Can You Prove that I’m Not Sovereign?

Header.png

I contend that I am sovereign.  Being a gentleOne, I do not create controversy, but rather make a counteroffer.  If You can prove that I am not sovereign, but rather that I am subject to some Human-created system, I will happily be so.

But if You cannot prove that I am subject, within the “jurisdiction” of some set of rules beyond Natural Law, expressed as the three Law of Ethics, then I expect and demand that, lest I do something unEthical, lest I break those three Laws, that I be left alone to do as I please.

Contract.png

As I do not consent to any such system, I ponder what proof You might offer.  I made no contract at birth – no infant is capable of giving fully informed consent to make any contract binding.  I made no contract growing up.

I made no contract as I entered adulthood, though I complied and thought I was subject.  Any obeisance I performed surely was not done in fully informed fashion.  I was not told that it all is optional, that My “implied consent” was taken because I did not say “no” to a contract I did not even know was there, not being given the data in direct and Ethical fashion.

Consent.png

It was only through years of research and study that I established that consent is key.  Without consent – fully informed consent – there is no contract.  And without providing prospective contractees clear and complete data on all implications of the contract, the contract is null and void.

The legal system has skewed this a bit, allowing things like a, “We published the information in that paper Few read or even know about, so You were informed,” approach.  In no way is it Ethical – which is where all valid contracts stand, on Ethical ground.

In fact, the legal system was set up to thwart Ethics.  By convincing Us that only legal ground matters, and not even teaching Ethics, They can create “implied consent” as They please.  “Tell” People via obscurity, symbolism, “fiction,” and esoteric avenues, and then claim, because We did not say “no,” that We consent to what They’re doing.

No.png

It is for this reason I cannot consent to that ghastly, that psychopathic! system.  I stand on Ethical ground, and lest I break any of the three Laws of Ethics, I expect and demand to be left alone.  If it’s legal but not Ethical, it does not apply to Me, and if it’s Ethical but not legal, the legalate does not apply.

This means that, for example, if I choose to smoke some cannabis in My home (if I had one – I’m quite homeless), any legalates claiming it is a “crime” have no bearing on Me.  There is nothing unEthical about such behavior.  It does not break any of the three Laws.

The three Laws – as opposed to legalates, which everything in the legal system is, and of which the number of them is greater than anyOne knows – are:

1.  Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther

2.  Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone

3.  Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)

As You can see, none of those Laws says that inhaling smoke from a natural medicinal herb is unEthical.  And as You know, the legalates say it’s “illegal.”

Legalates.png

As I mentioned, there are more legalates “on the books” than anyOne knows the number of – millions upon millions.  And They expect Us to know them all?  In truth, I think We cannot live without breaking one or more of them!  I would not be surprised if somewhere there was a legalate making it “illegal” to breathe.

So…  Why should We consent to that mess?  Why should We give it power?  Why should We wind up giving “implied consent” to legalates We were “told” about in obscure places or were otherwise “told” but indirectly or esoterically?  With Ethics, all contracts are valid only if all parties offer all pertinent data in clear and unambiguous fashion, and all parties agree.

And, of course, the governmental system is merely the active fingers of that legal system.  It is all one.  So I therefore cannot consent to it all.  Where Ethics is applied, I have no issues, but with things like “mandates” requiring submission to having My flesh invaded by experimental, undisclosed toxins – well, I just can’t consent.

I consent to a vastly better way of doing things.

SOES.png

Granted, alone I cannot do much to co-create that better way.  But I will persist in standing sovereign, writing words I hope will bring Many to reject the unEthical system We did not consent to, fully informed.  Hoping to open eyes to the wretched systems They have indoctrinated Us into from birth.

Hoping to bring many More into co-creating better on Our planet.

Cestui.png

As it stands now, We Each are owners of the planet, a share of its wealth belongs to every One of Us.  But centuries ago, the psychopaths of that time, promoted to power by money, declared Humanity “incompetent,” and started tucking Our wealth into “trusts.”  We each have many millions that belong to Us, but They keep it from Us, acting as “trustees,” and using Our wealth against Us.

