You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Hive Rewards Distribution System: Good, Bad & Entitlement

in LeoFinance2 months ago

Hello
It seems to me that you are doing a serious job here, I will be attentive to your content. To participate in this bluemist initiative, I tried to understand a little bit about how Hive works, I think very few of us do because we see it only as a social network where we have the option to receive rewards and since most of us don't invest money, we obviously see it all in a lighter way. I agree that people with more investment should have more influence, because they will try to keep their money safe.
I thank you for the example of the ten partners to explain inflation, it's a topic that is difficult for me to understand, but at least I know where we content creators come in the game, although I still don't understand much about the value we add. Until now I have assumed that our content and interactions on the web allow the generation of new blocks or something like that and that this in turn generates more currency and that as more publications exist the benefit is greater, but I feel that I am wrong, because at the same time, if that were the case people would have a more valuable role than I perceive; also, the quality of the content would not be so important.
I like the potential of Hive and I like how demanding it can be and that to be valued the content requires a minimum of effort, I feel a certain exclusivity in being here, since I am not attracted to traditional social networks, unless it is to look for something specific that solves a problem for me.
Regarding the negative vote, which I see has caused a stir, I disagree with its deliberate use, I think it should have specific purposes such as penalties for faults and correction of rewards, but I already know your point of view and respect it. The most beautiful thing about life is that each of us is unique and that absolute truth does not exist, so we are all right.
I used the DeepL translator for this comment, if there is any error I apologize.
Greetings

Sort:  

I agree with most of your points. While some of us can't invest with large amounts of money, our participation brings ton of value as well. As more people put in more time and effort on Hive vs traditional social networks, it increases the value of Hive as real people are engaging in real interactions, connecting, and networking with each other. Play games, exchanging ideas, trading things. All of these real human interactions have a great value on the internet. That is why Google, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, etc are highly valued companies.

Until now I have assumed that our content and interactions on the web allow the generation of new blocks or something like that and that this in turn generates more currency and that as more publications exist the benefit is greater.

You are not completely wrong. That is how blocks are created, all blockchain activities are put into blocks and block producers create blocks and blockchain keep moving. Our real interactions make these blocks meaningful. Otherwise witnesses would be producing empty blocks.

Thank you for you comment.

Thanks to you for your answer, the picture has become much clearer to me, my first interaction with the blockhain and cryptomode world has been steemit / hive and I'm trying to understand a little bit about how it works. This publication really helped me a lot about the inflation issue, which I didn't understand at all, and now your answer has helped me to know where the chain of all the movements we users make is.
Have a beautiful day.