共識之三 On Consensus #3

avatar
(Edited)

在前一篇文章:共識之二 On Consensus #2 最後,我們說到

以Steem伊始,至現在的Hive,為區塊鏈帶來的新現象是:在機械層的機器共識之上,帶來了人類思想共識的新空間

讓我繼續說下去...


pixabay

所謂機械層的機器共識,大家應該都相對熟悉,就是從分散式系統到後來區塊鏈的PoW或是PoS等等,出於分散各節點而必須一致的需求,所發展出來的protocal等等。

沒有這些共識,就沒有分散式帳本,也就沒有現在這些分散式去中心化的貨幣或資產,甚至於這萬千的去中心化經濟了... 這些咱們且不談,這可是我談不動的一大大大塊領域呀~~~

我們談小一點的,偏一點的,就是咱們這在分散式帳本上承載社交、寫作的獎勵平台。

原本寫作或是社交,可以像去中化版的facebook一樣,愛寫啥寫啥,反正都給你弄上鏈,也沒人去censor你,思想言論不必求取共識,這應該是追求區塊鏈媒體的一種"共識"。

哪還有什麼建築於機器共識上的共識可言呢?

有的。一切關鍵在於,獎勵。光是獎勵還不足以驅動另一種共識產生,還要加上一個條件,共享的獎勵池

是囉,這才是一切美妙與罪惡的根源。

由於共享獎勵池,整個社區分成多少次社區都一樣,都還是彼此透過獎勵池相互關連。A點B,C可以有意見,也很容易會有意見,因為彼此的奶酪池是同一池。A儘管可以因為持有HP而有權力決定獎勵分配,但分配結果最終只能有一種情況,是綜合全部持有HP人點讚或踩的總合結果,這也就是那...

另一個共識

這幾個月來的紛紛擾擾,甚至是導致這幾個月紛紛擾擾的前幾年的意見不合的積累,其實都源自於這個根本的根源。

這也是我一直支持類似SMT這種概念的發展,讓獎勵池變成許多許多池,各自去經營,把底層鏈變成工具用的鏈,把原本寫作獎勵的這項功能放到某特定SMT上去就可以承接原有大社區(如果有人對於全球式社區感到很有價值應該繼續的話...)自然,許多矛盾就會迎刃而解.. 可惜,似乎目前Hive尚且沒有這種打算...

不過,即使是分開為許多池,本質上,特定獎勵池還是面臨相同的共識問題。所以,這個問題還是避不開的。

但這個問題,我認為就是考驗參與社區者的素質了。首先,社區的人得要更深入認識所謂去中心化治理的本質,然後要更有接納他人不同意見(行為)的見識,否則,就會進入到下一種抉擇:離開社區,類似於硬分叉,不同意,就用腳投票,走人。

我最受不了的是,明明罵得要死(不喜歡),卻還每天上來罵(繼續參與),罵的還沒有道理(並沒有為社區凝聚共識進有貢獻)。身體與言語分頭行動,雖然也不是不可以,但實在會令人感覺很受不了,如果我是大鯨魚,我就踩下去了(但因為我不是,所以我都沒作聲)。

去中心化治理跟遊戲規則,跟日常運作很不一樣,並不是大家很直觀可以簡單理解的。常常有人不如意,或是被踩,就批評說這不是去中心化精神云云...

其實,殊不知,這恰恰就去中心化精神的展現哪~~~~

(一個容易的判準就是,把個人利益反轉套用到情境,是否當事人會有一樣結論,如果還是一樣,那代表這是相對客觀的批評...)



0
0
0.000
4 comments
avatar
(Edited)

Dear new member of HIVE, you have made a big mistake by signing up here. Here on this Blockchain you are surrounded by abuse of power and the greed of some who determine what happens here.

If you publish here, make sure that you publish only what is beneficial to the owners of the assets on HIVE. You must never express your own opinion or criticize anyone. If you do, the powerful will destroy your account and take every cent from you.

You will soon find out that you only earn a few cents here. Others, on the other hand, sometimes get extremely rich. Look around, you'll soon find that some people get 2 or even 3 digit $ amounts for small contributions, but you don't even get 50 cents.

Here's an example of a witness with his powerful friends called @pfunk destroying a small account of a non-profit organization and destroying all donations. He has disadvantaged and socially weak handicapped persons, seniors but also people who raise a child alone, harmed very much. Surely you do not want to support such a block chain that allows such a thing. Do you? In the contributions all data, inclusive registration with the court - address and further data are listed. You see this is an official charity.

You can read the contributions in which this witness expressed himself here. As you can see he tried to destroy the contributions, but you can still see them.

https://hive.blog/deutsch/@nesomi/hive-the-blockchain-of-cold-hearts-and-egomaniacs-hive-the-blockchain-of-coldhearts-and-egomaniacs

https://beta.peakd.com/hive-181465/@opidia/a-very-unhappy-account-on-hive

I know you'd like to earn a few cents too. That's why I'd like to show you some alternatives

Hive was originally the Blockchain Steem. Steem is still the bigger and much more active chain. There you can get a free account from me including a delegation of power that is on the account. Just enter as a comment - Steem account and I will get back to you. https://steemit.com/

At the beginning of July Voice ( voice.com ) will end its beta phase and be available worldwide. There will be no powerholders like here. A capital of 150 million US $ was made available there. I think this system will be very successful.

With these comments, I welcome every new member on HIVE. I have access to hundreds of accounts and you can't turn that off.


0
0
0.000
avatar

SMT是个好东西,从2016年那会白皮书就出来了,一直没有出来,我觉得要胎死腹中了。

0
0
0.000
avatar

SMT應該不可能是2016,最快也是2017年提出的... Hive搞不搞SMT,我也不太清楚...

0
0
0.000
avatar

我看到已经有steem 的wordpress插件了,或许这也是一种方式。搞不搞smt都不重要了。

0
0
0.000