Verificationism as a philosophical current useful in everything that needs to be demonstrated

Image source

Philosophy is the mother of all sciences, therefore science has developed under certain autonomous principles of philosophy that allows it to have a demarcation in the verificationism, it is necessary that every theory can be verified, for this it is subjected to a series of studies that in the end manage to demonstrate such veracity.

Perhaps in the beginning, especially in ancient times, what today is a strength with all the development that has existed with the scientific method in the past would have been a weakness, since it was enough to think about any fact or natural and/or social phenomenon to be judged only under the principles of ancient philosophy.

Now it is important to see what philosophical proposal is hidden behind verificationism as that idea so necessary for each of us to consider something as true,

I remember my old days as a university student, in my first semester I could notice the importance that Euclidean geometry began to have in my life, since everything that was formed or denied had to be demonstrated using a set of principles based on theorems, axioms and corollaries.

It was at that time when I lived reflecting on the fact that everything in life and beyond academic arguments had to be demonstrated, and even more I understood that everything had an explanation derived from a why, although everything seemed logical the existence of all the easiest things we see must have an explanation.

Based on all my own reasoning about the necessity of having to verify most of our arguments, how can I conceptualize verificationism?

Many things in life seem logical and evident, so much so that it would seem that they do not need a logical and apparent explanation, however it seems contradictory, but those things are the ones that may require further verification and explanation.

Science is the one that most relies on verificationism, since it has a hunger to be based on a support of significance, everything must have a meaning within science, this meaning is only provided by the philosophy based on verificationism.

While it is true that the philosophy of verificationism is based on a principle of sustainability and credibility, it is not always a good current to allude to significance in environments where talks about religion, politics, economics, art and philosophy, since it takes more than a set of open-minded participants to generate a broad debate that logically does not require verification.

Conclusion

It is incredible how each one of us can reason in a broad way about the philosophy involved in the current of verificationism, since science needs it to generate a basis and a support of significant order, however, to deepen about other current of knowledge where the demonstration or negation of an argument is indifferent, this philosophical current is not so valid.