RE: Wenn die DDR wiederkehrt..

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

This is non-sense. Demonstrations in 1989 were in favor of liberal/constitutional democracy, globalization, European integration. Right-wing populists, collectivists, nationalists are doing the opposite. They are against individual freedom and human rights, against liberal-democracy and constitutionalism, against global development and Europe, favor racism, social-phobias, authoritarian governance and reactionary politics. What you are doing in this post is romanticization that does not reflect the social and political reality.

https://fee.org/resources/right-wing-collectivism/



0
0
0.000
23 comments
avatar
(Edited)

Lol I dont care.
The picture describes that people who were for free-speech in 89 were called "freedomfighters" while nowadays people for free-speech are called all kind of names, like for example nazis or right-wing-populists.
At least in germany.

And you unramping ur prejudices and accusations aint any better.

Especially cuz europe has nothing to do with democracy. They are not even democratically voted.

Imho, left and right wing are both complete bullshit. They are part of the system. Part of the plan to divide and rule.
Corruption and fraud are structurally organized. It's part of the system.
As much part of it as ur taxes pay wars.

Change it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Der Witz ist ja, dass man immernoch das selbe sagen darf wie nach der Auflösung der DDR. Nur ist man jetzt nicht mehr zufrieden damit.

0
0
0.000
avatar

"I do not care"?

So you do not care about rational arguments and facts? As regarding political theory. I would say that is ignorant behaviour.

Yes, there are many people, as right-wing collectivists and nationalists, who say that are in favour of free speech. But what is meant is that one is favour of hate speech or free speech for certain groups while at the same time wishing to abolish constitutional democracy.

Members of the European Parliament are democratically elected. Commissionaires are elected by democratically elected national governments and approved by MEP:s .

I am completely in favour of change and more democratization but that demands long-term development https://www.opulens.se/english/how-can-we-democratise-our-world-for-a-post-industrial-future/

0
0
0.000
avatar

I do not care about ur political biased lies.

There is no hate speech.
You fucked up guys now start to jail people for telling truth. Good job boy.
The European Parliament is not democratic. Get your facts right. We have a new EZB president (van der leyen) who wasn't even up for choice.

Have fun sliding down the rabbit hole.

0
0
0.000
avatar

What you are writing here is typical right-wing collectivist behaviour:

  • postmodern/post truth

  • facts do not matter

  • divides humans into elites and people

  • does not favour constitutional aspects as freedom and rule of law

0
0
0.000
avatar

and you are a typical left-wing with their accusations and fucked up believesystem and worldview
thanks for the conversation

0
0
0.000
avatar

I am not left-wing. I am a liberal, and therefore against both left- and right-wing collectivism

0
0
0.000
avatar

And I am an anarchist and therefore not only against rigth wing or left wing, but the whole system.

Cuz we are being forced to pay taxes, which finance wars.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Interesting. So what do you think about Rojava or free/experimental zones?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I support and favor production-autonomy as economical aim of countries instead of/ over maximizing economic growth.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ok, but I do not understand. What has that to do with anarchism? You want state-capitalism and protectionism based on government money?

0
0
0.000
avatar

No.

I want freedom. And I believe free markets are the way to go there.
Decentralization.

Capitalism (what we have right now is mainly corporatism) and communismus are the same thing. Centralized structure, which can be infiltrated.

Cheers

0
0
0.000
avatar

With your ignorance, you only further proved his point.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is not ignorance. It is about facts and political theory. Right-wing populist parties see "people" as a homogenous group that should have unlimited powers. That is dangerous since it goes against freedom, human rights and constitutionalism.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You are simply labeling people as 'right wing'. That is pure ignorance.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I work with political theory. And I am not using the label "right-wing" but right wing collectivist https://fee.org/resources/right-wing-collectivism/

0
0
0.000
avatar

I work with reality.

You are an authoritarian using all sorts of labels so you do not have to engage in an honest debate.

https://you.are/a/child_of_the_lie

0
0
0.000
avatar

Which honest debate? The point is that right-wing populists are anti-freedom and in favor of strong-man authoritarianism

0
0
0.000
avatar

Everything you are saying about those 'right wing' -whatevers might be true; It's just that the people in the top picture of the OP are not right wing at all.

0
0
0.000
avatar

And what are you basing your perception on? That the "people in the top picture" are not right-wing

0
0
0.000