Member Management Notes
Epilog
What's the name of the game again? We run an open guild. From a snapshot (below) it is not the highest open guild, nor the one with the largest hall. But from this snapshot, it is the third guild that actually has an open spot.
And what luck for some of us, because we have numerous passive accounts, and two of them could have been removed already, IF only someone had understood what it means to play with us as a guest. But since that is not the case, I am happy not to have to remove a decorated account this time.
To make sure of what our procedures are for this case, I went WAY back in time. The first note I posted on-chain at the time shows that we had apparently reached Hall Level 3 by that time. At that time, there was only consideration of activity within seven days, and those who had not contributed for longer were sorted by me by amount of scrolls contributed - with a few documented exceptions.
The second note published on-chain had then followed many weeks later. There you can see - as well as in the third, which followed shortly after - that a lot of accounts left the guild on their own, and always only the last place was reopened, and not all those who were passive.
There were no brawls back then. Accounts were always removed when the last open spot was filled. I had to deal with that every day. To this day, it's a lot of work! This here is not happening on its own, even though it may feel like it at times.
Only with the note of January 12, 2021, can we find an example where several accounts were removed at the same time. But from what I see in the note, that was simply because all those accounts had NOT contributed, and thus were collectively at zero.
Now, enough reminiscing about old times. We have an open spot, and that's why I see no reason to remove passive accounts. But please note: It only takes someone ACTIVE using the last slot by contributing ONE DEC for a passive account to need to be removed, no matter how decorated it is.
For those accounts that are just passively mentioned within 5 to 10 days, the mention is a warning. Those that have not been active within two brawls will be flagged for removal. And the account, at the time of the start of the next brawl then is still passive, will be farewelled over the plank. At least that's the picture I'm getting of it as I write this right now. LFG!
Index
- Timetable
- Internal Player Score Table
- If you are new to this
- What we expect from any member, in a nutshell
- Link to addendum
Timetable
06/28 11:00 AM CEST - top-up auction ended, since not all spots were filled, no need to remove an account
06/28 09:50 AM CEST - @amburst removed because of ignoring this text
06/27 10:17 AM CEST - @amburst joined
06/27 10:17 AM CEST - @beatbyanewb removed because of ignoring this text
06/27 01:59 AM CEST - @beatbyanewb joined
06/26 10:37 PM CEST - @freedom02 removed again because of ignoring this text
06/25 09:40 PM CEST - @freedom02 joined again
06/25 09:25 PM CEST - @freedom02 removed because of ignoring this text
06/23 09:34 AM CEST - @freedom02 joined
06/23 07:55 PM CEST - @ronaldchie removed because of ignoring this text
06/23 02:48 AM CEST - @ronaldchie joined
[previous timetable]
Internal Player Score Table
Actively contributing accounts within the recent blawl and its position by score:
| Spot | Account | Calculated on | Score | DEC | Scrolls | Times brawled | favorite Tier 1 | f/T 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @thelunacysystem | 06/11/22 | 19,569,368 | 215,048 | 91 | 91 | 8/9 | 6 |
| 2 | @prxhunter | 06/11/22 | 8,057,796 | 118,497 | 68 | 66 | 8/9 | 12 |
| 3 | @naive-god | 06/11/22 | 5,739,555 | 85,665 | 67 | 60 | 9/10 | |
| 4 | @anjanida | 06/11/22 | 2,095,488 | 29,104 | 72 | 86 | 8/9 | 7/8 |
| 5 | @sm-rules | 06/11/22 | 1,042,131 | 18,283 | 57 | 87 | 13 | 15 |
| 7 | @anjadani | 06/11/22 | 533,082 | 16,154 | 33 | 67 | 5/6 | 3/4 |
| 8 | @a3manolo | 06/11/22 | 478,040 | 6,460 | 74 | 75 | 11 | 13 |
| 9 | @sodom-lv | 06/11/22 | 442,888 | 5,336 | 83 | 47 | 5/6 | 3/4 |
| 10 | @pandaman20001 | 06/28/22 | 344,472 | 11,112 | 31 | 14 | 13 | 16 |
| 11 | @shawnmichael-gt | 06/28/22 | 296,177 | 10,213 | 29 | 11 | - | 14 |
| 14 | @tld05 | 06/28/22 | 114,810 | 1,335 | 86 | 64 | 3 | 2 |
| 15 | @dr3am03 | 06/28/22 | 103,455 | 6,897 | 15 | 8 | - | - |
| 18 | @annijada | 06/28/22 | 37,107 | 1,197 | 31 | 4 | - | - |
| 20 | @amfrak | 06/28/22 | 8,580 | 330 | 26 | 8 | - | - |
Passive accounts with no DEC or Scroll contribution within the recent blawl:
| Spot | Account | Calculated on | Score | DEC | Scrolls | Times brawled | Days ago | Tier 1 favorite | Tier 2 fav |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | @jk420 | 06/28/22 | 889,956 | 15,084 | 59 | 80 | +11 | 8/9 | 7/8 |
| 12 | @m-mirage-e | 06/28/22 | 263,130 | 5,370 | 49 | 83 | +11 | 10 | 10 |
| 13 | @teerandom | 06/28/22 | 307,255 | 10,595 | 29 | 12 | 6 | - | 9 |
| 16 | @eika | 06/28/22 | 59,813 | 1,391 | 43 | 22 | 6 | 1/2 | 1 |
| 17 | @mervol | 06/28/22 | 52,492 | 1,193 | 44 | 16 | 6 | - | - |
| 19 | @ykyan2 | 06/28/22 | 31,980 | 615 | 52 | 27 | 7 | 1/2 | 3/4 |
| 21 | @ OPEN | 06/28/22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
@m-mirage-e scheduled for removal
For more recent notes an unofficial draft is at https://hackmd.io/@anjanida
If you are new to this
Become familiar with the member management, please. Because the guild spots are precious, the last in our list will be removed regularly. That is part of our procedure as noted in the addendum linked at the bottom. And if you don't acknowledge all this within the first 2 hours after you joined, you may be removed without notice right away. How can we know? Well, you'll see! And any questions are welcome anytime!
Please understand, it is not on me to show comprehension. I'll do the best I can! Though this guild is somewhat managed like a DAO. That is Decentral Autonomous Organisation. So I simply follow the procedures that have evolved here by now. And for when you become passive and no one can reach out to you in time, ugly things can happen. As documented in past notes. See e.g. https://peakd.com/@anjanida/member-management-notes-defc067f6e74f
If you want to join and stay, we can make that happen even with presently no open spot available. We may schedule it for that you can be there the moment our weakest contributor is removed. Sounds familiar somehow? Like with a mob abandoning their weakest offspring to survive a predator attack. Your contribution needs to be enough for not being the weakest. Everyone who got removed is welcome any time again. It's just that contributions from earlier are at zero any time an account re-joines.
What we expect from any enduring member, in a nutshell:
Priority A: Some contribution within the last 2 brawls. Without at least 1 DEC even a quest scroll will make this, if the Lodge is not maxed out for the rest of a season.
Priority B: Be not the weakest contributor in our mob the moment an auction ends. This moment is when a new brawl starts. The second to last score in the list is bold highlighted. That is the tide you need to take in DEC without scrolls added to the lodge yet for outpacing that account.
Link to addendum
For our recent Member Management Notes Addendum with general guidelines and procedures see
https://peakd.com/hive-179856/@anjanida/member-management-notes-addendum-rd1515