Responding to a Money Lover About Ayn Rand
The character Francisco d'Anconia says in Ayn Rand’s book, Atlas Shrugged:
"To love money is to know and love the fact that money is the creation of the best power within you, and your passkey to trade your effort for the effort of the best among men. It's the person who would sell his soul for a nickel, who is loudest in proclaiming his hatred of money – and he has good reason to hate it."
This seems to cover the foundational views of money that Ayn held and promoted in Her books.
Let's start with the fact that loving money does NOT evoke "best" creation. It evokes deviousness to see how much for how little can be gained. What evokes the best efforts is love for what One is doing. Love for the Ones that the work is being done for. Love of the positive social currencies One receives for work well done (praise, thanks, reputation, admiration, etc.).
And it is the One who sees that money will promote psychopaths to power – and that's why We have psychopaths lying to Us to get Us to conform to Their plans for Us – who reviles the practice. Not One who would sell anything for a nickle.
And the list of lies We are told by the psychopaths in control (by virtue of money) is very long – "deadly viruses" exist! "Contagion" is gonna get You! Humans are causing the weather (never mind that the sun adds 99.9% of what drives the weather). We should eat mostly grains – and bugs (while the useless ELiters are beefeaters…)!
That's the tiniest tip of a giant iceberg.
And the only tool these psychopaths have to affect the lies upon Us is money. Without the money, They can lie to Others, but They are just one voice Each. They cannot pay Others to tell the lies too. They cannot buy media and schools and publishing (like Rockefeller did to tell the twin tower lies of "deadly viruses" and "contagion") to tell Us many untruths.
Add to this that there have been Human societies that lived in abundance – where all They needed was there for the taking. In abundance, no accounting for One's energy input arose – no form of money manifested. These were mostly "island paradises," Tahiti being one, the culture of which vanished in the early 20th century when the "western world" moved in, usurped the land and forced the accounting for energy (money) on Them.
Rather than the psychopaths being promoted to control everything, They had the caring One taking care of things. People were promoted to prominence by the respect and admiration They received for the wisdom and good works They offered. There was no poverty, and People were motivated to choose Their behavior Ethically else Their standing in the social group would fall.
And those People did things because They loved to do them. They cared. They wanted acceptance and love...
So. Ayn Rand's perspective would be fine (but for the limit on the money, which means Some will live richly while Most will live in poverty) if there were no psychopaths. If We all were loving, caring, compassionate and empathetic Ones. But the reality is that We have Ones amongst Us who genetically cannot feel caring, compassion, love, or empathy for Others. They do not feel remorse. And They lust after power over Others – which money provides – and will not stop short of breaking the three Laws of Ethics to get it.
They will lie, cheat, defraud, steal, torture, and kill if it will put Them at the advantage.
I aim for a planet paradise – We have been "post-scarcity" (no political baggage intended with that) for decades at least, but money creates artificial scarcities, deliberately created by the psychopaths aiming to control Us all 100%. Where We can fulfill Our potential rather than having to find some way to plug Our energy in to receive the token of the day that accounts for that energy added. Where We can do what interests Us, what We love to do, rather than being chained to a "job" to pay the bills so We can survive.
Money is an archaic tool – and an EXTREMELY dangerous one, and I think We should put it down in favor of freedom.
To that end, I will point out that not only do We have abundance behind the money wall, but We have free energy technologies the psychopaths keep well hidden. I know of one that My father worked on, that went into black projects in 1959. (Yeah, I’m old enough to remember His excitement as He would tell Us what They were getting in the experiments, the gravity control, and the energy from the aether – the electro-gravito-magnetic field that pervades the universe, feeding it energy.)
Free energy makes accounting for Our energy in an abundant world pointless, makes money moot, and this is why the psychopaths so avidly hide it. Without Their tool, Each would be no more powerful than You or Me.
We also not have robots, which, if We didn’t need money to survive, to live as richly as We choose, can freely be set to do the necessary work no One wants to do. And there are plenty of People who love to create robots…
And We can build a truly decentralized web, with mirroring nodes and no backbone (the backbone system We have now could be shut down at any time...), open-source coded, to report problems on and offer ideas and help through, with an emergency section where emergencies are reported, and the Ones who would love to help Those in emergency situations can be notified.
We can co-create better than the psychopaths are creating for Us. We need Many to create it, though, and My work is aimed at showing how We can get there from here:
Electrogravitics: Gravity Control & Energy from the Aether (9 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/electrogravitics-gravity-control-energy:6?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
About the psychopaths:
We Have Psychopaths in Control (8 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/we-have-psychopaths-in-control:b?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
Is Money Evil? (14 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/is-money-evil:9?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
My Most Memorable Economic Lesson (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/my-most-memorable-economic-lesson
Money... Do We Need It? (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/money-do-we-need-it
What We can build:
The Detailed Blueprint (for a Society of Ethical Sovereigns) (7 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-detailed-blueprint-vocal-redo:9?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
You Have a Choice – Will You Choose Wisely? (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/you-have-a-choice-will-you-choose-wisely
Do You Have the Balls? (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/do-you-have-the-balls-ruykps
Will You choose to be a part of the solution to psychopaths in control?
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.