims of psychopaths for their very lives.

Let this cynical psyop and ploy fail miserably by undertaking to be secure by your own damn power. Then watch as your enemies undertake their own destruction - as is ongoing now.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I will reply to this a bit later. You are throwing many differing points into a long comment and to respond to each point will take awhile.

0
0
0.000
avatar

So, like Chicago during prohibition?

Cops cause crime. Lawless thugs are able to prey on society with impunity because the people have not undertaken their responsibility to secure their persons, property, and community. Criminals then prey on the people at will, and cops show up and take a report. At best the cops then go and catch the criminal. Of course it's a catch and release for real, violent predators, because the cops need them to justify your fear and dependence - exactly as you undertake in the OP.

I do not disagree that cops cause crime. Everything a cop does to anyone is a crime against anyone, because nobody actually signed an agreement stating "I can be arrested for violating X Y or Z laws and I agree to this of my own free will". I never signed that document did you? According to the "law" contracts are only viable if it is signed not under duress and that you are able to mentally comprehend what you are signing. The way the systems work in all countries is that we are somehow "born into an agreement with the state" and have to follow the laws. It makes no sense.

You've still suffered the predation before your master's thugs come and take their report. All because you trusted police to keep you safe.

TBH I don't see anyone lining up to form a posse and go kick out the squatters who are stealing/raping/committing offenses against the innocent people who live in the area, kicking them out of the CHAZ/CHOP. I am open to that happening but will it really happen? Not in my opinion.

In the meantime cops have stolen >$30B from Americans without convicting them of any crime. They call it 'Civil Asset Forfeiture' but it's just piracy.

That should be done away with.

Here the cops dip and the criminals go wild.

Now they've got you begging for them to come back, please come back and oppress us like we're used to!

I would prefer a voluntary group of people doing something, but that actually violates a lot of things too. Since nobody signed any contracts with anyone agreeing to follow X Y or Z laws or morals or ethics, nobody technically can do anything to anyone if you really expand it. Why does someone get to stop a theft? Because people don't like being stolen from and it is morally wrong/ethical, so what? I guarantee the person stealing didn't sign an agreement of his own volition saying he wouldn't steal from you or others. I would be interested to see how you respond to that statement. It is something I just thought of right now so its a new thought process I have not gone through.

Before 1900 there were few cops in America and far lower crime because Americans were armed and handled their business.

I think that is great, let's get back to doing that.

COPS CAUSE CRIME

Agreed

Free society will only ever be possible when free people secure themselves from hazards. When you do, you can call yourself free.

And we are not free, and the only possible way to be free it essentially to go up against the entire govt which is not a pragmatic thing to do. I can however do what I can to help incrementally decrease the govt's power and that is what I will do. I will pragmatically do what I can do.

Right now you look like a goddamn supplicant in chains begging for the masters attention and the familiar touch of the loving lash.

Not in the slightest. I don't provide personal details much. I have had my issues is all I am going to say

JFC, I'm practically at a loss for words. Believe me, I've censored myself to avoid ad hominems because I want to remind you of your actual sovereign power to create a free society rather than simply be property of the overlords who grant gangs of thugs a monopoly on force.

You can ad-hom me all you want lol. I don't particularly care if anyone does. Been bullied, beaten up, threatened, cussed out, physically abused, etc. My skin is thick and extremely rarely will anyones words set me off in any way. I do what I can when in my own personal life and for my family/friends, and when time permits online.

I only want to insult you enough to make you regret this abject calling for the overlords to protect you, by reminding you IT'S YOUR JOB to keep your liberty and provide your security as a sovereign person in a free society.

I agree with it being my "duty" I would say not job, for keeping myself and my family/friends safe.

Keep your freedom and your kids will inherit it. Give it up, and leave them that legacy instead, leave them the property of your masters dependent on the whims of psychopaths for their very lives.

I don't disagree.

Let this cynical psyop and ploy fail miserably by undertaking to be secure by your own damn power. Then watch as your enemies undertake their own destruction - as is ongoing now.

It is a psyop by commies to A/B test and see how things go. Now that they see they can just take over blocks of cities and set up their radicalization camps they will start to pop up everywhere eventually. The authoritarianism they are spreading is growing at an accelerating rate. Almost every big corporation is actively endorsing BLM and funding them. Discord/Facebook/Youtube/most MSM are all spreading the virus and infecting people with authoritarianism and black supremacy/marxism(some leaders of BLM are admitted marxists)

0
0
0.000
avatar

I appreciate your measured, and substantive, response.

