What is Biden's Proposal for Capital Gains Taxes?

avatar
(Edited)

What Are Capital Gains?

Before getting into what Biden is including in his tax plan for capital gains, we should first define what is a capital gain.

A capital gain is a sale of any property. This is different than selling inventory.

As an example, if you are in the business of selling bicycles and you buy one bicycle for $100 from the manufacturer and sell it for $150 to a customer, your gross profit is $50. This is ordinary income and taxed at ordinary income rates. Read as: higher taxes.

A capital gain is made when you sell property (capital asset) but you are not in the business of selling that type of property. If you bought 100 shares of stock for investment purposes at $10/share ($1,000 total cost) and then sold that stock later for $15/share ($1,500 total sale), you have a $500 capital gain.

Long Term vs Short Term Capital Gains

Whether that capital gain is long-term or short-term depends on whether you hold the asset for a year. Under one year is short term capital gains. Over a year is long term capital gains.

With the current tax code, short term capital gains are taxed at whatever the taxpayer's ordinary income tax rate is. So if the taxpayer is in the 22% bracket, short-term capital gains will be taxed at 22% as well. Slight gotcha: your capital gains do get included in your adjusted gross income (AGI) for figuring out what bracket you are in.

If your $500 gain in this example was made over a year, it becomes long term capital gains. And long term gains (LTCG) have preferred tax rates. In other words, Congress has decided to reward this type of behavior by taxing it less than ordinary income types. LTCG tax rates are 0%, 15%, or 20% depending on your total income and filing status.

Current Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here's a table of how the capital gains tax brackets work depending on your income and status:


Source: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/capital-gains-tax/

Biden Capital Gains Tax Plan

Biden's plan has proposed a number of changes to the tax code. One of them is changing the capital gains rate in two important ways.

Gains Over $1M

First, a long term capital gains tax hike for high earners who make at least $1 million a year. A lot of people have misinterpreted this to mean that only people with very high incomes will see this tax hike. But that's not really accurate. The vast majority of people who see these incomes over $1 million are doing so not every year, but in one specific year: the year they sell their business. This tax reform would change the capital gains tax rate to be equal to the taxpayer's ordinary income tax rate (which he also plans to raise to 39.6%).

So notice how this is effectively a doubling of the federal income tax on large capital gains from 20% to 39.6%. Also, there is the Net Investment Income Tax of 3.8% which is under current tax law, and will continue to be assessed under the Biden plan. So the total tax on large capital gains will go from 23.8% to 43.4%. Remember, this is just for federal tax. State income taxes may be more, depending on where you live.

Step Up Basis

The second way that Biden's tax proposal is planning to create a tax increase on capital gains is by eliminating the so-called step-up in basis.

The step up in basis occurs when people inherit property. This is most often in the form of a house being passed down to children upon the death of a parent.

Under the current tax code, the inheritor of that property gets a tax basis at the fair market value on the date of inheritance. In English, that means that if you inherit a house worth $250,000 then for tax purposes you "paid" $250,000. So if you turn around and sell it for $260,000 you have a capital gain of $10,000. And you'll owe taxes (if any) on that amount and how long you held it as a capital asset.

With Biden's plan, the step-up upon inheritance is eliminated entirely. So if grandma paid $5,000 for that house in 1957, you inherit it at a value of $250,000, and then you sell it for $260,000, you have a capital gain of $255,000.

That's obviously an enormous tax increase because of the increase of taxable income.
Imagine that this person is married, making $60,000 at their job, and has 2 kids. Under the old rules, they'd pay $0 in capital gains. Under Biden's proposed rules, they'd pay $51,000 in capital gains tax. Some might say, "Nice problem to have," but this is not some high earner or wealthy person. This is middle-class generational wealth transfer. On top of that, it will end up increasing their tax bracket on their ordinary income, increasing their individual income tax rate.

If the details were such that the taxable income were over $1 million for the year, then the capital gains tax on that $255,000 gain jumps up to $110,670.

Other Tax Issues

In this article, I have only discussed one element of Biden's tax plan. There are many more elements to his proposal, almost all of which mean higher taxes. The two potential elements that would mean tax cuts are the un-capping of state and local tax deductions in your itemized deductions and changes to the child tax credit. Everything else in the tax plan, like payroll tax (social security tax) changes, corporate tax changes, and more all tax hikes.

I'm writing this in November of 2020 and it looks like Biden will indeed be the President in 2021. Whether he gets a Republican Senate or not is still unclear. So the political landscape of whether he will get his tax plan passed, and in what form, are still open questions.

