Word Control

avatar
(Edited)

The pen is mightier than the sword. I think we all know that saying and what it basically means is that words, language is a much better tool to conquer people than weapons and violence. The threat of a sword dissipates once it's sheathed, the threat of an enemy disappears once he's defeated, but words have a tendency to burn themselves into conscious and subconscious minds, thereby creating an everlasting effect on the behavior and beliefs of individuals who've consumed them...


pen_writing_small.jpg

source: Wikimedia Commons

Add to that truth the knowledge that history is written by the victors, and you start to understand how we, the people, have been suppressed by our elite upper-class leaders throughout the ages. It might sound silly, especially because English is not my native language and I often struggle with finding the right words or constructing fluid sentences, but as I write these daily posts I'm fully aware of these truths, and I do my best to not use the "wrong" words and sentences. However minor the effect of my words on your mind may be, I know that effect exists; on a very small scale you and I, dear reader, shape each other's minds. You shape mine by just being there, by creating an audience that compels me to keep on writing, to keep the quest for the "right" words alive. I shape yours by presenting to you the outcome of that quest. The mass media does the same, but on a massive scale, not just because of the numbers of people they communicate to, but also because of the frequency with which they do so; if you watch the daily news on TV you expose your mind to a constant bombardment of words that are carefully selected to solicit a carefully response from you, with the main goal being your continued acceptance of the status quo.

One of my favorite word-magicians was George Carlin, may he rest in piece, and today I share with you one of my favorite fragments of his brilliant performances. In it he describes how the use of language has changed during his life, how it has become more and more euphemistic, and how that language is used to shield Americans, because he was an American performing in America in front of an American audience, from the harsh truth. He starts by discussing how after the Great War the mental illness many soldiers suffer from was first called "shell-shock", but later became "battle-fatigue" and the even softer "post-traumatic stress-disorder"; "shell-shock" was direct and harsh, which is the truth about the condition, but that truth is now completely covered up by calling it "post-traumatic stress-disorder" or PTSD in short.

One of my favorites is when he says this: "Poor people used to live in slums. Now the economically disadvantaged occupy sub-standard housing in the inner city"... "Poor people" and "slums" are still the truth, but being "economically disadvantaged" somehow sounds much friendlier, again covering up the harsh conditions these poor have to endure daily, and "disadvantaged" makes it sound like their position in life is somehow the result of circumstances that can't be helped (other that the good old "pick yourself up by your bootstraps" of course). Also, "sub-standard" leaves a lot open for interpretation; what is "standard", and how much beneath that is "sub"? With incomes for regular citizens going down for decades, and internal warfare being intensified for decades, it was necessary for the ruling class to adjust the language around those topics to keep their actions acceptable, to make us keep our pitchforks locked in the shed. But I've said too much already; just watch and listen to the word-master that was George Carlin make the point in his own unique way...


George Carlin on soft language


Thanks so much for visiting my blog and reading my posts dear reader, I appreciate that a lot :-) If you like my content, please consider leaving a comment, upvote or resteem. I'll be back here tomorrow and sincerely hope you'll join me. Until then, keep safe, keep healthy!


wave-13 divider odrau steem

Recent articles you might be interested in:

Latest article >>>>>>>>>>>Individualist Empire
It's Crazy...Defund The Bullies
Slaying DragonsA Long Time Ago...
Abominable ObamaFraud R Us

wave-13 divider odrau steem

Thanks for stopping by and reading. If you really liked this content, if you disagree (or if you do agree), please leave a comment. Of course, upvotes, follows, resteems are all greatly appreciated, but nothing brings me and you more growth than sharing our ideas.



0
0
0.000
34 comments
avatar

We've been psychologically maneuvered into confusing offense with harm. We can no longer use the most appropriate words, for fear of offending someone. Deliberate obfuscation of truth. This business comes from the far left though my friend. Now I am looking at the field of psychology as a major player in our readiness to submit to authority.