"...I don't see anyone lining up to form a posse..."

Do you realize the people you do see have been indoctrinated their entire lives to believe cops protect them? It takes a jarring event to break lifelong programming. I suspect such necessary impact is but beginning to eventuate, and when folks realize they live or die by their own efforts, them as intend to live undertake necessary effort.

Given that you have agreed almost completely with every point I have made, why do you not rescind your call for state gangs of thugs to restore the power of the overlords in CHAZ?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Just pragmatically speaking is why. The pragmatic side in me sees that nobody is stepping up to band together and do something about it, the only way I see this getting done(in the short term) is some sort of police/national guard/feds coming in.

I think incrementally people WILL learn from this and start to do better in the medium to long term, whether the medium term is a few decades to long term being hundreds of years.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

"...nobody is stepping up to band together and do something about it..."

Why should they? If folks immediately impacted because they live there, or own property there need to act, I am sure they will either act or bleat for help. I am unaware that anyone has.

Pretty sure if people were pleading for help from the outside world, I'd have heard about it from folks like yourself, though.

Other than folks there, who has any right or interest in doing something about it? Why does it so offend you that rather than let the folks there handle their affairs you call for the implementation of martial law to end that offense to your sensibilities? What actual business is it of yours, or anyone besides them as own property or live there?

Even then, while I can see that devout statists will absolutely seek to invade CHAZ militarily upon the first cry for help from business owners or residents there, I don't see it as particularly necessary. Folks that can't abide there can just flee and abandon all they own.

I've done it. It's unpleasant, but quick and easy.

Leaving them to their business will edify all concerned IMHO. If they can't defend themselves and their property, no one will learn more than the defenseless, and no one better needs to learn that lesson. If they flee, they can always seek legal remedy in court for the tortuous harm they've suffered. Again, that will be an edifying process to watch proceed. This particularly because the governments that claim to be responsible for that place and it's residents and property owners have just abandoned them. I expect the state to be one of the primary defendants in any such action, as well as the SPD.

Has anyone sought legal remedy for financial or other harm yet? I am unaware such claims have been pursued.

If the BLM and Antifa revolutionaries aren't daily learning valuable lessons, I'd be shocked. Particularly if tort actions are commenced and they're named defendants, good will be done, at least educationally.

Unless some kind of pogrom or rabid violence begins there and folks are held captive, I don't see any need to act. While there's been continuing unrest and unsavory speech coming out of CHAZ, that don't confront me. I have greater respect for the rebels than the offices of state and local governments that simply abandoned that area and it's people to the rebels. I'd as soon leave them be as not, and absent pleas for help from the outside world from folks trapped there, I'll stick to that plan.

I find it quite telling that no mass exodus of residents has happened. Either I'm far more poorly informed that I think I am, or folks living there apparently find it tolerable.

Cops aren't getting in, neither is the Fire Department, and I assume garbage service, electricity, water, communications, and etc. are all on the line. If folks there want any of those services they'll pay for them and make sure they can be provided. Ain't none of my business either way.

Why is it yours?

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I take note of it because it is a viral contagion that is spreading.

Social media is like a very wide blood vessel/artery that allows viruses to flow through and multiply and infect.

Signals from MSM and thought leaders multiply the rate at which the virus multiples. The response against said virus(bad ideas) can be quick or take a long time. I am speaking about Chaz in particular on other social media in my effort to hamper the spreading. I have also talked about many other things of course, but right now with the limited time I have I am spending it on Chaz. It is a great thing to study how things work.

I should add and clarify, if a movement were to legally propose seccession from the USA and setup their own borders and all that and be voluntary I would be amplifying that message and not hampering it. I am against authoritarian virus spreading. The Chaz was a bunch of idiot LARPing commies taking over stuff that isn't theres. It would be different if they actually owned the area they were occupying and declared it autonomous, as I would support that(as long as everything is voluntary and not stolen)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well, the folks that lived there before CHAZ and them that own property there are absolutely free IMHO. If they seek to defend themselves and their property from CHAZ, they will. If they cannot, and cannot abide CHAZ, they will flee.

As far as I can tell, neither of those things is happening.

Where the USG, states, counties, and municipalities remain, outside of CHAZ, such institutions neither own the property where they claim dominion any more than does CHAZ where it claims dominion. I see no difference.