The one thing that is clear though is that Biden's tax plan has targeted capital gains in a significant way. And it's a simple mechanism: tax something more and you get less of it. That means fewer business created, less investment, and less economic prosperity.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
29 comments
avatar

The socialist can only work and decide on others people money.

What happens if somebody inherits a company that gives work for 10 people. Do they need to pay a tax on it?

Also, inheriting is taxed at inheritance or at sell of that asset? This is decisive.

In Europe we have some idiocracy like that. In Germany every inheritance is taxed at the time of inheritance. There are some loop holes, like first degree inheritance where 400k € is not taxed for a cycle of 10 years. So if I want to give my son something over 400k value on a period of 10 years, it is going to be taxed. Since from his birth, we started moving assets on his name and we pay attention to not cross the mark. Not that we have 400k as a total, but you never know.


I think that there will be a lot of changes in the USA and I think that a lot of wealth will move to more friendly horizons in the next 4 years

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

In the US, the inheritance itself is only taxed if it is over a certain amount (currently about $11 million). Other than that, taxes are assessed at time of sale.

But that might change!

See my post on the Biden-Wyden plan for that monstrosity.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Madness at peak. Every inheritance tax is a killer, especially on companies that have a value and give work to people. Will check the referred post.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great article Neal. This is going to be a trainwreck.

It takes a truly moronic mindset to consider tax increases in a complete and total economic collapse. Double some tax rates while the global GDP plummets double digits in 2021.

By the way, did you see the CEO tax in San Francisco they just voted?

Here is a write up I read about it:

Secondly, San Franciso passed the CEO tax. The tax applies to companies in which the highest-paid managerial employee earns 100 times more than the median worker in San Francisco. Businesses above this 100 to 1 threshold pay an extra surcharge on their gross receipts. The greater the inequality, the bigger the tax. Companies with an executive earning 200 times the median worker in the city incur a 0.2% tax, all the way up to 0.6%. For large firms (businesses with more than $1 billion in gross receipts and 1,000 employees nationwide), the tax is applied to up to 2.4% of its city payroll expenses. The bill is expected to bring in between $60 million and $140 million per year, about 0.4% to 1% of the city’s annual budget.

All sounds good except for the fact that the company is on the hook for this, not the individual. What does anyone think will happen if margins are squeezed? This could happen if the stock package that is usually in the compensation plan moons.

Oops, time to lay some people off. I doubt the highly paid CEO will be the one let go.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2020/11/06/san-francisco-voted-for-a-ceo-tax-to-rectify-wealth-inequality-heres-what-they-should-do-instead/?sh=2ec542325c72

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah I have seen some things about the SF taxes. It’s crazy how they are driving business away.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

New York too.

Baltimore, Detroit, and Cleveland before them.

Some will never learn but I guess with class warfare is more important than economic growth, sensibility is not required.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Taxes always are hard to digest and if you are earning more to give more to the state is just like somebody stopping your growth. This might indeed narrow the social gap, but if the tax money is not used for the people that it doesn't serve the purpose. And usually in such cases people are looking for fiscal paradises or other means not to move to the next threshold.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Increasing taxes tends to limit growth. This furthers the entire problem because when economies contract, people lose their jobs which is obviously only furthers the inequality.

It becomes a vicious cycle.

Class warfare of attacking the wealthy is what Argentina put in during the Peron regime.

That use to be a leading country 100 years ago, then it went to crap as the economy was completely destroyed.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well, if it all goes according to the World Economic Forum prospects for 2030, we will all own nothing, have zero privacy and life has never been better. That even dwarves all of Biden's plans. Of course they are just an NGO and not the president of the USA but very powerful. And Biden has spoken in Davos several times and already mentioned higher taxes in 2017. And its founder, Professor Klaus Schwab, seems to love Biden. Yay, what a fun time we are living in.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well many things come to mind for me about Biden. Socialist is not one of them. I feel like there seems to be some inferrence to Biden being this either Robin Hood figure or whatever. I don't think that's what Biden is. He's a moderate. As far as the Tax Code whom does it serve?

Well no matter how you turn it or flip it. It doesn't seem to be serving the average American no matter what you do he becomes much poorer everyday. So if i were to look at some indictator of what tax plans have worked for the average American. I'm not saying anything Biden has suggested works better. I'm saying everything you all have suggested certainly hasn't worked because Americans continually get poorer under your ideologies.

So you asking average americans to care about the taxes you gotta pay on selling a business for a million bucks and they can't afford almost half the country a $400 emergency. Imagine how ridiculous that would sound to them. We hear everything from trickle down economics to don't tax rich people or they fleeing to Monaco or China or some place or another as they aren't true Americans probably.

