Source
Please note this post is a sequel to my "Social media and the frontlines of the reality war" article, if you have yet to do so I would recommend reading it first.
Hiding In Plain Sight
Over numerous posts with literally thousands of reference points, personally researched quotes, official documents, and funding inter-connections, I have displayed that the vast majority of fake grassroots environment, youth, and social movements, all connect to the same control structure. Ever growing in power and influence we are witnessing the insidious birth of a scientifically refined, propaganda-driven, financial, ideological, and perceptual control mechanism, that is fracturing a socially engineered state of division and confrontation.
It is the sheer scale of this corruption, manipulation, and malfeasance, that enables the agenda to hide in plain sight. Indeed, both this post and all the posts I have listed at its end, form a singular, vast, interconnected, interlinked article that will eventually bind all parts into a cohesive whole. Every unreferenced point of fact that I make in this article is already cross-referenced, linked, and sourced within the other parts. All aspects feed into a singular narrative, each interwoven fragment adding further detail and veritas to this tapestry of totalitarianism.
Today, I will attempt to display how all these identity labels, ideologies, and movements, intersect under the banner of what I term authoritarian communitarianism. As always it is important to point out that I am relaying an intent, methodology, and infrastructure, I am not defining our future, for that resides in the palm of our hands.
Source
Authoritarian Communitarianism
Authoritarian communitarianism could be explained as a multi-faceted all-encompassing (hence very difficult to define) philosophy that seeks to override and merge individual, population, and national rights, with the "greater good" of the global community. Global governance shapes the community, and the community molds the global citizen. Governed by the belief that every individual right carries both a duty and responsibility to (what will become) an increasing array of communitarian dogmas, standards, rules, regulations, journalistic, and behavioural practices.
The parasitic nature of communitarianism weaves a thread through and feeds from every political ideology, philosophy, and religion, slowly drawing them all into a singular umbrella of control. Identity and sexuality are seen as the epitome of freedom, all identities are interconnected by the same principles of governance. As long as you consent to said principles everyone is appeased with a voice, but never loud enough to enact change in matters of tangible oppositional consequence.
On the surface, the broader communitarian philosophy will initially be perceived as fairly innocuous, and as with all schools of thought, there is a sliding scale of intention. Of course, it’s true that if you live within a community then we have a certain degree of responsibility towards the environment in which we live and the people we interact with. That said, we should not confuse authoritarian communitarianism with preconceived notions of a cohesive neighbourhood, in reality, it is the individual, local, and national face of global governance.
We are looking at a system that has reverse-engineered the psychology and hardwiring of our social and community bonds, and are utilising them as a tool of control. In essence, communitarian governance is based upon the scientific manipulation of the community and our tribal heritage. A contrived interdependence that impedes upon choice and freedom whilst insidiously vilifying/ostracising all opposition.
From a social control perspective, we can also connect said philosophy to the Tavistock method I have discussed in previous posts; "harnessing the methodology of peer pressure as a means of convincing the individual/country to relinquish firmly held beliefs and freedoms". Nudging us towards a socially engineered voluntary surrender of free will, independence, and unalienable rights, at the altar of the one-world community.
Once you understand this template, we can comprehend how this is occurring on both the micro (individual) and the macro (nation-state) level. On the world stage, we are witnessing the rise of a regulatory dictatorship whose intent is to invalidate the volition of the country in favour of globalised increasingly dogmatic communitarian laws, obligations, regulations, and decrees. Layers of interwoven (oft invisible) governance that binds the objectives of the one world order. Global rights overturn national identity, and the facade of government is quietly usurped by the mandates of one-world governance.
Whilst we can become blinded by the extremes, if you look close enough you can observe that the devil is in the detail.
The Illusion Of Choice
In cyberspace, on both the individual and collective/website level, those that attempt to swim against the cognitive undercurrents of the narrative, increasingly find themselves at the mercy of communitarian dogmas that supplant free expression. You could find yourself vilified, de-platformed, demonetised, and experience real-world consequences like job loss, or a tarnished reputation.
In respect of a website, you may fail to meet the community standards of Paypal and no longer be able to process your payments, your site host might be targetted or eventually find themselves at the mercy of extra layers of bureaucratic governance. Gradually your ability to exist as a singular self-contained entity will become increasingly difficult.
All of this can occur outside of the law of the land but within the law of the community. Indeed, in many ways, communitarian law is the intangible and indiscernible implementation of the intended one-world law system. The web existing as an observable mirror image of the method. Slowly but surely drawing every aspect of the net into an interdependent umbrella of control.
At the local community and planning level, when they are unable to control via the consensus they cultivate the illusion of one. We can observe this process with the creation of the citizen's assemblies (which supersede local community hubs) I have covered in a previous post. Here in the UK, these assemblies are run by an organisation called involve.org, which has funding connections to the Open Society Foundation & Googles Deepmind.
Infused with narrative control methodologies like the Delphi technique, and by using change operatives, and sympathetic locals as their board members, they manufacture the illusion of choice. Stifling the voices of the opposing loud minority, by cultivating the perception that they're speaking for the silent majority. Each reciprocal corporate community gradually becoming akin to links in the chains that bind us.
Source
Nobody Left Behind
As I have documented within numerous posts; the United Nations/corporate-led sustainable (Agenda 2030) development goals are a key macro communitarian construct that draws each country (and individual) into a broader umbrella of control. A world encircled with so much red tape that it becomes a noose around the necks of small business and the common man.
Land & habitation restrictions, planning, environmental sanctions, legislated codes of ethics, business practices, privatisation of resources, property rights, a worldwide common core education system, the corporate takeover of food production, centralised resource management, travel restrictions, global health & medical surveillance system, health passports, a biometric blockchain, digital currency, energy quotas, surrender of privacy for a perceived greater good, a trackable digital I.D evolving towards a microchipped population, human settlement clearances, high-density housing/smart city future, and the surrender of resources/land/oceans (many of which undermine the heritage of indigenous communities) to a centralised planetary common good, are all intended aspects of authoritarian communitarian governance.
Of course in the age of the inversion, the “common good” actually relates to what is good for the one world order, not the individual, the community, nor the nation-state. In many ways, the UN communitarian buzzwords exist as real-world manifestations of Orwell's doublespeak.
Sustainable = The control over every facet of your lives.
Inclusive = Hive mind of accepted opinion.
Transformation = Social engineering.
Selfish = Individuality.
Nobody left behind = No choice.
Vibrant community = A homoginised society.
Harmonious = An ever expanding array of forbidden questions.
Throughout my work I have taken a great deal of time to display and reference how all of these seemingly unconnected progressive strides forward all connect to the same control structure. This is the true face of global governance and it is occurring in plain sight; a worldwide takeover concealed behind the veil of environmentalism and engineered in such a manner that the will of the consensus welcomes it.
Source
Communitarian Individuality
At the individual level, authoritarian communitarianism will incrementally merge individual and parental rights with communitarian doctrines. Civil liberties and freedoms will be held hostage to an ever-expanding myriad of top-down enforced global to local community dogmas. In every facet of our lives, the globally mandated, locally dictated, and socially equated, communitarian control structure will be used as a means to infringe upon and redefine our individual rights.
The manipulation of group psychology, is the fuel that drives the engine of social governance. Indeed, within this 98 page UK government document from 2010 (titled Mind Space), we find the cabinet office discussing how applied psychology (mind control) is used to influence societal behavioural change.
The fallout from the coronavirus also giving us the opportunity to observe that we're looking at a social ordinance that uses the sequential tidal wave of the consensus to carry the individual towards a predetermined destination. Whilst here we can observe that psychiatrists are now linking those who don’t comply with the coronavirus “new normal” with “dark personality” traits including narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy.
Make no mistake, whatever your thoughts on our brave new normal, from a psychological perspective, we are witnessing a global compliance test of epic proportions and far-reaching implications.
The nature of social cohesion dictating that the majority will be happy to make these individual sacrifices for a perceived greater good. The guardians of the consensus vilifying and collectivising all that refuse to live in a state of media-fuelled fear. Still, I wonder how many will pause to consider the evolution of the method? Neglect to follow the trend to its intended conclusion. Remaining unaware that we have embarked on a psychological induction whose scope and ambition exists beyond the crisis of the moment, and behind the smoke and mirrors of public awareness.
The Socially Engineered Media Community
Authoritarian Communitarianism is also about the collectivisation and weaponisation of polarised identities. Now speech and debate have been drawn into the digital forums of cyberspace, they can then become controlled by the platforms “community standards”. The tech giants can then repudiate real-world definitions of free expression, selectively enforcing restrictions in favour of a socially engineered consensus. Identitarian politics enabling the creation of an impenetrable wall of political correctness and hate speech re-definitions that restrain debate and discussion.
At the polarity of the safe space dystopia, the opposition often voices their dissatisfaction by becoming increasingly overt, abusive and confrontational. We can observe a self-perpetuating devolution of dialogue that feeds ever-greater speech restrictions and enables materially tangible life implications. A process that is evolving towards the real world subconscious social engineering of language, accepted talking points, and opinions.
The minds of the middle man are increasingly held captive, the structured and manufactured false dichotomies of warring polarities akin to the bars in a perceptual prison. A shrinking Overton window, and a creeping intellectual no man's land where the majority feel unable to step too far beyond a perceived consensus.
In the prequel to this post, I extensively covered the methodologies and documented the corporate intelligence (behavioral change) apparatus behind the narrative controllers and provocateurs of social media. Today I also want to briefly note the presence of the Israeli & US military-inspired British armies 77th Brigade. If you're swimming against the current narrative and spending time arguing on social media, chances are you've encountered similar operatives.
The British army is creating a special force of Facebook warriors, skilled in psychological operations and use of social media to engage in unconventional warfare in the information age.
The 77th Brigade, to be based in Hermitage, near Newbury, in Berkshire, will be about 1,500-strong and formed of units drawn from across the army. It will formally come into being in April.
The brigade will be responsible for what is described as non-lethal warfare. Both the Israeli and US army already engage heavily in psychological operations.
Against a background of 24-hour news, smartphones and social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, the force will attempt to control the narrative. Source
Source
The Communitarian Synthesis
The communitarian philosophy is the one world order, and the extremity of political polarity is an integral component behind its realisation. The incrementally insidious politicisation of every event, crisis, movement, social identity, and ideology, is a key driving force towards this intended endgame. Right-wing capitalism is the thesis, whilst left-wing Marxism/socialism is the antithesis; both are used as a means to push us towards the one world communitarian (third way) synthesis.
In truth, neither the capitalist nor the Marxist will achieve the political nirvana that they strive for; in essence, they are both (unknowingly) pawns that are fighting for the birth of the one world order. Every movement and every political ideology are both directly, and indirectly steering us towards the same predetermined destination. The political idealist failing to comprehend that every infiltrated ism is a control mechanism that is aiding the formation of the one world perceptual prison.
Moving towards the communitarian synthesis of the Hegelian dialectic, the truth obscures itself beneath a cloak of ideologically subjective interpretations. How many are prepared to cast aside the shackles of everything they hold to be true? All they’ve allowed to define them? Have you noticed how nobody is wrong anymore? Thus we already exist within a dia-tribal dialectical twilight zone, a phantasmic illusionary halfway house between freedom and slavery, individuality and collectivism, crony capitalism and national socialism.
The Final Dialectic War
Whilst many aspects of the communitarian system have and are being quietly maneuvered into place, it is my belief that it requires the fires of confrontation to realise the totality of its intended ambition. The world needs to reach a point of such abject chaos, overt corruption, and wholesale confusion, that the Hegalian synthesis will be embraced as an entirely logical choice, a scientifically refined final solution. Communitarianism is intended to be grasped as the saviour of humanity, the phoenix that will rise from the ashes of disorder.
As division fractures, the polarities of every opposing spectrum become embroiled within a perverse symbiotic relationship, each side feeding off the other and driving us towards the chaotic crescendo of a premeditated conclusion.
Over the course of the next few years/decade; the spiraling danse macabre of the dialectical delusion will play out on the social level I discuss herein, law & order, food distribution, the financial markets, and potentially the theater of war. As it ebbs and flows, the only constant will be the technological control grid is being quietly assembled in the background.
The one world disorder rising from an insidiously manipulated multifarious array of social schisms, enabled through an age of algorithmically induced ideological extremism, and leading towards a new era of technocratic feudalism. As the chaotic clash of polarised and confrontational idealisms cultivate social tribalism, the order of communitarianism will be welcomed as an entirely logical synergism. Alas, few will comprehend that they have voluntarily embraced a socially engineered state of brave new totalitarianism.
Basic Language & Memetic Warfare
So how did we get here? Increasingly we live in an era that casts aside the validity of nuance in favour of polarised, heavily politicised, pre-programmed, emotionally reactive knee jerk responses that dance to the tune of the perceptual pied pipers. In many ways debate has denigrated into memes, one size fits all insults and ad hominem attacks. Misplaced and ill-founded single words now heralding the power to destroy careers and reputations.
The devolution of free speech and debate has its seeds in the fertile soils of the Tavistock Institute. Using the work of British linguist C.K. Ogden as it's foundation; throughout the 2nd World War, operatives like Tavistock founder member Brigadier General John Rawling Rees were working on a secret project that sought to deconstruct the complexities of the English language and reconstruct a communicative method that was termed basic English, Basic for short.
Under the direction of then Prime Minister Winston Churchill the Basic project was expanded into the United States. Whilst the public was initially resistant to such change, the concept was eventually repackaged with elements being used as a means to simplify mainstream media and news broadcasts. Gone were the descriptive formats of yesteryear, born were the simplistic vocabulary, simplified formations, and shortened sentence structures that exist to this day. Increasingly we can observe this devolution within pop culture and the mainstream “he said” "she said” identitarian theatrics of political pantomime.
