"Coronavirus Is a Bioweapon" - Says US Bioweapon Lawmaker. + Danish Law Allows Forced Vaccinations!

▶️ Watch on 3Speak


The recent hostile takeover of the STEEM blockchain by a Billionaire from Wuhan has coencided with the worldwide pandemic of a hostile virus, also out of Wuhan! This has kept me busy the last few weeks, but I have found time to post some of the evidence I have come across that shows that the Coronavirus threat is fairly likely to have begun in various labs in China. Plus, news from today shows the Danish government has passed into 'law' a decree that allows them to forcibly detain and 'treat' (vaccinate) people (despite a vaccine not yet being available) - going against all medical ethics protocols.

This video includes references to scientic studies and also an interview between Dr. Mercola and Dr. Francis Boyle, where they discuss the case for Covid 19 being a bioweapon.

Let us know if you have any additional information to add in the comments below, thanks!

Wishing you well,
Ura Soul

Links


Full video interview with Francis Boyle:

Archive pdf of the retracted doc from Wuhan: https://img-prod.tgcom24.mediaset.it/images/2020/02/16/114720192-5eb8307f-017c-4075-a697-348628da0204.pdf

Article in Nature on warnings from 2015 about the risk of coronavirus research:
https://www.nature.com/news/engineered-bat-virus-stirs-debate-over-risky-research-1.18787

(Study) "Difference in Receptor Usage between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and SARS-Like Coronavirus of Bat Origin" -
https://jvi.asm.org/content/82/4/1899

Denmark rushes through emergency law:
https://www.thelocal.dk/20200313/denmark-passes-far-reaching-emergency-coronavirus-law

Bing Covid Tracker:
https://www.bing.com/covid

2010 Whistleblower from Project Camelot warning that China would be attacked by an engineered flu virus:



0
0
0.000
33 comments
avatar

He said, 'Stop doing wrong things and turn back to God! The kingdom of heaven is almost here.'(Matthew 3:2)

Bro. Eli Challenges Atheism Belief, There is No God

Watch the Video below to know the Answer...
(Sorry for sending this comment. We are not looking for our self profit, our intentions is to preach the words of God in any means possible.)


Comment what you understand of our Youtube Video to receive our full votes. We have 30,000 #SteemPower. It's our little way to Thank you, our beloved friend.
Check our Discord Chat
Join our Official Community: https://steemit.com/created/hive-182074

0
0
0.000
avatar

The key is to find that patient zero if he/she is still alive and figure out who is behind this devilish plan. As time progresses, the world will eventually learn the truth.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That would certainly help, though I doubt that we will truly find that information any time soon.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

A problem that is occurring is that multiple countries are discovering the first cases in their country were not connected to cases in other countries. There now appears to be multiple patient zeroes, each with the same disease but unconnected.

This is exactly what would be expected from a covert deliberate spread of the infection by introduction in multiple places around the world.

In June 2019, Ft. Detrick, the US primary biological warfare lab, experienced a leak and was shut down. Shortly after this, many places began experiencing massive increases in ILI and pneumonia. Australia suffered an 800% increase in deaths from flu-like illnesses in June 2019, for example.

It seems from the evidence that a biological weapon leaked from Ft. Detrick, and it was then deliberately released around the world.

0
0
0.000
avatar

im in denmark and i support this law :D this virus is very contagious, hence presentably infecting people with it is almost like causing harm to a person, when not all other people can get vaccinated due to a health condition or allergy and rely on us to get vaccinated.

also whats up with 3speak i am unable to comment over 3speak...

0
0
0.000
avatar

I suggest studying the nature of vaccines and immunity more deeply.

0
0
0.000
avatar

even if not every vaccine reaches immunity, if a large enough population achieves immunity it would protect the people unable to get vaccinated. vaccines like mmr often require 2 shots to have a high enough immunity rate that measeles dont spread, but so what thats 16 dollars? or 0 danish crowns since healthcare is free :D

if this is not what u meant honestly unless you elaborate your point i have no clue what u mean....

