RE: Witnessess, you f**** up... It is probably time to take responsability for your own mistakes.
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Dear @phgnomo
Could you please change word starting on F to something else? Maybe F***d up ? Or even less offensive?
I wouldn't like to attract negative and hostile attention to our community.
Yours
@crypto.piotr
0
0
0.000
Sure. Just did. Sorry about that.
This is exactly why i dislike community functions. Freedom of speech is being attacked by NAZI moderation. Never self censor @phgnomo This is STEEM, you CANNOT be banned.
Dear @phgnomo
Unfortunatelly you're not making any sense. The fact is that I personally consider @phgnomo a good friend and we've been in touch for quite sometime.
Do you think that the factt that I asked politely to remove one particular word from the title gives you right to compare me to being NAZI?
Don't you think that you went little bit to far?
Regards
@crypto.piotr
True. @gray00 shouldn't say those words. After all it's all being stored on blockchain forever and cannot be changed. And calling anyone NAZI can easily end up in lawsuit.
Never called you a Nazi or implied you were. Lets not be that sensitive. Censorship is a tool used against , weaponized against millions of people every day. Why can't we build systems where users cannot be censored? Why can't people stop the projection of their values and beliefs on others. To love each other one must know each other. How can people know each other if they are all censored? A mute functionality exists for a specific reason.
Certainly, each blog is independent and each user can write in their own blog what they want, but when it is published in a community, it is accepted to share the set of minimum rules of coexistence, in case you are not willing to accept those rules, because There is no point staying in such a community, doing so would be a way of aggression against the other participants.
I think that one of the conventions around here was not to use foul language, explicitly offensive or directly swearing; that kind of words and language would attract unnecessary negative publicity and contradict what you want to achieve in living together.
Consider censorship such rules ... It is something that already falls in the field of opinions, after all, it may happen that any limitation is considered unpleasant (even those that are to maintain the coexistence and peace of the group to which belongs) and that everyone should do or say what they want regardless of the impact or damage that can occur to others, although in a way, I think that such behavior would be too selfish, harmful and antisocial.