A quick post to share some important information - @familyprotection
A while ago I shared a video containing an interview with Samantha Baldwin, a mother who had her family torn to pieces by a corrupt family court judge and, of course, the social services.
As it happens the very same judge(Judge Jeremy Lea) is currently presiding over my sister's case and my family are still awaiting his judgment, one that will determine whether or not my sister can be reunited with her daughter. It has now been a year since my niece was taken into care and after a year-long court battle, we were recently told the judge was ready to give his judgment. This decision was supposed to be announced sometime last week but in keeping with the traditions of these courts nobody has heard a thing and no reason for the delay has been given. So, my family is made to endure our torture a little longer.
Samantha Baldwin's case highlights so many failures within the system and would be a great reason to have this terrible organization closed down. Sadly, there are many "Samanthas" out there and many have tried to raise the issue of corruption. The fact is, the corruption with the Social Services and the family courts is no secret at all, and the establishment is very happy with the way things run. It's all one big money train and those who are involved, besides the parents, have nothing to lose and much to gain.
Every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, I tune into UKColumn's news round.
This is a great source of information and the points they raise would never see the light of day in the mainstream news. One of the regular guests to the show is David Scott, a "citizen journalist" who reports for Northern Exposure.
Recently, David Scott has ran a series of in-depth interviews with Samantha Baldwin and I would like to highlight these as this has been a tried and tested case of abuse, corruption and conspiracy. Samantha's case is harrowing to hear but one that needs to be heard in order for people to ever understand the corruption within the Social Services, Family courts and even the Police. In Samantha's case these enablers even went as far as to raid the home and remove the children, after which placing them in the care of their abusers.
Praise must go to this couragous mother as well as the people who have supported her. As I explained in my previous post about Samantha, the only reporter who was brave enough to tackle this issue and raise it to the authorities was, himself, arrested and incarscerated, but only because of his actions has this case found some form of justice. Unfortunately, this is price people have to be willing to pay when going up against these monsters.
As you will hear in these interviews, the people who are given the responsibilty to protect children are sometimes inadvertently and sometimes actively protecting child abusers.
Knowledge and information is our only escape from this corrupt structure built around us. Please share this information with others, because without awareness things will never change.
Samantha Baldwin Interview Part 1
Samantha Baldwin Interview part 2
Samantha Baldwin Interview Part 3
Thank you for taking the time to visit this blog. All post payouts under the @familyprotection # go directly back to the community. Please show your support for @familyprotection by sharing the information they help to support and if possible you could delegate some Hive power to them. Any support is hugely appreciated.
Thank you @familyprotection :)
Wow! What a story. Too many of us have these stories. Awful
Thank you for your support and for leaving your thoughts.
I just knew there was something missing from Hive and what ya know it pops up with all the idiocy it's known for. I wasn't even fifteen minutes into the video and I knew she was lying. Thirty minutes into it and I was convinced. Of course you know me I didn't stop there but more on that in a minute, first let me tell you how I knew she was lying. One her statement that he had the children a couple of days a week and on the weekends. You know what that means right?....that he had the kids more than she did, he had them four days a week and she had them three days a week. If you watch her carefully, which we all know you didn't, she had to catch herself when she said that deciding to just let her kids stay until bedtime was hard on her as she wanted to be going out herself...but if you watch her carefully she gets a lift then catches herself from saying she wanted to go out and have fun....so much fun in fact I believe that it could have been exactly that causing her son's behavior as now he has a mother who rarely wants to be around him, that folks can leave a child clinging onto his mother and crying not to leave him. The second reason I know she was lying was because to her everybody was abusing her sons but her basically. I mean come on people, the father, the fathers family, the fathers friends. Get real with yourselves. She's lying so much she can't look the guy(s) in the face she's seen in the video's with. Plus she brings no paperwork with her to prove any of her story. If that'd been me I'd been laying it all out onto their desk, drug test, witness statements, the whole nine yards. But you may say she couldn't she was under a court order....yes she was and between the time she stopped letting her kids stop seeing their dad until the day in court she paid no attention to it and waged a public smear campaign against the father, his family and his friends. Now she wants to abide by it but now it's a bit late into the game for that.