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is a complicated topic and I cannot explain all the details to you here in the time I have available. There are multiple threads that require much deeper research to understand them than mainstream and your doctor will provide you. You only need to look at an insert for one of the commonly provided vaccines to learn some of what I am pointing to here, however, you are unlikely to ever see one (despite them being 'intended' for you to read them before being vaccinated) and in truth, many Doctors don't even bother to read them.
The reality here is that what has been sold as 'evidence based medicine' is actually mostly blind faith and policy following by people who should have done their due diligence research but really are just bootlicking and lazy af.

vaccines do NOT provide real immunity, which is why you need to repeatedly receive them. in the case of this virus there isn't even a vaccine available because they take time to create them. even the UK's top gov specialist has stated that he would be amazed if a vaccine appears within 1 year from now.. yet, as the video provided by @luca1777 references, 'somehow' an Israeli group is 'just weeks away' from producing a vaccine! How amazing and convenient! Not suspect at all! :/

Vaccines represent one of the only ways that groups can insert material directly into the cellular structure of large numbers of people, bypassing their natural defences. Think about that for a moment. If you were securing a house or a computer, would you allow all your security to be bypassed just because someone in 'authority' tells you to? Maybe you would - but then you haven't understood security or confidence trickery.

These are only the tiny tip of the iceberg of this topic. The bottom line as far as healthcare goes is that it is VOLUNTARY. As soon as 'medicine' is enforced, ALL medical ethics codes have been violated and the action is NOT health CARE, but is physical abuse.

You don't get to dominate people's free will and body because YOU are SCARED! There's a reason why the world united to bomb NAZI Germany.

0
0
0.000
avatar

its a bit over generalized. flu shots give you only 1 year immunity because the virus mutates so fast, and tbh i have not taken any flu shots. measles though do not mutate fast enough for the vaccine though, hence you only need 2 shots done one time to get immunity, and data supports such claims, by looking at the death toll before and after measles vaccines got discovered.

ofc there have been always anti vaccination groups where massive amount of groups did not vaccinate and caused random small outbreaks in the group once one person got the measles, but ever since the measle vaccine was introduced the deaths are low.

if more than 95% are immune then herd immunity will cause measles to go extinct

and vaccines dont work by bypassing natural defences, but by trigering them. Vaccines are the actual desease but genetically edited to be the harmless version of the desease. it is possible (but rare) to get infected then by the desease but the symptoms are then very mild. but by the immune system killing the dummy desease, the immune system trains its self to fight the real deal.

and by that logic i should be able to do with my body whatever i like and pay no regard to how i affect others around me. i should be equally be able to smoke in elevators and fueling stations or wehreever no matter how others feel. if you are infected instead of smoke and fire causing hazard to the ones around you, it is your breath and body liquid. if in the case of measles you reach a new born or baby, there is a very high chance you kill that baby. would you voluntarily take that risk? in the case of covid19 ur probably gonna kill a granny.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I know how vaccines work. You would not normally end up with such an intense focus of disease pathogens and other materials in your blood stream because your body is designed to prevent that. Some researchers have shown that the massive flood of foreign material and the hyper response of the immune system that they trigger has been shown to block small blood vessels in the brain and can cause brain damage / autism. This has been heavily denied.

Do you know why almost all the graphs you will find for cases of measles and other vaccinated diseases start in the mid 1900s and don't show earlier data? See if you can find one that goes back further, they do exist.

Nothing you say will change the reality of the sacredness of personal will and personal health/body. Yes, people make choices that cause harm to themselves and that can actually in some cases spread disease. At the same time, the immune system of most people is massively under-resourced due to a total lack of understanding about their own body/mind/emotions and nutritional requirement. Such a lack of responsibility among the general population is not solved by vaccinations and certainly not by forced vaccinations.

Overpowering the will of people is an area that has been heavily denied and yet has caused more ill health than anything else.

0
0
0.000
avatar

as an individual with autism, i find such claims highly offensive. that one paper was a hoax and proven to be a hoax and was retracted from the journal and scientists got discredited. autism is genetic and the only way to get autism is by being born autistic. also autism does not mean you are less abled, but it simply means you have a different way of thinking. meaning for me it was always easier to do math physics or programming tasks than student peers, and having a focused interest in such tasks helped me improve such skills. autism also needs no cure. if the majority had autism and non autistic people were a minority, then those would be considered "disabled".

