America under attack.

avatar

Coup in the Republic ...




Hello, today I want to analyze the situation that is occurring with the political crisis that is currently being experienced in the United States and I want to present a characterization to try to understand what is happening in the context of what is happening is the choice of Donald Trump in 2016, a person who was not a traditional politician and who in his race to achieve the Republican party nomination practically did the opposite of what the specialists recommend, in the marketing that he should do to win an election, However, he not only won the nomination but, of course, wins the presidency of 2016, this is very important because the arrival of Trump to the presidency occurs at a time in American politics where there is deep disappointment with the political class in general. , with Republicans and Democrats until the arrival of Trump or his insurgency in political activity, in the United States the difference was not clearly perceived between Republicans and Democrats especially let's say in important state policies in foreign policy.


In this context, Trump is inaugurated as president of the United States and with a profile that we can characterize as not doing what is considered politically correct, however, he begins to develop policies that have a profound impact on what we say, had not been up to that moment of the American state and I am going to cite two examples: one of them is the confrontation with China, this has a context and it is that since the 70s there is a policy that has been assumed, it is a heritage that has been assumed by the different administrations to understand with China, but that understanding with China that precisely sought to have a kind of balance there in that bipolar world with the confrontation that there was with the Soviet Union that means making concessions and, let's say, support an economy that at that time did not it was seen as a power, but an economy that took advantage of that opportunity and this happened with the cost or the price of dismantling everything that has been the North American industry, so in the US you can get extremely cheap products, of course made with cheap labor, which comes or is in China and this has become an addiction for the North American economy, the price has been that many there are not Incentives precisely because the policy was to support everything that came from China, North American industries that manufacture their products carry their patents there, manufacture their products there and that then allows bringing to the North American market a series of products, let's say at affordable prices, however, this Let's say it raises an economy based on a completely artificial scheme and the result is that the US has a significant debt with China at this time on the US, it practically depends for many things not only on electronics, but on many components that are necessary for the production of goods and services, the US depends on China.


So it is one of the policies that Trump initiates is to reverse this process and apply tariffs to products that come from China, to create incentives for these North American companies to return to the United States or at least to relocate in the area of ​​geopolitical influence of The United States in the Americas, for example, I am referring to the Trump conversations with the president of Mexico, seeking precisely the way to address the problems: the problem of creating incentives for North American industries to return to this area, but also by settling in Mexico as This could in some way respond to the, let's say, the interest that Mexican citizens have in emigrating to the US, precisely because they do so because of the socioeconomic conditions, so this is really a rethinking that means a substantial reversal in a US state policy; The other important aspect to touch on is the presence of the United States as the world's police, the presence in the Middle East, Trump initiating the withdrawal of the conflicts to the Middle East to play a different role, a role as has been seen In recent months, of a role that sought to create peace agreements between Israel and other countries in the Middle East, but these measures mean that the United States is not going to play that role or does not want or does not want to play that preponderant role in it with its Military presence in the Middle East and this has a profound economic and financial impact on what is known in the US as the military-industrial complex, they are large corporations that sell weapons and technologies that make a living from that business and of course when faced with this new situation, that means good to sell fewer weapons and it really is a policy that has an undoubted economic impact.


It is seen that there is no correspondence with what he and his officials communicate, for example, what Pompeo says when talking about an election in Venezuela in six months, returning to a negotiation process, it does not seem, for example, with what Mr. Eliot Abrams, this is to show that there are substantial differences between Trump administration officials and President Trump himself, this configures or shows that there are indeed people within the US state of North America who are conspiring that they are part of an effort to sabotage and specifically to remove Donald Trump from power and the characterization of a coup that is a response to a coup is the seizure of power by a group or party of a political movement by means that are not legitimate or that they are not legal, the United States of a country that has a legal system there is a constitution, there is a way to choose the president of the republic and when it is subverted, what Ando is transformed, when the way that process is changed and disrupted, which under normal conditions should produce a result, then we are effectively facing a coup, facing a degeneration of a process that leads precisely to a result, which It is none other than trying to remove Trump from power, now this is not as we have seen, let's say as we normally have seen in America, in South America here we are facing a much more sophisticated process, better articulated, this is a coup classic, this is a coup by the military, this is a conspiracy where it is evident that since 2017 there has been an effort to attack Trump in power, the lynching to which he has been subjected by the media that no other President of the United States has had to endure, having to deal with newspapers with television networks, which even interrupts and they have the luxury of not transmitting a speech from the president In calling, for example, encouraging social networks called for what they called the moral and physical lynching of the president, all this trying to create an opinion matrix to establish the idea that this should be removed from power, to this of The media must be added the role played by social networks, mainly Twitter and Facebook, where their owners have practically become sensors, not only of Trump but of the people who express or express some kind of support for the candidacy or the presidency or Trump as leader or as president.


