What do you think about Blurt and Zapata?
Another two STEEM hardforks that came to life after Justin Sun's takeover. Blurt excluded the Steemit's stake, but Zapata didn't. They are trying to experiment with a lot of other things too, but will they succeed as social media blockchains?
Blurt's features and economy.Both Blurt and Zapata's approaches seemed "approximately correct" to me, which is why there are two approaches to genesis and two upcoming chains. - @jacobgadikian
If you didn't visit Twitter a couple of days ago, you may not even know that Blurt is already up and running. It's not exactly working properly as of now, many things are still unreleased, but there's a lot of activity on Gitlab.
I am not sure what's going on with Zapata. To be honest I think both of these blockchains are not getting enough attention. Airdrop is an airdrop and it really makes sense to keep an eye on them because what if there would be an option to trade/swap those tokens for HIVE or LEO tokens?
To stay informed about Blurt and Zapata I suggest you to follow @jacobgadikian. He's working on both of these blockchains and you may find some pretty interesting posts on his blog, such as:
- https://hive.blog/blurt/@jacobgadikian/blurt-multichain-decentralized-social-media
- https://hive.blog/crosspost/@jacobgadikian/blurt-rfc--clearing-out-the-stinc-4ct093t3wbh
Do you know about any other account that I should follow to not miss any updates?
Thank you,
see you soon!
Posted Using LeoFinance
They are poop
Posted Using LeoFinance
When I saw Bernie's multiple dongs on Blurt, I just felt sorry for them TBH...
Are the wallets working yet do you know?
Posted Using LeoFinance
Not for me, no.
https://blurtwallet.com
https://wallet.blurt.world
https://ionomy.com
:)
The wallet didn't work previously, but it does now.
Thanks.
Wanna know who I feel sorry for?
Not the Blurt team.
I feel sorry for communities that accept @ngc @berniesanders in their upper echelons.
Accepting behavior like that doesn't seem real wise, what with him running around spamming cocks on steem, blurt and whaleshares, or threatening people or engaging in the various and sundry terrible behavior that he engages in.
Kinda makes communities that accept that kind of behavior look bad, you know?
Certainly, you'll find exactly zero known cock-spammers or threat-issues in the Blurt discord or slack.
We would nuke their access to discord or slack after the first cock or threat.
standards people, standards.
@blocktrades It pays to have, and enforce, certain standards of conduct in your community.
If certain behaviors are accepted, folks could easily get the wrong message and write off any possibility of collaborating on anything, ever.
Software could be built, which by all rights could and should interface with Hive, and spread the hive message, but wouldn't, simply owing to Hive's continued acceptance of a few bad actors in their easily-censored off-chain communities.
On-chain, a good blockchain has zero censorship, as censorship destroys value. No choice.
In Blurt's our off chain community layer, we can choose who should and should not be members of our community, and we do, because those choices reflect on the blurt community and ourselves.
No need to feel sorry for me. I’m not a poor schlub like you, Jake. Also, nobody gives a fuck about your opinion of Hive or how it should be run.
I suggest you watch your mouth and heed my advice, little man.
Now, get back to sucking Ritardo's micropenis.
Unless you have proof I posted those, which you don't because I didn't post them, I suggest you watch what you say.