Exchange of experience and stupid fiction.

avatar

One day, someone came up with such a stupid concept, or definition, as low-skilled labor.

Apparently, the person who coined this word was a loafer with a very high conceit, he may have bought himself several diplomas, but even if he didn’t buy them, he spent most of his life sitting on the fifth point of support and never tried anything something, do it yourself.

Low-skilled labor includes the work of loaders, laborers, janitors and other public utilities workers.

You know, if you put next to the one who came up with such a term and the one who held a broom or a rake in his hands all his life and ask him to clean the territory of the same size, then everything will immediately fall into place, at that moment it will be clear who of them, low-skilled.

I think it's not often you see a young man who dreams of cleaning up fallen leaves in the park, but it happens, and in this photo, we see a guy who listens carefully to instructions from a worker with a rake in his hands, how to do his job well .

The exchange of experience is an important component of any work, it's time to classify theorists as low-skilled work.

1ag054D2C.png

Photos taken with a Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 camera.

Author @barski



0
0
0.000
10 comments
avatar

Hmm. Is your point that "loaders, laborers, janitors and other public utilities workers" aren't low skilled or is your point that theorists are also low skilled?

Posted using Proof of Brain

0
0
0.000
avatar

Definitely, a person who masterfully does his job cannot be considered low-skilled. At the same time, many theories are not confirmed, or go the wrong way, which suggests that theorists can be counted among the number, or the concept of low-skilled labor. But if the janitor does not sweep the yard well, you will see it immediately, and you will find out that the theory was wrong years, or centuries later.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You need to stack more BBH (Each 1000 BBH in your wallet allows you to send 1 BBH per day)

0
0
0.000