they dont really site sources on those plots from before, was data back then even recorded? i wonder how they kept an accurate plot of the measles even through the world wars. i dont think i can trust sites like antivax.org which is appearantly the only "scientific" institute publishing numbers from before 1950... so lets look at current data. pakistan is famous for its antivaxxer fake news and ranks with gigantic countries like india and african countries where its virtually impossible due to their size to reach every corner with vaccines... china with similar population size with mandatory vaccines are not on the list in the top, but i would not trust a vaccine in china since china is also famous for reselling outdated vaccines

pakistan the free vaccination programs make little progress because of fake news and taliban saying vaccines are haram (mmr vaccines contain something from pig)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Your 'offense' is misplaced here, nothing in my words was offensive or belittling to you or anyone else. In fact, the individual who publicly stated his research into the brain damage alleged to be caused in some cases by vaccines died suspiciously not long after and was not able to fully respond to those who ridiculed him. The reality here is that I have put significant amounts of my own time, for free, into coaching people with autism and they have thanked me greatly for the benefits they have gained from me doing so.

The connection between autism and vaccination is more than just brain damage from hyper-response of the immune system. Here two of the world's leading experts in aluminium state publicly that they have been forced, recently, to change their position on aluminium in vaccines' role in causing autism, due to their own (privately funded) research:

Exley1.jpg

Shaw.jpg

You can view an interview with Professor Exley here

0
0
0.000
avatar

"In addition to the live, attenuated or inactive virus, pathogen or toxoid, the MMR (MMR-II) vaccine contains the following ingredients:

  • chick embryo cell culture
  • WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts
  • vitamins
  • amino acids
  • fetal bovine serum
  • sucrose
  • glutamate
  • recombinant human albumin
  • neomycin
  • sorbitol
  • hydrolyzed gelatin
  • sodium phosphate
  • sodium chloride
    "
    source
    about mmr vaccine ingredients i dont see any aluminium. there is also not any mercury as some other antivaxxers claim.

having autism is also not a worse alternative for children, compared to dying. infact if you get diagnosed early with autism it would be easier to learn those unspoken wierd conventions like looking away every 7 seconds during conversation and then looking back into the eyes, and keeping eyes in a relaxed state during conversation. it is possible to diagnose autism as early as the second month of ones life. its just physical disabilities, despite much less common, are more appearant and people are more aware of them, while having autism its like having social blindness. but im glad u actually put in the efford teaching such social conventions as most neuro typicals (NT) would not even know where to start as these come unnoticed by most NT.

0
0
0.000
avatar

CDC states that the following vaccines contain Aluminium based adjuvants:

Anthrax, DT, DTaP (Daptacel), DTaP (Infanrix), DTaP-IPV (Kinrix), DTaP-IPV (Quadracel), DTaP-HepB-IPV (Pediarix), DTaP –IPV/Hib (Pentacel), Hep A (Havrix), Hep A (Vaqta), Hep B (Engerix-B), Hep B (Recombivax), HepA/Hep B (Twinrix), HIB (PedvaxHIB), HPV (Gardasil 9), Japanese encephalitis (Ixiaro), MenB (Bexsero, Trumenba), Pneumococcal (Prevnar 13), Td (Tenivac), Td (Mass Biologics), Tdap (Adacel), Tdap (Boostrix)

Children today receive a riduculous and extremely dangerous cocktail of vaccines as compared to my generation and before. I assure you that given the research I have done, I am 100% certain that I would choose not to have vaccines and will never have another. I was suicidal for much of my childhood due to immune dysfunction caused by vaccinations which I only managed to resolve after studying the topic in depth and thoroughly detoxing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

which of the vaccines are mandatory or even recommended? i have hepatitis AB vaccine but no idea which but thats because i lived in countries where cases are common.... anthrax though seems very rare though, unless you are a politician targeted by bioterrorism its hard to get anthrax XD... that concludes the deseases i ever heard about. yet i suppose u agree about mmr being safe?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Legislation in different parts of the world makes different demands of people regarding different vaccines. The US is one of the most extreme and also one of places with the lowest level of overall health - which is not random. Numerous specialists and a few studies have made ultra clear that the overall health of vaccinated children is LOWER than those who are unvaccinated.
The pharma industry has always refused to publish studies which directly compare the health of vaccinated to unvaccinated people - however, private funding has allowed this to take place relatively recently.

I do not agree that MMR is safe, no. My understanding is that each of the individual components of MMR, injected separately, with a time gap, is hugely more safe than the combination version which was field tested on living people and caused numerous problems.

