Communities

avatar

Now that the cat's out of the bag about communities which I've been very excited about and was sitting on edge during the presentation of @roadscape at Steemfest, I wanted to discuss what we at @ocd would like to do with it moving forward.

Let's keep this short. Over the last couple months we've been receiving a lot of requests for curation and supporting people's projects, the main reason we haven't continued responding to them has not just been cause we've been super busy but also because we get swamped with people asking for assistance. Many of those have been about onboarding users through your projects, the biggest flaw there has been that it's been promises of what you will be doing and asking for support on your project's posts about it mainly.

Now you may think there's nothing wrong with that but similar to other smaller curation projects we've been assisting lately we've only supported the posts they curate, not the actual curators or reports of what they curate with ocd and ocdb, same thing goes for our own team of curators at ocd - yes even when we've been downvoted for reasons that often have not been due to disagreement of rewards.

We're passed the time where we announce a project and ask for assistance from the get go. Now you have to take a risk, put in some work and invest yourself in your project either with funds or time. Then once you have a working project that is getting some traction and actually flowing - that's when you should look for more support and to help user retention. You should have some sort of statistics followed by proof when requesting further assistance and a kickstart. I am sure I am not the only one here who thinks this should be a requirement by now after the many years of empty promises, rewards and delegations that went nowhere. There's nothing more disheartening than delegating to a project only to find out a few months later that the leader has gone AWOL and was selling his free delegation votes through a bid bot.

Anyway, please keep that in mind before approaching us in the future. We always answer to proposals and take the time to talk about ideas through DM's, but they have to be somewhat serious for our interest to not extinguish.

Having said that, now that communities are arriving, we have some news.

We would like to help kickstart communities through our voting power and other ways we can help. Here as well we would like some thought out ideas and plans before we consider your community. A very good community idea won't even need much voting power incentive to work and grow, if we see signs of that happening in new communities we will assist it anyway. Similar to that at our own discretion we may not assist communities we may believe won't grow as big or be able to stay relevant for a longer time period.

So if you're reading this and are as excited about communities as we are, feel free to join our Discord server and/or hit us up in direct messages about your ideas for our consideration. Please remember that support won't exist from the start unless it's a really great idea we like and think it has a great potential for growth.

The last few weeks we've been helping grow the Gods Unchained community here on Steem as we believe the game has a high chance at reaching mass adoption and showcasing the blockchain proof of ownership advantage to the world. At the same time immutability is important as we've seen players be censored, demonetized and all other nice things for their beliefs. We are happy to see the community grow and be introduced to other advantages of blockchain through Steem than just proof of ownership which we also got here as showcased by Splinterlands and even better they've shown what more you can do with blockchain in gaming through evolved chains like Steem that won't get clogged up or require fees for every trans/action.

We are looking forward for the cryptorush of communities starting up on Steem and hoping to be on the forefront to assist their growth, retention and success.

Thank you for reading and we'll be looking forward to talking with you more about your community ideas!



0
0
0.000
18 comments
avatar

There's nothing more disheartening than delegating to a project only to find out a few months later that the leader has gone AWOL and was selling his free delegation votes through a bid bot.

Glad you picked up on this. Too many scam artists involved with anything to do with free stuff. As soon as the bad guys win the support, they feel like they earned it and already 'proved' their idea.

0
0
0.000
avatar

As soon as the bad guys win the support, they feel like they earned it and already 'proved' their idea.

All too common unfortunately and then it is coupled with, "now proven, time to get paid and extract".

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yup, delegations and support definitely need to have strings attached. I like the Steem.dao for proposals because if they stop doing stuff I can cancel my vote. A lot of these projects aren't even openly critized because people are worried about the consequences. They are given chance after chance after chance, but until they are hit where it hurts (a reduced or removal of delegations), why would they do anything?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Reminded me of a #gaming community here on steem. After gaining our trust the founder asked many of us for money to support the project and then ran away. Well, it's our fault that we trusted him but you get the point.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Gaming or gambling?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Gaming... He requested the money for bid bots for the main community account (when bid bots were a thing.) He didn't request a huge amount only $5 from each user (I think he asked more from the big users,) but he did so with each one in private and we didn't know he asked the others until he ran away.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Lol.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I Lol'd, too. People should be suspicious when asked for money via DM in discord or something. If they don't make a post about it and communicate the information openly, it's naive to trust. Sadly, shame prevents people from sharing until they've scammed more and more people.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep, one of the earliest pieces of advice once I went into chats, don't give anyone money. I have actually given friends loans and the like over the years in quite significant amounts, but I am careful with who. This is pseudonymous crypto, trust no one :D

0
0
0.000
avatar

Has happened way too often unfortunately.

0
0
0.000
avatar

There are also a few review websites that basically did nothing after they got funding. Why develop further if you reached your real goal to get a massive delegation?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Communities are going to be great once they get into the groove. The support is needed of course, but as you say, the groundwork needs to be done first to make sure there is viability.

Will ocd have its own community?

0
0
0.000
avatar

For sure, our focus will be on original content but at the same time assist other communities and projects until either our authorbase grows, our delegations are gone or the price drops too low. If it goes up instead it'll allow us to do much, much more. :)

0
0
0.000
avatar

I believe you have a team to focus on original contents. Keep up the good work and keep making stem a place for content creators to thrive while promoting community growth.

Dante is here no fear

Cheers

0
0
0.000
avatar

You should do some monitoring work from time to time and see what you are really doing with the delegations.

"Not everything that shines is gold."

0
0
0.000
avatar

I've been far too busy trying to survive to know or care what's going on here but I'm happy it's still up and running with so many familiar faces. Peace

0
0
0.000