WHO Admits Sweden Did It Right, a 'Model' for Responding to COVID

avatar

▶️ Watch on 3Speak


I go over the recent news about the WHO praising Sweden as a model for other nations with respect to how they responded to COVID-19. The mainstream media and public opinion was harsh, giving Sweden the evil eye, saying they blundered and how bad it was. But I've done calculations on death rates for the populations of lockdown US and no-lockdown Sweden, and they were pretty much the same 2 weeks ago, and still are nearly the same now. The media was fooling the public.

The difference is one country is fining and arresting people for being too close, and has closed businesses, putting people out of work, raising poverty and unemployment, increasing depression, domestic abuse, child abuse, sexual abuse and suicides. We haven't felt the full effects of the government's failure to respond to COVID-19 by implementing lockdowns and forced isolation edicts. COVID itself will have done much less damage to Sweden than other western nations and their governments policies.


▶️ 3Speak



0
0
0.000
8 comments
avatar
(Edited)

lets see what WHO thinks about taiwan:

taiwan does not exist according to WHO. john hopkins map of coronacases originally used WHO country labels and labeled Taiwan a province of china. WHO will ofcourse say open up and let chinese travel to your country. they are loyal to china. and i dont see how mainstream media criticises trump for pointing that out when for once he made a valid point.

European model country i think is Czech republic for responding early and making masks very early mandatory. they had a very relaxed lock down since they could afford to have a relaxed lock down since they responded early. mainstream media just dont like to admit it because usually czech republic has a right wing stance in the EU....

btw sweden has much more deaths than their neighbors who all had a lockdown and currenlty few of the ones currently with corona have recovered so far. they want to achieve heard immunity in stockholm very soon but how long the immunity lasts is a gamble.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah i saw that shameful interview a while ago. So pathetic. WHO is a sham crooked corrupt organization. Just meaningful for them to remark on Sweden in the whole pro-lockdown craze going on. Sweden population deaths is the same as US population deaths. No lockdown vs. lockdown comparison. Freedom for the win.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

maybe in sweden they dont jam feeding tubes into the lung? plus they have free healthcare and can actually afford to call an emergency?

deaths per 1M pop in USA is still 214 while sweden its 283. i think thats quite a difference.

trump was a bit late though to respond on the virus to be fair. I feel like he could have seen spain how corona virus denial worked out for them. spanish response to corona virus was very much like trump just a bit shifted earlier in time.

european superstar czech republic 24 deaths per million

0
0
0.000
avatar

On April 20, the "COVID-19 death" rate for the Swedish population was: 0.0154%.
On May 3, the "COVID-19 death" rate for the Swedish population was: 0.0260%.

This is an increase of 1.68 times, or 68%, in 14 days.

On April 20, the "COVID-19 death" rate for the US population was: 0.0129%.
On May 3, the "COVID-19 death" rate (from 67,046 deaths, worldometer) for the US population was: 0.0204%.

This is an increase of 1.58 times, or 58%, in 14 days.

Lockdown:

People force to not work
Businesses ruined
Economic hardship in coming years
Increased poverty
Increased unemployment
Increased depression
Increased spousal abuse
Increased child abuse
Increased sexual abuse
Increased suicides
Fines and arrests for not standing 6 feet apart
Long lines for buying food
etc.

0.0204% deaths in the population for lockdown (US) vs. 0.0260% deaths in the population from non-lockdown (Sweden). Which one seems more worth it?

0
0
0.000
avatar

From the earliest reports on this outbreak I have paid close attention to events, and dug deeply into the research that was undertaken. From that research, I concluded that this was a deadly plague and pandemic, and it is clear now that research was highly misleading.

I specifically note the report from The Lancet, which undertook to describe the clinical symptoms of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and claimed up to 60% of victims suffered lymphopenia, that the virus attacked various organs such as kidney, liver, and testicles, as well as the lungs. Other research indicated SARS2 could infect nerve tissue and there remain dormant, to re-emerge later like herpes, or destroy autonomic functions and the sense of smell. The New England Journal of Medicine revealed asymptomatic transmission, which led to an almost hopeless situation in terms of preventing spread.

Unless one posits that highly respected journals such as The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine deliberately imparted a false narrative, the research itself that was reported in those journals was itself misleading, and was not nominally corrected during peer review. The list of authors of the cited article in The Lancet are all Chinese.

