"I'm Rewarded For My Engaging Content!"

avatar

CONTENT.png


When it comes to social media posting and writing articles, it might be important to think about how you write as your goal should be to engage with your audience. I have previously explained why engagement is vital for Hive and communities so I won't talk about that this time, but I will say this:

  • The more engagement you have on a post, the bigger the reach.

The greater the reach – the more comments, shares/reblog and likes/upvotes you'll get, which obviously equates to more rewards and a larger audience. You probably have some sort of goal on Hive, but at least one of your goals should be to focus on your audience and to grow the amount of followers you have. This can be done in many different ways, but one of the smartest moves is to reward your audience whenever they leave a comment on your articles. Nothing beats real engagement and everyone likes to be rewarded.

However, rewards can be more than just $ and tokens. An upvote worth 0 can be seen as a reward, because it's an act from someone who seems to enjoy your contribution. I am obviously not talking about auto-votes in this scenario, as that is passive and doesn't involve any form of manual work whatsoever.

I enjoyed onealfa's post "0.01% vs 100%" very much. Not only because I liked the idea he shared, but also due to all the engagement. The engagement was great with 115 comments in total at the time I am writing this and I went a bit back- and forth with other awesome users in the comment section.

One of the things sort of inspired me a bit so I'll use that as an inspiration to explain my thought process about rewards..

This is one of my replies from that post:

"A small upvote from a whale is still a whale vote, but people will be curious to know why they received such a low valued vote. I think it's a great idea, and I can definitely see how this would actually change the behaviour or some people."

I strongly believe in the fact that people are here for the money before anything else and I have been here long enough to have witnessed a lot of different things. For instance, the results or should I say consequences of auto-votes from whales and other heavily invested stakeholders.

We have seen it happen many times in the past. An author who seems to produce an average of 1 or 2 articles per day starts to share 4 articles per day as soon as they figure out that they have been able to land on the "lucky-list" of a whale that starts to auto-vote whatever they publish.

We have often seen quantity increase and quality decrease due to those votes. That wouldn't have been the case if those people weren't here mainly for rewards and money. Just because you hold long-term doesn't change the fact that you are here for the sake of money.

Anyhow, we want engagement and that is likely to come from effort. I say effort instead of quality, as a funny meme could rake in thousands of comments. A meme isn't very likely to give you ideas for new topics to write about or great discussion though, and that wouldn't be "rewarding" for anyone but the author if we're talking about rewards in form of money.

If you look at onealfa's post "0.01% vs 100%", you can clearly see how much he rewards his audience by upvoting the comments. Some more and others less, but he makes sure to make his audience be seen and/or heard in one way or another. @taskmaster4450 is great at this as well. Comments in his own articles, comments in other people's content and comments within the @leomarkettalk posts are being upvoted left and right. An awesome way to spread some love & tokens around the community.

That being said, we're still talking about rewards in form of money. Comments are another type of reward. Make a comment and tell the author what you think about his content. That goes a very long way most times and for someone who is rather new, it can be game changing for them. That single comment can be the only thing someone needs to decide to stay and continue to put in more effort over time.

Reblog/share the article with your audience or on Twitter/Facebook etc. That's another amazing thing you can do to reward the author. How about doing both? - Make a comment & reblog..

The point I am trying to make is that rewards are far more than just $ or tokens. In fact, most people who comes to Hive have never earned a single cent from any of their content before, so they are used to not getting paid. They are used to be rewarded in other ways.

However, we also have people who are trying to establish themselves further. They want to improve their reputation, credibility, writing skills or whatever.. And they want to grow their stakes as well.

If a full whale vote (I use that as an example because a vote from a whale has huge impact), has a value of 100 LEO/Hive/POB or whatever and they decide to manually vote and they reward content with 1 LEO/Hive/POB instead of 100, it should work as encouragement and it should motivate users to improve even further. It's definitely a token of appreciation and it shows that a whale has noticed you.. Instead of being sad about the value not being 100 for that specific vote, be encouraged and think about the reason for the upvote. Think about the why.

  • Why did they give you an upvote worth 1 instead of 100?
  • Why 10 instead of 100? Why 50 instead of 100?

It could be as simple as the curator wants to spread the tokens far and wide. He might want to rewards as many users as possible without spending too much of his voting power.

It could also be because he appreciate the effort you put in, but he wants to see more from you. It can be because he likes the content but not to such an extent that he thinks it's worth the full vote..

There could be several reasons for that specific vote and I wouldn't recommend analyzing it too much, but I think it's a great chance for you to actually think about how you write, or what you write.

Use it as fuel to improve. That way you stay encouraged and motivated which is vital for your own success on Hive. Despair, anxiety and miserable won't lead you to anything good, so stay positive.

You just caught the attention of a whale. Now it's time to lure them in. You might not taste that juicy whale-vote this time, but there's always a tomorrow and you need to remember that.

More than anything else though, you need to remember that rewards are more than $ and that Hive is nothing like a get rich quick scheme. It takes time, hard work and effort.

  • Be grateful for all the rewards. Everything builds up over time.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
32 comments
avatar

I strongly believe in the fact that people are here for the money before anything else and I have been here long enough to have witnessed a lot of different things

True words! I feel the same, myself included; the good thing is, we can have both: gain money AND knowledge, while building some virtual friendships along the way. It's a win win situation, and actually engaging instead of dumping effortless content just makes our stay here even more enjoyable.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Commenting adds a lot more than financial rewards.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Indeed. It is rewarding to see that someone read what you wrote and enjoyed it enough to take some of its time to answer it. Even some of the tokens that we have here are a good/fun way to engage; so cheers and... have a !BEER ;)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Comments, discussions, tokens and reblogs. All of it can- and should (according to me) be seen as rewards.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

It sure does! It's unfortunate that there are so many "Hivers" here who doesn't seem to understand that.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Very well said.