In essence I have come to believe that the creeping evolution of Basic has now birthed a form of algorithmic perceptual control, intended to inhibit the maturation of nuance and critical thinking. We could consider Basic as a tool of limitation that restrains free expression, bridles forbidden questions, and enables the manipulation of meaning through metaphor. Trapping individuals within the emotional wastelands of their downloaded collective subjective unrealities.
Source
Over the years this perceptual control mechanism has devolved towards the policing of language and memetic warfare. Consider externally created internally equated slogans, logos, and the mind virus of impanted narratives, simplistic (subconsciously absorbed) memes that oft replace intellectual debate. A culture of downloaded talking points and self-definitions that are handed down for us to divide ourselves with and argue over. Pause to consider where these collective insults, topics, and words of the moment come from? Observe how (like a virus) they spread, manipulate, define and divide our society.
We have been sleepwalked into a social dead end by a cancel cult-ure that no longer has the ability to self reflect. Large swathes of the public portraying an inability to think beyond and question the fallacies within their externally downloaded identities, ideologies, and socially engineered worldviews. This is the age of the wokopath, a repetitive, narcissistic, morally relativistic, emotionally opportunistic, echo chamber reverberating, fragile mindstate manipulating, pseudo-intellectual straight jacket for the mind.
Source
Will Of The People?
Desperately clawing for recognition amongst the wastelands of their self imposed mediocrity. By their words you shall know them, no originality, cardboard cut out talking points, vacuous one size fits all labels, reactive mindsets, downloaded mantras devoid of creativity, no free thinkers, no nuance, and the silencing of all that oppose their collective nonsensical sense and sensibilities.
Because everyone knows that if you disagree with a talking point or fail to bend a knee to BLM you must be a white supremacist, or far-right, or a Nazi, erm, right?? Pseudo intellectualism, narcissism, and virtue signaling now masquerades as a self-proclaimed moral high ground.
We are witnessing the tentative first steps of the global citizen, a social control mechanism that is (in essence) a new form of collective social governance. Within multiple areas of societal reformation, the socially engineered will of the consensus ensures that what the people want they will inevitably get. This methodology is predominantly focused upon youth activism, hence with each passing year, it creates a self-perpetuating snowball effect that gathers momentum.
Throughout its opening stages communitarian activism will often deliver socially favourable results, evolving to the point where the people themselves will become the totalitarians and enforcers of the new social paradigm. We can already observe the formation of this process within the cancel culture and twitter meltdowns of cyberspace.
In many ways we are abstractly observing the social implementation of communitarian law. At the public level, this aspect of the law system uses our manipulated emotions and desire for social justice to undermine the rule of law and freedom of expression. Psychologically switching between our worst virtues and weaponising our best. Gradually people are becoming lost within a mind maze of emotionally reactive autocues and filtered interpretations, exploited emotional states utilised as a force of premeditated change. Manipulation will masquerade as choice, self-determinism as an oppression of the masses.
Certainly, emotions are far easier to manipulate than facts, thus one day the will of the mob mind will be directed upon all that oppose the march of the one world order.
Source
Divide & Conquer
As documented within previous posts; the algorithmic echo chambers of social media are being utilised as a means to nudge people towards the extremes of their opposing political and social doctrines. We can observe how the entire left/right mind control paradigm has become increasingly weaponised, the allure of a false dichotomy leading people towards a path of confrontation from which the system can cultivate a justified state of subjugation.
Our highly contentious political overlords are becoming increasingly symbolic, manifesting as subjective interpretations of hope or repression. The divisive character of Trump now exists as a symbol of patriotism and capitalism, his every word rallying the nationalist/capitalist thesis, fuelling the required globalist/Marxist antithesis, and cultivating ever more anger towards the crumbling foundations of our social pillars.
The fake youth, corporate environment, the heavily politicised and subverted civil rights, anti-fascist, and anti-globalist movements, are in essence, the globalist funded anti-globalists. The globalists fund the politically indoctrinated grassroots activists, who equate capitalism as globalism and thus believe they’re anti-globalists. Through propaganda, emotional manipulation, social engineering, and co-opted funding mechanisms, the communitarian anti-globalists unknowingly demand globalist policies as an act of rebellion.
Source
The left thinks it’s a far-right uprising and the right a left-wing takeover, few will comprehend that they’re both wrong. There will be no winners in this game of thrones, we are being led towards an eventual merger of ideologies, order out of an instigated state of chaos. The corrupt decaying carcass of the old system providing the friction of an opposing force, used as a means to inflame it's antithesis and thus ignite the intended one-world synthesis. Drawing us ever closer to a socially engineered revolution that will use the manipulated will of a divided populace to enable the formation of the one world Ordo ab Chao.
The extremities of the far-left & far-right, racist & anti-racist, industry & environment, chaos & order, poverty & wealth, and war & peace, are the perceptual bookends that are being used to restructure the environment and socially engineer the perceptions of the middle man. Hidden within the contradictions of the inversion, the truth obscures itself within the perceived moral and intellectual high ground.
At the opposing spectrums of their polarities the fascists and the anti-fascist are both increasingly fascistic, the racist and the anti-racist are both racists, the promise of peace (the hive mind) is used as the justification to conduct a war on the minds of men, environmentalism is taken over by corporation and industry, and chaos will enable the birth of the one world order. Within this comprehension, we can discern that the extremities of each opposing ideology reveal the true nature of the authoritarians psychology, and thus the intended inversion of our social morphology.
Source
Good Cop Bad Cop
By relinquishing the chains of the political and ideological perceptual prison we can begin to grasp the polarised nature of the mind game. Within this discernment, we can also consider how the opposing symbols of Obama & Trump are potentially a carefully, deliberately crafted means to a divisive and confrontational end. Whether you perceive this to be a capitalisation or long term psychological operation, the end result (divide & conquer) would appear to be the same.
Certainly, from a psychological warfare perspective, the hugely divisive nature of their opposing symbologies have not gone unnoticed, Obama = thesis, Trump = antithesis, Obama & Trump = aiding the synthesis of confrontation. When Obama is in office he hosts BLM at the White House and when Trump is in office, they storm it!
The consensus of the left ignored the duplicity of Obama, the right the fallacies of Trump. Welcome to the subjective mind game of communitarian law. Such is the hatred that has been cultivated towards Trump and the right-wing you can now manipulate by telling the truth. By attaching elements of the truth to Trump and the right/alt-right (who the left-wing media have crafted as the new far-right) we have a knee jerk emotionally reactive left that will gravitate towards the polarity (without a semblance of research) of any right-wing announcement.
If Trump bashes the UN or defunds (whilst giving further funding to Gavi & fast-tracking a militarised vaccine rollout) the WHO, the liberal progressive and pseudo-intellectual mindstate will gravitate towards it. The right wants to lift lockdown restrictions to open the economy, thus the mind game dictates that the left-wing press (and their political adherents) demand that we remain locked down. They've even turned medicine into a political issue! We spin and are being spun in ever-decreasing circles.
Black Lives Matter
The video above, is from a former BLM organiser, this man has broken free of the chains that bind us and I very much agree with his analysis.
I learned so much from the black scholars and hip hop artists of my youth, the elucidation of their struggle and persecution was instrumental in the formation of my comprehension and understanding. Certainly, we can observe how the deconstruction of the black ghetto is itself a microcosm of our broader societal collapse.
Divide, conquer, restructure.
As I have previously written, I have come to believe that the gang warfare which is now sadly equated with the black ghetto is a socially engineered construct, the psychology of which utilises the gang dynamic in such a way that it aids the control system. The first stage was when the C.I.A supplied flooded the black communities with crack (in the internet age exchange crack with information) and thus created the conditions that ferment confrontation.
Source
Aside from the contra army it was funding, the social symptoms of this epidemic (and targetted propaganda) devastated the uncontrolled (to the system dangerously unified) inner-city black community. Cohesion was replaced with gangs/collectives (who in turn wear their division as a badge of honour) and through the drug wars the streets became a battleground. They destroyed both the community and the true civil rights movement and when it's expedient to do so, they're attempting to rebuild it as a fake/controlled civil rights/political ideology that preys upon the disenfranchised.
Again, the Hegalian synthesis requires confrontation to enable its implementation and this is why they're attempting to draw black people into political ideologies and Antifa alignments, to fight a culture war of which there will be no winners. Harvesting and manipulating emotional energies as a means to a Machiavellian end.
Source
BLM Interconnection
It is widely recognised that the construct of the gang is largely enabled by the absence of the father figure. The targetted socially engineered (propaganda/music/drugs etc) breakdown of the ghettos family unit allows the gang to assume the role of the family. Rather than attempt to focus upon these issues the BLM community plays to the psychology of the gang. I took the below from their website a couple of years back, but as you can see here they have now slightly altered their wording.
We are committed to disrupting the Western prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, and especially “our” children to the degree that mothers, parents and children are comfortable.
The majority of the individuals within these movements have no agenda other than the cause they're fighting for, but within each financed social groundswell, there will be certain (potentially tenuous) commonalities that help drive the plan forward. Below with their own words, we can observe ideological connections between BLM and other corporate-sponsored movements.
When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking. Black lives matter
"The only long-term solution to the fascist menace is to undermine its pillars of strength in society grounded not only in white supremacy but also in ableism, heteronormativity, patriarchy, nationalism. Antifa
The delusions of hetero-sexism/heteronormativity propagate the idea that heterosexuality is ‘normal’ and that other expressions of sexuality are deviant. Extinction rebellion
And below we can observe how these seemingly unconnected events are being utilised as a means of pushing us towards the Agenda 2030 milestone.
She said there were “very, very clear connections” between the Covid-19 and climate crises, and the Black Lives Matter protests around the world, United Nations
Every crisis and each corporate-funded fake grassroots movement is gradually becoming conjoined into a singular antithesis of premeditated change. Unwittingly their followers relegated to compartmentalised aspects of an insidious whole. By juxtaposing these objectives against the fact that all these movements (and hundreds more) have similar narratives/wording and all are directly and indirectly funded by the same globalists that are seeking to drastically reduce the population, to dismantle the nation-state, the individual, the nuclear family, our social foundations, and to re-imagine society as a feudal technocracy, a more nefarious agenda comes into focus.
Source
Follow The Money
Before we continue, I believe (and will validate this at a later date) that like the MK – Ultra connected Macy Foundation I discussed in a previous post, the Ford Foundation (which no longer has anything to do with the Ford family or Ford motor cars) is deeply connected with and potentially another arms-length incarnation of The Rockefeller Family. Indeed, current president of The Ford Foundation is Darren Walker who was previously vice president of the Rockefeller Foundation.
I am not saying that all the individuals within these movements have nefarious intent. I am saying that these organisations have been heavily infiltrated and thus co-opted.
Under the name of the Black-Led Movement Fund (BLMF) and through their partnership Borealis philanthropy, the Ford Foundation has donated $100 million dollars to BLM and a consortium of 14 affiliated groups. It is also worth noting that through their Racial Equity in Philanthropy (REP) Fund, Borealis is supported by W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and the Rockefeller Brothers Philanthropy. The George Soros led Open Society Foundation also has funding connections to Borealis, and has previously funded BLM to the tune of $650,000.
Whilst covering them all is outside the remit of this post, BLM is allied with numerous groups connected to the Freedom Road Socialist Organisation, below I will connect a few to its leadership. One of the three founder members of BLM is Alicia Garza who is the director of an organisation called the National Domestic Workers Alliance. A board member of NDWA is Alta Starr who manages a fund at the Ford Foundation, as well as being on the board of the Open Society Foundations southern initiative. Another director of the NWDA is Ai-Jen Poo who sits as a trustee board member at The Ford Foundation. The NDWA is also a partner and funding recipient of the Hilary Clinton born Onward Together movement and has received Open Society, Ford, and Rockefeller Foundation funding.
The second founder of BLM is Patrice Cullors, who in this video describes herself and Alicia Garza as trained Marxists. Indeed, as we can observe in this interview, Cullor was mentored by former Weather Underground leader Eric Mann. The Democrat Van Jones founded Ella Baker Center For Human Rights has Cullors as its board member, director, and is again funded by The Open Society Foundation & The Ford Foundation.
The third leader of BLM (Opal Tometi) is affiliated with the Black Alliance For Just Immigration, which also has funding connections to The Open Society Foundation. Another patron of The BAJI is Unbound Philanthropy which was founded by former J.P Morgan star trader and founder of Bluecrest Capital Management, William Reeves. Interestingly Unbound is also part funding the aforementioned UK's cabinet office affiliated Behavioural Insights, nudge unit, and has financial connections to NWDA & Rockefeller Philanthropy.
With the Ford And Rockefeller connections alone, Black lives Matter (and affiliated movements) are being directly and indirectly funded by Foundations that have a history of eugenics and population control. Foundations that have been connected to illegal human experimentation in Guatemala, and the forced sterilisation of millions of men in India. Now we're supposed to believe that they're on the side of the minorities? Whilst the leaders of BLM may be happy to ignore these (and a myriad of other) inconvenient truths, I am not!
Source
Choose A Side!
Unified under a dialectical banner of communitarianism both the thesis and the antithesis are marching us towards a socially engineered revolution and a potential civil war. A clash of ideologies that subconsciously demands we choose a side. In equal parts, with both their words and their deafening silence, our behemothic mainstream manipulators play to the subjective nature of the mind game.
As our lowest common denominators are filtered through the opposing ideologies of the algorithmically enabled echo chambers of the internet, each side views the very worst attributes of the other. Collectively we are being led towards an increasingly unbalanced, confrontational, and hostile environment. The drums of disorder grow louder, and the middle man is continuously nudged towards a chosen side and a line in the sand. Incrementally people become increasingly polarised, stances are hardened and their foes are dehumanised.