If you see that those implementing CHAZ are unreasonable, then you will expect them to fail to do reasonable things, and CHAZ to fail. Censoring this failure by violently preventing it will deprive them watching of the opportunity to learn from it.

Discussing things on social media is the appropriate response to disinformation being spread on social media. If social media are censored and opposition to the propaganda prevented, social media becomes unusable for that purpose, and rational people will understand this. Rational people won't be fooled by censorship, and wont use censored media. Folks that do use censored media aren't rational, so reason won't help them.

Some folks are incapable of understanding facts. When genocide is a consequence of oppression, they will suffer the hammer blow that kills them without understanding. Some folks with marginally better comprehension will see the hammer fall on the chattel in front of them and understand only then, too late to do anything about it, and nothing else will enable their understanding. No words or reason, no facts or explanation, can help them. When catastrophe comes, when genocide next is undertaken, they will die in terror.

Catastrophe has always been evolutionary. Today catastrophe is being implemented by institutions, rather than volcanoes or comets. Evolution is happening as we speak. Those that survive to breed will be those that grasp the existential danger, and successfully act to mitigate it. They will pass on their genes.

Some folks will be able to understand when availed facts and reason, and you can help some of them by reasoning with facts, but censored media will prevent that. If they remain on such media, they prevent you from helping them, and no violent attacks will change that fact.

Recommending overlords violently takeover CHAZ will prevent reason and facts from being understood by them as can grasp them. It is contrary to your purpose from the above comment IMHO, because it perpetuates the misunderstanding of those who could benefit from seeing the consequences of false information and faulty reasoning. Falling for propaganda and allowing censorship has consequences, decreasing the ability of people to survive existential threats, as I see being deployed globally today. CHAZ will enable people to understand better the consequences those things have in the real world - if we allow it to do so.

Worse, CHAZ may reveal it is learning, and it could (theoretically) succeed. I am confident that if it threatens to succeed, we won't need to call for armed suppression, because that will happen even if we defend it.

Either way, nothing good can come of seeking to impose US troops on CHAZ. Martial law is the precursor to disarming the American people, who are the most significant barrier to genocidal oppression in the world today, because they have more personal arms than all the military forces of the world combined. Only by allowing martial law to be instituted can troops then start disarming Americans, and that will leave not only Americans, but the peoples of the world defenseless against any oppression imaginable.

That includes forced injection with DNA altering 'vaccines', and turning people into GMOs.

Martial law and US troops on the ground on American soil needs to be the line in the sand that free civilians do not tolerate if we intend to remain human and free. CHAZ seems to me to be an attempt to create tolerance by Americans of martial law, which will spread once it is instituted in Seattle. I see your call for martial law as exactly what is necessary to that ploy, and I recommend you reconsider.

America cannot permit martial law to be manufactured and tolerated, because that will allow Americans to be disarmed, and that will enable oppression and tyranny to be unstoppable.

If you would defend your humanity and freedom you should defend CHAZ from martial law. If it is incompetent to rule 6 blocks of Seattle, it will fail on it's own. If it is competent to rule, crushing it militarily is a crime. Worse, committing that crime against CHAZ enables that crime to be committed everywhere else in America.

There is an obvious massive global propaganda campaign that is using the SARS2 virus and this social unrest to seek to deploy DNA vaccines. Some countries, like China and Denmark, have already passed laws that mandate vaccination. If America falls, so falls the world.

Calling for martial law in CHAZ advances that deployment of forced DNA vaccines that threaten genocide. At best, even if the rest of my comment is absolute rubbish, calling for martial law in CHAZ only keeps the current corrupt system in place, and prevents any rational observers from learning the consequences of mob rule. Nothing good can come from martial law in CHAZ.

0
0
0.000
avatar

"...bring in the National Guard/Feds..."

So, the Machiavellian plan of the left/right alliance of banksters to usher in martial law without alarming the American people is working. The left agreed to abandon the police station to the paid rabble spouting racist and fascist ideology. Then they'd allow the rabble to degenerate. The right then would await the fear conformists would suffer to spark rage that non-conformists lived without being forced to conform.. Rape. Gasp! Abandon all freedoms so that we can crush those that violate the flower of feminity!

Problem, reaction, solution.

