The Digital "Dollar" Will Not Prevail

CBDC is being discussed by every central bank around the world. Since the success of Bitcoin, central banks and governments are taking a closer look at digital currencies. This is a move to eliminate cash and become "technologically" advanced.

Or is it?

To start, we know that blockchain does offer a lot of advantages for transacting. As compared to the SWIFT network, the cost of transacting is much less and a lot faster. Settlements within the present system take days. On a network like Bitcoin or Ethereum, it can be within minutes.

However, speed and cost are not the only advantages. Immutability and transparency allow anyone to see what took place. Transactions cannot be easily reversed nor can accounts be targeted for withdrawal unless one has the keys.

Of course, this all applies to a decentralized blockchain. In one where the main players are controlling the network, we see a different story.


Source

CBDC are not meant to be operating on a decentralized blockchain. While there might be some advantages to using digital currencies of this nature, the goal is control. At the top of the list is taxation. Countries are all mired in debt and running deficits. Thus, they need money and when governments need money, they go after taxes.

Another aspect to this is the ability to shut down accounts. This will enable governments to "combat illegal activity". That is how they will sell it. In reality, they will shut down the accounts of those entities they do not like. Take the pot community in the United States. Some states made the growing and selling of cannabis legal. However, those businesses cannot operate using a bank account because, according to the Federal Government, it is still illegal.

Results are coming in from China after their weeklong experiment with the digital Yuan. Let us just say the users were not really impressed. Most could not see any difference between the new currency and how they were presently operating.

This makes sense since China is a digitally advanced country and the majority of their payments were done through applications anyway.

The same is not true for other areas of the world.

Globally, most transactions are still done in some form of cash. Even in the United States, physical checks still make up for more than 12% of all money remitted. This is an issue for the United States Federal Reserve in their effort to push forth a digital version of the USD.

Nevertheless, there is a much bigger obstacle in the way. Presently, 60% of the physical USD is held outside the United States. This is a number that keeps growing as people use it as a hedge against the Euro and Yen as those central banks continue down the Keynesian highway. Add in the third world nations where the USD is more valuable than gold since those countries currencies are a mess, and we see the battle the Fed will have.

When the fallout from COVID-19 hit, the world went into panic mode. There was something very telling about what took place in March. The global community gave a resounding answer as to what it views the store of value in a time of crisis. We saw traders all over the world move to cash, and that currency was the USD.

Outside the United States, much of that move was to physical cash itself. Even within the borders, many took out a few thousand dollars to have at their disposal. In other words, for all the talk of Bitcoin, gold, real estate, and whatever people espoused as a store of value and hedge, it was the USD that the world turned to.


Source

Another irony, in spite of all the money printing since March, there is still an issue: there is not enough USD out there. The world is thirsty for it, at least in the physical form. The more games the central banks around the world play, the greater the need for USD. People are simply going to turn to it.

The United States Government hates the physical dollar because of what people can do with it. For all the talk about the amount of criminal activity done in cryptocurrency, the truth is the USD sets the gold standard for this. Criminals all over the world interact in the USD because it cannot be traced. Even using the banking system, they can "wash" the money as evidenced by the latest report citing $2 trillion in money laundering by the major banks around the world.

It is interesting that the likely failure of the digital dollar will not come from rejection by Americans. People are basically sheep and most of the US is still sucking the teat of the MSM and whatever the government "experts" say. Instead, it is going to be people in countries like Venezuela, Nigeria, Greece, and Portugal that keep the USD afloat in its current form. They simply are not going to give it up.

Of course, the United States Government doesn't want that to happen either since it helps to keep the USD firmly entrenched as the global reserve currency.

In the end, currency comes down to confidence and the USD is still king by a wide margin. The worse the conditions get, especially across the Eurozone, the greater the likelihood that people keep turning to this currency.

In the end, this makes a full conversion to the digital dollar almost impossible. Ultimately, the Fed will be forced into some type of hybrid system which will leave the door open for people to exploit it.

It is going to get very interesting.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.

gif by @doze

vision2025.png

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
30 comments
avatar

well just like you said ,obviously central banks and governments are taking a closer look at digital currencies.....they now see that there are so much benefits that one can get from digital currencies and that the world has changed and we need to adapt to those changes that are happening right in our eyes,technological advancement is also the order of the day too.....
@taskmaster4450

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

They are looking but not for the same reasons we are. In fact I would say their goals are completely opposite to us.