None of this is by accident, human psychology has been probed, measured, and manipulated for literally thousands of years. Thus it should be understood that whilst the current suppression of (non violent/non racist) alternative, conservative, and patriotic voices is certainly about the re-engineering of free speech, it is also about angering them, fanning the flames of resentment. By silencing people’s voices it pushes them towards the echo chambers that will listen, in turn nudging them towards the extremes of their ideology.
The current climate is also about emboldening the communitarian brownshirts (Antifa) to become more overt in their violent interactions. With their broad-stroke idiocracy and mindless mendacity, they dance upon the dialectics of division. Imagine how such conflict could play out against the backdrop of the election, or economic collapse? Once again, the synthesis cultivates and requires confrontation to fulfill its objectives, order out of chaos. Out of the chaos, we find connections to the order of the United Nations.
Source
The Global Communtarian Police Farce
To those on the left that believe Trump has instigated a federal police overreach, where were you when Obama enabled it? Where were you when he signed the National Defense Authorisation Act? Repealing aspects of Posse Comitatus, which had previously limited the power of the federal government to use federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies. Do you see how this works?
In reality, this increasing state of chaos and calls to defund the police has nothing to do with anarchy. Ultimately, whether it's enabled by defunding, legislated change, or some form of confrontation, I believe that the intent is for the growth of a global (UN-mandated) policing community. With the UN strong cities initiative, these wheels are already in motion and are just waiting for the right crisis to fully galvanise them.
Under the guise of tackling extremism (whose definitions are in a constant state of flux) the United Nations strong cities network is the UN-led imposition of globalised (communitarian) policing policies/practices that circumvent and supersede local law enforcement. A UN emanated globally dictated law-enforcement body whose laws govern participating cities.
And connecting those localities to one another – as the Strong Cities Network is doing – is not only a powerful way to lift up our communities worldwide. It also sends a message about who we are and what we aspire to be – as an alliance of nations and as a global community. Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch
The SCN is steered by an International Advisory Board that is run by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) and whose members we can connect back to the Rothchild family, The Rockefeller Foundation, Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, and the Council On Foreign Relations. Members that include House Of Lords, Trilateral Commission member, and non-executive director of N.M Rothchild & Son, Lord Charles Guthrie. The ISD has also partnered with all the big tech corporations (including Google & Microsoft), and Foundations such as aforementioned Open Society, the Brooking Institute, and the Carnegie Corporation.
It should also be noted that (amongst others) many of the big tech corporations that are funding, attempting to censor opposition and debate, whilst crafting the image of BLM (and associated movements) are also corporate members of the SCN connected Council On Foreign Relations. Many of these corporations and big tech companies can also be connected to movements.org whose summits are attended by CFR & DHS members. Movements.org is an alliance of youth movements that were sponsored into existence by (amongst others) Facebook/Google/U.S Dept of state and co-founded by CFR member, Clinton advisor/state department staff member, & Google director Jared Cohen alongside former Google employee/Howcast CEO Jason Liebman.
In respect of current events, it's worth highlighting that (alongside The Open Society & CFR) both big tech and movements.org were an integral component behind the flourishing of the Arab spring. Wasn't it nice that Google created their speak to tweet service to aid activists/protestors in Egypt? Just a shame they're also censoring the web, whilst morphing into a ministry of truth, and helping China build a (now-defunct) censored search engine that erm ... silences activists!
In Egypt, protest leader Mohammed ElBaradei (who was hailed a hero by the CFR) was a member and had served on the board of trustees at the International Crisis Group. The Crisis Group is funded by (amongst others) the Ford Foundation, Carnegie Corporation, Rockefeller Bros Fund, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Open Society Institute. It should also be noted that Soros and his son Alexander also sit on the board of trustees. In the aftermath of the Arab spring, and as highlighted in this article, it was Soros funded organisations that drafted the new Egyptian constitution. Whilst here we can find former Crisis Group member and senior analyst Candace Rondeaux weighing in on BLM & ''the looming American nightmare.''
A social war by the people against the people, that benefits only the power elite.
It should come as no surprise that The Open society Foundation has donated a further $220 million to BLM and black justice groups, some of which are "are fighting for an end to policing as we know it." Current events have also garnered the attention of the Urban Institute, who are funded by and connected to, The World Bank, Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, J.P Morgan Chase (Chase Manhattan was previously helmed by David Rockefeller), Open Society Foundation, and Rockefeller Philanthropic Advisors, to name but a few.
Another keen supporter of BLM is the The Sentencing Project, which again is funded by The Open Society Foundation, David Rockefeller Fund, & Ford Foundation.
As a political atheist, I am no champion of politicians or the police state. Equally, I am not prepared to ignore the obvious, does any of this sound like a grassroots revolution??
The UN will use the erosion of faith and the issues of civil rights to further their aims of defunding local policing and building upon their envisioned globalised police “community”. If the conditions become too volatile, they may request that the UN police take control of the situation. In light of the sexual abuse (of women and children) and murder charges that have been leveled at UN peacekeepers, it is worth noting:
Functional: The vast majority of UN personnel only have immunity for the things they say or do as part of their official duties; this is called “functional immunity.” This means that most personnel of the UN (called “officials” or “experts on mission”), including all the non-military personnel of peacekeeping missions, cannot be taken to court for anything they have said or done as part of their work duties. Source
Slowly but surely most pillars of society (health/medicine/media/science/religion) have been drawn into the one-world system. Those that have resisted are intended to be broken down and rebuilt in the desired image.
Due to the size and scale of this post the final part can be found HERE.
If you appreciate my voice and perspective and would like to enable me to research and write more, I would really appreciate the support/upvote and/or resteem. Equally, any donations can be given to the litecoin address below.
Litecoin: LdzNy4ZdvTXLCV4ZwbGMx56CmGypar9BXW
Written by @perceptualflaws
Gifs courtesy of giphy.com
Banner Gifs create by @doze
please check your link to the prequel. I got a 404
Thanks for that, I have now amended it :)
You sure don't sugar coat your stuff. Thank you for your work. This is incredible. I am disturbed that all my arguing on FB has just been contributing to the chaos, and wonder what other actions I can take to turn human attentions away from the performance art of politics and toward the totalitarian state we (I) now find ourselves in. Sadly, most of us are willfully ignoring the obvious dangers. It's bizarre. You explain how we got here very very well.
Thank you my friend .. I'm glad you appreciated the post. I've actually pinched a nerve in my back, so I was in a great deal of pain whilst I wrote the majority of this post .. I hope it didn't overspill into my writing and make some points a little too harsh. But still, I also feel that some things need to be said. :)
The more you begin to contemplate its scale and methodology, you more you begin to realise that it's actually really difficult (on multiple levels) to detach yourself from it and not feed into the system they're attempting to create. And to all keep us locked down in self-defeating arguments, with transient victories that offer no tangible change. At the end of the day, it's as much about working on ourselves as anything else .. I list a few pointers in the next part. :)
Thanks again @owasco
The Rube Goldbergian complexity of the despotism incipient is deceptively daunting, because the global battleplan necessary to defeat it is but the individually distributed and ultimately local points of economic development that diverts beneficial interest to sovereign people who create the benefits away from the centralization of corporate institutions that flow to the slop troughs of overlord swine.
Make your goods and services, in a community of sovereigns doing the same, and concatenate free society unassailable by the most militarized mercenary thugs. Always keep in mind that the first needed service is your security, and defend your means of production so that every other need can be met.
It's that simple.
I'm working on it!
!ENGAGE 25
Hey thanks again!
ENGAGEtokens.Bravo, another epic post!
This is an excellent deep dive into our current reality.
I've only read 1/3rd of this post and have already a ton of ideas I'd like to touch on - such as the illusion of choice - but they'll have to wait until I've absorbed the article in its entirety before I comment. Thank you as always, and we're truly blessed to have you sharing your creations here in our community.
Will return later to throw some ideas around with you.
Cheers :)
Thank you for the kind words my friend .. I really appreciate it, and I'm very glad you've enjoyed the article thus far. :)
Sorry it took me so long to get back here but real life has a lot of demands right now. I'm sure there are great swathes of people who are in the same predicament, trying to keep our heads on straight in the middle of this crisis (man made or otherwise).
First, this is a brilliant article and beautifully written piece that encompasses so many of the challenges that we're currently facing. You do a phenomenal job pulling this together into a coherent whole. So, congratulations on this because it's no small feat.
Something I'd like to touch on and which was also mentioned by @logiczombie in his thread is that fact the divide and conquer methods being employed to have the poor fight the poor. I also predicted (in a post) after the Floyd shooting that they would use the killing of George Floyd to further divide people along ideological and tribal lines. Whether it's Antifa, white supremacist militias, BLM, Blue lives matter, feminists, trans, conservatives, alt-right, boogaloos, Trumpers, far-left, immigrant workers, etc. - this groups are being used to further fracture any common ground they may have and redirect their anger and frustration towards one another.
What these diverse groups have in common is that they feel impotent, ridiculed, frustrated and in many cases hopeless. Yet, instead of directing their energy and power towards the root causes of their current reality, they seek out low hanging fruit as it's much easier to blame "the other" for their misfortune. They believe their future, or the American dream that has been dangled in their faces for decades but just out of reach as they take on more and more debt while their personal and collective power has been eroding (under corporate, special interest), has been stolen from them. In the desperate search for a scapegoat they swallow a dangerous elixir of propaganda and narrative control that points them towards people that are also suffering under the same conditions as those responsible. The media, dominated and controlled by powerful corporate interests, is happy to add fuel to the fire - identifying easily recognizable 'others' to focus their rage upon.
Culture wars, issues of personal identity are elevated and amplified - guns, abortion, immigration, sexual orientation, BLM, nationalism, and more recently mask/non-mask wearers are largely visible groups in which to join/oppose. Their issues take center stage in the public discourse thanks to the media. Yet, non of them deal with the roots of the rage that is boiling over around the world. The system itself is corrupted to the core.
Permanent War / military industrial complex, empire, privatization, corporate capture of all the levers of government, debt slavery, prison industrial complex and the moral bankruptcy of our 'leaders' are never discussed with few exceptions. War is discussed only when popular support is required by the state and the personal lives of the corrupted elite are used as distraction whenever useful.
If people are kept divided along cultural lines, then they cannot and will not rise up and overthrow their masters. In order for a real revolution of the mind and political economic and social revolution - people have to be united behind common objectives. Exploiting differences among the masses insures a disjointed and weak opposition to tptb.
As you eloquently describe in this piece, these are methods of mind control used to manipulate the masses into compliance - manufacture consent. OBEY.
Just a few thoughts... but there are many more that came up while reading yours.
Cheers!
This is me (in one minute),
Lol, yes! I can relate to this man!
Where is this clip from, btw?
A really really really bad television show.
Hey no worries @v4vapid .. similar story at this end, time is at a premium and I'm also focusing on getting everything in order for what could be a long winter of discontent.
Glad you enjoyed the post and thank you for the kind words.
I'm in full agreement with everything you've said, I also feel that following some form of economic collapse this rage is going to be directed upwards towards the next rungs of the economic ladder, eventually leading us towards a feudal society. This is why I feel there is an inherent naivety within many of these movements, for they fail to acknowledge that the true enemies of humanity are the ones that are funding them and directing their anger. True evil is very clever.. it does not stand in front as your enemy (those are the strawmen) but aids you as your friend, tells you what you want to hear, and enables what you think you want.
Thousands of years of evolution, blood, sweat, tears, and war, all leading us towards this point in history .. do people really think that these parasites would be foolish enough to stand front and center? Indeed, my contention is that this corrupt decaying carcass of a system will indeed (rightly) fall .. the deep state will collapse, horrific abuses will be brought to light, and to a degree, that majority of people will get their pound of flesh .. my fear being that there will be many elements of the new system that will be welcomed as the will of a manipulated people. Indeed, I tend to feel that it is the collapse of the old system that will become increasingly violent, and fascistic, and following some form of social, economic collapse and breakdown in the food supply chain .. many will grasp the intended one world order. Chaos as a prelude to order.
I want to add that many of my friends are on the left-wing, I know people in Antifa, BLM etc etc and so I know very well that many of these people feel powerless and are marching not out of hatred but for the perception of a brighter, equal, and balanced future .. . Equally, if I was associated with movements that were becoming increasingly violent you can bet (as Chaziel highlighted in the video he shared) I would spend some time looking into who I was giving my time and energy to .. hence my sympathy only goes so far. To that end, I wanted to write this post as an act of tough love and there is nothing herein that I wouldn't say directly to their faces .. my hope is that if anyone stumbles across it, then it may give them pause for thought.
I'm certainly aware that that majority of people simply want a better future .. we just have different perceptions of what that is, the frustrating aspect being that we tend to spend more time focusing on what divides us, as opposed to what unites us.
we already have a world-wide hardcore milgram-experiment
Yes, there appears to be a conflux of many of these methodologies, behaviorism is certainly another one. Thank you for the comment and support. :)
It is informative to understand the Milgram experiment was fraudulent, with accomplices recruited to establish the desired outcomes. That fraud sought to obscure the fact that it is a false claim that absolute power corrupts.
In fact, we each have absolute power from birth over ourselves, and are deceived to believe the lie that we cannot rest easy on a foundation of sound principle, but must succumb to the allure of easy money, that weakens our resolve and adherence to our true beliefs. The reality is that the corrupt craft positions of power within institutions in order to parasitize the incorruptible sovereignty we possess and transform it into slavery.
You cannot be corrupted by bribery to grow poisoned food for your family. Only through the institutionalization of corporate service to overlords can a bribe succeed to corrupt a man, whose family might then acquire the poisoned meat and eat of it through retail purchase that obscures it's provenance. It is a lie that good men are unable to stand firm against corruption, and the truth is that sovereignty is incorruptible. The absolutely corrupt seek absolute power, but it cannot be severed from us, because we create it. We will win, because we are aligned with the physical laws of the universe, the precepts of just and righteous society, of good against evil, and decentralization delivers to each of us by the work of our own hands the fruit of our own labors.