0
0
0.000
avatar

XDDD US health system is just wierd, but if u want to fix it, i would suggest to vote bernie sanders

wat health impacts do those specialists claim and wat evidence they show?

and if u take chemicals one chemical at a time you must be sustaining your self from supplements and not eat real food? maybe you only eat soylent? injecting and eating is different only that a lot of chemicals get broken down in the stomach... but whats different from swallowing medicine and injecting medicine? and a lot of these ingredients are also in normal medicine and dont get broken down by acid... its the dummy virus though that would get broken down in your stomach that needs to make it past ur stomach into ur blood, but thats the point of being a dummy virus, too dummy to be infectious enough

0
0
0.000
avatar

actually i just looked over the mmr ingredients and the only chemical i was unfamiliar with was sorbitol and neomycin.

vitamins, glucose, amino acids, sodium cloride, sodium phosphate, gelatine with removed double bonds to make the gelatine less prone to free radicals, should be all natural products. im guessing the amino acids and the salt is there as a buffer to keep the ph at a safe level, meaning if u take the ingredients separately it would kill you by changing the ph of ur blood. sodium phosphate is also in cocacola and most sodas.

sorbitol is natural

neomycin is an antibiotic to prevent the sample to be contaminated i guess...

about those cells, im sure u agree they are natural, and somehow the virus needs to be carried by cells...

0
0
0.000
avatar


actually consider this map from before mid 1950 :D so i guess less deaths occured since the medical system allowed cases to survive more likely and the medical system just improved gradually... but the cases have dropped dramatically

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Yes, you can find the data for all infectious diseases going back way before 1900, but you are unlikely to because it is almost never shown. It was at one time on the Swedish government's website, but last time I looked it was impossible to find.
The reason is that the data CLEARLY shows that pretty much all vaccinated diseases were nosediving down to zero before vaccines were invented, due to improved sanitation and general healthcare / nutrition during that period. The less disease pathogens that are in our environment and the better our nutrition, the more effective our own natural immunity is at keeping us clear from disease.

Scarlet fever killed more people than most vaccinated illnesses combined, yet it followed a similar downward trend and moved on to be eradicated. The catch is that there is no vaccine for scarlet fever.

0
0
0.000
avatar

are you sure its mease desease cases and not measle deases deaths? because vaccine only prevent deaths by reducing the number of cases

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

It is usually claimed that vaccines save lives, but the full data set does not demonstrate that at all. Holistic cellular biology also does not support that claim. How can you be sure a measles vaccine prevents deaths when deaths are already nearly non existent and the trend was continuing downward prior to their adoption?

Look into Scarlet Fever.

0
0
0.000
avatar


about before 1900 they seemed constant for measles

there seems to be a similar trend for scarlet fever?

vaccines also do no cause deaths, and 95% of the people with ONLY 1 mmr shot are immune, hence logically these 95% will not die of measles, which kills 0.2% of people infected and is especially deadly for babies and toddlers. there were people who noticed after the vaccine some alergic response or side effect that can needed to be treated but that was like 1 in 360 000 if i remember correctly... if everyone in the world took the vaccine though now, then the next generation ever would not need to take the vaccine again since then measles would go extinct.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The bottom graph is not labelled - is it for scarlet fever? There is no vaccine for Scarlet fever and yet it was eradicated around the same time as the other diseases.

Vaccines DO cause deaths, this is well known and well documented. Billions of dollars have been paid out in compensation due to vaccine injury and death - even in the face of a situation where vaccines have been given special legal status that prevents their manufacturers from being sued in the normal way. Manufacturers were facing so many cases that they pressured the US gov to change the law or they said they would not be able to continue making/selling vaccines.

What evidence is there that a disease would cease to exist if the whole world were vaccinated for it? Consider that we know for sure that Scarlet fever ceased to exist WITHOUT vaccines.

If people want to VOLUNTARILY be vaccinated, that is up to them. The decision to try to force people to be vaccinated is EXTREMELY EVIL - it is based in fear and a lack of understanding of the nature of life, health and self.

A huge wealth of information and personal tragic stories exists online from the families of victims of vaccine injury, they are not hard to find and they are as heart wrenching as any other story you will see relating to health.

