RE: Cascading Decentralization
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
So when we draw out that logical conclusion...
Autism is a spectrum.
Everything is Autistic.
0
0
0.000
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
So when we draw out that logical conclusion...
Autism is a spectrum.
Everything is Autistic.
This guy gets it.
I think that instead of making decentralization into a meaningless nothingburger, it would be better to draw a comparison to pH scale. There are weak acids and strong acids but we don't call it a base until it gets past a certain point. This would retain your cascading effect without completely muddling the whole dichotomy which has more utility than trying to say vinegar is basic because sulfuric acid is more acidic.
Kinda sounds like a spectrum which is exactly how I described it.
And then I linked to a previous post that explains that exact topic in way more detail.
So, nah, I think I explained it more than enough already.
pH scale is the exact same thing as what I already said.
Pretty good example though, I'll leave you to it.
You probably shouldn't nitpick about some random detail at the beginning of the post that isn't really relevant to the main message being conveyed. Even if you win the battle you lose the war. You picked the wrong hill to die on.
How do I lose the war? It's your thesis statement that I'm refuting and if you took that idea outside of the echo chamber of sycophants here into a real marketplace of ideas, you would find your idea challenged more broadly. There is a lot of faulty logic in your statement which takes away from what good could be gleaned from it. Trying to say everything is centralized and everything is decentralized is not only bad reasoning it also just makes the terms pointless. Even if something were a spectrum, that doesnt make everything on both sides of the spectrum nor does is that spectrum all inclusive. There's a political spectrum but that doesn't make everything political or both right and left.
"sycophants" eh?
Interesting choice of vocabulary you have here.
Only know one other person around here that talks like this.
I am not some little bitch who surrounds myself with yes-men who stroke my ego.
So you can drop that shit right now.
Since you don't seem to understand the topic at hand let me spell it out for you:
While these dinosaurs are running around playing whack-a-mole with all the low-hanging fruit, we gain strength and expand our censorship resistant infrastructure. We don't have to worry about all the garbage out there, because that garbage acts as a meat-shield for everything else.
Now do you have anything useful to add to this narrative?
Or do you want to keep pursuing this bullshit semantical argument about the definition of "decentralization"?
Like seriously you look like such a jackass right now.
It's like a child came into my comments after reading the first 14 words of the post looking to start an argument over a subject that actually has nothing to do with the main topic.
Did you read farther than this?
You've written 3 comments so far, and it is impossible to tell if you actually read past the first 14 words, ass.
Come in here and think you can just insult my character and argue about the definition of a single word that has no relevance within the macro context of the original post? Get the fuck out, kid. Go troll someone else. You've brought nothing to the table except opened with a passive-aggressive backhanded comment followed by nitpicking the definition of a single word within the article.
No I read the entire post before commenting. I was also trying to engage in a provocative but polite way then got a little insulted by the hand-waving you did saying I was nitpicking so I came back with a bit of a counterpunch but I came in a little hot and you're right, I shouldn't attack your character like that. It was meant to be more in jest but a lot gets lost in text and I should have given myself a minute to chill to phrase it better. I do think my points are more than just nitpicks and it ties into the rest of your post than but I could have done better to not get stun locked by that aspect. I didn't come here to troll and I was being polite before my last comment.
Interesting. Well I take it all back then.
Very surprising response I must say.
Good de-escalation.
How refreshing.
The pH thing is a good analogy and I may use it somewhere down the road.
Telling someone they look like a bitchboy bc they challenged the logic of your posts title is really strange behaviour. We are all friends in this blockchain space and he is just pointing out a logical fallacy to help you grow. I usually enjoy reading your content and especially the comments but wooow wtf is this?
ITS PURE UNFETTERED RAGE MUHAHAHAHA IM AN ANIMAL!
Couldn't tell you man I was in a mood that day.
#triggered
Also if there was some kind of lesson to be learned it went totally over my head.
Logical fallacy? What logical fallacy?
Lol