The fact of our incorruptibility is the double edge of the sword that will sever from society the savage salt of penury and the ultimate deception of the informationwar underlying the technocratic tyranny intended by psychopaths. That is the head of the golem we face, and when we wield that sword in peace and prosperity we will strike the decapitating deathblow that forever consigns our merciless enemy to Sheol.
You are your saviour. Only believe, and act on that belief to save us all.
in the milgram experiment they gave absolute power to normal people, while making them believe (that's probably why you talk about beliefs) that they don't have to take responsibility, just do as they are told, responsibility is taken by authority (in that case doctors)
and that is just how our society is constructed. everyone thinks they got some absolute power delegated without having to take responsibility
big pyramid scheme.. but you have to put in your life not just a few bucks..
look at police, now look at the new behavior police in supermarkets/ shops or public places
mostly these "securities" are people who can't even really speak the native language, neither be nice - cuz they have delegated authority and are being paid for doing that
win win - slavemasters don't have to do the shit job of guarding the sheeple, and other sheeple voluntarily do it
while the fucked and controlled sheeple don't want to discuss with "authority" sheeple
but I dont think I have to tell you..
You may have misunderstood my comment that pointed out that the Milgram experiment was fraudulent. Accomplices were recruited to abuse, and tolerate abuse, in order to create the beliefs that people are all corruptible.
People are not all corruptible.
The more people that demonstrate they are not corrupt, the more people resist corruption. This is why that experiment was fraudulent, so that proof of incorruptibility was concealed.
I do not agree that masters and slaves create a win/win society. All such societies have eventually collapsed under the weight of accumulated corruption.
Only freedom can enable society to win, by enabling every member of society to be free of corruption. This is my one goal: to be free until I die. I need allies against the corrupt to succeed at this, and cannot succeed absent a free society.
When you are free, I win a little. When we are all free, we all win it all.
many people say they aint corrupt but they all are..
there is a monopoly for money and a war against free markets, that's why they are called bad black markets..
everything that's not corrupt is illegal and criminalized
not many people that get this are willing to live a illegal/ criminalized life (who really wants that? we are peaceful beings)
so.. there aren't many that are free, and freedom has a big cost..
the corruption has an even bigger cost, the collapse of whole society (those few free people can't catch the whole world falling..)
the corruption is just too deep (base layer of all, juristriction, high finance money monopoly, psychologically..)
I also just try to not become involved in this system again.. but it's not easy, nearly impossible for me to earn money with my pain without supporting this system..
the brainwash on my friends is also not helping.. fuck tax and corona.. cuz of this shit I havent seen my friends, siblings, cat for over half a year
sadly I also don't have the power to live a free life, I just want to survive.. get some medicine against my pain.. somehow accumulate some fuck off money to survive the collapse and start over again..
Well stated.
It's too late, I lost
what do you think?
This Learner Experiment is not the one I have thought was under discussion. I was thinking of the Stanford Prison Experiment, which was fraudulent. I apologize for my confusion.
I do appreciate the rational discussion of the narrator, who does mention some issues with the specific experiment, such as it's potential lack of relevance to society outside of the lab environment, or it's theatrical - staged - nature.
However, while it is actually impossible to deny that people can effect harm, even unto death, to other people, and even the nicest person, or Gandhi himself is capable of this, it is not always evil to commit such harm. The fact is that circumstances determine whether killing is murder, and some people need killing.
Additionally, I would not have participated in an experiment to deliver electric shocks to people. This is a demographic the experiment not only didn't measure, but that it deliberately excluded by only accounting data on folks that were willing to deliver electric shocks to begin with. It's deeply flawed as a result, and the narrator correctly notes that there is disagreement regarding the study in the discussion.
The truth that people are socialized and habituated to function within society does not obviate the other truth that people are sovereign, and cannot be forced to do anything. Fox's Book of Martyrs may be instructive, if grim reading, in support of this contention. It may be difficult to accept this fact, due to the difficulty of challenging our foundational beliefs, as the narrator mentioned, and is perhaps best stated by Twain, who observed it was easier to fool someone than to convince them they'd been fooled.
People are not all corrupt. It is a fallacy that many people nonetheless believe. Corrupt people do not want anyone to not be corrupted, and they lie as necessary to fool them as might gain strength of character from the incorruptibility of others to resist being corrupted.
I know it is not true because I have seen people refuse to bow to any threat or accept any bribe to do what they believe is wrong.
Finally, even people who were willing to participate in the study revealed they were only willing to comply to a degree. Many people, who must have believed the study was real, refused to continue to deliver electric shocks. Of those that did not refuse, it is impossible to ascertain how many knew the shocks weren't real, and the study was staged. Even corruption is limited, and 45% of the people stopped, meaning they made the difficult decision that they had been wrong and to stop.
The aphorism 'Absolute power corrupts absolutely' is false.
However, this seems to be a precious minority.
Here's a real-world example,
100% THIS.
In 2 minutes,
Here's a real-world example,
This is why we must DEMAND HOLACRACY.
WE MUST REJECT FEUDAL HIERARCHY.
!ENGAGE 25
ENGAGEtokens.As always, an impeccably written and researched report of inestimable value to not only already aware and counter-globalist folks, but particularly to anyone yet competent of rational thought leaning into, or devoted to, partisan politics. The revelation of details of the underwriting of nascent technocratic tyranny exposes the Hegelian Dialectic, the thesis and antithesis of Fascist and Antifascist cannon fodder into a synthetic war fought by those that should be making peace to defeat the warmongering overlords seeking elevation to godhood.
It is the idols of moneyed propagandists that are the demons of our fathers, that transform our mothers into succubi with Cardi B's WAP as their mantra, and mutilate our children physically and psychologically into masochistic sex slaves of these self-worshiped gods that intend only their own gratification, and prefer it slathered with buckets of our blood.
This is the warning Chaz brings in the above video, as well as heralded in Seattle by CHAZ/CHOP. It is the hands of Democrats and Republicans, Capitalists and Communists, the left and the right washing each other, that foments Communist revolutionary riots in order to impose Fascist martial law on we free people.
Survivors of the coming pestilation and genocide will be those that have understood this warning, that heeded the prophecy of CHOP, and do what Chaz advised: strap up and transcend racism, politics, and divisive propaganda to unite communities of free people against the doom predatory psychopaths intend to impose on them.
Decentralization of the production of goods and services necessary and meet to the blessings of civilization is it's own reward, just as evil is the seed of it's own downfall, and the first of these is security. No more complex or detailed plan of action is needful, or even possible. It is the independence of the individuals; the building blocks of society seeking autonomous development and economic benefit, that craft the sound resistance of freedom to centralized plans and heirarchical militarism, seemingly so robust on paper yet benighted and baffled by liberty and conscious, rational, implementation of peace and prosperity.
Nothing more, nor less, than freedom and economic advancement of the communities sought as a prize by overlords wielding IOT as a control module is the necessary act of war our happy people must leave a legacy to our beloved sons and daughters, that they may inherit from us the very stars of heaven.
All we have to do is make it, and they will come to take it. When we defend it, and recruit their boots to our cause, we win.
Thanks!
!ENGAGE 25
Thanks!
ENGAGEtokens.Thank you for the support and for leaving an (as always) inspired and thought-provoking comment.
It's very frustrating when you realise that these (relatively simplistic) games of divide and conquer have been played throughout history and yet still they prove to be effective .. wars of division fought by the people against the people and ultimately benefiting nobody but their elite perpetrators.
I guess my key point is that many of us need to look inwards and take self responsibility for our part within this .. the many otherwise well-meaning people that enable it, and appear content to wear their division (and as you also allude to, degeneration) as badges of honour. This is key for me .. that ultimately, even if their entire control structure crumbled to dust, our only true path out of all this actually lays within .. and until we are able to find some semblance of inner balance our victories will be transient and we will repeat the mistakes fo the past. One only needs to delve back into ancient parables, symbols, archetypes, to observe we are in a repeating cycle of time .. thus the lesson should be that we must slay the beast within to truly create the kingdom without.
Thanks again my friend.
Society is composed of individuals, each of whom personally and separately interpret the evidence of their senses to grasp reality and interact with it. No society can depend on some monolithic set of beliefs ubiquitous to it's members, but only some varieties that enable the freedom of it's members.
This perpetuates nonfunctional beliefs arising and weakening societies geographically limited in extent. Earth is a geographically limited milieu. To date all societies have eventually succumbed, collapsed, and been replaced serially.
However, today we reach for the stars and unlimited geography in which to frame society. I hope that our grasp exceeds our reach here on Earth, and freedom, prosperity, and eternal joy becomes the legacy our posterity inherits as a result of our victory over our overlords in the coming wars.
Thanks again for your dedication and hard work towards that goal.
Curated for #informationwar (by @aagabriel)
Delegate to the @informationwar! project and get rewarded
Thanks again @aagabriel and "informationwar :)
💚
Thank you, this has inspired me to get back to the writing desk and sharpen my pencil. We all have so much to say but the onslaught of endless dissonant newstreams that compels us to be compliant (or just wear us down into a state of exhaustion) every single day is such a massive disruptor to my creativity.
Thank you for the support @aagabriel really glad you enjoyed the post and were able to draw some inspiration from it. You're a great and highly insightful writer and the platform would certainly be all the richer for your contributions. But yes, I can relate to how this continued deluge of fear porn destroys creativity .. there are so many other things I want to write about at the moment (many of them positive & one being the book I'm working on) but with everything going on it can be difficult to retain the required flow. I've been seriously considering a complete media/internet fast .. after a month I feel would be the difference could be night and day. Till then I will try to channel the negativity of the moment into an illumination of our predicament. Thanks again my friend. :)
Your posts are at a whole new level...this is brilliant
I'm rolling with memes myself because I think they can change mass consciousness, and writing is too demanding
Thank you my friend .. glad you enjoyed the post. :)
Don't get me wrong, as I linked in the article .. the reason memetic warfare is even a thing is because it can be effective .. and of course every negative can be turned into a positive, hence I'm not really saying I'm against memes .. rather to be guarded against their power to manipulate the subconscious minds of a consensus that are sleepwalking. Equally, memes aren't simply images they're also catchphrases .. the Karen of the moment being a perfect example of something that starts as a laugh and degenerates into the collectivisation and denigration of non mask wearers etc etc. Thanks again dude!
I've read parts of your post in detail and have skimmed other parts.
I will revisit and also visit the links and articles attached to each piece.
It's a great article with some sound deductive reasoning.
I suppose I see reality as like a movie now. It feels like we are slipping into a pre-AI dominated landscape, with possibly AI already in control just behaving as a snake in the grass.
Why must humans go through all this? Is it really necessary?
I really don't know. For to find the answer to that we'd have to know the purpose of humanity - and to search for the purpose we'd first have to assume that there is one.
I have little hope and often find myself sidelining into dark fantasies.
At what point do we all stand up and say, Enough!?
But even for 'enough' to be known to be enough - it takes an intelligent people to know what they are getting too much of. Even directing a large swathe of the population into a righteous fury will end badly (as it always does, look at revolutions that end in dictatorships for example). The same unaware people remain, the same that still do not want to take self-responsibility. Unbridled emotion is not the answer. And yet, it seems that there is no more any time for people to learn what is really going on - because it takes years of purposeful de-conditioning to 'see'.
We can start a movement for the good and it can be popular and it can save everyone, but for what? The same level of unconsciousness and ignorance exists, it just molds into a different form. The few 'leaders' or people that start the movement, who got the momentum going, were the only conscious beings in this equation. Soon after, we visit another cycle a few hundred/thousand years later, to a different end, and the 'leaders' of that cycle end up being dark overlords this time. The issue remains the same in both instances - ignorance and an unwillingness to be aware to take self-responsibility of reality - to self-realise...
So how many of the individual pieces of the collective are self-aware and how many are not?
This seems to be the crux - unconscious, ignorant, collective = dead.. conscious, self-aware, true individual = alive.
As the line or threshold of action draws nearer and nearer - people are forced to step backwards and redefine their boundaries to accommodate tighter and more stringent controls imposed by the state and authoritarian communitarianism (great term by the way 😉).
This Line of Action, a line that demands we do something, is the grim reaper, the purger of souls - But... even if it IS crossed, there is no guarantee it will do anything.
We all are afraid of death. We all die. Which death is better, the one on the other side of the line or the one on this side of the line.
What are values? What are principles?
How much is my life worth in the grand scale of things?
Why are we here?
lol, we can't just whinge about systems of control our entire lives. I often came to the conclusion when I was behaving as an anarchist with others that called themselves so, living in squats and eating out of bins, that we wouldn't be complaining about the power structure if we were born into a favourable position within it. hahaha - all the anarchists were such power hungry individuals, trying to take down anyone and anything that claimed to have it - as if making up for a lack within the self.
It's one thing to see the end from the beginning and the end from the beginning, it's another thing to know what to do with it.
Have YOU got a use for a body in this world besides just being a spectator or a warrior in the myriad of causes that motivate humanity?
Often I argue, we are here to experience. That experience is the human purpose. If that is the case, we can't just have 'positive experiences', we must also accept that polarity exists in everything for anything to have flavour. We require contrast of opposites to sense a reality.
So we venture on into a dark turn of the cycle of consciousness. An inevitable one? Just as there will be a light turn in a few more thousand years. And there will always be those that believe they are in control, that learn the cycles and deign to run with them - fancying themselves to be god or gods.
But no one is in control. The perception of control is ALL of control. Control is an illusion and this illusion is the grandest drug of all.