This situation of advantage was made clear in the electoral campaign where polls are manufactured that supposedly gave Joe Biden an advantage of 20 points over Trump and here at this moment we are in a discussion where we are practically counting vote by vote, because I present and defend the theory that we are facing a process of a developing coup, this is not something that is going to happen in one day, this is happening at this moment, what is happening at this moment is that there is elements of the US state itself within the states, which for example in the case of Pennsylvania changed the electoral law to allow voting in conditions that justly favor the Democratic candidate Joe Biden, the same happened for example in Nevada and also happened in North Carolina And in Arizona, the very fact that irregularities have been presented in a systematic and massive way and that this irregularity does not want to be resolved, that is the other to evidence that there is indeed a conspiracy within the same institution, within the same structure of the state to produce a determined result.


This has been, let's say, the end of a whole systematic campaign at the beginning of the year when they start with, let's say, the impeachment, which was the attempt to remove Trump from power through a coup orchestrated from Congress by the Democrats, to this is added that in an unusual, unprecedented way, when it comes to establishing Trump as the person responsible for the coronavirus, the CCP virus (for which they do not know the Chinese Communist Party) then when Trump called for precautions to be taken, the Democrats said no! No! No! Not that everything is normal, it is not necessary to involve China, accusing China today is practically racism and when Trump decides that it is necessary to take true measures because the severity of the crisis is verified, then the Democrats go the other way; To demonstrate the hypocrisy with which they are handled today, no media talks about the PCHC virus, and that does not matter because the elections have already passed and what must be taken into account is that with all the negative campaign that was made against Trump, The manipulation of the racial issue, you can see how, for example, he wins widely with the support of Hispanics and the black community in the United States, then all these lies that were trying to position themselves, were practically defeated by the votes, but the product of These manipulations of these technicalities, of these legalisms are looking for a way to create and move the number, so that Joe Baiden stops at 270 votes.


All these efforts to ignore the votes in favor of Trump constitute an attempt that can be verified to circumvent what has been the decision of the citizens, what would suit Joe Baiden best is if he is declared the winner that he is the product of a process that is recognized by both parties and by the American people, if they insist on denying the claims of fraud, denying the impositions and counting the votes cast illegally and insisting on finding the votes secretly without giving access to the representatives of Trump, well it is possible that they could swear in a president who would be a president who not only has the rejection and non-recognition of more than half of the American citizens, but also would be perhaps the first president to come to power in the United States as a result of a coup d'état, in what situation are we at this moment, we are in a situation where it is put to the test, a litmus test that that it is facing the political regime of the republic of the United States of North America, which has always proclaimed to be a republic of law and order; If it is the rule of law (Republic), they will have those challenges that are being considered to be resolved in a satisfactory manner in that legal framework, if it is the rule of law (Republic), Donald Trump cannot be denied the right to challenge those elections, the right even to go to a recount and if necessary to seek remedies so that the right that has been violated, what exists at this time is simply the hope that the institutional mechanisms that have the same republic will come into operation and correct and manage to defeat this coup that is practically in a phase of full development, if indeed these mechanisms are activated and determined, and the fraud situations that have arisen are corrected and remedied, then in the republic of the United States of America, inspired by the law of order, will have prevailed; Otherwise, if these rights are denied to me by the Donald Trump campaign and they insist on proclaiming by force, in the midst of all this mountain of fraud that has been denounced, and they try to swear in Joe Baiden by force then we will have to conclude that the republic of the USA has FALLEN.




0
0
0.000
1 comments