CPS Seizes Autistic Child.
There can be no more frustrating and illustrative case of government over-reach and abuse than the so-called "child protective" "services" (CPS) that are run under our name and that are fed by our hard-earned tax dollars. It is to the ever-lasting shame of our nation that this agency continues, day after day, without oversight or limitation to damage the reputation of all of us.
(The Pardo family. Image courtesy of thcs.org.)
Here is the most recent example of what I am talking about:
Parents dealing with an autistic child (often as a result of the dangerous vaccinations... that now total 70+... that are forced upon them) now have to also worry about the state thinking their child is "medically fragile," and that the parents are not "qualified" (in whatever cases the CPS may decide to thus declare) to even, apparently, rightfully keep and care for their own child. The State of Texas is a cutting edge case, both good and bad, when it comes to CPS.
(Courtesy of christianpost.com.)
Let's hope that the guest is right and that the Governor will work to set rules (that will actually be enforced for once) and let this situation finally stop. CPS (in my opinion) should almost never have the "right" to seize a child, but without due process, even the right to contact a family and this type of unwarranted seizure, should NEVER happen. They should also never have a right to seize a child just because the parents seek a second medical opinion or do not decide to kowtow to hazy "medical professionalism" in the care of poorly understood diseases and conditions (like autism.)
The fact that CPS gets away with giving kids to convicted drug users and sex abusers to "care for," and then turns around and seizes children from loving families-- just because they may stand up to "medical authorities"-- is the pinnacle criminal act of our time, and is rightfully laid at our feet as long as it continues.
Pray for the Pardo family and Senator Bob Hall.
To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.
Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.
Atrocious, when you consider the times they did not do their job, count how many times they neglected to use their power in the case I'm bringing here.. when they should have.. because I lost count..
I bring you the brief summary of Phoenix Sinclair - I'm ashamed this happened in my home town.. This was big, I still lived there at the time.
Phoenix Sinclair
Phoenix Victoria Hope Sinclair (23 April 2000 – 11 June 2005) was a Canadian five-year-old girl who was murdered by her mother and stepfather. The circumstances of her life and death resulted in one of the largest public inquiries ever held in Manitoba, examining the child welfare system.
And if this story peaks your curiosity, or anyone elses -- if anyone wants to make an opinion piece using it, I'd love to read it.
The final report of the Inquiry on Pheonix may also be of interest:
Part 1 and Part 2
Thank you.
Write that up and include the tag @familyprotection, and @canadian-coconut will upvote (and she has 400,000+ SP.)
Well, well, well what do we have here...a senator who is funded by the same pac that funds the lawyer for the Pardos.
It would be their lawyer who didn't response to CPS for interviews prior to the removal of the child. CPS tried for two weeks to get the parents to response before an emergency order of removal was placed.
I mean really just how much time do the Pardos think would have been adequate to respond to CPS? Never would be my guess.
Seems the mother may have a bit of Munchausen syndrome by proxy going on:
Since removal from his mother the child's health has improved:
I guess the judge thinks pretty much along the same line that I would, that'd be to error on the side of caution as he ordered the child be further evaluated and the family under go counseling and to work with CPS, something that if they had done in the first place they may have just found themselves under supervision of CPS while evaluating the situation out.
https://www.inforney.com/local-news/judge-upholds-cps-decision-to-remove-child-for-possible-medical/article_0cc416fa-9f66-11e9-8231-ffd9d7790c3b.html