I see you prefer the good 'ol thugs funded by the corrupt overlords we have known and suffered all our lives to the new and frightening thugs funded by the corrupt overlords. Excellent choice sir! We'll bring them right up, and plenty of them.

Yeah, no. Let's see the goddamn people of Seattle have bit of spine and themselves secure their lives and homes, rather than groveling at the feet of cancerous oppression for the semblance of security.

Remember the words of Franklin, who pointed out that giving up your authority because you were too lazy to take responsibility and then delegate it to them as promised to keep you safe would let evil overlords take your authority, take your wealth, and take your freedom too, without giving you any security.

Fuck the police. Murderous thugs that undertake piracy for polities and craft but poor pretense of public protection are no solution to machiavellian psyops. If the folks in Seattle can't bear to protect themselves, let them flee. Better to be a penniless refugee than a slave of the state.

I know. I've been both.

I find it quite surprising to see you voice this abject bootlicking. Falling for the obvious trap with apparent zeal to see the rebels crushed violently by your masters. Such a force for truth!

I thought better of you.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I never claimed to be an anarchist or be pro rightwing or leftwing anarchy.

The system that is in place is against our wills. What is in place pragmatically speaking isn't going anywhere for probably another few decades to 100s of years, potentially never.

The systems that I see that everyone flock to are centrally planned and authoritarian to varying degrees. People love central planning and love being ruled over, it is sick and twisted I recognize that.

Would you prefer I request that individuals band together and go in and clear out the Chaz/Chop? That isn't going to happen so I wouldn't even suggest such a thing. There still are innocent people who are being harmed by what is going on in Chaz/Chop, and barring a random banding together of "patriots" or some kind of group nothing is going to happen. I am almost willing to place a bet on it that nobody will come in and clear it out who are just random people who band together, I could be wrong in my assessment however.

I voted for Trump. The only time I have ever voted in my life. Because I want him to destroy the system as much as possible and make everyone disrespect the office of President. I want the govt to be made smaller and smaller as much as possible, cuts happen, hundreds of thousands of govt employees fired, drug laws done away with.

I also decided I won't be voting ever again in my life because Trump didn't live up to what I wanted him to do, and voting is participating in their system as well. At the time I saw it as a damned if I vote damned if I don't.

Franklin has good words on responsibility and giving up authority. I don't think it applies when it comes to dealing with outside enemies who have nuclear power/EMPs. If we become so decentralized and disorganized in the USA that enemies from abroad can just take over they will. Do I think having mercenary armies that we all volunteer for will work, no.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I never claimed to be an anarchist or be pro rightwing or leftwing anarchy."

You're calling for troops to be deployed on American streets. That's not just 'not anarchy'. It's martial law, and you have consistently opposed such tyranny for all the time I have followed you. This position IMHO of calling for martial law is completely unprecedented and utterly opposed to all your prior posts.

" What is in place pragmatically speaking isn't going anywhere for probably another few decades to 100s of years, potentially never."

Do you not note the complete upheaval and separation from what has been normal and longstanding practice and social order and the utter flux while nefarious actors seek to implement a new, and more terrible, tyranny? It is exactly during such events and times that transformations happen all at once.

This is the time, this is the day, to secure for our posterity the freedom we would have them enjoy.

"Would you prefer I request that individuals band together and go in and clear out the Chaz/Chop?"

Why would you? Do you live there? Have people there? How is it a threat to you that requires your action? I reckon you should do as I do, and ignore it except as it provides entertainment value, or illustrates principles useful to grasp, particularly for statists and cattle.

"...innocent people..."

No. No one has been forcibly kidnapped and transported into CHAZ against their will. Folks that lived or worked there have potential innocence, but I am unaware they are prevented from leaving. Other than those latter folks, there are no innocents in CHAZ, and the innocents can just leave if they prefer that to defending their homes and property.

"...nobody will come in and clear it out..."

Why should they? Other than folks that live or have property there, whose business is it what happens there? If folks there are in fear, let them secure themselves and property or flee. The rest of us have literally no compelling interest in CHAZ, except as I have earlier mentioned.

"... I won't be voting ever again in my life because...voting is participating in their system..."

Good. We utterly agree, and I note I have better things to spend my attention on than choosing between overlords to oppress me. Things like preventing overlords from oppressing me.

Regarding foreign enemies, recall Mao's words, when he stated that he would never want to invade the US because 'there'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass...'

