RE: The LEO Dilemma: Changing the Way I Curate Content
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I totally agree, there is so much material to write and discuss together but I would need more time or I could clone myself 😏
Leofinance aims to be a reference finance site in the crypto sector and it is necessary to cover a greater number of different topics in order also to attract new users.
On the other hand, the purpose is precisely this: to attract new users through the quality of our content! And also have some nice support from the whales for our commitment 😊
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
0
0
0.000
I can see your point, but I disagree.
We need more users, that's a fact. By not curating leo-related content we set up limitations for newcomers who have never experienced anything except LeoFinance.
They should talk about their Leo-experience, because that is how we will reach even more people.
Also, by not curating leo-related content we also change the token distribution, which ultimately makes the well-known, established and good authors even more wealthy while the newcomers doesn't earn much at all..
Hence, we make the same mistakes we've seen ever since the days of Steem.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I am sure that all new users who arrive and introduce themselves will receive the support of all other users in the community.
But I agree to focus the vote on more structured articles and on different topics, as a finance platform should be.
Nothing takes away from posting on LEO, it is not forbidden, only you will not get the vote of @ leo.voter but you will have the support of those who appreciate your post
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta