RE: Hello Bullies, my name is RESILIENCE!
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Glad to see you're not going anywhere, but PHC is a sad story. I get why they flagged you on a few of those, but others were unnecessary and outright uncalled for. Usually, you would get a warning before all that stupid drama, so I'm guessing they needed a target to 'make an example of' as it has been awhile since there were any major issues with that. I love meatloaf though, I may have to copy it. 🤣
0
0
0.000
I have long since had a target on my back. Guess my voice is a little too annoying ;)
As for the recycled posts... and like I said above:
I think it is ridiculous that some read worthy content that is years old cannot be republished... yet so much other crud is acceptable around here. In fact, this is the ONLY space I know of where the re-publishing of your own original works is treated like some kind of deadly sin.
Why is there not a turnaround time for things that can be shared again.... considering the high turnover of members Hive has....?! I would far rather enjoy a really good old piece of writing than sift through a lot of the bollocks that people here put out and call "blogging".
Who makes these decisions / rules if nobody is "in charge"........
at least 3 of her last 7 posts were reposts. I stopped digging there.
Many more so it seems. Many years already as per Hivewatchers research. Thanks for uncovering.
I found a lot, but I quit when I saw so many in her last 7 posts.
I think one of the biggest problems is that people want a curation reward, and they want some decent content to read and view.
If the Auto Vote users had a list of content recyclers then the only votes that individual would ever get would be from new voters or friend voters. If the vote was to big from a friend, then a down vote to adjust the reward would maybe be called for.
If the auto voters did not waste votes of recycled content then there would be more quality content possibly rising to the top of the chain.