They want control, we want freedom.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

@taskmaster4450le you are right sir,but i believe that there must be a balance if we want to have a better society,and i believe freedom is more important in my own opinion.....

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Freedom is at the top of the list of society's needs. Unfortunately, we are in a time when freedoms are being eradicated all over the world.

We now are going to have to fight harder to accomplish that end. Technology certainly can help although it is also available to those looking to enslave.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Your current Rank (30) in the battle Arena of Holybread has granted you an Upvote of 18%

0
0
0.000
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 27 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
9

0
0
0.000
avatar

At least the conversation on the alternative form of currency has initiated. With that perspective, it should be celebrated by the enthusiasts who are talking about digital assets. As you rightly pointed out, digital dollar is nowhere to near to the true sense of digital assets blockchain pioneers aimed for. Transparency is a key factor that differentiates these two. I would rather say that digital dollar is just the digitization of the cash flow system of the current form of USD. It will digitize and expedite the process but will not adopt the concept of blockchain.

Nevertheless, it will for sure fan the conversation and interest around crypto assets.

0
0
0.000
avatar

In the end, it will expose more people to what is taking place within cryptocurrency and, ironically, could actually speed up adoption of other digital assets.

People tend to fear what they do not know. Once they are exposed to digital currencies, one will look like another. Thus, the idea of a true crypto vs a cbdc will be more accepted.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Exactly. People will be more receptive to wallet and keys culture I guess. Most of the bank operation is already digitized and the major chunk of the population is using digital cash in the form of plastic cards and mobile payments. The idea of CBDC is a prep ramp for the mass adoption of crypto.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Agreed. Once people get accustomed to digital assets, they will be open to others.

I still believing gaming will be the main on-ramp for large numbers, something that is going to operate outside of regulators and governments. They are focused upon payment systems when NFTs are wealth assets.

By the time they catch on, they will have too big a problem on their hands. After all, in the US, they are still going through the ICOs which happened four years ago. Next they are going to have to sift through all the DeFi.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think that's the irony in a true sense. You have to be disruptive to build. You are right, it will be too big a problem to handle. The wealth assets and associated infrastructure may help or force the regulators to skip steps in allowing the concept into the mainstream.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

To me, that is key. The wealth that is held in crypto/digital assets versus the currency system.

I do not know the number that needs to be hit but when there are trillions of dollars in those classes, that will be too much for the establishment to fight.

We need a quick 10x since we are sitting at a few hundred billion dollars. That would get us to $3 trillion or so, that might be enough to announce "game over".

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

So, the space has to be significant enough for them to be able to not ignore. From where we are at, that sounds like an anti-regime but that's where the ship is headed right now.
I totally agree.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

CBDCs are about people having accounts directly in a central bank. Money could be moved between the accounts like between regular bank accounts but faster than between accounts in different banks. There is no particular benefit to this arrangement. First of all, that system is akin to a financial panopticon where a central authority knows everything that is going on and has the ability to censor transactions in real time. This setup has nothing attractive to it. Instant payments are already facilitated by a several different apps connected to bank accounts. As for the dispensation of UBI, that can be done through the banks without any difficulty.

Then there's crypto. Central bankers are clearly less worried about crypto because crypto is volatile. But they hate stablecoins because stablecoins are an uncensorable and anomymous payment rail.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

There is no particular benefit to this arrangement.

Not for users but for the control establishment, a great benefit will be gained.

But they hate stablecoins because stablecoins are an uncensorable and anomymous payment rail.

That is true, stablecoins represent a big threat since they can be used outside the CB's control yet offer the same benefit since they are pegged.

It is a fun race to watch, the old regulatory establishment trying to keep pace with the technological advancement.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

It sure is fun. The latest idea being requiring any crypto asset provider who offers their assets to register as a legal entity in a EU member state. So, if some EU resident wants to buy some token released by someone on Uniswap, that someone has to register as a crypto asset provider in some EU member state.

