Alarm on NATO's Eastern Flank!

A Eurofighter had to intercept a Russian fighter jet, which shows us the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is getting worse! The question that arises is: how far will this go, how many more trouble spots will be exposed? The following is reported by "Der Express" (German medium) on the subject.
EXCERPT: "Next highly explosive incident in the skies over Europe: Russian Army Command is apparently testing the operational readiness of NATO air forces on its eastern flank, sending two SU-27 fighter jets west - Eurofighters provided the aircraft. This is not the first incident on NATO's eastern flank that could lead to dramatic consequences. Experts fear that incidents of this kind, which are currently occurring more frequently, could become a regular occurrence, whereupon they thematized the question when the red line will finally be crossed."
Of course, this question arises on both sides, because we see all the time the said line is pushed back and forth. There are constant threats that if one does this, the other will definitely do something much worse, etc., but then such a threat is simply ignored and it is done anyway! Remember in this context only times the thing with uranium ammunition. From the Russian side it was said that the tank deliveries to Ukraine will be targeted first and destroyed, later it was then said, as soon as uranium ammunition is delivered, then it really goes too far and will have consequences, which did not stop the opponents side to do exactly that anyway and thus to fuel the conflict quite deliberately.

In addition to the USA, Great Britain has also confirmed that it will supply uranium munitions, which raises the question: What is still tolerated and what is really going too far? Another article in "The Express" mentions Russia's reaction to the issue and other examples of testing the limits.
EXCERPT: "The three Russian Air Force planes flew westward over still international airspace without transporter signals, the German Air Force reports. The SU-27 jets have been produced since 1984, 680 have been built so far, they can reach speeds of up to 2500 kilometers per hour and have a range of 3530 kilometers."
Basically, this incident only shows how tense the entire situation is and how challenging both parties to the conflict often are. Sometimes they tease here, then they provoke somewhere else, and so on. You surely remember the conflict between China and Taiwan, the provocative maneuver, a short exercise of encirclement, a short warning action that was supposed to send a clear signal. Let's see how long it takes for this red line to be crossed in the eye of one of the adversaries, because there's nothing in it for the provocateur, from his point of view it's always just small provocations, even if they weren't always as provocative as originally planned, but that's another story again.

EXCERPT: "The German Air Force already had to intercept two Su-27s and an IL-20 over Estonia on April 14: In this air incident, too, the Russian aircraft then turned away."
These events really seem as if they were small test actions, with which both sides are deliberately testing how far they can go. Now, of course, one could say: Why is everyone provoking the other all the time? The answer is that these are constant warnings, constant small escalation foci that "could" break out. So what do we have to expect, will sooner or later a third world war break out over Europe?
Of course, this is a question that many people are asking themselves at the moment. All I can ever say is, look at what's happening right now, with migration, with the energy crisis, with deindustrialization in Germany and with this fourth industrial revolution that's being pushed forward. In view of this domestic political madness, is there even a need for a direct war in a country with such conditions, or will it not be destroyed much more effectively from within by all the social unrest that is just emerging there on this path through the division deliberately brought about by the mainstream than it would ever be possible by enemies invading from the outside (keyword: civil war, mainstream politicians, traitors to the people, war against their own people)?

All these decisions, which are just taken within Germany, Austria and other Western European countries, ostensibly because of for us completely fictitious dangers from the outside (example: The heating costs must be drastically increased for you citizens, since we had to impose sanctions because of the war in the Ukraine and can no longer get cheap gas from Russia), would never be accepted by the Europeans under normal circumstances and without pretexts propagated by the media!
The question arises, if such a toxic domestic policy, as it is currently practiced in some European countries (actually in all Western countries, but in parts of Western Europe the economic suicide is added to it) is not already enough to destroy a country and to bring down the prosperity? The leaders of the western "rainbow-Sodom & Gomorra-value-community" even show us quite openly what still everything is planned and what everything can be implemented in a short time because of conflict situations which actually all take place further away from us.
Before we let ourselves be incited by the media as if this war would affect us more than all the others in the world, which apparently could be safely ignored (keyword: NATO's war of aggression in Serbia, unjustified US invasion of Iraq, Nayirah testimony, Obama's drone war in Syria, etc.), we should consider there are, after all, still two countries between Ukraine and Germany! Considering all this domestic insanity, is there still any argument, which justified letting us of the crazed leaders of the (self-proclaimed) "value West" - instead of fighting them - plunge us additionally into a third world war?

Taiwan, in whose conflict our own politicians "want" to drag us in addition, is even further away from us, the Sudan likewise, nevertheless already with the thoughts is played to sacrifice there European soldiers for US interests, also economic commitment is announced there, while European countries are ruined at the same time by the true people-traitorous enemies in the inside!
First step to solve a problem is always to recognize there is one, and I'm not talking about media-hyped "enemy images" (keyword: Putin & Xi), which are constantly presented to us, but about the enemies in our own country. If first enough people realize our enemies are not to be found in Russia or China, then this alone will not solve all our problems, of course, but at least it will be the first important step that leads in the right direction!
This problem has been long known. The leaders of countries hob-knob together, eating caviar and drinking champagne, while setting their people afire and flinging them at one another. Regarding Germany, Angela Merkel was E. German, in the Stasi before unification. V. Putin was a Colonel in the Stasi. They were well acquainted, and had a common cause: the destruction of the German people, flooded with incompatible cultural people to cause constant conflict amongst the people, which weakened them politically, economically, and culturally.
You well note the retarded power plays Germany has taken. The government of Germany is not any benefit to the German people, because it is hopelessly corrupt. It is there to betray the German people, and unless, like you, they recognize their extremity, they will face their betrayal unaware they have been betrayed and led into an ambush they will not survive.
German people need to stop working for the polity of Germany, and devise their own polity. They need to divorce their labor, their money, they will, from their would be masters that seek to betray them, and work to underwrite economic power that will not betray them, that will instead protect them, strengthen them, until they have the power to be rid of their tormentors.
Decentralized means of production can be a critical and major part of this evolution.
Thanks!