I say let them run to their tax havens and tax their businesses to high heaven if they try to import to the American consumer. See how they like losing the biggest consumer in the world. So im not saying the Biden plan is appropriate.

I think the big problem isn't inequality. We need functional inequality. The problem is we have outrageous inequality that transforms our economy to neofeudalism with all these people with very little of anything. They aren't worried about real estate, the stock market.. the futures market.. none of that. These people trying to survive and the idea of letting people be super rich by their own bootstraps or code word government aid or tax systems that serve them and only them works. I think not. That's not going to work. So we may need taxation in the way to atleast have functional inequality..

I think that middle class family sure may not like paying a bit more taxes and maybe not being able to afford that vacation home. However i think the average working joe who's taking on a ton of taxes in ratio who's just trying to put gas in his car to get to work may not find that a reason to hoot and holler. So when you start dealing in figures like a million bucks which i know is not alot of money to some people. I"m thinking this is upper middle class territory. So we aren't talking the destruction here of the middle class lol.

So this tax system needs changes. However i'm not really aware where its ever served the average american yet more than its served the wealthy. Also i'm not a person who is into class warfare. This is just dual economy indicators 101. That if you have this great imbalance in your economy this is not good. It's seemingly gotten worse no matter who's been in charge or who said he'd do all this or that for the country and the stock market lol. It hasn't worked the economy is in bad shape. It's gotten worse over the last 4 years. Thats a fact even before covid it was getting worse on the real data.. not the fake data. The actual job numbers and lack of budgetary spending as i don't see how you can really become healthy economy if you're spending more and more than your previous administrations. So yea i'm not buying alot of what they selling.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

These kinds of discussions always leads me to the most obvious question: "What will I GET for my taxes?"

The existing US model clearly doesn't seem to be working, unless the objective is to create a handful of uber-rich feudal overlords who own EVERYthing, and everyone else remains stuck in a giant underclass.

Biggest challenge in the US invariably seems to be that nobody trusts government. Not that I can blame anyone... the entire nation was founded out of a mistrust of authority.

One of the great "mythologies" of US economics is this idea that people with money are "job creators." They are not. Consumers are job creators; rich people create jobs in response to consumer demands; they see an unmet opportunity and fill it. The idea is pretty much the same, except a trailing indicator is being mislabeled as a leading indicator.

Income inequality in the US is becoming problematic, not for "social" reasons, but for the fact that if people can't afford to buy stuff industry stagnates. As a regular working stiff, I haven't "consumed" anything other than essentials for more than a decade: no new cars, no vacations, no electronics, no home improvement projects. Our family income was essentially, in gross dollars the same in 2019 as it was in 2007, NOT adjusting for inflation. Meanwhile, our cost of living is about 80% higher. That equation — regardless of what one might say PHILOSOPHICALLY — simply doesn't work.

Meanwhile, some good friends of ours — he's in senior management at Microsoft — have something on the order of tripled their income since 2007. That's the current US tax system. The reason it's likely to eventually fall apart from an economic/industrial production perspective is that our friends will not need to buy 17 toaster ovens to make up for the one the average person can no longer afford.

Which, of course, stands separately from what will get DONE with the higher taxes. And I've VERY skeptical about the notion that a trend towards more income equity is likely to happen...

=^..^=

0
0
0.000
avatar

I upvoted your comment for the sole reason
you stated something not out of ordinary.

In the meantime !BEER

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

"What will I GET for my taxes?"

The overall fraction of GDP that gets collected in taxes doesn't change much. People change their behaviors in response.

So we've been bouncing between 7 and 12% for the last couple of decades. Let's say history is completely wrong, people roll over for tax hikes, and the net rate goes up to 15%. There still isn't enough to cover expenditures and the deficit grows.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Im from Canada and currently studying abroad in the US. our taxes in Canada are higher. while people in the US are like vampires seeing sunlight when it comes to hearing about taxes going up.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I love to read about tax code changes
and it shows truly why most people do not like it.
On the other hand, there will be loophole
for the big pocket to shake off
any changes you summarized.

!BEER

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Leave it to the government to continually kill the people who actually spend money to buy stuff.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Franz Oppenheimer told us:

There are two fundamentally opposed means whereby man…is impelled to obtain the necessary means for satisfying his desires. These are work and robbery, one’s own labor and the forcible appropriation of the labor of others…I propose…to call one’s own labor and the equivalent exchange of one’s own labor for the labor of others, the 'economic means'…while the unrequited appropriation of the labor of others will be called the 'political means.'

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for the informative post.
It's also good to understand how similar it is in other countries. Different brackets, different magnitude of values but the same trend.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000