RE: Your Hopes and Expectations for COMMUNITIES? + My Thoughts

avatar
(Edited)

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

As one who came here for the communities and a community ( been waiting for 3 years!) I have to say your description of it is well put.

Communities will allow choice and with choice comes content discovery which is badly needed. As you stated , rules will be a nice way to control the flow of relevant information and stakeholders to a community.

How is communities filling a need?

Great question to try to tackle. You are right the biggest selling point of communities vs. reddit subs is there is no need to trust one particular site or company to maintain your audience. You own your audience which is pretty powerful once you think about it.

As you mentioned in the following hypothetical situations you could have a separate reward pool dedicated to that particular niche topic. SMTs will help bring that out.

Burning the particular SMT for a promotional purposes makes sense.

One question I was wondering can rewards a particular topic creates be distributed back to moderators and admin. A kind of group beneficiary for their communities.

Btw, love your diagram of what communities will look like in Steempeak. :)



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar
  1. I feel like those boxes are way too big specially when you consider there will be thousands of communities and each person may be a part of 10 or 20 or more communities. But thanks I'm glad you at least like this view.

  2. Yeah i feel SMTs and communities will be linked quite closely on both the blockchain and hivemind level.

  3. And yes a community owner could possibly require a beneficiary. To do this I feel like the community should state that in the governing community meta data and the interfaces should be willing to comply with that desire of the community owner. It'd be up to the community moderators to give repercussions to users who don't comply... though an interface could give them the tools to help. For example filter by interfaces that don't help the user comply with the request.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I feel like those boxes are way too big specially when you consider there will be thousands of communities and each person may be a part of 10 or 20 or more communities. But thanks I'm glad you at least like this view.

Right, I suppose they can be smaller but the concept remains I do like it.

Yeah i feel SMTs and communities will be linked quite closely on both the blockchain and hivemind level.

Yes, I'm excited about this. It unleashes a whole new element to things.

And yes a community owner could possibly require a beneficiary. To do this I feel like the community should state that in the governing community meta data and the interfaces should be willing to comply with that desire of the community owner. It'd be up to the community moderators to give repercussions to users who don't comply... though an interface could give them the tools to help. For example filter by interfaces that don't help the user comply with the request.

Yes, this would incentived everyone in charge to keep the community clean and up to speed. It is one of the things I'm most interested in seeing implemented. Maybe, SteemPeak can do it. Looking forward to what you have coming up and if you need anyone to help test it I have time! Thanks.

0
0
0.000