The network keeps on building along with our knowledge. The time spent is rewarded very well.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

The time spent is rewarded very well.

You're definitely being rewarded a lot for the time you put in on Hive.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, Hive is an amazing place to gain knowledge, share ideas and change lives. It actually requires very little effort compared to many other things that holds the same potential.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is not rocket science.

I am truly baffled why people think crypto is any different from any other business building project. Even when we compare it to the traditional online world, why is there the belief that things are going to magically happen here.

Does someone throw up a YouTube channel or open a twitter account and instantly have thousands or millions of followers. How many times do we see people mentioning to subscribe and promoting their stuff elsewhere while also engaging their commenters.

Yet here, it is the concept of "post and everyone should upvote me".

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

why is there the belief that things are going to magically happen here.

Well, I honestly think it can be because Hive is so extremely easy. I mean, we know that it takes time, requires effort and that you need to "work hard" to become established etc.. But, it's easy and doesn't involve much work compared to traditional work for instance. +You literally have a chance to make a day's, week's or month's salary for a single article. Depending on where you live.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

That was a really interesting post that you are referencing. I know I commented on it, but I am nots sure I got much engagement. I've actually gotten into the habit of not really noticing all of those "dust" votes anymore. If I were to get a $.01 upvote from a whale, it would like be scrolled past and forgotten before I even got to the end of the page. I've been doing this long enough that I don't plan on changing my habits based on votes. I have been posting more lately, but that is because some new communities have popped up that I feel like contributing to.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't look at the voters or percentages from the article-page, I either look at the "activities" or use "hivetasks.com/@yourusername", and I usually have that page open whenever I use my computer. That way, it's easy to see those details and it has definitely helped me a lot in terms of motivation and encouragement during the time I've been on Hive.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Very interesting. I have been known to use those sites quite a bit as well. Hiveblocks is another one of my favorites that I have open quite frequently.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I hardly ever vote below 100%. If I ever become a whale, I'm sure my 100% votes will be downvoted by other whales who don't want to see me giving out such high votes.

As far as onealfa post, I might just go ahead and make a "M'eh" vote bot. LOL

0
0
0.000
avatar

Lol yeah that's good but what if there are 40 good authors who are contributing to the platform? If you use 100% votes then you can reward only half of them

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Are all 40 contributing every 24 hours?
I doubt I would have time to read 40 articles every day, even less so if I was Whale rich.

My newbie tip was to give 10 upvotes a day, which would keep your voting power close to max each 24 hours. If there were only 40 good authors, I would just give them an upvote 1 time every 4 days. (10 votes per day, 4 days until all 40 were upvoted at least 1 time). They would probably be satisfied with that upvote.

If I was a Whale.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Are all 40 contributing every 24 hours?

Yeah they might be because as we grow we can expect that .

Right now we have more than 1000 users posting everyday , so 40 good authors per day isn't that big isn't it ?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Nope, not that big.

And, determining what was "good" is also subjective. But, with my way, even if there were 400, each one of those authors would at some point get a full 100% Whale upvote. I think they would be happy with that, even if it was once every month and a half.

Now, can you imagine if 10 whales would do that?

0
0
0.000
avatar

So you wouldn't upvote the same author more than once per day, regardless of the amount of posts they made?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

No. In this scenario, I wouldn't do any automatic curation, so I would only upvote those articles that I deemed good enough for the upvote and I would also limit it to one per author.

But, let's say that of all the feeds I watch, there wasn't any good articles, except 2 from the same author. I guess, if it warranted it, I would give the 2nd upvote. So, it could be flexible, just limited to 10 total upvotes.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I am grateful for the comments on my articles so long as they aren't the general spam of "great post" and I don't know them. Nothing is a get rich quick scheme and I know full well that I may not get the vote in the future.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't like the spammy-looking comments either obviously, but I've actually missed those comments every now and then due to the lack of overall engagement.. lol

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Consistency is very important here, as in nearly all kinds of businesses. If you show up every day and try to make it a little better than the day before, you will eventually be a lot better than when you first started.

Comments and other forms of engagement are a very important aspect of this community, after all, it's a social network.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

If you show up every day and try to make it a little better than the day before, you will eventually be a lot better than when you first started.

That is soooo true and even though I haven't been able to be here everyday lately, I try to do as much as possible when I'm here, and I strive to have better results or do more than last time. I think it's a really good approach.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Another important element that I'm learning - post when I have something to say - not when I want to make a post.

If I don't have anything to say, there's no point in posting. This results in longer, more considered posts, with more content, that take more effort and time to craft.

This then becomes somewhat untenable when I go on really long rants and no one reads the whole thing. :P

0
0
0.000
avatar

post when I have something to say

I did the same for a long time, but due to the "lack of posts" I published, I actually started to question myself by doing this.. So I usually try to be somewhat active and write something just to make sure that I don't become inactive more or less, but I obviously want to contribute and it makes things a lot easier if you feel like you can add something.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I can do that by commenting unnecessarily on other people's work.

There's so much I could write the question is... who would really read it? :P

0
0
0.000