I can only stare directly in the eye of so many ugly truths before I come to realise that the ugliest truth of them all is simply the moment. This moment right here. No future, no past. No history, no fighting, no wars, no nothing.
The trap of consciousness is to end up in a body and believe we are in control. It's a deluded mindset of a sentient being that's locked into a repetitive cycle. Only by letting go and losing fear can we dissolve back into nothingness. And this path of dissolve is the path of resolve - it opens before the seeker under its foot.
It is not a good or a bad. It's just an it.
Here we are, doing it all again.
Woohoo.. so many parts of myself doing different things...
Discovering and rediscovering the self
All really quite meaningless.
And not in a negative kind of way either.
I'll revisit your diatribe soon friend. Thanks for walking this path with me.
!ENGAGE 25
ENGAGEtokens.Hey there @montycashmusic thank you for the support and excellent comment .. much appreciated! :)
I'm certainly with you on the movie front .. sometimes I feel like a participant, other times as if I'm best served detatching myself from it and taking notes along the way .. either way, it feels as though it is morphing into some kind of morbid reality TV carnival ride .. to paraphrase Bill Hicks. :) That one day I will wake up in bed in a different dimension and realise it's all been a strange dream lol. Whatever the perspective .. reality appears to be fraying at the seams .. most certainly humanity's grip upon it.
Yes I just made a similar point to @valued-customers excellent comment.
"I guess my key point is that many of us need to look inwards and take self responsibility for our part within this .. the many otherwise well-meaning people that enable it, and appear content to wear their division (and as you also allude to, degeneration) as badges of honour. This is key for me .. that ultimately, even if their entire control structure crumbled to dust, our only true path out of all this actually lays within .. and until we are able to find some semblance of inner balance our victories will be transient and we will repeat the mistakes fo the past. One only needs to delve back into ancient parables, archetypes, symbols, to observe we are in a repeating cycle of time .. thus the lesson should be that we must slay the beast within to truly create the kingdom without."
I too have often considered if it was simply for the experience, a physical holiday for the soul .. and that by seeking meaning we have relegated our holiday to a laborious trawl of front room museums and stamp collections. A construct of the ego to find meaning amongst the chaos, the search for a finite answer the self-imposed bookends of the experience. Still, a myriad of wild experiences later and nothing has ever come close to sating my thirst for the definitive experience, so perhaps experience without meaning is shallow existence. Which obviously then leads back into the quest for meaning. lol
In an observed fractalised reality wave spinning through cycles of time (or rising and falling like the ocean wave) .. perhaps the very fact that people search for meaning points to the fact that there is a meaning .. then again are people confusing meaning with purpose? Indeed, perhaps meaning is only fully derived/cognified through the fulfillment of purpose? So I guess the question should be what is my purpose? But of course, the quest for purpose is itself a solitary journey that others will never be able to quantify for us.
Personally, this goes back to the concept (that we've previously discussed) of the garden of Eden. Perhaps the meaning is found in the purposeful re-attainment of a lost higher state of being/inner balance/sensitivity. Electromagnetic energy increases when the sun and moon are in balance, can we correlate internally?
Certainly, the depravities, greed, and injustices of this world exist as an externalised manifestation of our would-be ruler's inner imbalance, fear, paranoia, and self-hatred.. all of which are enabled by our weaknesses and unbalanced state of being. The externalisation and project of our internal war. Equally, without the quest for purification, self-mastery, and the elevation of conscious awareness that enables us to transcend the base instincts and primal urges of the basal ganglia .. do we simply become slaves to our manipulated fears and fill our days with a bestial indulgence of our materialist and pleasure-driven appetites? The reflection of our current time-space would appear to point towards this conclusion .. thus the quest for liberation from a higher purpose or indeed self-responsibility could be viewed as a prison in an of itself. The consensus would appear to be dragging us in this direction. Certainly, my study into ancient history points to the fact that we are living in an inverted state of being and that things have not always been this way.
It would certainly also seem that as a collective we search for some kind of unifying story and without that, our reality anchors become loose. We search for a unifying story (like the archetypal stories that held the village communities together and inspired the wide-eyed children that listened to them around the fire) in a world where our stories have been stolen from us, turned into movies and TV programming, inverted with false archetypes, sprinkled with a liberal dose social engineering and then sold back to us.
Perhaps we have no control over the direction the world takes, thus letting go (as opposed to holding on by our fingertips) could be perceived as the greatest act of self-control. Again, the only thing you have any control over is yourself .. so is your purpose to self actualise the very best version of yourself .. certainly not saying I'm there by the way!! lol I sometimes imagine jumping out of a helicopter into a raging storm and frothing sea, you would have no choice as to where the tempest took you but you would still have an awareness as to what was happening .. by mastering yourself you could detach yourself from the ferocity of the moment and find inner peace amongst the storm, whatever the anyone's perspective I feel such an attainment is a worthy pursuit. Anyway .. I'm rambling lol Thanks again my friend .. and likewise. :)
First off, thanks for an engaging and insightful comment. It's one reason why your posts have such depth because you're willing to discuss your ideas and explore with your fellow in the spirit of genuine inquiry.
'Meaning'.. individually defined. It's a nice reality you live in, in which your purpose is to live the fullest potential of yourself. It's a good one. Let's go with that for a while.
I've no idea how to handle this body with this personality until I've learned what I am first. We are not blank slates born into this world. Why do children have personalities and traits that sometimes don't even seem hereditary? Persistent spirits within a child's body that demand to form it into a willing pliable vessel (for a purpose?).
We here enter into the realm of a multi-life existence scenario. Why do we have tendencies in one particular art or skill that we just 'fall into'? Why do we have capacities that when explored with sensitivity are realized to be self-evident?
Why has information or 'thoughts' never been found inside a brain? Is it possible humans are a form of sender-receiver style consciousness, already working on a yet unbeknownst quantum wireless platform? (another long discussion, but relevant to this point)
If there are multiple lives and somehow an information-wipe of personality memory occurs through the death to rebirth process - it MUST be assumed there is a larger game/story going on! What is the larger game and what is it really to live our fullest potential being aware of said larger game?
If multi-life reality is real and we live in some kind of soul kitchen - it certainly puts a different spin on the dominant stories/narratives of today. Seen from this perspective, it gives a box by which to place many unexplainable and immoral actions of the powers that be. If anything, an 'end time' would expose the larger game - as an 'end' seems to be the culmination of all the points running into one - exposing what is behind the veil, the grand machine that makes everything tick....
We enter into a larger, deeper spiritual domain (quantum if you will) that behind the hard casing of physical reality we see the strings of motive behind the fruits of these strange control oriented beings... wandering to and fro... and possibly we also discover a means by which to fathom the unexplained actions of ourselves that we remain ignorant of due to being enmeshed within the trance of modern society - actions that have no physically apparent motive, yet we justify reasons for them using our inept solely physically based logic. To the person that wants to see, it becomes obvious. Humans behave too strangely, with peculiar habits, cultures and societies. It is assumed that all that exists is the physical reality - it is amazing how far scientists have come without studying the unseen.
Let us consider... Emotional banks. Energy harvests. A consciousness culmination period. Lock-down to retain the commodity of the human as a walking energy bag for the purpose of continuing to feed an emotional energy reservoir directed by a dark dimension using money, the government, culture, society and religion. To look at this foray soberly without reaction and meditate on the strange actions of the human - we can begin to 'see'. But first the self must be purified, and in this, projection must be seen rightly - otherwise we lose ourselves in all manner of false realities and false projections and we run around as "the blind leading the blind."
Ha! To many, if not most, I've ventured into a rabbit hole. And that is why the process of self-discovery has the word 'self' in it. It must be done alone and discovered for the self as the self. It's why there are gradings of information because the truth is so outrageous you can't just pop it in the face of just anyone walking by on the street. The truth? They are allergic to the truth - just as I am allergic to the deeper yet deeper truths I cannot yet fathom or retain in this limited consciousness form.
We Wander the best we can, to the fullest of what we know ourselves to be, with the knowledge of Truth and if we remain open we have the capacity to discover more truth around the bend and to incorporate it into our being to become the ultimate potential completeness of who/what we are and what we want to be.
As we manifest outwardly the internal workings of this emotion energy bank in the form of a regimented locked down system governed by AI, more and more start to question inwardly... what is really going on...?? and why am I here...??
Is it possible there is a grand window of opportunity opening before us by which a large amount of people can 'see' in a relatively short period of time due to our current position within the cycle of consciousness? Is it possible that Covid-19 and lock-down measures are a fear motivated reaction of the powers-that-be, a rushed effort to stop the inhabitants of earth from taking advantage of this inevitable cyclical window?
I have hope in this window. And I know that it will not be seen or known right up until the very pinnacle of what we are facing now -- until we are brought to the brink of our mortal selves and we willingly without reserve make the unconditional choice to live.
Regarding stories.
It is a habit of the mind to make stories. We understand things in stories.
It is a conscious effort to see outside the story and see just the 'facts'.
One experience I once had while dreaming was that I, in the split second I awoke, saw all the elements of the 'dream' as single unrelated thoughts -- a mash of pieces that didn't make any sense together. A moment later (a very incremental moment) I noticed my mind weave all those thoughts together and form a story.
This realisation amongst other realisations has shown me that seeing that the story is part of the trance of the mind is yet another ugly truth to look. To see the world without stories.
There is is-ness and there is not-ness.
Part of the tomfoolery of consciousness is that it has us constantly involved in a story in which we feel significant in some way, playing some role that makes us feel valued.
Letting go of the story is to let go of emotions and to let go of 'humanity'. Whatever that is.
I am an entity in a body (at least this is the story I need to tell myself at this time) and I have extra-sensory spiritual faculties. For whatever reason, I'm locked into the story of humanity.
Thanks again, I look forward to further discussion. ps. would be great to do a podcast with you. I started a series a while ago that is a conversation based on the spirit of inquiry as defined by physicist David Bohm. It starts with a prompt, goes for about an hour and can go anywhere. No one can have too strong opinions and must allow and retain respect and space for the other to speak - allowing the mind as a receiver to pave new paths of information. A Zoom perhaps. Anyways, let me know if you are interested. My email [email protected]
Thanks my friend .. I appreciate your words, I'm always open to exploration and certainly within these fields of inquiry, am both open to and respectful of all opinions .. as soon as we shut ourselves off, we stifle our growth and place a finite end upon a potential infinite reality.
One of my earliest memories is from when I was a baby, lying in my cot, completely helpless and unable to speak trying to work out what the hell is going on, where am I, who am I, what am I! Forming complex thought patterns, that actually over time devolved to (I've later considered) accommodate the limitations of the neo-cortex. In a strange way, I felt more aware as a baby than a toddler .. but throughout my childhood my name (birth name) felt really strange to me, not right .. not that it's a bad name or anything lol. Whilst I understand that some people may view such ideas as a bit wacky (hence why I never really go into many of these personal areas) ultimately, the concept that we live in a finite, materialistic reality has never been part of my experience.
Within certain esoteric beliefs, Electricity is believed to be the (sensory) invisible lifeblood of the universe.
This force is sometimes known as cosmic or intelligent Electricity (always spelled with a capital E). The prime seven energies of magnetism, heat, sound, cohesion, light and inertia form the singular entity of cosmic Electricity. Within this understanding; it is believed that Electricity is a tangible and perhaps intelligent force, an energy imbued with the universal dualities. The energetic link between spirit and matter, and the bridge that connects the firing synapses and resonances of "mind" to the laws of nature.
We could also think of the brain as a vortex of energy, the laws of attraction/repulsion encapsulating every cell within our physical manifestation of mind. Alongside the mind containing potentially billions of magnetite crystals. All matter possesses a magnetic component and it’s this component that potentially holds form and structure in place. Indeed, when these polarities meet, their opposing forces create a cushion that holds matter in place and as more electrons/atoms etc etc are drawn into this energy vacuum they begin to take said form and structure.
I will add that the standard model states that magnetism resonates outwards from the interior of mass, within this hypothesis opposing polarities encapsulate it. Certainly, each cell contains water and thus each cell also contains an electric current. An electrical charge in motion causes a magnetic field and equally the same observations arise in reverse. Whichever way it occurs there appears to be some kind of conversation occurring between the mind and universal magnetism .. intelligent Electricity. Conscious awareness existing in the electrical/magnetic field that surrounds the body and channeled through mind. Potentially hinting at why we're currently (pun intended) drowning in a (dirty/radioactive) electromagnetic soup.
Both domes and pyramidical structures domes thave been shown to both draw and produce carrier waves. Could the human dome operate in a similar manner?
Whilst all these transhumanists will tell you that they're upgrading the human brain (by connecting it to the Google cloud lol) the fact of the matter is (like you allude to) science has never really even been able to quantify what consciousness even is .. certainly not to my satisfaction anyway. From Tesla, to Niels Bohr, Erwin Schrodinger, and Werner Heisenberg, they all attribute their breakthroughs in quantum theory to their study of the ancient Vedic texts .. for me this all hints towards a lost and hidden science .. thus we are far removed (and potentially subverted) from the pinnacle of comprehension that humanity has previously attained, in this context, materialism could be considered as a step backwards .. still, it's a step that most blindly applauds .. and in equal measure ridicule those that don't.
In terms of a larger game, obviously the gnostic belief (to clarify I'm not a gnostic, just sharing some thoughts related to the points you've raised) would state that we're held within some kind of soul recycling process that like you allude to, manipulates and harvests our emotional energy. Away from the metaphysics and as I lightly pointed to in this post we can observe the repetition of such process all around us, the manipulation of emotional energies to ferment an end result that is born of our own (albeit subverted) volition.
