Special Coastal Architecture - moved to a better community

avatar
(Edited)

Because my content has been muted here for no reason, it is moved to other community: https://peakd.com/hive-104101/@soulsdetour/special-coastal-architecture-declined-rewards



0
0
0.000
26 comments
avatar

Manually curated by ackhoo from the @qurator Team. Keep up the good work!

0
0
0.000
avatar

The photos are good. I like the perspective of each shot. It show how intricate the detailing are. Enjoy a slice of !PIZZA

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you, @juecoree! It's actually the beautiful buildings that make the pictures good 😊

0
0
0.000
avatar

Timber is very common here in the US, which is why Americans are always amazed at stories from Europe about people living in 500 year old houses and such (because ours DO NOT LAST that long, lol). I understand in the past why this was common as timber was easily accessible so people built their log cabins and such, but why it continued to be the norm, even today, I don't know. Tradition, I guess.
Anyway, the house I lived in as a kid which was near the ocean had wooden cladding like that in the front and it required a LOT of maintenance. I feel like my dad was out there staining it again every year or every other year maybe, to keep it sealed and not rotting in the salty air.

0
0
0.000
avatar

In America? Really? I've never lived in a wooden house, so I cannot imagine what it's like. My mind always connects the wooden structures with fire and woodworms, ie. perceives it as an unreliable building material.
That's why I'm also very surprised when I see such buildings. Even the ones I show in the post. Most likely, they also required huge maintenance efforts over the years, otherwise they could not have survived so far.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep, I think it's the most common building material here. Of course, it's usually covered in other things - so they're doing the framing of the house in wood and put insulation in between the wood beams, with drywall (plasterboard) on the inside which is what gets painted. On the outside there's plywood and a plastic sheet to seal it in from water and then whatever cladding, which might be wood, aluminum, fake stone, etc. And yeah - fake stone, not real stone! They will put up a sheet of what looks like a stone wall but it's really resin or something. It's all lightweight and cheap, and that's the idea; houses in the US have gotten bigger over the decades and it's cheaper to build with wood so you can have a bigger house made of wood for the same price as a smaller house built out of something else.
Of course, yeah, it is more prone to fires, and termites, and rotting and mold and all the other problems that come with making your house out of wood. But it's cheap and fast, and that's pretty demonstrative of how the US works. 😂
I had a friend who lived in a ~100 year old house that had been turned into apartments, and it had NO insulation or anything, so it was wooden frame - wooden slats, the end. I live in Denver, which has really cold winters, so while I'm sure that was nice to air out in the hot summers, in the winter her apartment was FREEZING no matter how high she had the heat on. You'd have to sit inside with your winter coat on. She had a plant literally climbing up the inside of her living room wall from the outside. You'd think it was a fancy house from the outside, as it was big and pretty - but terrible to actually live in!

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's really strange. And means that America has a lot to learn from Europe in terms of construction. 😁 Or are your houses deliberately built so that there is no great destruction and losses from hurricanes, etc.?
In the country where I live, Bulgaria, and where it is very cold in winter, traditional construction is with bricks. I would not say that this is necessarily the best. Much depends on whether the builders themselves do their job well and conscientiously. Of course, insulation, which was not known in the old construction, plays a big role nowadays.
But what I've heard about other countries, the Scandinavians, for example, is that they build really well. And despite the cold outside, their houses are easily heated and very warm (I don't know how they achieve this - I haven't been there and I'm not familiar with their architecture).

0
0
0.000
avatar

Or are your houses deliberately built so that there is no great destruction and losses from hurricanes, etc.?

No, it's just because it's cheap for the builders, and not about quality or lowering the cost for people living in the houses at all. Houses like this cost hundreds of thousands of dollars - the average house price in my city, I just looked, is $568,178.

Some people say it's more eco-friendly to build with wood because it's renewable, rather than concrete, which causes a lot of carbon. But the developers building things really don't care about that, they just care about cost. They'd use concrete if it was cheaper.

0
0
0.000
avatar
Thank you for sharing this amazing post on HIVE!
  • Your content got selected by our fellow curator @priyanarc & you just received a little thank you via an upvote from our non-profit curation initiative!

  • You will be featured in one of our recurring curation compilations and on our pinterest boards! Both are aiming to offer you a stage to widen your audience within and outside of the DIY scene of hive.

Join the official DIYHub community on HIVE and show us more of your amazing work and feel free to connect with us and other DIYers via our discord server: https://discord.gg/mY5uCfQ !

If you want to support our goal to motivate other DIY/art/music/homesteading/... creators just delegate to us and earn 100% of your curation rewards!

Stay creative & hive on!
0
0
0.000
avatar

The owners of those structures must have been had their hands full in maintaining the integrity of each.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I hadn't thought about this before (before the comment above), but yes - it probably is. Every house generally requires constant maintenance, but somehow I think that in order for these houses to be built this way, then there was some reason. It wasn't just fashion. It must have been something practical.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I agree, there was some reason why they are built that way.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Fantastic stone and wooden houses. If it weren't for some modern elements, it seems as if you have travelled back in time to the Middle Ages.
Best regards @soulsdetour.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't really know exactly from which century this architecture dates. Only in one place I read that these are houses from the 18th-19th century. They're not that old... But they are old, yes. And they cannot be left with old window frames. Or without air conditioning. They may be very well built, but the new is new.
Thank you, @cuvi!
Regards

0
0
0.000
avatar

It can be seen in the photos that the houses are quite deteriorated, I imagine that due to the saltpeter, but the deterioration is due to lack of normal maintenance or are the environmental conditions aggressive? Thank you...

0
0
0.000
avatar

These houses date from the 18-19th century, if the information I found about them is correct. I am not familiar with their maintenance, but I know that they are part of an architectural reserve, and I guess the municipality takes some care of them. Or not. Really, I have no idea.

0
0
0.000
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 140 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
!BEER
1

0
0
0.000