'I prefer violence.' Andrea Dworkin

avatar

If you don't recognize that name, ddg it, eh?

For those of you that do recognize that name, here she is again.

I like her proposal, this time.
I'm a firm believer in guns and ammo for everybody.

If you are afraid of getting raped, get a 5 shot 22magnum revolver and carry that thing with you every where.
If you wear dresses, strap it to your leg.
If you wear pants, get a gun belt and wear a long shirt.

Purses are an option, but sure as shootin' your gun won't be there when you need it because you have walked away from your purse.

Or, you can just keep getting raped and waiting for armed, uniformed man, that likely wants to rape you too, to do something for you.
Seems like a no brainer, to me.

image.png

I Favour Violence: Andrea Dworkin

In this short video Andrea Dworkin answers the question: “is law is an appropriate tool for the protection and also the advancement of women?”

Well, what I feel about it is that we have to use what we’ve got and what we’ve got isn’t very much and we have to find some way to keep the rapists off the streets.
There are different ways of doing it, law is only one way of doing it.

I myself favour violence, deeply.
I favour it.
And the reason that I favour it is that the law isn’t working.
And as long as the law isn’t working women who have been attacked or who are being attacked need to understand that they have a right to defend themselves against anyone who is attacking them.

Many people prefer the legal system, I don’t blame them for that, I wish it would work.
It’s not working.
We have another 50 years to try to get it to work.
We have a woman (whose name I’m not remembering right now) who killed a paedophile, who raped her son.
It was clear that he was going to be acquitted, so she shot him.
In my view she did the right thing.
I admire her for what she did.

So, I’m willing to sit down with my sisters and think of a dozen other things that we can do that are not terrible things to do, but we have to do something.
We can’t do nothing.

That’s my answer to you.

https://invidious.kavin.rocks/latest_version?id=8niSFVcc9cc&itag=18

As you can see, Andrea is continuing her defense of women's right to exist as individuals.
So much of our 'culture' denies the individualness of people at our mercy that this is a step in the right direction, if you ask me.

I've stopped using utub links as much as possible because I don't like them loading my data just because I opened some random news story.
If you agree, here is the chrome extension I use to block that crap.
It uses open source software to forward links to privacy respecting other platforms.



0
0
0.000
11 comments
avatar

There is one big problem not addressed here.

Feminism doesn't care about women getting raped.
Feminist stance is "teach men not to rape".

And in one breath, feminists have defined:

  1. all men are bad
  2. all men can't control themselves
  3. all men are so stupid that they have to be told that rape is bad.
  4. women have the power to destroy any good man's life with just an accusation.
  5. make sure women don't protect themselves
  6. make sure women feel entitled to just walk into bad situations... because its not their fault
  7. Get more women raped so that the feminists have more fuel to keep their movement moving.

If would be rapists died every time they tried to rape, then all of this would just disappear. And probably feminism along with it.

We, as a society, really need to take back our power of defending ourselves.
Cops should show up and say, "good shoot".

0
0
0.000
avatar

A culture of competent self defense is definitely the way to go. I think it's a little more tricky when you talk about shooting someone you think is guilty but was acquitted. The law will never get it perfect but as the saying goes "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer." Someone who shoots someone they think was guilty after the fact can be wrong too.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Better to be judged by 12, or carried by 6?

We each have our own rows to hoe, too many busybodies now a days, iyam.
Kid should get self defense classes in skool, but heaven forbid the control freaks give us useful info that might free us from their control, eh?

0
0
0.000
avatar

The list of what we do not teach kids is long.

We do not teach kids self-defense
We do not teach kids law
We do not teach kids money.

But, if we did teach these things, then govern-cement would be in a world of hurt.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Never expect a slave master to teach the slaves to read.
They'd burn the books, but they don't have to, anymore.
Now they teach the kids to hate reading.
They move the language forward and it becomes tedious to even read of the past.
The memory hole is alive and in use.

I just hope to get out before the gates out close.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Guns, and ammo, for EVERYBODY!

It's 'Murican, by god given right.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I always thought is funny that leftist 'feminism movements' are also anti -gun.(THE greatest of equalizers)

0
0
0.000
avatar

'God may have created humans, but it took Sam Colt to make 'em equal.'
Western 'Murican wisdom.

0
0
0.000