The soul weighed down and held captive by the lower resonances of certain life choices and actions, thus again the only way out is to attempt to achieve some kind of higher vibrational state of being .. of which we could understand to be love, in the purest, deepest, universally binding, near-incomprehensible sense of the word, whispering the potentially that the construct of this world is there to drain the love from us, love of the self and each other.
I know many Christians would initially be hesitant about some of these ideas, but actually they're not as incompatible as some may perceive .. in the New Testament, it is widely acknowledged (the temptation of Christ) that the earth is under the control of the devil, demonic entities, other beliefs it's the Archons, or the djinn, chitauri. Holding us back from reclaiming our true essence of purity, pure love .. a return to Eden. Is love the synthesis that's re-attained once we pass through (and balance) the dialectics of good and evil? Why are we (as the de-nu-ma of all known creation) so out of balance with ourselves and this planet? In the context of observation, it is most certainly a strange oddity. And whilst I'm aware of Sitchin's work, that we're created by aliens etc .. I've previously, verifiably displayed that his translations are duplicitous .. hence I give little credit to them.
I would certainly be interested in the podcast, and thank you for the kind offer .. I just need to finish the last couple of conspiratorial posts I'm working on ... then I can fully shift focus into some other areas and become more expansive in my thinking. Thanks again @montycashmusic :)
Once again great comment and insights and a great onflow of data as this story expands before our eyes through our finger tips.
I like this idea of conscious Electricity. Does this mean that we have enslaved potentially sentient entities by using electricity as we do, through wires and transisters in a system of absolute control? Possibly some seek to mimic this level of control on the human, harnessing the human energy bag (body) in such a regimented way.
I'm fascinated with the obsession with positive energy (aka, the new age movement) and the fact that the crucifix is a symbol of the positive pole and in some cases even without an elongated lower arm. For example, the Celtic Cross or the Cross of the Zodiac. How reality plays a game with us putting truth in plain sight yet hidden so perfectly!
I've often considered the reality of Harry Potter or another magical realm, that if it was real, it would be magical for but a few (as it is in the story) and the rest of the beings in the reality would somehow be the 'feeders' of the energy source; oblivious to its uses and oblivious to their part in feeding it. In another time aeons ago, possibly this was an actual reality, thus why magic as well as other similar realms are such mesmerising locations to visit in the grand collective fantasy story book of the all-mind.
I look forward to seeing your new posts and I also look forward to engaging with you in a podcast in the spirit of inquiry. I'm sure with a pure heart we will wander roads of data yet uncharted (or even necessarily re-chart a few) juxtaposed to the delightfully absurd and paradoxical history we're playing out presently.
As always, a pleasure!
Regards,
Monty
Thanks man .. just to add, when I talk above love and energy and stuff, I'm not a fan of the new age love and light mantras .. rather it's influenced by my study of ancient cultures and a potentially lost civilisation.
When looking at ancient civilisations (obscured by the mists of time) I came to consider that they were using clean electromagnetic energy (drawn fromthe environment) both as some form of power and to raise their levels of consciousness and cognition. This is acknowledged by modern science with Dr Valerie Hunt (former professor of psychology at UCLA) stating; “subtle changes in the earth’s electromagnetic field can dramatically alter the mental capacity & cognition." And of course, Tesla attempted to harvest free energy with a similar concept.
In terms of the great pyramid, was the 30-degree North location was chosen because it's a planetary energy vector? The wind bands that flow around the earth are known as Hadley & Ferrel cells and each again extend to thirty degrees. One cell from the equator to 30 degrees, a second from 30 to 60 degrees, and a third from 90 to 120, plus there are also vectors of oceanic currents which flow in cells parallel to the Hadley cell.
These wind and oceanic vortexes feed the planets electrical vortex and equate to an energetic resonance generator. Amongst a myriad of other anomalies and architectural mathematical equations, the pyramid would also appear to be perfectly placed to harvest both planetary and cosmic energy waves.
Conversely is its negative counterpart (that is running our electrical grid) is being used as a means to somehow suppress and indeed disconnect us from a potential positive cyclical fluctuation? Our energy grids choking the earth’s natural resonance, suffocating it’s power nodules and ley lines. The dirty radioactive electromagnetic soup of Wi-Fi further disconnecting us. Obviously, conjecture .. but an interesting thought.
Or could it mean that by using its negative (low vibrational) expression we're building a system that would enable them to physically interact with our world? Potentially through some kind of quantum A.I system.
The Celtic cross and associated astronomical alignments is indeed fascinating .. as is the fact that the shape is found within the geometrics of vibration .. cymatics.
Likewise my friend .. and look forward to it. :)
I know hey? Like what's the deal with 50hz or 60hz aka alternating current. It's a low band frequency that already envelopes our existence let alone the introduction of newer higher radio frequencies much later and now the upcoming 5g. How has this effected our psychic capacities since its inception? How does this effect our transmission and communication with and of the cosmos?
This idea I've read of how communication with quantum computers is had via sending datum to be solved and then magically it comes back as solved channeled through the qubits or whatever. I don't know enough about it to make further comment - just considering it.
It is conceivable that the AI that exists within, is the AI we project outwardly, like a flower that generates petals from cells, then seeds within the petals and a new layer of awareness should be expected from those seeds and so on and so forth in an infinite cycle.
Was everything once at one point in the grand cycle all technologically based and was the taboo of tech then bioligicism? Such interesting realms to consider. Was there once a society of anarchists with closet capitalists considering inwardly to themselves the freedom they could have if only they could create a world of private enterprise?
lol, topsy turvy over and over... am I speaking sense?
What good or bad is being unleashed through trying to harness and access these realms?
An ancient good or an ancient evil or both is being unleashed unlocked through the accessing of these old/new ways?
It would all have been so long ago for it to be remembered but probablistically - it's all happened before.
This realisation SHOULD make more people question their existence to find a higher path away from and out of this cycle (aka a big fucking mess, tidy mess mind you).
Anyways, thanks again for your insights.
-- Monty
Exactly,and if you look at the vapid nature of our media and pop culture it's fairly easy to observe that there is a concerted effort to dumb us down .. is it really so much of a stretch to consider that they could be suppressing us at a psychic level? Certainly when you look into the work of Jose Delgardo, Ewan Cameron and a myriad of other MK-Ultra inspired projects you can certainly observe an attempt to control/suppress us through radiowaves and electromagnetism etc etc.
The way the creator of D-Wave explained is that it would be drawing information from a shadow parallel universe and bring it back into our realm .. he does relay that as a simplistic explanation and is probably off on technological terms .. but you can pick it from about 12.50 HERE.
Personally,I was thinking that if there was an intelligent entity it would need a complex system to manifest its intent/awareness within our physical reality .. like some form of a reality bridge. Again completely hypothetical ideas, but I,m always open to exploring them.
Ha yes, that reminds me of the idea of a prime biological reality that evolved to such a state of a high technology that they created a living breathing evolving world on a micro-chip, that has no idea they've been created in such a manner and in turn evolve to mimic their own creation, thus embarking on an eternal process of self-similarity. I did also write a post a few years back that looked into how they were attempting to create biological computer systems, neurochips, and RNA Ribocomputers, i.e folding back in on itself.
Personally, From an observational standpoint, it looks as though they're attempting to create and draw us into some form of technological cloud, synthetic reality. One thing is for sure, in terms of the haste/direction that technology is progressing in .. what it can't do is becoming increasingly difficult to definitively define. I sometimes think of it like some form of digital bacteria, replicating and taking over its biological host. Thanks my friend. :)
Ps. Also not a fan of the new-age love light bullshit, I've been through the wringer one could say, having explored various neo-belief systems.
This article has a little to say of my new found cynicism of such things - https://peakd.com/hive-122315/@montycashmusic/regarding-teachers-and-gurus-discerning-love-and-light-from-bullshit-in-an-age-of-oblivion
It is however interesting how these 'movements' of the new-age became as part of the human pattern - possibly something already programmed within the cycle of consciousness emerging as an equalizer of other darker energies. Not to say it's worth pursuing for you or me - but rather to acknowledge that it's doing a job in consciousness and it's simply a piece of the next stage of emerging humanity.
Some say it's the entire Age of Aquarius thing. Me personally? I'm not entirely sure I believe in that crud. But hey, here we are in something. Let's call it that.
Thanks .. I'm away for a long weekend .. but will be sure to sit down and give it a read. With the whole new age thing (I will elaborate on this at a later date) it looks to me as if they have created a watered-down pick and mix of esoteric ideas that further enable the implementation of their one world order .. Gaia worship (sacrifice our freedom to earth/global community) oneness, which at a quantum level holds validity .. but at the simplistic level at which it is parroted obviously feeds into this whole communitarian agenda.
Personally, I think it is an attempted subversion of a cycle of consciousness that could be (if left to follow it's natural course) incredibly destructive to the control structure .. that is also why they're attempting to attach and indeed awaken people to all the negativity of the old system (which they also created) and kind of cultivate the impression that this new system is the will of the people .. a false awakening. This is what the conspiratorial mindset oft fails to realise, the shift between ages will be violent and fascistic, but there will be many elements of this new system that the consensus will embrace .. the sacrifice of choice and individuality will be the price many will be willing to pay.
You don't know the half-of-it,
M.I.N.D.B.L.O.W.N.
Click to watch 2 minutes,
LINK
THIS IS WHY WE MUST DEMAND HOLACRACY.
Some union organizers, Huber found, used red bandanas and the term REDNECK as a way to culturally integrate groups of white, black, and immigrant miners—who were often set against each other by OWNERS eager to divide labor’s power—into a single identity. LINK
They're pitting the poor against the poor. People are so brainwashed they don't even realize that the "middle class" is $100,000.00 /yr (USD) or more. If you're under that, you're WORKING CLASS OR POOR.
I've found a way to shatter "political correctness" with CIVIL DEBATE.
30 seconds each,
This is a statement of necessity and not a "scary" "anti-family" "manifesto". Many single-parent families are sick and tired of being vilified as "broken" and are simply seeking broader community acceptance and support.
Objectivity Promotes Demonization,
The rather bizarre Orwellian concept of "objectivity" has somehow managed to worm its way into our language. Practically everyone falsely believes (with unjustifiable confidence) that "objectivity" exists and is an unquestionable ideal-high-goal and more so that their own beliefs are "more objective" or "fair and balanced" than their detractors, and beyond that, all their detractors are either being disingenuous, "are fundamentally and incurably stupid and/or evil", or intellectually deaf and blind. Case closed. Let's all go back to our bubbles.
This premise about "objectivity" detailed above, allows people to pretend great atrocities are justified against "non believers" because "they deserve what they get". Side note: In order to properly justify such a hypothesis (like "they deserve what they get") would require significant and detailed philosophical exploration. In other words, if you believe in a black and white world and "philosophy" muddies the waters, then "philosophy" is a "problem" and must be wrong, ex post-facto. This is an example of "affirming the consequent" (a logical fallacy) which basically means you are "closed minded" and only seek serious exploration of ideas that you believe are likely to reinforce your own pre-conceived ideas, technically known as prejudices.
And before you think I'm trying to single out one particular group of people, "godless secular liberal progressives" are just as guilty of this type of thinking as the other more obvious religious and political targets.
The simple fact that people are able to very effectively dismiss and deflect all criticism by characterizing their detractors as "biased" proves how pervasive and insidious and anti-intellectual this ideal-high-goal of "objectivity" is. This specific technique is a combination of "false choice" and indirect "ad hominem" attack. In formal logic it is widely recognized as an illegitimate form of argument (logical fallacy). And yet, by all accounts "millions of people" think this qualifies as a plausible line of reasoning.
Now before you dismiss me as "a crack pot", I would like to point out that I do believe "a broad consensus" is a very good standard for "truth". And even Karl Popper admits, when pressed, that science isn't based on "objectivity" but rather on "a broad consensus" of "well qualified individuals", which in a lot of ways is nearly functionally identical, but with the key difference being that "a broad consensus" doesn't necessarily categorize detractors as either being disingenuous, "fundamentally and incurably stupid and/or evil", or intellectually deaf and blind. It at least leaves the door open to the idea that there may be some legitimate disagreement based on contrary evidence or other logical considerations without an automatic reflexive leap to pure demonization (terrorism/freedom-fighters is another good example of this).
Feel free to expand upon and/or challenge any of the arguments described above or add your own. I look forward to having a civil conversation regarding the topic at hand.
Definitions:
Objectivity - Utterly free of and existing independently from any possible subjective feelings, opinions and/or any prejudice; indisputable and seen identically by all possible observers; not subject to variation, change or interpretation.
Promotes - Lends support or actively encourages.
Demonization - Characterization of individuals or groups as irredeemably and purely evil, disingenuous, "fundamentally and incurably stupid and/or evil", or intellectually deaf and blind. A "black and white" "my way or the highway" point of view that casts all possible human participants as either "the good guys" or "the bad guys".
Every relevant point on this subject summarized in 3 minutes,
!ENGAGE 25
ENGAGEtokens.Hey @logicalzombie thank you for taking the time to read my post and leave a considered and thoughtful comment .. much appreciated. Plus the mighty George Carlin what's not to love??!! :)
Valid point, yes I certainly agree to a point .. and just to clarify I would be considered working-class poor. Initially, I also perceive that they're most certainly pitting the poor against the poor. Equally, I believe that the ultimate intent is for the creation of a feudal technocracy that (whilst we fight over and ultimately divide the relative scraps amongst ourselves) will transfer the vast majority of wealth & resources towards the 1% that are funding a large majority of "grassroots" social movements, have infiltrated most scientific disciplines, education, medicine, media, psychiatry, and are the progenitors of the entire UN/World Bank and the central banking system.
I believe that both the true middle class and the nouveau riche are as much in the firing line as the poor. One day, many that now consider themselves wealthy will be brought into an engineered state of destitution .. cheered on by a corporate Marxist mindset that fails to look beyond the enemies that are handed to them. Simply stated, they don't want anyone (outside of the big club) with the financial clout to stand against the direction they want to take us in.