I LOVE this insight of yours:

However minor the effect of my words on your mind may be, I know that effect exists; on a very small scale you and I, dear reader, shape each other's minds. You shape mine by just being there, by creating an audience that compels me to keep on writing, to keep the quest for the "right" words alive. I shape yours by presenting to you the outcome of that quest.

I had no idea you were not a native English speaker. You craft your words extremely well. I marvel every single day that you've put together yet another thoughtful and thought provoking post. Thank you for your devotion.

0
0
0.000
avatar

This business comes from the far left though my friend

100%.
Leftists have to try and control words, as their 'illogical' logic, collapses under scrutiny - and so meanings and context have to be continually twisted. ('political correctness' just one example).

Communism is a way to hide your greed and envy under a cloak of philosophical self righteousness and faux moral superiority.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Perhaps any "ism" provides a way to do that. I'm no expert on any of this. I just want to save the world from totalitarianism and the police state that is coming at us FAST. I think any of us who see this condition wants to correct it.

I have no idea which ism is bringing it: capitalism, socialism, communism, luciferianism, satanism, over-thinking-it-ism. I just want to have autonomy over my own body, and a safe home.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I just want to save the world from totalitarianism and the police state that is coming at us FAST.

100% THIS.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Leftists have to try and control words,

"TWO PARTY" = ONE PARTY

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks so much for the kind words @owasco; coming from you that means a lot :-)

Having said that though, I have to disagree with the part @lucylin agrees with; you're both so very very wrong, and it's so easy to see why you're wrong that I can't fathom why you would even think that the deliberate obfuscation of the truth is a leftist invention. It should be clear to see that America hasn't seen a leftist (let alone far left) government since the days of FDR, so anything coming down from the top, including the lies to protect the status quo, are therefore clearly from neoconservative and neoliberal origin. Now, unless you want to erroneously label the liberals as "far left", the lies can never originate from the far left. I'm far left, and I don't lie. Th lies are, and always have been, capitalist lies; read today's post (I'm almost done writing it) for more on that.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You're right. Political labels are also part of the obfuscation. What we call the left now is nothing more than the wing of a stage that a actor on this world stage walks in from.

We can say the same about any ideology. The true path is one that one chooses for oneself. Our error is in thinking that any one of them is tantamount to any other. I'm leaning toward anarchy at present. If each tiny plot on the earth could just be true to itself, there would be no need of government at all. That we need governing at all is the illusion. Socialism included. Sorry, I knew you disagree there.

0
0
0.000
avatar

What we call the left now is nothing more than the wing of a stage that a actor on this world stage walks in from.

Whether they enter from "stage left" or "stage right", they're all part of the same "performance".

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, I am fond of saying that politics is performance art. Trump is a master at it. I sure wish I knew what his true intents were.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The "true intentions" are the same as any 3 year old.

Constantly demand to be the "center of attention".

INFORMATION WAR = ATTENTION WAR

THE CORPORATE MOBSTERS SHOULD BE PAYING US TO EXPERIENCE THEIR PROPAGANDA ("ENTERTAINMENT").

Cable, streaming, satellite, it seems like they've tricked us into paying for our own poison.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes they sure have, via government mandates that we must purchase products we don't want, sure don't need, and are harmful. We've been quite naive. It's time to correct that condition.

I just came across this guy. For some reason I think he would resonate for you. I haven't really delved into this yet though. I love his vocabulary list.

https://theethicalskeptic.com/?fbclid=IwAR2xbqtsKMIYXJ9Kj7iaToyPYcw1Y7YIHh2o_YY8bPFktEkSjw3wifIFdQ0

0
0
0.000
avatar

The Bricklayer’s Error – the presumption that academic, heuristic or deep single-function expertise (bricklaying) qualify one to stand as authority as to how the broader issue is to be managed (house is to be built or lived-in). Presupposing that a physicist who studies precession, should be the foremost expert on bicycling.