Also, a militia, which is what an army comprised of civilians is, is not a mercenary army. Rather the opposite, and which history reveals has won every conflict in which they've been involved, ever, when reasonably led.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The problem I see with a bunch of people's forming a militia group to do X Y or Z is the same problem that I see happening in the Middle Eastern countries westerners and USA invades. Those rag tag militia groups are still fighting to this day. I would argue just from a practical perspective that enough people do not want the western countries/USA expelled from their country strong enough to where they will do much of anything about it.

Are the gangs of Muslim Brotherhood and smaller groups not militias? I don't see them as winning against a centrally planned power anytime soon. If China was dealing with the Middle East they would probably just slaughter more people to get them in line, whereas the Western countries slaughter people but not in a high enough magnitude to end anything. Slaughtering people is bad that should go without saying, just pointing out that these gangs/militias don't seem to be capable of repelling modern forces.

How can a militia defend against drones/air superiority for example. It is really hard to do something against that for any individual or small group. The founding fathers defintely did not have the forethought to see a future in which the skies are dominated or robots control things via AI(similar to the Terminator movies).

If US citizens could throw off the shackles of government, agree to disband everything and start over with voluntary agreements where people join and pay "taxes" at their own free will, and everything is voluntary and we have a drone army/army/airplanes/carriers/ships/submarines/etc and that works out I would support it. I just don't see that happening in my life time to be honest. It will require a radical shift in the way humans think to accomplish such things.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

"Those rag tag militia groups are still fighting to this day."

And they're winning. The US is withdrawing forces ahead of schedule from Afghanistan, and Iraq isn't far behind. The US is not winning in Syria, and has handed over the reins of the warhorse to Turkey, who isn't going to win either. Neither are the mercenary terrorists the US, Israel, and Turkey fund and support.

The Muslim Brotherhood is probably more like a criminal gang than a militia TBQH, as their association with HRC has undoubtedly put them in the same light as Hezb'Allah, who have been increasingly associating with the CIA and deeply involved in drug trafficking and money laundering, and their popularity in Lebanon reflects this today, as they are increasingly irrelevant to the Lebanese people.

Indeed, many of the protests ongoing in Lebanon today are against Hezb'Allah, whose corruption has caused them to abandon the people and focus on their own power and profit of late.

Such groups aren't militias. They're gangs. That's not the same at all.

"How can a militia defend against drones/air superiority...[?]"

There are multiple means of defeating, seizing, and avoiding drones, and careful searching will produce enlightening information. Drones are just computers, and all computers can be hacked. They can also have their signals jammed, and some militia forces in the ME have used simple water pumps that create interference to do just that.

Don't forget Iran has actually captured a Predator drone by hacking it and taking it over.

"If US citizens could throw off the shackles..."

People haven't grasped the extremity of hazard they face yet. The plan I am grasping we are in the process of being subjected to ends with DNA modification via forced vaccinations, and that's why we see the martial law bait today in Seattle, because it will require armed force to make it happen at all.

Troops on the ground is a line in the sand, even in Seattle. It will trigger certain parties to prepare. As the exigency and threat of forced injection of tracking chips and DNA modification continues and becomes more alarming as it approaches implementation, further preparations will be undertaken, and when the cattle finally realize they're in the chute to the slaughterhouse and begin to bleat in alarm, means of enabling their participation will be ready for them to undertake.

Folks that intend to survive will undertake necessary actions to do so, and those will absolutely include preventing martial law from being effective, suborning military forces and materiel, preventing forced DNA modification of civilians on a national scale (although it's likely that enough of it will be committed to enable dull witted folks to grasp their danger), and more.

If this progression to martial law, and forced chipping and DNA modification continues, little old ladies from Peoria will take up arms. It will become increasingly obvious as the machinations progress to latter stages that it's literally a matter of life and death, not just for America, but free human beings.

Smart people are planning ahead for these events today, and have been for years.

Armed conflict against the US civilian population cannot succeed. Just ask Mao.

0
0
0.000
avatar

First, congrats for being part of winning our challenge, by spreading information!

Second, when people from the defence system no longer protect our rulers, our rulers no longer have power and we can head toward a better world.
As long as we don't solve this issue,

  • our rulers continue doing their stuff that are against us,
  • we're not progressing.

When more people spread information, we might have more chances of solving this issue.
So the best we can do is to continue helping people be conscious of our challenge.
This way, more people might get involved.

What do you think?

0
0
0.000