Proposals for a prospective analysis in Hive: Final part .

Fuente imagen
Nothing in the world is more powerful than an idea whose time has come.
-Victor Hugo-
A big greeting to all the hive and especially to the LeoFinance tribe. Today I am posting again after several days in which some pending matters did not allow me to write as often as usual. I confess to the community that publishing has become on the one hand a necessary habit and on the other hand a burden of conscience when different circumstances do not allow me to do so. Without further ado, let's get down to business.
Looking back before continuing with our prospective analysis, we will recall that in previous weeks we have been publishing articles on ideas that could be implemented within Hive, all of them from a broad perspective, in order to take advantage of all the potential of the platform. The proposals discussed previously dealt with democracy, decentralization and education.
Today we are going to talk about the last three proposals raised in our first article, which from our perspective we consider feasible to implement, and not only that, but these ideas converted into projects could give added value to the platform and put it in the sights of investors willing to work in community as has been done since the launch of this ecosystem.
The first of these said: to gradually incorporate web 2.0 functions and options, for example: the possibility of giving external likes to hive, as well as having a visualization counter within each blog and being able to make comments from outside the platform without the option of upvote. These facilities would allow a better interaction with external users and would make the hive more attractive.
Moving on to other prospective proposals, one of the projects that would make the hive occupy a prominent place among the many social networks with which it competes would be: implementing incentives for reading the many publications produced on the platform through a minimum monetization, awards with points or figures, recognition and assignment of roles in order to form a team of outstanding readers within the platform, among other strategies applied to reading activity.
I have often wondered: How many valuable productions are there in Hive that do not always correspond to the votes or awards obtained? Implementing a reading incentive could include the possibility of discovering perhaps undervalued posts that surely there must be within the Hive, and getting these to receive a rating, even if they can no longer be voted on in the standard way.
The prospective proposals described above close with the idea of: the creation of a virtual gallery and library with publications, videos of short films, music, interviews and digital artwork produced by the hivers.
The idea behind this virtual gallery or museum is that these productions will be evaluated by a jury composed of experts from the hive and outside it, specialists in various scientific and artistic areas. They will carry out a special curatorship of the selected productions and will award them NFT certificates or any other category corresponding to the theme and format of the work.
This would give an added value to the community, since some of its productions could acquire worldwide fame in the different artistic and literary branches. It would also serve as an incentive for other members of the ecosystem to increase the level and quality of their productions.
A one-of-a-kind virtual Oscar or Nobel Prize could even be created, to be awarded annually, in my opinion, this would catapult the platform into outer space. With these last three proposals we end this series of posts. Below, I will post the previous articles for those who wish to know the other proposals.
See you soon.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator
¡Thank you for reading and supporting me!

0
0
0.000
0 comments