Linear Affirmation Bias – a primarily inductive methodology of deriving inference in which the researcher starts in advance with a premature question or assumed answer they are looking for. Thereafter, observations are made. Affirmation is a process which involves only positive confirmations of an a priori assumption or goal.

Thanks for the link!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks to you too! I'm up to the acid trips, and the world as I know it. So good.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Watch about 5 minutes of this if you get a chance,

0
0
0.000
avatar

THIS IS FANTASTIC! THANK YOU!

0
0
0.000
avatar

M.I.N.D.B.L.O.W.N.

Here's the follow-up (interview with the creator),

0
0
0.000
avatar

I know what I'll be doing for the rest of today.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You think tax isn't theft - because it's legal!

The biggest intellectual lie there is.
Maybe you don't even realize you're lying - to yourself.
lol
Communism is popular because it ennobles theft and violence with an air of philosophy and legitimacy.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Once again you demonstrate the narrowness of your perspective... So let me, once again, correct you; tax is theft in a society built on the individuality and individual greed you so fervently defend, so we're in agreement there. Taxation in itself is not theft because it's the completely rational recognition that you're not alone, but part of the society from which you pluck the fruits. Get it?

0
0
0.000
avatar

So a forced reallocation of resources from 'A' property owner - to 'B' is not theft?

Ok.... got it....lmao.

Communism is a way to hide your greed and envy under a cloak of philosophical self righteousness.
....Got it?

0
0
0.000
avatar

The "forced" part is only true when viewed from a highly self-centered and purely individualist perspective. Get it?

I don't blame you if you don't though; only a few people ever recognize the brainwashing they've been subjected to their entire life. Do you know the difference between believing in God and believing in Santa Claus? With the latter parents are sensible enough to tell you at a young enough age that he's just a made up figure... Get it?

I do hope your four-legged, not brainwashed friend is still doing okay :-)

0
0
0.000
avatar

There is only the individual.
That is reality.
Society is a concept. get it?
You can have individuals without a society - but try making a society without individuals....good luck on that.
The individual is the lowest common denominator on which to build any model.

I don't blame you if you don't though; only a few people ever recognize the brainwashing they've been subjected to their entire life.

If you think society is real- not conceptual- have you ever considered the fact that it might be you who's been brainwashed?
(god and santa claus are conceptual too, so understand the concept)

She's doing fine matey, thanks. Back to normal now.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm so glad she's doing okay; we (my son actually) just got us a cat, like 4 months ago, and he's not been doing well for a week or two, just wouldn't eat... We were lucky though; turns out it was worms, and he's now back to normal :-) After only a couple of months we got so attached to the little bugger, so I can only imagine how stressed and worried we would have been if we'd had it as long as you've had her...

I'm still curious why the narrow perspective; if you're able to understand that both God and Santa Claus are concepts, why can't you understand that society and individuals are equally real? Individuals make up society, but society makes individuals. Every individual is the result of a community, even in a biological sense every individual is the result of a community of two people. It's that extremist individualism that's been propagated by your rulers that's got you stuck in your narrow perspective on the reality of the human condition my friend. We've always lived in communities and that will never change. All our freedoms are granted to us from the community we're part of and that will never change. Understand that concept.

0
0
0.000
avatar

society and individuals are equally real?

NO, they are not.
One is a concept based on large numbers, the other is a fact.

but society makes individuals

No it doesn't.
You can have an individual without any society.
You cannot have a society made up of no individuals.

I'm not arguing the facts the groups of individuals cannot work together. They can.
(this is also where communism can work on very small numbers)
It doesn't scale up because bureaucracy becomes a necessity - and bureaucracies are corrupt. Because of individuals.

As soon as you discount the individual as the lowest common denominator (coerced collectivism), it just becomes a matter of time before it decays and implodes. (as history as shown us).

0
0
0.000
avatar

You can have an individual without any society.

In what fantasy world is that? Ever heard of feral childs? Where did you get your morals from? From yourself and on your own I guess...

You can have an individual without any society.

Yeah sure, but those would be completely lost individuals because they would lack any moral compass, like those feral childs...