What an utterly laughable notion. Caveat emptor is a much better idea. If you don't have appetite for risk, then don't blindly invest in token X created by an unknown entity. It's much better for a culture of taking responsibility for your own choices to develop. Besides, suppose some EU organ tried to bring charges against an issuer of a token on some DEX on Ethereum. How could they possibly identify that person? But I suppose regulators might try and develop methods to do that, which in turn will result in further innovation to skirt regulation on part of the issuers. A game of cat and mouse.

At some point, it comes time to decentralize the entire Internet infrastructure including ISPs and name services.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

They have to do their best to stay relevant. If finance goes DeFi and people take responsibility for their own actions, then the regulators cant say they are doing things to "protect the public".

Of course, this is a fallacy; they are in place to protect the establishment and the existing players.

The EU is going batshit crazy with their desire to keep the failing actions of the ECB going. They are even worse than the US which is hard to be.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

ECB has been on a mission impossible from the start. I mean what problems could having Greece and Germany in the same monetary union possible cause. The whole charade smacks of German mercantilism. Germany wants to maintain a permanent trade surplus. Merkel's fourth Reich as they say.

0
0
0.000
avatar

True although I think the same could be said for most of the countries in the EU. Having the north and the south together is not the best of ideas. Hell even the Germans and the French arent too fond of each other.

The fact that the EU is not a leader in technology has caused it a host of issues. They cannot rival the US, China, or even Japan.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

im in trouble my post are not showing in Leofinance.io platform But showing at hive.blog

0
0
0.000
avatar

I must get to my goal of owning 1 BTC by the end of the year.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

You are intent on being part of the 1% based upon that alone. 😁😁😁

My view is BTC is a great store of value and will be framed that way in the future. Thus, I have a minimum level, long term, of the gold market cap.

Plenty of upside left.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I have to agree. While I am buying into crypto, I am also accumulating cash savings as a buffer. I would hate to be in a position where I would be forced to liquidate my BTC because I didn't have enough cash savings. I think it was Raoul Pal who pointed out that people have an aversion to having liquid cash because it is not earning. Yet, he further said, that having cash protects you from having to sell when everybody else is selling.

In terms of the market, you will see that when the market tanks, gold and BTC will also drop as weak hands have to liquidate to cover their losses. Then the strong hands swoop in and buy the cheaper assets.

I don't foresee myself as buying any extra during a dip. However, I would not be forced to liquidate if I have some cash savings. I think if I can ride out trouble without having to sell, I'll come out better on the other side, at least relatively to others.

To that end, I am also accumulating in Celsius so that I can use my crypto holdings as collateral. I don't need the credit at the moment. However, it must be ready to use should the need arise.

0
0
0.000
avatar

At the moment our mind cannot grasp a world without USD and due to the underdeveloped countries still using it probably it will persist a long time from now. Still, I foresee countries which are far richer than most of the world, start the digital revolution using cryptocurrencies and my bet is on Switzerland. Once that happens it will expand more and more and at some point USD needs to find its way into the digital world as it will be surpassed technologically be the others. So I see its transformation more from a need to keep the pack with the new "kings" of the world.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Central bank digital currencies are a joke.
We already have a digital dollar.
It's called USD.

So if/when they boot up a new currency using this strategy, people are going to ask questions like, "Okay, why should I use this instead of other cryptocurrency?" And there is no answer to that question except "because we said so and we have weapons".

The only thing that CBDC do is make real crypto actually valid in the eyes of the public. With their last dying breath they are going to fully legitimize the thing that made them extinct... it's a pretty weird thought.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The only thing that CBDC do is make real crypto actually valid in the eyes of the public. With their last dying breath they are going to fully legitimize the thing that made them extinct... it's a pretty weird thought.

I can't agree more with this, I also believe that will legitimate crypto, about the success of CBDC's is still soon to say, but I don't have any confidence in them.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's simply another fiat currency.
There's nothing special about it.
I can't understand what they expect to gain except trying to trick users.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The Chinese already busy with their airdrop and are ahead of everyone else,the swedes have also been busy with it for some time! If one pulls it off the rest have to follow or get left behind by the efficiency gains but not every country would want it

So they have to continue to drive inflation and currrency devaluation to a point where people accept anything “new” to save us

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000