RE: Splinterlands Ramblings... and a giveaway inside

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

I don't think we even need to devaluate anything, we just need to level the playing field; and I don't see a way to make it happen if the cards stay as they are. As with any game of the kind, bigger pockets will be able to buy more cards and play at higher level, I don't see a problem with that. I do see a problem if someone wants to try a game and gets bulldozed over and over again by teams with cards that are impossible to obtain, apart from months of gameplay and luck in the pulls.



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

They won't specifically devalue the cards. You just change gameplay to make things more competitive and the old cards aren't worth as much. New cards are better. New strategies emerge. On a positive note, introducing "sinks" to take cards off the market or off the playing field like farming on land is good for values.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Absolutely, there are tons of ways to create new usecases for older cards. But getting frustrated for seeing a pressing issue not having the attention it should be getting; we keep thinking in an investment first, instead of making a fun game for old AND new players alike.

0
0
0.000