You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Blockchain Governance Models | Should Steem Governance Model Be Changed?

in LeoFinance • last year

I can't agree more. We could also look at increasing the number of witnesses to a larger number then 20.

When i 1st joined this blockchain I saw the TOP 20 as waaayyyy too centralized. I do agree with what they did as reading the history of the blockchain it should have been addressed long ago, but we need more decentralization for sure.

last year in LeoFinance by
100%
    -100%

      Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

      • Disagreement on rewards
      • Fraud or plagiarism
      • Hate speech or trolling
      • Miscategorized content or spam

      Submit
      0.00 PAL
        1 vote
        Reply 2
        Sort:  
      • Trending
        • [-]
         last year 

        but we need more decentralization for sure.

        Agreed on that

        100%
          -100%

            Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

            • Disagreement on rewards
            • Fraud or plagiarism
            • Hate speech or trolling
            • Miscategorized content or spam

            Submit
            0.00 PAL
              Reply
              [-]
               last year 

              There are way more than 20 witnesses total (over 600 I believe last I checked?) but it is the top 20 that basically decide the direction of the blockchain. I agree increasing that number makes sense though.

              100%
                -100%

                  Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

                  • Disagreement on rewards
                  • Fraud or plagiarism
                  • Hate speech or trolling
                  • Miscategorized content or spam

                  Submit
                  0.00 PAL
                    Reply