Coronavirus Blowback: Event 201, Censorship, Quarantines, and Vaccines

"“An early concern for application of a SARS-CoV vaccine was the experience with other coronavirus infections which induced enhanced disease and immunopathology in animals when challenged with infectious virus [31], a concern reinforced by the report that animals given an alum adjuvanted SARS vaccine and subsequently challenged with SARS-CoV exhibited an immunopathologic lung reaction reminiscent of that described for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants and in animal models given RSV vaccine and challenged naturally (infants) or artificially (animals) with RSV [32], [33]. We and others described a similar immunopathologic reaction in mice vaccinated with a SARS-CoV vaccine and subsequently challenged with SARS-CoV [18], [20], [21], [28]. It has been proposed that the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV is the antigen to which the immunopathologic reaction is directed [18], [21]. Thus, concern for proceeding to humans with candidate SARS-CoV vaccines emerged from these various observations.” – Tseng et al.,"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060/

"Inactivated MERS-CoV vaccine appears to carry a hypersensitive-type lung pathology risk from MERS-CoV infection that is similar to that found with inactivated SARS-CoV vaccines from SARS-CoV infection.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27269431

Many more links to peer reviewed papers revealing the same vaccine modulated increase in pathogenicity of Coronoviruses are available at Dr. James Lyons-Weilers blog.

https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/01/30/on-the-origins-of-the-2019-ncov-virus-wuhan-china/
https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/02/07/2019-ncov-vaccine-recommended-readings/

From the Library of Congress:

"According to the Law, China is to implement a state immunization program, and residents living within the territory of China are legally obligated to be vaccinated with immunization program vaccines, which are provided by the government free of charge."

"The Law will take effect on December 1, 2019"

On January 26, ScienceMag published an article stating that the Wuhan Seafood Market appeared to not be the source of the initial introduction of the pathogen, which they report as having happened on Dec. 1.

"In the earliest case, the patient became ill on 1 December 2019 and had no reported link to the seafood market"

Below are three links regarding use of SARS vaccine on people in China.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4417-china-to-give-first-sars-vaccine-to-people/

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/china-to-test-risky-sars-vaccine/

https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-08/06/content_466753.htm

The above information may shed light on the current pathogenicity of the virus in China, and former residents of China, but far less pathogenicity elsewhere.

Edit: I wanted to add this research that states the virus infected one person and thereafter was transmitted from person to person, with no new infections coming from zoonotic, or wild, sources, because it shows that the seafood market did not infect multiple people, nor did some other animal vector.

"...the genetic data is highly suggestive of a single-point introduction into the human population followed by sustained human-to-human transmission."
http://virological.org/t/clock-and-tmrca-based-on-27-genomes/347

Thanks for posting this information, because the enemedia is not.