We have been made slaves, moving Our wealth up to Them.

This was “legal” but surely not Ethical.  No One can Ethically just declare anOther “incompetent” and then usurp what is Theirs.  What I aim to create effectively returns to Us what is Ours – We will all live as richly as We choose, as well as any multimillionaire today, but without money to worry about.

Barter.png

And this is possible because We have the technology now to do away with the practice of exchanging to survive.  A practice that arose in times of scarcity, where all hands were needed to produce needed things.  “Skaters” were not welcome, and so, proof of One’s energy input began to be expected.

“I’m not going to give You any of My milk unless You give Me some of Your eggs.”

But in the very few societies that had abundance, everything They needed there for the taking (mostly on “island paradises”), accounting for what energy We added did not arise.  Rather, They did things for the social currency – which, even in this moneyed society, We do things for – such as love, thanks, appreciation, reputation, lauds, esteem, respect, fame, bragging rights, and other such currencies.

These currencies are accounted for in Our hearts and minds, not in external tokens like milk and eggs, shells, bead, metals (coins), paper (bills), or electronic bits.

Abundance.png

And of course, Our planet is vastly abundant, but We were never able to cast off the accounting for the energy We add.  Kept as slaves, though the abundance began to flow as technology helped manifest it, We moved more and more into positions that added nothing to the needs of Humanity and merely moved the wealth.

Cashiers, sales, accounting, advertising, marketing, casinos, insurance, Wall Street, and banking (of course) all move the wealth, and overall upwards to the Ones at the top.  And given what We see being created for Us – the mind virus creating fear of the flu, rebranding it for that that purpose, and then demanding We allow unknown substances to be jabbed into Our flesh, even forcing it upon Us, makes clear that these Ones at the top are psychopaths.

Why would anyOne consent to all that ghastly mess, to being slaves to enrich psychopaths when We are royalty, sovereign Ones, bound only by Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do?  When Our wealth, as Individuals, is vast…  When We should be living richly, pursuing Our interests, following Our bliss, making Our dreams come true…

Crown.png

So.  I am sovereign, and You are too.  Unless You choose to consent to being enslaved to a system that is grossly unEthical and uses You to enrich Others.

If You withdraw Your consent, there is no proof You are subject to that ghastly and psychopathic legal/governmental system.  Like Me, You can stand on Ethical ground.  And if You and I (and many Others) aggregately work towards removing the accounting for Our energy added (by getting free energy technology out in the open), and creating a better foundation, We will like as the royalty We are.

I offer a blueprint for a better foundation to co-create, as  well as what I know of one free energy technology.  If I was not disabled, denied assistance, lost everything, destitute, and homeless, I would be seeing what I could do to bring it out.  But this is a co-creation, and I give My knowledge to You and hope You have both the wherewithal and the drive to bring it forth.

The energy We swim in belongs to All of Us, but the psychopaths at the top know that when We gain access to it, Their tool to power (money) will be removed, and They will no longer have a -planet of slaves.  They will both have no more power than You or Me, and They will be held to the same Ethical standards.

Will You work to free Us all from the psychopaths’ rule?  Will You share this with All You can?  It’s up to Us to create better on Our planet than what the psychopaths are creating for Us.  And enough of Us need to know We can.

Links:

Free energy technology:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/electrogravitics-gravity-control-energy:6?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72

The blueprint:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/i-have-a-blueprint:1?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
The Gene:  https://hive.blog/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/the-gene



__________________________________________


Signature:



Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia

Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change

The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella

My father taught Me never to believe anything.  He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data.  He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on YouToilet).  From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw.  So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.

I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles.  I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics.  I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"

When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY.  Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.

From this I realized the WHY.  We were accounting for Our energy input into things.  And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).

I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...

I was very interested in psychology, too.  And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths.  Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene.  Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.

And I asked...  If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them?  I think You can figure out what answer I came up with.  And would that explain what I see?  Absolutely.

Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy.  If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy? 

And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.

So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather...  I am a conspiracy analyst.  And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound.  That explains perfectly what I see.



Love always.



0
0
0.000
8 comments
avatar

I have come to the conclusion that what I am is not a body and I need not prove this to anyone for it to be valid. Sovereignty question not necessary.

Though I do agree with the majority of your diatribe.

Witch hunts in history have been led by those that practice witchcraft.

Mob manipulation has always been the key to control. Outsiders fear a mob that can defend itself simply for the sake of the mob and so subjugate the mob to a life of lesserness in order to debilitate the mob's potential.

We sit on the coin's edge - the edge of the abyss -

Each new community is an expansion of an internal world.

These worlds collide and we've seen it all happen before.

You'd think we'd be bored of this already...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Not sure I follow all that. Why has Individual sovereignty unimportant?

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I did not mention it it unimportant.

I mean, it is unnecessary from the starting point that you are a spiritual being.

For, whom are you proving your sovereignty to?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Um... To the Ones who think I am subject? The legal system/governmental system I don't consent to? To the Ones who would demand I surrender My flesh to a death jab based on a rebranding of the flu to create fear over BS? I'm not seeing how being of spirit energy = no need to deal with the world the psychopaths are creating.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Well there are many ways we can look at this.

For example, do you feel that proving your sovereignty is actually going to change how these psychopaths behave?

We are both right here - I am not starting an argument unless of course you need to create one.

You are addressing physical sovereignty.

I am addressing spiritual sovereignty.

These are two layers of the world we live in.

Spiritual sovereignty is self evident in that if you have a need to prove it - you don't have it.

Physical sovereignty is a child of spiritual sovereignty.

Those who control the strength of a situation have the capacity to change words, their meaning, rules and laws. You are petitioning to common sense within the mob with such a perspective - however if the definition of common sense in the mob is skewed your petition becomes irrelevant.

I understand and agree with the sovereign perspective however - it will not help you in the physical realm where mob rule has been manipulated, the narrative controlled and the mob believes they are right.

Regardless of how well you word something and how well we 'defend our sovereignty' in court - the mob always creates its own law - and from this it always creates its own definitions and language.

What method you outline here is a product of the past and our present entitlements.

How does this information help anyone practicably?

It helps some people that feel entitled as sovereigns to self-empower themselves but it does not in effect change anything.

The question remains - if you are sovereign - why do you need to prove it?

Be sovereign. Act sovereign. Live sovereign.

The courts will not save you.

0
0
0.000
avatar

No, not starting an argument. LOL! I know that on a spiritual level no proof is required. But I'm talking about the physical. And You're right. Their sewer is no remedy. My efforts are to gain enough of Us aggregately who will reject Their offers and construct a vastly better foundation. Did You watch any of the videos I linked to?

And I will not voluntarily go to a court. I will have to be bullied there. And once there, all I will say is, "I will be happy to engage this court if You prove I am in Your "jurisdiction," that I am subject."

If I have broken the 3 Laws (I won't), then Others have the duty to restrain Me and mete Ethical consequences.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Well I am glad we aren't arguing as that can be a tiresome endeavor.

Your principles are sound and I hope more live by them.

It is good to encourage this perspective in my opinion as it allows the public to consider what makes a law a law and if they allow it.

Some are happy being subjects and are willingly so. In a way I prefer the honesty than a pseudo-sovereignty that talks the talk but has yet to walk the walk.

Good luck navigating out there and keep writing!

0
0
0.000
avatar

As I mentioned, everything in the Ethics-thwarting legal system is a legalate, not a Law. Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do are the only Laws. and I assure You, I have the courts in a tizzy here. I gave Them Ethical Notice on bogus tickets and did not show up. There's no warrant, so... Haha!

And to be sure, I will keep writing. Slacked off on making vids. Getting too much for My elderly and disabled bones to handle. But I may do more. Maybe I'll have some really good days... I hope, at any rate.

0
0
0.000