Now, as Paul Harvey would so infamously say, "for the rest of the story". According to articles written on this story this case was not taken lightly. Every organization reporting on it stated it's highly unusual that a family court case goes on for twelve straight days in a court room. Testimony proved that she herself drugged her children to try and foster her case against the father. There were over two thousand documents and fourteen different witnesses in this case. At the end the judge did say that these boys were either sexually abuse or led to believe they were sexually abused but in his opinion after twelve days of testimony he believed it was the later. It's called parent alienation, and it's actually considered a form of child abuse. That's when one parent leads their child/children to believe something that never happened. It is so severe that in cases such as this the children have to be basically deprogrammed from the abuse and that is why they couldn't immediately be returned to their father. Through this whole ordeal he stood steadfastly silent not because he was guilty but to abide by the courts orders and to protect his sons. At least he manned up in that regard by putting his kids first over his own reputation. In a case involving the allegations made here that speaks volumes to his character. As far as she is concerned...like everyone with an opinion, including the judge, she has a right to appeal, also in a case like this where the court ruled against her she has right to a free attorney. So may I suggest that instead of continuing to make all the wrong moves by making videos that will forever haunt her sons as they grow up that she stops the internet talk show circuit and gets busy with an appeal. Divorces and child custody issues can be rough on kids and this case proves it.
After reading your reply my first impression was that you had done some research on this subject(Well, actually my first impression was made after your remark "Of course, you know me". -Erm, no I don't. But am I supposed to? There are other comments you make that point towards a large ego but let's brush over that) As I was saying, it appeared you had looked into this and given a detailed response. So, you know me, I looked into what you said, and low and behold, the first article to pop up on google parroted what you said(Or should I say, you parroted what it said). Being someone that has personally dealt with how the Social Services, Police, and family courts work in matters like this, it doesn't surprise me to find that the first article that's on public show is one that supports the Authorities. Google has a well-known track record for suppressing real journalists, especially when it's about child abuse. Maybe a better source you could have found would be that of Richard Carvath, the journalist who uncovered this story and also won an appeal against the corrupt conviction leveled against him. Or you could look for the many articles detailing Judge Jeremy Lea and how he has been found guilty of the accusations of corruption and others that detail his continued failures within the family courts. But then again, I know you, and due to how "you know" for certain, just from watching one video and reading the first article that pops up on google, that you won't bother to consider that maybe you've judged this one wrong. Anyhoo, I won't waste any more time with this reply and you are welcome to voice your own opinion.
Actually I did not open the first "google", it took several attempts to even find what I was looking for, that being the other side of the story plus a bonus article on how this case proved to be a prime example of parental alienation. I've never heard of that before and definitely was surprised to learn it can sometimes go way beyond telling children what to say to actually making them believe what you say actually happened to them. I watched a good chunk of both videos, I wouldn't if she had actually just accused the father but accusing everyone even associated with the father in regards to accusing them also of sexual abuse instead just an associate or two, that's within reach of probability but it was everyone associated with him plus his entire family....they call that being paranoid. You'd be surprised how far and long sometimes I dig for stuff and no matter the time spent on this last night I could not find one single sentence where this father spoke one bad word about her even after all was said and done. That's a rarity.
It's extremely sad to see what happens with women whose husbands abandon them. She felt jaded for sure and just wanted to go out and have fun like he'd been able to do unhindered with the responsibilities that come with children. I am sure there's more to this case that happened prior to her starting point, like there's a good probability he went after full custodial custody because he had them more than she did and was probably paying support to boot. To admit that though she'd have to admit her absence from her kids more than what she should have been. She'd also have to admit that may have attributed to her son crying and clinginess when she tried to drop them off. Really it's sad all away around but she rolled the diced without any limitations in place and she paid the price.