China is shown to have undertaken with very few, or no, reservations to deceive the world regarding this pathogen. In December China was actively arresting doctors that were reporting the emergence of the disease. It has become clear that the outbreak began at least in November, and it seems likely that early censorship of news was successfully undertaken and concealed. In January China was sterilizing the Huanan Seafood Market, still refusing to provide samples, and denying human to human transmission. Huang Yan Ling, likely patient zero who walked SARS2 out of WIV, just disappeared, and other than the lie she is just fine, China has not explained what happened to her. Shi Zhengli, her boss, continues her demented weaponization of viruses today, as does Peng Zhou, another minion of Shi at WIV.

Further, China allowed a massive exodus of residents of Wuhan prior to instituting the barbaric lockdown there, ensuring the spread of the virus far and wide. It is also known that the data on infections and deaths was falsely reported, while multiple mobile crematoria were in operation in Wuhan 24/7, and tens of millions of Chinese people were dropped from cell phone providers, a sign that those people were being completely censored, or had died.

What actually happened in China remains unclear, except that China seems to have done everything it could to allow the outbreak to become severe, and be spread as far and wide as possible. In February, China was strongly protesting travel restrictions on it's citizens even while imposing internal restrictions itself.

I am also aware of reports that Dr. Anthony Fauci personally ensured that over $3M in funding was provided the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2015, even though the US had instituted a moratorium on funding gain of function research in 2014.

There seems to be considerable indication and circumstantial evidence of collusion between the CCP, the CDC, and the WHO to produce SARS2 in BSL-4 labs around the world, including Australia, Canada, the USA, and China, cause an outbreak, and spread that virus around the world in order to implement the global economic catastrophe and put over half the population under house arrest.

I am extremely glad this virus now appears to be far less dangerous than the early research out of China indicated, but I am angry at the deception and psychological manipulation that has been undertaken to implement an opressive global tyranny using pandemic as the justification. Seeking remedy at law for tortuous harm seems the least we should do given the apparent deliberate creation, release, and spread of this pathogen, and the deception and promotion of draconian despotism that seems to have been the goal of the criminal fraud committed. Hanging might be more suitable for such crimes against humanity. I note RICO can be prosecuted by affected persons, and not only governmental jurisdictions, which may make it particularly applicable when so many goverments appear to have been conspirators in these crimes.

Your video reveals that Sweden either knew or had reason to suspect that research was false, and the models from Imperial College inaccurate by orders of magnitude. It would be very interesting to learn what they based their decision on, as given the information I had in January and February anything short of global quarantine would have resulted in tens of millions of deaths.

Of course the enemedia are front and center in the lineup of suspects that have pushed for surveillance, imposition of police state oppression, and the massive flow of wealth to investors through bail outs and immense purchases of stocks and bonds by national banks. I can name few in that industry that haven't proven to be liars intentionally betraying the societies that have expected to depend on a free press to protect their rights and liberty.

Thanks for proving I was wrong, so that I could fix that problem.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I can't comment on whether the virus came out of a lab whether deliberately or accidentally, but I do think there will be grounds for legal action over keeping people locked down against their will. People have lost businesses; I may lose a tooth, which is trivial in the great scheme of things, but it means a lot to me. I got toothache just after the lockdown started. My dentist told me I needed root canal treatment, but he was not allowed to do it, as the British Dental Association has ruled against procedures that involve drilling. He prescribed antibiotics instead. He said I may lose the tooth as a result. I would hate to risk infecting my dentist if I am an asymptomatic carrier, but to be honest, he is young and fit and cycles to work every day - I think the chances of him dying from Covid-19 even if I am a carrier are miniscule. He may lose his business though. My tooth problem is relatively trivial, but my neighbour was diagnosed with cancer shortly before the lockdown. I don't know whether he's been receiving the treatment he needs, although a nurse friend told me a couple of weeks ago that the biggest hospital in Scotland was half empty.
I have to admit I tried to ignore the coronavirus outbreak when it first hit the news, because the BBC coverage was so full of hysteria and fear-mongering, I smelt a rat. I just thought "They're trying to stoke up a huge panic over this". Sadly, the fear-mongering seems to have worked, as most people I know are in an absolute frenzy of panic over this virus, begging for a vaccine and begging for more lockdown. The younger and healthier people are, the more they seem to be freaking out.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's the first sensible thing I've heard from the WHO in a long time. I am absolutely furious about this situation. I live in Scotland, and according to our government, "the number of patients who have tested positive who have died" is 1620. That doesn't mean they died from Covid-19, but that it may have been a contributory factor. At the peak of the outbreak, deaths involving Covid-19 made up 36% of all deaths in Scotland. That percentage has now fallen to 31% of all deaths. Yet while the UK is starting to ease the restrictions, our government in Scotland has decided to keep all the healthy people locked up for another three weeks, whether we want "protection" or not! Businesses are closing and there are clear signs of increasing poverty in some areas, with high demand at food banks.

0
0
0.000