0
0
0.000
avatar

https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S1473-3099%2817%2930693-X
nope scarlet fever vaccine did not exist 1911 and there was between 1924-1945 which was proven to be not effective. treatement against scarlet fever is antibiotics (invented during first world war) and prevented by handwashing and not sharing toothbrushes... i guess the decrease of scarlet fever cases is due to antibiotics not vaccine....

so actually i have now no clue why we even discuss scarlet fever if there is no vaccine?

polio is eradicated from most of the world, and we almost eradicated polio if it werent for the antivaccer taliban. but ye u dont have polio in US anymore for example but in pakistan afghanistan.

last smallpox case was in 1977 thx to vaccine.

deseases that are highly contageous require all to be vacinated in order to eradicate them, why would an individual right to refuse to stop spreading the desease be valued more than the right of a baby to live? in order to reach 95% immunity, for every one person who refuses to vaccinate then 19 other people have to get second mmr vaccine, and there are already some who cant take the vaccine for alergy and health reasons.

0
0
0.000
avatar

you seem to be missing the point here, even though i have spelled it out more than once.
the fact that no vaccine exists for scarlet fever and yet it's decline follows a similar trend to diseases for which vaccines DO exist DOES make sense since all diseases were significantly heading towards zero incidence. This is because of improved sanitation, general healthcare, understanding about biology and other related factors. When people claim that vaccines have eradicated killer diseases they are nearly always denying the fact that the 'eradication' had almost entirely taken place BEFORE the vaccines were invented. They give vaccines credit for health improvements that vaccines were NOT responsible for.

From the paper you linked on Scarlet Fever:

The precipitous decline in many life-threatening infectious diseases during the course of the last century is well described but remains poorly understood. Improved living standards, particularly decreased crowding and improved hygiene and nutrition and, in due course, immunisation and development of effective treatments, are generally assumed to underpin this trend.

Also from the study:

A once common cause of childhood death, the incidence and severity of scarlet fever dropped substantially over the course of the 19th and 20th centuries. The reasons for the decline, predating the advent of effective treatments, remain unexplained.

So they are saying that the reasons that are WELL understood by numerous professional public health experts - sanitation etc. - are only 'assumed' in the first paragraph and then are 'not explained' in the section! Really? That is a clear denial of reality.

It is interesting that cases of Scarlet fever may have increased recently and it warrants investigation - however, it does not mean that the prior nosediving of cases is 'unexplained'.

The claims about eradication of polio are false. The polio cases have simply been reclassified. you can review commentary on this from various medical professionals here.

deseases that are highly contageous require all to be vacinated in order to eradicate them

No, they do not.

why would an individual right to refuse to stop spreading the desease be valued more than the right of a baby to live?

The right to not have your body invaded by another due to their own belief system is a basic right of human existence that is understood and respected by those with empathy, heart and awareness. Many of our laws are based on this understanding and very few people disagree with them. Your confusion appears to be based on a mischaracterisation and misunderstanding of fundamental rights and freedoms of the person. No-one has a 'right to infect people with disease', just as no-one has a 'right to overpower and inject people with a disease in the name of xyz'. Isn't this obvious?

In short, your question is based on a strawman argument.

in order to reach 95% immunity, for every one person who refuses to vaccinate then 19 other people have to get second mmr vaccine, and there are already some who cant take the vaccine for alergy and health reasons.

I suggest you listen to alternative understandings on health and immunity from people who have dedicated their life to constantly keeping up with the latest research or who are even the ones doing it and creating it from lived experience. The mainstream narrative does NOT come from such people.

I will be speaking with the Wim Hof community when I get a chance, since Wim Hof has already forced science textbooks to be rewritten after proving that it is possible to modulate and 'supercharge' the immune system through internal will.

I have already provided you with links from about 50 specialists that would take weeks to review in full.

0
0
0.000
avatar

All prior attempts to make a SARS vaccine were disastrous. None created immunity, and they all made being infected with SARS cause worse harm and more deaths.

SARS2 is unlikely to ever have a working vaccine because of this.

These are papers I have found published on attempted SARS vaccines.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22536382

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3209347/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18941225

https://www.jimmunol.org/content/181/9/6337.long

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks, I'll take a look at some point!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hi @ura-soul!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.310 which ranks you at #134 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 70 contributions, your post is ranked at #5.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You've built up a nice network.
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

0
0
0.000
avatar

Upvoted by @aagabriel for having similarities to the #informationwar tag, posts like this anyone can add the tag #informationwar so we can more easily find and upvote them! (by @aagabriel)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation, and Liberty. We are a peaceful and non-violent movement that sees information as being held back by corrupt forces in the private sector and government. Our Mission.
  • Discord, website, youtube channel links here.

Ways you can help the @informationwar!

0
0
0.000