It doesn't scale up because bureaucracy becomes a necessity

That's the first true thing you've said in this entire conversation. And yes, that bureaucracy has a tendency to degenerate into corruption because of individuals.......who place the self above the society they're part of. No one said it would be easy, but that's what we've got to get rid of; the bloated sense of self, which coincidentally is inherent in the mindset created by capitalist societies where everything is centered around the self, a mindset you demonstrate so effectively.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You can have an individual without any society.

In what fantasy world is that? Ever heard of feral childs? Where did you get your morals from? From yourself and on your own I guess...

SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE?
...it was a 'yes' or 'no' , logical answer.
Communism is popular because it ennobles theft and violence with an air of philosophy and legitimacy.

No philosophy required - just an acceptance of a verifiable fact. A truth.

You can have an individual without any society.

Yeah sure, but those would be completely lost individuals because they would lack any moral compass, like those feral childs...

No one asking for opinion, just an acceptance of reality.

That's the first true thing you've said in this entire conversation

No, what i said about the individual is true - A fact - but you seem o be unable to accept that truth. (which is, essentially, the whole problem about communist philosophy - it's built on untruths).

0
0
0.000
avatar

SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE?

No need to shout bro... Opinions don't magically become facts because you shout them, use all caps, embolden them or print them in italics my friend. And yes, I know exactly what I did there, the question is: do you? Communism isn't popular; that's a fact, so starting a sentence with that untruth is bound to be followed by a bunch of nonsense, and you don't disappoint there. So I guess we're once again reaching the inevitable wall where you refuse to accept reality, like the verifiable truth that children who grow up outside of society become humans only in the physical sense. Sensible people are able to recognize the existence, the reality of things by witnessing their effects, hence society is real, not a concept. One of us is stuck in the ideology his rulers so much wants him to adhere to, the other is free in his mind at least. So, no, what you're saying about individuals is far from the reality that's there for all to see. If they want to see it, that is...

0
0
0.000
avatar

So, no, what you're saying about individuals is far from the reality

Not being able to see reality - i.e a verifiable fact - is a sign of delusion.

You proved my point. Leftism is a mental illness.(delusional)

Good luck, matey.
I mean that.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Good luck, matey.

Thanks, but I'm not the one needing luck; I have reality on my side, remember?

Not being able to see reality - i.e a verifiable fact - is a sign of delusion.

Indeed; the second truth you've spoken today, and I really do feel sad for you... I mean that ;-)

0
0
0.000
avatar

We seem to forget that the first group that tried to ban Carlin's performance was from the "right" side of the political spectrum.

Recording material for a new album, Class Clown, he debuted a monologue called "Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television." Rattled off to hearty laughter and applause, the words were: st, ps, fk, ct, c********r, m**********r, and t**s.

The bit was meant to highlight the absurdity of signaling a few words out of the roughly 400,000 in the English language that would somehow corrupt our souls by repeating them for public consumption, and Carlin effectively made his point with silly voices and simple logic.

But the funnyman knew he was treading in dangerous territory: He had been with Lenny Bruce a decade earlier when his mentor was arrested in Chicago for saying at least two of those forbidden words during a show.

Sure enough, Carlin met the same fate in Milwaukee a few months after debuting his "Seven Words." His arrest was eventually thrown out, but the bigger battle was just beginning.

https://www.biography.com/news/george-carlin-seven-words-supreme-court

But Justice William Brennan slammed the "misapplication of fundamental First Amendment principles," in his dissent, writing, "The Court's decision may be seen for what, in the broader perspective, it really is: another of the dominant culture's inevitable efforts to force those groups who do not share its mores to conform to its way of thinking, acting, and speaking."

0
0
0.000
avatar

I was just thinking about this the other day, honestly!
How language was used to communicate...
Now we have Linguistic Magicians who use language to manipulate feelings....
🤔
In Biblical times they would call it Black Magic...
🤔🤨🤔

0
0
0.000