I've read a few of the opposing articles and most of them were like carbon copies of each other. To me, this shows signs of a collective narrative disseminated by whoever dictates what gets reported. Many even stated that their narrative was dictated by the Judge's decision, a judge who was found guilty of misconduct. Mainstream reporters are extremely controlled when dealing with family court proceedings and when they push someone to the point where they speak out publicly it is often the case that the MSM is used to smear that person in order to protect the reputation of the establishment. On the subject of people speaking out, you have to understand how the family courts and Social services manipulate the secrecy of their profession. They leave parents terrified and feeling as if they have nobody to turn to. Local MPs won't help and any complaints about the Social workers have to be directed to the head of Social Services, and there is no chance they will ever admit they have got things wrong or covered things up. In the end, parents lose their children and then have nothing left to lose. The consequence of this is that they have to resort to turning to the "internet talk show circuit" for there to be any hope and sometimes just so when the child grows up he/she knows mum/dad actually never gave up. Neither of us knows 100% if Samantha Baldwin is telling the truth or not but because I've seen first-hand how corrupt the authorities can be I believe her story. I understand that it's an extreme story but things like this aren't unheard of. In fact, it is more often than not that an abuser will come from an abusive family.
I can find some balance in what you stated. I don't think she was abused as she stated he never abused her. Of course there's mental abuse but she doesn't seem to have been inclined to suggest that. It's not like my heart doesn't go out to her, believe me I was a single parent of two children myself without any kind of real support system in place, it can be rough. Often times men walk away without a care in this world, free to do whatever they want while you struggle to raise kids, this case doesn't seem to have gone to that extreme even as he was very supportive in having the children. Like I said I'd believed her if it wasn't for the fact she accused way to many people of sexually abusing the children, it's just to unrealistic to believe that every single person in the fathers life was a child sexual predator.
Although I disagree, I do get what you are saying and I appreciate you being here to have this exchange. This is an extraordinary situation and for that we have to admit that only those closest will ever know 100% what has happened. I'm also a single parent and was left to do the hard work when it first happened, so I can totally agree with you that situations like that aren't easy.
Going back to our discussion I would just like to raise one more point that has become apparent through my sister's unfortunate experience. What I noticed throughout our ordeal is that my niece's father was a friend of the family and when we first heard about the abuse all of us were caught in a state of disbelief. It just didn't make sense and denial was instinctive. We wasted valuable time wrestling with our emotions and in the end it cost us dearly. My sister reacted instantly while the rest of us hoped it wasn't true. Unfortunately, she turned to the authorities for justice and this has turned into a complete nightmare. Every department tasked with safeguarding my niece has lied, cheated and acted in their own interest. Even when we have proven them to be corrupt they have ignored us and carried on regardless. I'm appalled at how the system works, which is why I have sided with the mother in the post we initially spoke about. It should speak volumes that my advice to anyone in a similar situation would be to deal with it on their own and without the "help" of Police/Social workers(Unless they have irrefutable evidence, and even then I would think twice).
We are all shaped by our own experiences and I know this makes me bias in certain ways. I'm still glad we can have this type of discussion though, as it reminds me of my own biases and to question everything.
Likewise I've had my own experiences to. As a child I was in the foster care system, there were six of us when we were taken, it was justified with the circumstances involved. Though at times I had a hard time adjusting to foster care it was one of the better things that happened in my life. Without them the chances were greater I'd ended up a rotted out toothed prostitute on some street corner in life. For that one short year I was there I learned what being a good parent entailed. That part stayed with me as a positive outcome of that whole experience.
Glad your journey through the system worked out for the better, many don't, and that's why I support @familyprotection. I understand the care system is necessary and children are in need of help but in its current form it just creates too much harm. The UK's care system is rife with pedophiles and corrupt/useless social workers, which has been proven to be true in the IICSA we currently have going on.
I shared this.
Thank you very much :)