RE: A case for $1 SPS in the next month.

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

I find it odd that they use the term voucher. Use of this word historically means you can redeem something but in this case you still have to buy the pack after getting the 'voucher'. I wonder how many people will buy a voucher on the secondary market without realizing they still have to pay $4 for the pack. Seems like a UX fail just to circlejerk speculators and create an awkward use case. It creates a lot of friction for newer players who want to get in which seems to be at odds with the idea of making a new format so the game is more accessible.



0
0
0.000
1 comments
avatar

I can see where you are coming from but over here we use the term voucher as a general term for claiming anything. It's just a voucher to say that you can claim a pack when there is huge demand and stops others from claiming something that you are ahead of them for.

Anyway, people without vouchers will be able to buy as soon as the presale is over as there will be plenty packs to go around and they will all be released for play at the same time. No reason for any friction as everybody who wants to buy can buy. They just won't get the extra perks of being a premium member which comes form large investment in the game from an early stage.

0
0
0.000