RE: A comparison of my 'hourly return' blogging compared to curating
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
In terms of efficiency, AV definitely stands out without a doubt. I have been MIA for two months plus and now back in action which brings me back to almost ground zero to start with. Yet, I see blogging is not just about the money but the contents that I created. It can be valuable when it acts as a thought record or some experience sharing and even marketing materials. Thus, it is earning us both money and also influence (consistency comes in crucial). So by combining both, it is something pretty promising! Without good blog posts and consistent authors, we will not be satisfied with the AV performance either.
0
0
0.000
Well put!
It is unfair to compare the two, but part of what I like blogging about it is these comparative posts that take one metric (like hourly rate) and then compare two things anyway!
I look at them as two completely separate things in my head!
I agree that I wouldn't want to vote on nonsense, I did go through a phase a while back of adding on a few people purely for curation returns (no one who was an obvious milker), but I think I've put nearly all of them on mute now.
The people on my AV I generally like, however I have some people who I like who I don't AV, with some people it just feels wrong, so I manual vote, typically those who have quite diverse content.
Agree on your strategy, AV those we preferred and deemed to be quality content makers. Unfortunately for Steem side it is rather hard to do that already. In any case, it would be good to manual curate some from time to time 😁 it is fun and can be done in a random manner, at the very least AV had done a decent foundation job for generating a return on our stake.
I do manual vote every day - you can set your Hive autovote to have a cut off on the Mana, which is handy to keep some for manual!
Steem I don't know too much about these days!