Movie review: thunder force
Inasmuch as I'm not a fan of superhero films, this one was too interesting for me not to watch it. The humor and actions were giving me the exact vibe I needed at the moment of watching it.
Thunder force is an American comedy and superhero film directed and written by Ben Falcone. This movie has a great cast which includes Melissa McCarthy(Lydia), Bobby Cannavale(William Stevens), Taylor Mosby(Tracey), Octavia Spencer (Emily Stanton), Pom Klementieff( laser), Melissa Leo(Allie) and Jason Bateman(crab man).
Short summary of the film
When miscreants terrorize Chicago with the lead of the William Stevens also known as the king in this movie, Emily Stanton is determined to find a way to stop them as she lost her genetically parents to the beastly hands of the miscreants.
Emily sacrificed most of her social life in hopes of finding possible methods to get rid of the miscreants. She was more of a book worm causing students in her class to bully her. One day while she was bullied in school,she met Lydia who saved her from the hands of the bullies and ever since they became friends.
Lydia supported Emily's dreams of making formulas that could give a mere human superpowers but also makes sure that she doesn't overwork herself and tries to have fun sometimes too. One time she convinces Emily to take a short nap from her studies and accidentally, Emily oversleeps causing her to be late for an exam straining their relationship which resulted in them drifting apart.
Emily finally fulfills her dream and takes over from where her parents stopped, she created the formula that could give a mere human superpowers. Lydia visits her at her company in a bid to take her to a reunion party. When Lydia sees all that Emily had built, she is amazed and touches things after she's been asked not to touch anything and in the process is injected the super power formula giving her super strength to fight the miscreants. Emily had to team up with Lydia to fight the miscreants and their friendship was rekindled again.
Personal impression:
Melissa McCarthy's husband(Ben Falcone) really did a great job directing this one, he's one hell of a writer and director. The plot/storyline was perfectly played out on screen and I enjoyed every action entailed in this film, I bet you would too. What I really loved most about it was that their actions didn't look exaggerated at all. The humor is one thing that can keep you watching as Lydia was just being a clown in every scene that involved her. Haha. The amazing scenes would make you forget predictions on how it's going to end and yes! Their super being suits were hilariously cool.
Initially released on the 9th of April 2021 runs for 106 minutes and was distributed by Netflix. Language is English.
You should check it out
Source of potential text plagiarism
There is reasonable evidence that this article has been spun, rewritten, or reworded. Posting such content is considered plagiarism and/or fraud. Fraud is discouraged by the community and may result in the account being Blacklisted.
Guide: Why and How People Abuse and Plagiarise
If you believe this comment is in error, please contact us in #appeals in Discord.
I'm sorry but you're deeply mistaken here, this is a movie review and that makes it highly possible to have similar word usage, I wrote this review right after watching this movie.
The link you provided there looks nothing like my article and this is my first time even visiting that website.
I sat and typed this on my Google documents and I don't see why I should be penalized for my own review.
Please review your sources, you even had me running my own article through a plagiarism check to see and all results points back to my article here on hive.
21 matches from 1 source which is palnet.io due to their tag usage on this post.
This is absolutely disheartening.
Hello.
The article is definitely not written in your own words, after watching the movie but it is clearly reworded after reading that article.
Just because a useless online plagiarism checking tool was not able to detect the plagiarism, it does not that it was not there.
Example of re-wording from the source:
Source:
Source:
Sorry but I chuckled a bit when I saw your reply, I still can't believe my own content is still being pinned as plagiarism.
I don't know if you don't pay attention to the movies you watch, but how else are you supposed to review a movie without saying what happened in the movie?
I can't manufacture my own words or create scenes that weren't in the movie to present as a review, that would be misinformation.
There are certain content categories that would look much alike; commonly movie reviews and news reports, you can't really expect to read anything different from what happened.
This is huge misunderstanding and again I'll ask that you review your claims.
The evidence is above.
Everyone can clearly see that it was re-worded from that article and you did not write it completely in your head.
Come on man, give her some credit, I can sense she's been able to convince you to some extent that this wasn't an act of plain fraud.
I can tell due to your sudden use of the phrase "completely in your head"
I just went through the source you provided above and found reasons you shouldn't pin her for this one.
First, the article is a 100% match to a version on Wikipedia, know I am fully aware that both companies share some history and probably content license but you should know that wiki is a free encyclopedia thus content on there can get redistributed a lot.
There's also the subconscious writing effect that gets us writing in a similar pattern as the content we've read somewhere, which in my opinion is highly possible she has gone to Wikipedia to have a little background check on the movie like casts and the other shits we go there for.
I personally do because you can't get everything just watching.
Her calm reaction and attempt to iron this out is something to consider as well, this is in addition that this isn't a perpetual offender and doesn't sound like a wannabe either.
I don't usually stick my nose in these things but this one caught my attention. Take for instance my coverage on how the hive blockchain works written and published by me on my private website, would you call that plagiarism of the original whitepaper?
Of course not, the message is literally the same because I can't write what isn't true about the system. However, a more personal touch is given to it in other to attain some level of uniqueness, in this case, she presented her personal thoughts on the movie, but maybe it wasn't enough.
Contents on the internet are mostly duplicates of another, tailored for a different audience, it doesn't necessarily translate to plagiarism.
I've seen a couple of fraudulent authors and this ain't one in my opinion if that matters.
Due to the content category, you can't have much different writing language, are any of her previous content categories plagiarized?
That's some food for thought.
Keep doing the good work you're doing for hive.
Content being free does not give someone a right to use it as they are authors of it and/or monetise on it.
The user has been evidently misleading by saying that everything written here was original and with no re-writing.
If there were no intentional misleading, maybe we would have taken a different action.
Internet plagiarists often think that they can freely plagiarise because they will face no real-life consequences for their actions. They consider the virtual world as a joke that they can exploit.
If you committed such plagiarism (like the one above) when writing an essay or dissertation and any legit University, you would be suspended and possibly face legal consequences.
EDIT:
I have just gone to check on some random post and, right away, I found plagiarism there too.
It seems that this user has been scamming with content theft since the beginning.
https://hive.blog/hive-166408/@windgirl/the-four-qs
I see that you also have a history of scamming with plagiarism:
https://hive.blog/hive-190212/@malopie/history-after-all
Wow, if other of her contents show that, I'm leaving it for her to defend, and for the content you are calling out for me, that was a case of fraud by a paid management of the account, that wasn't me and if you followed through you'd see all the proof that was presented.