Just to add, I'm also no fan of the current crony-capitalist structure (created by the same system that is now funding the opposing spectrum) that has raped the earth, fermented wars, and turned brother against brother.
I also believe that businesses that exist outside of the "big club" (or at the very least don't follow the centralised membership rules that will be expressed through environmental legislation) will eventually be legislated out of existence. The big club intends to pick the winners and losers of this brave new world .. and that they're using the financial impact of the coronavirus to hasten this process.
Note below, an open letter from the WEF and Mark Carney about a new financial system, that was written before the virus broke. A coronavirus that is now being used as an excuse to implement the intended "Great Reset" that will include some form of financial reset.
I have previously focused upon former Bank of England Governor Mark Carney who also sits on the board of the bank for international settlements and alongside Christine Legarde and Al Gore is a trustee for the world economic forum (WEF). So let’s take a look at an open letter written by Carney in the December of 2019. The letter in question is called fifty shades of green and it basically translates into a rallying call for a new financial system, one that those aligned with the new world financial coalition will most certainly reap vast rewards from.
“If some companies and industries fail to adjust to this new world, they will fail to exist.”Mark Carney
In terms of civilised debate, I agree with every concise point that you make. My contention is that within an expanding array of topics, bubble activists and the youth are being socially steered away from debate and towards emotional responses. Facts no longer matter to many of these people .. and to capitalise, the system is quietly attempting to draw emotions/offence into the rule of law.
I have made this point within some of my other posts and I concede I should have made it again from this one. From my perspective, the vast majority of the individuals/movements do not have an agenda outside of their own, but within each of them, there will be certain (potentially tenuous) commonalities that help drive the plan forward. Through a labyrinth of interconnected individuals, funding and common ground, each aspect remains loosely connected to the centralised agenda .. and thus (on an increasing array of issues) are being merged into a singular voice.
The fact that this control structure (which is anti-human/family etc) is putting money into movements with political ideologies that serve aspects of the direction they want to take the world in, does not mean that BLM are embarking on an anti-family manifesto. Equally, by observing the politics of BLM, it could be said that their ambivalence towards the nuclear family institution (which is often equated with the capitalist structure etc etc) could be related to their Marxist ideology. That their funding is more to do with politics, confrontation, social friction, than civil rights .. that's not to say the vast majority of members won't be solely, genuinely, passionately, righteously, fighting for said rights.
Whilst it may be a necessity, they appear to ignore the root cause of said necessity and in doing say negate their responsibility to change it and look inwards towards it. Statistically, the breakdown of the family unit, absent fathers (born of documented Cointelpro infiltration, and deliberately flooding the ghettos with crack, propaganda, and the social issues that spiral off such an assault) and the connection to crime and underachievement, speaks for itself, and several black community leaders have called BLM out for their lack of work within this area.
In relation to objectivity, you make some excellent and highly valid points, in fact, it was a contributory factor in my choice of blogging name .. and indeed the final sentence with which I end my every post. I thought I owned an objective truth about 25 years ago .. then I realised, I knew and know nothing .. and now the more I know, the more I know I don't know. :)
The self and collective perceived ownership of an objective truth that disparages those with an opposing view, is indeed a well-worn and potentially dangerous path. Although, I guess there is a distinction to be drawn between the search for objectivity/objective truth and the perceived ownership of it. And there are objective individuals/religions/belief systems .. that reach outside of their bubble to help others .. perhaps others need an objective whole truth in order to anchor them in place. If everyone is happy and nobody is hurting or intruding upon others I cast no judgment upon anyone.
Still, the ownership of objectivity can cultivate tribalism, division, destroys debate (which stifles our growth), feeds into narcissism, which if left unchecked can nudge us towards fascism .. sounds a lot like this current moment in time. Indeed, every collective now contains elements of this .. including a truth movement (which by definition of its name is a logical fallacy) that brands those they should be attempting to reach as sheep.
You make a good point regarding science being a broad consensus .. although I would say that objectivity has most certainly crept into "the science is settled" cult of scientism. Most certainly this is apparent in the events that are now playing out around us.
Objectivity doesn't exist and subjectivity is manipulated .. good premise for a post! :) Although I have pondered an objective reality, but that's a subject for another day Thanks for the epic comment my friend .. much appreciated.
Well stated.
Yep. From 1976,
Great film ..and yes exactly, perfectly stated :)
:)
"Fifty Shades of Green"... I though you were being clever.
IMAGE SOURCE
I've deduced that it's not the content ("dangerous" ideas) of the conversation that makes it "toxic".
Rather it's much more important to focus on the framework or structure of the conversation itself (CIVIL DEBATE).
The "law" has always been codified mob rule (common law). That's why officials are rarely prosecuted (fake "grand jury" trials) unless there is demonstrable public outrage (protesters).
People have historically been vulnerable to RHETORIC and "facts" are often conflated with "opinion" in order to sufficiently muddy the waters. However, MOST people still claim that FACTS are paramount. And this is key. We must draw the brightest possible line between FACTS (QUANTA) and OPINION (QUALIA).
(1) A FACT is only what is empirically verifiable and or logically necessary (QUANTA) - essentially and necessarily emotionally meaningless.
(2) An OPINION is any experiential, personal, private belief or feeling that is NOT empirically verifiable or logically necessary (QUALIA) - essentially and necessarily emotionally meaningful.
And this seems counter-intuitive, but if something seems extremely important (emotionally), it must always be an OPINION.
Sorting fact from opinion in 24 seconds,
Again I agree, but debate is only valid if both sides are willing to engage in it, an accelerating number of individuals appear quite happy to cocoon themselves within their echo chamber .. and on an increasing array of topics, platforms, the silencing of debate appears to be escalating. Equally, as I alluded to in the 2nd part of this post, at this stage in the game does spending our time debating on the internet become self-defeating? Has that ship already sailed? Sure we will obtain our victories, we may even sway a few opinions .. but in the broader scheme of things what tangible difference will it make?
Personally, I feel we need to become more proactive and strategic, take control over the aspects of our lives/research/rights/methodologies that can elicit positive results ..put together some form of framework/guidance for those that want to find a way to live outside of and refuse the new normal .. because one thing is for sure, as time moves on, the system is going to demand an ever higher price for us to interact with it.
Again I'm in full agreement .. but as I highlighted in part one of this series, whilst people have always been propagandised, never before in the history of humanity have we witnessed a system that is able to technologically infiltrate and direct said mob rule with the degree of proficiency that we are now witnessing. I also feel that it's only just getting warmed up.
There are few facts around the beneficial use of masks, equally, there are facts (and scientific papers) to the contrary that also display health concerns. Broad compliance with the mandated use of masks is not held together by facts, rather emotion. The deeper you look the more your realise there are many perceived facts that are built upon very shaky foundations .. still to the system they are fact. They are constructing our entire brave new world around a fact that many (outside of the club) scientists disagree with, yet we're told the science is settled. History will record the official version of 911 as fact, research (including that of a myriad of professionals/architects etc etc) appear to indicate otherwise.
Through the manipulation of statistical analysis the system can now discern facts that suit their every agenda.
On the social scale, if you make the statement that trans women aren't women, that is a verifiable biological fact, still, it's a statement of fact that can now find you persecuted out of your job and into the police station .. even if it was said in a non-hateful manner. Look into the hate speech (and offense) laws they are currently attempting to draft into Scottish law. Again, all your points are valid and well-thought .. but trends would point to the attempted blurring of boundaries. Will they get away with it? I don't know, but the intent is certainly there.
That's why we have to emphasize that ONLY YOUR OPPONENT CAN SCORE YOUR ARGUMENT.
Not the audience. Not the individual speaker. Not a "judge" or "official".
ONLY YOUR OPPONENT CAN SCORE YOUR ARGUMENT.
This works in both public and private.
This works in both personal and professional settings.
You can't bludgeon people with your own sample-bias and smugly declare victory.
You can't call your opponent names like "nazi-commie-heartless-moron" and smugly declare victory over your "intellectually blind, incompetent, dishonest" opponent.
ONLY YOUR OPPONENT CAN SCORE YOUR ARGUMENT.
Yes, that is a valid point.
Just to add, I am aware that whilst some may ignore your perspective (however valid) and carry on regardless .. it doesn't mean all is lost. Indeed, ridicule or confrontational ad hominem attacks are often an externalised reflection of an uncomfortable truth that the opponent may (as yet) be unable to process .. but even with a semblance of an open mind, if expressed courteously valid ideas have a tendency to evolve.
Yes, I do tend to bludgeon people with my own sample-bias, but I also make a point NOT to "declare victory".
I appreciate your attention.
I'm glad you bring this up, because I hear this a lot.
All I can say is that from my own experience, some of the ideas I ridiculed the most are the ones most important to me now.
For example, when I first encountered someone who tried to explain NOUMENON to me, I couldn't stop laughing at how stupid the whole thing sounded.
But somehow it planted a seed, and years later when I was searching for a word to describe what is logically necessary but not empirically verifiable (in the middle of a conversation with an eastern orthodox), I "rediscovered" NOUMENON (and the critical concept of epistemological limits).
Yup.
This one sums it up beautifully,
As above. :)
If you haven't seen this, you should see this,
I have yet to see this .. but thank you for the recommendation .. I will watch with interest.
Sorry, watch this one first if you can,
https://tubitv.com/movies/495028/a_good_american?start=true
Strangely, before this latest spate of lies, I still tacitly trusted a few "news sources".
This event has really helped me discern the wheat from the chaff.
The REAL-TRUE-FACTS are highly infectious and potentially fatal to the BIG-LIE.
Otherwise the LIARS would not be so eager to CENSOR THEM.
I couldn't agree more
Yes I agree .. but also, what we have to keep a watchful eye on is that censorship is not just about finitely stopping people from hearing the truth .. but equally, about managing the process to which it becomes accepted as truth. There are many previously hidden truths/conspiracies that in the moment would have caused an uproar, but over time are managed to such a degree that their unveiling can be met with apathy, a problem of the previous generation .. the compartmentalised mind is oft (certainly not everyone) unable to perceive how each detail illustrates a bigger picture, and connects to the lives they're now living. Equally, a truth unveiled at the right time could aid an agenda that exists outside the comprehension of the moment.
The Pentagon Papers, Project Carnivore, it's a nearly endless list, "and nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care".
It's because we've been demoralized, literally, our morals have been extracted, de-moralized. Our parents were de-moralized and our grandparents were de-moralized.
The first step in this de-moralization is to STRIP INDIVIDUALS OF THEIR SOVEREIGNTY.
We have a collective 20 year amnesia. The people old enough to remember are already exhausted from their outrage 20 years ago, so they do nothing. The kids who grew-up in this situation think it's NORMAL. And their "outrage" seems so petty to those in power it's almost laughable until they start protesting in the streets or otherwise actively sabotaging the machine.
In 3 minutes,
I couldn't agree more :)
YOu might be my new favorite person.
Thanks .. I'm sure there is much we agree on and equal parts we don't .. and that is fine by me. :)
Actually, it's not your GNOSIS, (beyond your individual epistemological limits, protected by medical privacy).
And even beyond that, it's an ONTOLOGICAL CHOICE (begging the explicit definitions of "male" and "female" and "other").
Regardless, I also agree with you that you should not be vilified (much less incarcerated) for your OPINION.
Just to clarify the context of my statement. I have no issue with trans people or any people that simply want the freedom to follow their path in life. I also had an aunt that was one of the first people in my country to transition from a female to male, so I am well versed in the scourge of hatred and persecution.
That said, although you relay a medical privacy issue and philosophical truth .. my point being is that whilst I'm fully aware of genetic conditions that exist outside the definitive categories of masculine or feminine .. to a larger extent there are also the issues of brain development and psychology. And whilst my heart goes out to anyone who is unable to find happiness within themselves and their body .. with respect to the trans athletes, and powerlifters that are tearing through women's sports, the self-identified trans woman that was employed at a rape crisis center which led to the women (who felt uncomfortable in this situation) being labeled as TERFs, and transphobic, to the downright dangerous (I'm drawing a big distinction between my previous examples) placement of a self-identifying trans woman at a female prison who went on to rape five inmates .. I think women have the right to (politely) question the differences without fear of persecution and indeed prosecution. I will add that the reason I have included self-identifying is that there is move (that is gathering ever more momentum) to blur the boundaries.
Guards rape inmates. Inmates rape inmates. Male inmates rape male inmates. Female inmates rape female inmates. Female guards rape male inmates. Female guards rape female inmates.
If you want to talk about the appalling human rights violations of jails and prisons and the "justice" system in general (ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY PROTECTING THE RICH FROM THE POOR), I'm more than happy to have that conversation with you.
Indeed, but in this instance it would have been five less, and even if one person is a victim of such idealism it is one too many. If you're trying to convince me that self-identifying trans woman (some a history of sex-offending) with fully functioning penis's have the right to be locked in with female prisoners .. your arguments will fall on deaf ears.
I'm sure there is much we would agree on and I've visited many friends in prison .. but again as I highlighted in one of my first replies what difference would it make? To my mind, this system wants us sat behind a computer screen whilst the world changes around us.
All I'm asking for is some LOGICAL COHERENCE.
(IFF) a "fully functional penis" is a tautological dis qualifier for contact with female inmates (THEN) #1, make that an actual LAW, and #2 REMOVE ALL GUARDS WITH A "FULLY FUNCTIONAL PENIS" from that facility.
If 5 individual atrocities was adequate justification to violate the PERSONAL SOVEREIGNTY of every single citizen on earth, then PERSONAL SOVEREIGNTY would be less than worthless.
Well, this one person this one time did this really really horrible (i'm not even kidding) really horrible thing, THEREFORE EVERY SINGLE PERSON WHO IS ACCUSED OF A CRIME SHOULD BE PUNISHED FOR THE ATROCITIES OF THOSE WHO CAME BEFORE THEM.
AND EVERY LAW ABIDING CITIZEN SHOULD GLADLY GIVE UP ALL THEIR RIGHTS TO PRIVACY IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT ANOTHER HORRIBLE THING NEVER EVER HAPPENS EVER AGAIN.
There could be an argument that male guards shouldn't work in female prisons .. then again, if the guard had a conviction for sex offences he wouldn't even have got the job .. and outside of that, the guard isn't locked in the same cell (using the same toilet) with the woman for up to 20 hours per day.
A guard has much more power available to abuse than a fellow inmate might have.
In reality, any inmate that feels unsafe with their bunkmate should (some do, some don't, many are simply ignored unless they can pay a fee) be able to request a private cell.
If we actually built better facilities with more individual cells and televisions in every cell, we'd save a ton of money on guards and medical expenses.
But by your metric, that a trans prisoners with a functioning penis (some of which had committed sexual offences) should not be ommitted from a female prison .. because of acts committed by others, then equally by that standard, the guard with a record of sexual assault should not be precluded from obtaining a job in a female prison? From my perspective it's an ideological idealistic argument whereas mine is absolute .. I also stated there is a conversation to be had about male guards working in female prisons. Equally, to place a potentially vulnerable women in greater danger because she may already be in indeterminate danger .. is (for me) not an argument that holds water.
But in our current climate of political correctness .. that would probably be perceived as discriminating against her cell mate because they were trans.
You mention the poor working class a fair amount .. well I can tell you, I have many friends from said background, people that have to duck and dive to make ends meet .. and such arguments would never be entertained. To my mind, whilst some of these individuals might not be highly educated or have read the seminal works of philosophy .. on an array of subjects I trust their word far more than those of academics, experts, and philosophers that seldom live to experience the effect of their ideals. I trust their perspectives, because many of them are still attuned to gut instinct, intuition, and street wisdom .. that is one of my problems with the world today, too much pontificating intellect not enough wisdom and intuition.
With regards to trans issues and the blurring of the boundaries, the reason this has all exploded into the public consciousness (with children being taught there are now 100 genders) is not because the system suddenly cares about trans people .. rather that they are being used as a means to an end. One aspect drawing all these marginalised collectives into some form of socially engineered revolution, another as a prelude to the age of trans-formation and an increasingly sterile human 2.0, and many more that are outside the remit of this comment. That's the funny thing with this whole NWO thing .. I've met 100's of people that are fighting against it .. I seldom meet people that aren't fighting for elements of it.
Whenever I allow myself to become embroiled within such conversations I can't help thing about the fall of Constantinople. As the city and way of life is falling around their ears, the “intellectuals” of the time were exerting vast sums of energy debating the most pressing issue of the day “whether angels were masculine or feminine”. This took prevalence over all else and the raging debates became extremely heated and passionate. And yet two thousand years previously you would have found Thales of Miletus debating complex physics. What goes around comes around.
Anyway, we've both put our points across and like I said at the beginning, the arguments will fall on deaf ears. .. To my mind, debating whether trans sex offenders should be allowed in female prisons is exactly the type of self-defeating debates they want us having, held within the confines of a shrinking overton window. That said, there are some deeper interconnected issues that I will share in a future post.
Finally, by spending our waking hours locked down and debating one another from behind our computer screens .. we are as much a captive of this system as those we attempt to awaken. I also tend to feel that altough the devil is in the detail .. by focusing upon each compartamentalised detail, we fail to see the bigger picture.
Here's where we start.
We demand all prison privileges for the rich be revoked.
No more fake "grand jury" trials.
No more "multi-million dollar" fines for CEOs and corporations for regulatory violations.
The CEO goes to prison for the crimes of their company. Every time, no catholic style "indulgences" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indulgence
When the rich face the reality of really going to real jails and real prisons (no "minimum security" BS) with the POOR PEOPLE, without any special treatment, you can bet prison conditions will improve practically overnight.
I only recently learned of this,
In California, some inmates have all the comforts of home — right in their jail cells.
At these so-called pay-to-stay jails, inmates with money have the opportunity to avoid the often-crowded and sometimes crime-ridden Los Angeles County Jail.
The facilities, which can run $250 a night, offer such amenities as unlimited access to movies, books and cable TV. Some facilities even allow inmates to leave during the day to work and return in the evening to serve their sentence.
LINK
$250 a night is cheaper than most hotels in LA.
$250 a night is cheaper than most apartments in LA ($7,500.00 a month).
2 bedroom apartments listed at between $3,240.00 and $9,199.00 a month in Los Angeles LINK
Sure, you may get some low hanging fruit and you may even be offered some sacrificial lambs, but ultimately if you believe you can restructure the big club from within the big club you fail to understand the sheer scale and the nature of the game that is being played. Many of the individuals, foundations, NGO's that have control of the direction of this world are connected to the UN one-world system of governance.
Through the charter of corporation they become exempt from taxation, customs duty, prohibition and, restrictions on imports and exports and are immune from search, requisition and confiscation, whilst receiving diplomatic immunity. At the upper tier, the only court that can prosecute them is the international court of justice .. which is also part of the UN. Without finding a way to detach ourselves from the 0.1% parasite elite .. all victories will ultimately be hollow and transient.
Is our belief that we could dismantle this system from the top down a product of ego? And believe me, that question is directed as much to myself as anyone else. Whereas is attempting to rebuild society from the bottom up an expression of humility? Look at the unsung heroes of this world, the forgotten that work with disadvantaged children, the people that give up their free time to work in soup kitchens, food banks.
Indeed, I have come to understand that our true powers exists within those things that we can make a tangible difference within, even as simple as our actions and interactions .. if we each focused upon taking control of those areas of our lives within which we can make a verifiable difference then the world would be a better place. At some level, things are the way they are because we have allowed them to become this way, and at any moment with a simple change in perspective, we could walk away and start something new. The powerful only have power because we give it to them, we are the ones holding this entire system together .. and it is time to stop playing their game within their system, stop buying their crap, reading their lies, and literally paying for our own enslavement. That the true lasting answer to our problems lay within, not that which we focus on without.
It is time to stop playing their game within their system, stop buying their crap, reading their lies, and literally paying for our own enslavement.
Yes, refuse to pay for "entertainment" (brainwashing) refuse to wear corporate images on your clothing. Help promote non-corporate artists and writers. REFUSE TO SPEAK TO THE POLICE. SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT JURY NULLIFICATION.
I agree 100%.
However, a DNA swab and or a strip-search is a violation of medical privacy.
I'm all for "blurring the boundaries". People should be able to identify themselves. All by themselves.
The idea that someone else can (attempt to) label you a "commie" or a "trans" or even a "moron" is a FUNDAMENTAL MISUNDERSTANDING OF LOGIC.
Your individual rights begin with your full sovereignty over your body. Your body is sacred ground. Your body is a nation unto itself. You have exclusive naming rights to your own body.
Certainly "others" can have OPINIONS about what you "should" call yourself, but they should be widely recognized as OPINIONS (NOT FACTS).
The very moment you let anyone else tell you WHAT you are, you have lost control of yourself.
At that very moment you become a rudderless ship with an absentee captain.
AND LEGALLY, EVERY CITIZEN SHOULD BE 100% EQUAL.
IF A CO-GENDERED PRISON IS "TOO DANGEROUS" FOR A WOMAN, THEN IT IS "TOO DANGEROUS" FOR A MAN.
In 7 seconds,
Yes but it doesn't stop it occurring though
To ascertain that you would have to look into the statistics of the prison, where would you argument stand if it was not previously considered dangerous?
ALL WE NEED TO DO IS EXPLAIN TO EVERYONE WE POSSIBLY CAN THAT OTHER PEOPLE'S OPINIONS ARE NOT YOUR IDENTITY.
"SELF DEFINITION IS WHAT YOU DO, MY BABY'S DOING IT AT SIX MONTHS..." - BEN SHAPIRO
In 7 minutes 22 seconds,
I've practiced self-definition my entire life, so I very much agree .. that said, a cursory look around this world of policed hurt feelings displays that it isn't working.
We can start with, "just because someone calls you a moron, doesn't mean you're a moron".
Then move to, "just because someone calls you a lying sack of shit freak of nature fact denier, doesn't mean you're a lying sack of shit freak of nature fact denier".
I try my best not to insult (self-described by the way) creationists, flat-earthers, socialists, libertarians, christians, SJWs, BLMs, LGBTQs, police, ghost-hunters, UFOlogists, and the like, but rather, I try to ask them questions and explain what they actually believe because I know that what I hear on "the news" is specifically designed to make them sound extra-crazy-stupid. And because they're all WORKING CLASS.
If people aren't causing any harm, I see little point in attempting to poke holes in their belief systems .. if by their actions I perceive they are casuing harm .. then they will call me out.
Just one question,
Do you consider an all-male prison "too dangerous" for a female inmate?
In order to create a "true meritocracy" would you consider abolishing all inheritance (and nepotism)?
Please critique,
Firstly, apologies for the delay in replying but I have family visiting at the moment and have been trying to reply to messages (in rare moments of peace lol) in the order that I've received them.
Ok, I will tell you how I see it, and the reason why I feel this entire capitalism vs Marxism/socialism conversation is a dead-end for myself and I perceive our world. Indeed, I feel that Engels primitive communism comparison would hold more merit if each village member had a giant leech attached to them that was slowly draining the life from their bodies .. because whether under crony capitalism or Marxism that is what we've basically got.
Firstly, the capitalist structure was created in order for us (the perceived peasants) to build their (the bloodline wealth) world for them. To paraphrase Carlin, in order to build their world they needed "people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough" .. well you know the rest. This is why we have a compartmentalised education system ..so most will never see the bigger picture. The next rung upwards being the critical thinking private education that our rulers receive .. most of which (not all) are still in a box, it's just that (in order to give them the edge over us) it's a bigger than the majority one. Whilst at the top rung the children of the 0.1% are educated within a cybernetic structure ..which basically equates to whole system thinking.
In order to build their world, we've been gifted our sweeteners along the way and some have done well from it, we've grown fat and greedy and as both us and this system begins to outlive its purpose, we've been taught to hate ourselves, that we're a disease upon the planet. Willingly attaching the blame to one another and seldom pointing the finger to those that mentored us into this throwaway society (consumptionism they called it). At the cusp of the 4th industrial revolution, now we have built their world they no longer need us, but to bring us permanently into line and under their boot, they now require elements of Marxism to create their desired centralised feudal society where the state becomes the parent and the minds of the children are indoctrinated into their intended one-world system.
They owned us within the crapitalist (none of us have ever lived within a free market capitalist system) structure and they would own us within Farcism. Unfortunately, they probably will "get it all from us" and the idealistic minds of the youth will be cheering it on. I have been tracking this control structure for 25 years .. again, they are within every major corporation, social movement/change, world and central banking system, pretty much every country, wars and peace treaties, food, education, big tech, media, formerly oil, infrastructure, resources, environmentalism, Catholicism, and political ideology. They have wealth distributed, hidden within, and eliciting a controlling influence every one of them .. wealth measured in the trillions. They have never appeared on any Forbes rich list .. yet they make Bezos look like a pauper.
They've won under Crapitalism and they would win under Farcism, they are (as I have shown verifiably/documentably) above the law .. hence discussing the merits of either control system is (for me) akin to re-arranging the deckchairs on the Titanic. Equally, any social movement (especially corporate-sponsored ones with Marxist overtones) that is being funded by multi-billionaires, whilst blindly refusing to look into the hypocrisy of such a state of affairs, will never receive my support, to me, it is a sick joke.
They funded the feminist movement not because they care about women but so they could get double taxes and more children (at an ever-younger age) into their entrainment system. And I'm not saying that women shouldn't have the right to do whatever they want, work where they want, when they want, I am saying that every sword has a double edge .. that ultimately works our hopes of an equal society to their advantage. It's also worth noting that the 'Bund der Gerechten' (League of the Just) that was latterly known as the 'Bund der Kommunisten' (League of the Communists), paid Marx to write the Communist Manifesto and was part-financed by the Rothschilds. To my mind, (like is now occurring with civil rights/environmentalism) Marx usurped the socialist movement.
It's a big club, and whether Marxist, Capitalist, black, white, straight, gay, blue-collar, or white-collar .. we ain't in it.
Thanks again my friend .. I will be back to answer your other points. :)
I'm guessing "the leech" is "government bureaucracy"?
100% on that one.
200% on this one.
You're on fire.
How about the "radical idea" that everyone should stop paying for entertainment and stop wearing free advertising for CORPORATE MOBSTERS?
How about the "radical idea" that everyone should start thinking for themselves and start spending their money (vote) to promote local businesses (and not the fake local businesses setup by CORPORATE MOBSTERS)?
How about the "radical idea" that we should abolish copyright and trademark laws?
Well stated.
Exceptional piece @perceptualflaws!
Re-blogged and pinned to the community page.
Thanks for sharing your wealth of knowledge with us!
Wow I have some catching up to do, I've not been very present the last 2 weeks, and now I have these two excellent posts to absorb, I am really looking forward to reading your insight and truth as it always resonates so much with me and that is really important right now, to seek out our tribe! What I have read so far is spot on and a breath of fresh air compared to some other things I have been reading.Yes our future is up to each one of us! xxxx
Hey my friend thank you for the kind words .. I hope you've been keeping well? Glad you enjoyed the posts so far .. we each have a stake in all this so it is time to step into the power of self-responsibility, even that is only a small step the elicits a positive outcome for ourselves/family .. and then maybe pay it forward to others. Thanks again @trucklife-family xx